Lawyer Jenna Ellis, right, with Donald Trump
Photo by CNN Politics/ Twitter
Reprinted with permission from Alternet
Jenna Ellis, President Donald Trump's personal attorney and the Senior Legal Adviser to the Trump campaign is once again being mocked, this time for her near-immediate response to a unanimous 3-0 ruling against the campaign in a Pennsylvania election case.
Ellis says she and Trump personal attorney Rudy Giuliani, have decided that the three judges, who were all appointed by Republican presidents – including the one who wrote the opinion who was appointed by Trump himself – are all part of the "activist judicial machinery" in Pennsylvania.
She is also vowing to take the case – which the judges say has "no merit," to the Supreme Court.
Ellis was quickly mocked.
@JennaEllisEsq @RudyGiuliani If you supposedly have evidence of massive fraud, why did Giuliani tell the court “Thi… https://t.co/4OPVig61xg— Helen Kennedy (@Helen Kennedy) 1606500581.0
@JennaEllisEsq @RudyGiuliani Epic failure but you go for it The world is watching your circus And the voters are la… https://t.co/mC5L02oLg0— Kathleen Alice ☘️ (@Kathleen Alice ☘️) 1606499400.0
"The activist judicial machinery" = three Republican-appointed judges in a *unanimous* opinion written by a *Trump… https://t.co/PjTVhWDUIo— Steve Vladeck (@Steve Vladeck) 1606500179.0
Rudy Giuliani and Jenna Ellis are the Milli Vanilli of lawyer duos. Tons of attention, but all lip service. https://t.co/hOPpuZCpc7— JeremyNewberger (@JeremyNewberger) 1606503445.0
The grift will continue until morale improves. https://t.co/AbPPYZ0aYo— Gary Legum (@Gary Legum) 1606503555.0
Down 58-0 and on our own 2 yard line with 42 seconds left in the game is exactly where we wanted to be all along https://t.co/GZat033yHt— David Frum (@David Frum) 1606500275.0
The "activist judicial machinery" meaning a 3-0 decision by three Republican appointees, the scathing opinion autho… https://t.co/JOayV2TOGO— David Burbach (@David Burbach) 1606500667.0
This. Is. HILARIOUS. On just so many levels: hilarious. If you read the opinion (which I IMPLORE you to read), th… https://t.co/nuqp9y8Ie9— Ken Schneck (@Ken Schneck) 1606501178.0
That's an interesting way to spell "we once again failed to produce any evidence and the court justifiably told us… https://t.co/F4LliNOzT7— L.A.Witt, etc. (@L.A.Witt, etc.) 1606503107.0
From Your Site Articles
- Uh Oh: Rudy Now Heads Up Trump Team Of 'TV Lawyers' On ... ›
- Deluded Trump Regales Farcical Hearing In Gettysburg, Insisting ... ›
- Trump Campaign Claims 'Twitter Polls' Should Bolster Confidence ... ›
Related Articles Around the Web
