Tag: chief justice john roberts
Top GOP Senator: Republican Threat To Impeach Judge Is 'Idiotic'

Top GOP Senator: Republican Threat To Impeach Judge Is 'Idiotic'

Egged on by wannabe dictator Donald Trump, House Republicans are pushing GOP leadership to let them embark on impeachment proceedings against federal judges who dare to rule against their Dear Leader—a time-consuming and destined-to-fail effort that harms the rule of law and could even wound the Republican Party in elections moving forward.

Multiple Republican lawmakers have filed articles of impeachment against four federal judges who recently ruled against the Trump administration.

“Congress has the constitutional power to impeach rogue activist judges—and we intend to use it,” Republican Rep. Brendan Gill of Texas, who filed articles of impeachment against a federal judge who ordered the Trump administration to turn around planes that were deporting alleged Venezuelan immigrants to a gulag in El Salvador, wrote in a post on X.

House Republicans are pushing for the impeachments to move forward even as Politico reported that some GOP lawmakers view the effort to be “idiotic.”

“You don’t impeach judges who make decisions you disagree with, because that happens all the time,” Republican Sen. John Cornyn of Texas told Politico in early March. “What you do is you appeal, and if you’re right, then you’re going to win on appeal.”

Even Chief Justice John Roberts warned that impeachment is not the way to handle disagreements with judicial decisions.

“We are going to keep the impeachments coming,” Republican Rep. Andy Ogles of Tennessee wrote in a post on X. Ogles himself filed articles of impeachment against a judge who ordered the Trump administration to restore websites it had taken down to comply with Trump's executive order targeting “gender ideology extremism.”

But complicating things for Republican leadership is that Trump blessed the impeachment efforts on Tuesday, saying that the judge who tried to block his effort to deport immigrants without due process is a "Radical Left Lunatic of a Judge, a troublemaker and agitator who was sadly appointed by Barack Hussein Obama."

“This judge, like many of the Crooked Judges’ I am forced to appear before, should be IMPEACHED!!! WE DON’T WANT VICIOUS, VIOLENT, AND DEMENTED CRIMINALS, MANY OF THEM DERANGED MURDERERS, IN OUR COUNTRY. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!” Trump wrote in a deranged Truth Social post.

Co-president Elon Musk, who has threatened to fund primary challenges to Republicans who don’t do what Trump says, also wants judicial impeachments.

“This is a judicial coup. We need 60 senators to impeach the judges and restore rule of the people,” Musk wrote in a post on X on Tuesday after another federal judge ruled against the Trump administration, this time on its attempted ban of transgender troops.

Given that GOP leaders acquiesce to all of Trump's wants, no matter how immoral or unconstitutional, his demand puts them in a difficult place of having to choose what’s right or to make their Dear Leader happy.

“Everything is on the table,” Russell Dye, a spokesperson for House Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan, toldPolitico. An unnamed spokesperson for House Speaker Mike Johnson also told Politico that judges “with political agendas pose a significant threat” and that Johnson "looks forward to working with the Judiciary Committee as they review all available options under the Constitution to address this urgent matter.”

But as aides for Johnson publicly said all options are on the table, top GOP aides privately admitted the impeachment route is stupid and will take up time the House needs to pass the rest of Trump’s destructive and unpopular agenda.

“It’s never going to happen,” an unnamed senior Republican aide told Politico. “There aren’t the votes.”

Plus, forcing Republicans to vote on impeachment could be politically damaging for the GOP.

Polling from February—when Republicans began crowing about impeaching judges who ruled against Trump—showed that voters want Trump to follow court orders.

"This court issue is a big loser for Trump," CNN's Harry Enten wrote in a post on X, referring to a Washington Post poll from February. "The belief that Trump must follow court orders is more popular than Mother Teresa: 84% of all adults, 92% of Dems, 82% of Indies & 79% of the GOP."

Other polls have similar findings, including an NBC News survey released Wednesday. It found that a 43 percent plurality of voters believe the president and executive branch have too much power, as opposed to 28 percent who believe the Supreme Court and judicial branch have too much.

The cherry on top of this for GOP leaders is that their members would be taking potentially damaging votes on impeachment for nothing. The charges would be disposed of in the Senate, where there is no way on earth that two-thirds of the chamber would vote to convict and remove judges. Republicans have just 53 votes there. To impeach a judge, they’d need 14 Democrats to also join in.

But never put it past Republicans to do stupid things in the name of subservience to Trump.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos.

John Roberts

Is Chief Justice Ready To Confront Trump Regime's Lawlessness?

"For more than two centuries," Chief Justice John Roberts wrote Tuesday in an extraordinary statement, "it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision. The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose."

"Not appropriate," huh? That's really going to scare them.

The chief justice's statement, which might have been enough to give a former president pause, is not likely to make much of a difference with this crowd. It comes in the face of what appears to be open defiance of an order by the chief judge of the District of Columbia District Court, James Boasberg, to return planes carrying migrants alleged to be members of a Venezuelan gang to the United States while he considered whether their removal was lawful. The planes did not turn around.

Rep. Brandon Gill, R-Texas, said on social media on Tuesday that he had filed articles of impeachment against Boasberg, asserting that the judge's rulings amounted to "high crimes and misdemeanors."

This followed President Donald Trump taking to social media himself to condemn the Judge as a "Radical Left Lunatic of a Judge ... This judge, like many of the Crooked Judges' I am forced to appear before, should be IMPEACHED!!!

Boasberg is a highly respected federal judge. He is the definition of a bipartisan appointee. He has been on the bench for 23 years, having first been appointed by President George W. Bush in 2002 to the D.C. Superior Court, and to the U.S. District Court by President Barack Obama.

He is not about to be impeached: Only eight judges in American history have been impeached, none of them for making a decision the administration doesn't agree with. While it takes only a majority of the House of Representatives to pass articles of impeachment, it takes two-thirds of the Senate — which Republicans don't have — to convict.

The real question is whether his — and other federal judges' orders — will be followed by an administration that seems determined to bend the law in its direction and defy the rule of law, and what John Roberts is going to do about it.

"We're not stopping," border czar Tom Homan told Fox News on Monday. "I don't care what the judges think — I don't care what the left thinks. We're coming."

The administration is still playing games in court, arguing that the planes took off before the judge's written (as opposed to verbal) order was handed down and that the judge lacked jurisdiction to order them to turn around once they were in international airspace. That might avert a constitutional crisis this time around, but it will not avert the coming constitutional crisis.

The chief justice is going to have to do more than comment about what is "not appropriate." The rhetoric that might have moved former presidents is not going to move Donald Trump and Tom Homan. Roberts may think his warning, and that of other federal judges in recent weeks, will make a difference, but there is simply no evidence that Trump is listening. Like Homan, he keeps on coming.

Roberts has no one to blame but himself for affording broad immunity to the president to disobey the law. The chickens are coming home to roost. Federal district judges need to know the Supreme Court will stand behind them and their rulings. It is one thing to defy and demonize a single federal judge, as they are trying to do with Boasberg. It is another to defy the Supreme Court. That is where this is headed. John Roberts had best be ready. Our democracy is depending on him.

Reprinted with permission from Creators.

John Roberts

Chief Justice Rebukes Trump And MAGA Goons Over Impeachment Threat

President Donald Trump and some of his MAGA allies are calling for the impeachment of U.S. District Judge James Boasberg, the Barack Obama appointee who temporarily blocked the deportation of undocumented immigrants allegedly associated with the Venezuelan Tren de Aragua gang. Trump, with his executive order, invoked the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 — which has only been used three times s in U.S. history.

U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts intervened in the matter on Tuesday, March 18, issuing a statement that was highly critical of Trump.

"For more than two centuries," the conservative George W. Bush appointee wrote, "it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision. The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose."

Responses to Roberts' rebuke of Trump came swiftly.

On a legal panel, MSNBC's Lisa Rubin pointed out that Roberts is concerned with the "safety" of judges. And Georgetown University law professor Paul Butler noted the important role that judges play in the United States' system of checks and balances, adding, "Congress will do whatever the president wants."

Roberts' rebuke is also receiving a lot of responses on social media.

Billionaire Elon Musk posted, "As Justice Roberts well knows, impeachment is a constitutional right of the legislature."

Other X users, however, defended Roberts' position.

Former federal prosecutor Barbara McQuade, a frequent legal analyst for MSNBC, tweeted: "Chief Justice John Roberts has issued a remarkable statement in response to Trump's call for impeachment of the judge who ruled against him in Alien Enemy Act case. This is about law, not politics."

Attorney Gerald A. Griggs wrote, "When the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court feels compelled to issue a statement, it’s a clear sign that there are serious issues with how two branches of our federal government are operating."

Comedian John Fugelsang commented, "John Roberts, who poured gasoline on a raging inferno, sternly rebukes one of the flames."

Reprinted with permission from Alternet.

…And His Activist Wife

…And His Activist Wife

At one point during Donald Trump’s impeachment trial last month, I ended up sitting in the family gallery next to Jane Sullivan Roberts, wife of Chief Justice Roberts.

Her husband was presiding over the trial. My husband, Sherrod Brown, was one of the 100 senators who would cast a vote in the final verdict.

Follow me, please, down the rabbit hole: This is not the first time I’ve disclosed my marriage of 16 years. Whenever my role as a columnist intersects with Sherrod’s job as a senator, I disclose our relationship. In 2007, Random House published my memoir …and His Lovely Wife. A whole book about my marriage!

Nevertheless, my marital status was a complete surprise to Donald Trump. Makes sense. I’m a woman, and I’m over 30.

Anyway.

In mid-February Paul Sperry, a conservative author and defender of all things Trump, tweeted:

“FYI: syndicated columnist Connie Schultz, who’s slammed Trump as ‘a chronic and unapologetic liar,’ is married to — surprise! — liberal Democrat and rabid Trump-hater Sen. Sherrod Brown.”

Who knew!

Four days later, at 1:21 a.m., the president of the United States tweeted:

“Nice conflict. Brown dropped out of presidential race FAST. Polled at ZERO!”

Sherrod never entered the presidential race, and both our doctor and pastor have confirmed my suspicion that he is not rabid. And he wouldn’t waste his time hating Trump. However, the Yankees?

Let’s move along.

Yes, I’ve said Trump is a chronic liar. As of last December, The Washington Post reported that Trump had made 15,413 false or misleading claims over 1,055 days. If this isn’t a chronic condition, then my asthma of 46 years is just a head cold.

I didn’t see Trump’s tweet about my marriage until I awakened from a night’s rest to alerts from fellow journalists tagging me like tattlers. I love my people.

I thanked Trump on Twitter for proving my point and pivoted to raising money for baby diapers for families living in poverty. In a single day on Twitter, we raised more than $10,000 for the National Diaper Bank Network.

The need is endless. You can donate here: https://nationaldiaperbanknetwork.org/ 

Where was I?

Oh, right: The Senate gallery, sitting next to Jane Sullivan Roberts during part of the impeachment trial.

On a brief break, we introduced ourselves to each other and I asked, “What do you think of all this?” I was referring to our witnessing history. She said it would be inappropriate to offer her opinion. I pressed; she demurred.

What a contrast to Ginni Thomas, the wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas and longtime right-wing activist. You may remember her for calling up Anita Hill in 2010 to extract an apology from Hill for accusing Clarence Thomas of sexual harassment during his Supreme Court confirmation hearings in 1991.

These days, according to multiple news reports, Ginni Thomas is fueling an effort to help the Trump White House ferret out people in the federal government who don’t like Trump. Good thing I don’t like cliches or we’d be talking about those fish in that barrel.

Thomas has a list of replacement employees, too. For example, The New York Times reported that, in 2019, two of Thomas’s preferred peeps were David A. Clarke, the former sheriff of Milwaukee County, whom she wanted to be in a homeland security role, and frequent Fox News guest Dan Bongino, for a counterterrorism post.

To refresh your memory about Clarke, here’s an excerpt from a 2019 Daily Beast story:

“While Clarke sought a White House position in 2017, he was sued by the family of an inmate who died of dehydration in his jail cell after being deprived of water for a week. The sheriff allegedly approved denying water to the man. He was also slapped with a lawsuit from a woman whose unborn child died while she was in his custody.

“And in June 2017, a jury awarded $6.7 million to a woman who alleged being raped multiple times by a guard in Sheriff Clarke’s Milwaukee County jail.

“That same year, Clarke was investigated by the FBI for allegedly abusing his authority when he ordered a subordinate to intimidate a fellow airline passenger who personally insulted the sheriff.”

Bongino is a former Secret Service agent and author, most recently of Exonerated: The Failed Takedown of President Donald Trump by the Swamp. A year earlier, he was the co-author of Spygate: The Attempted Sabotage of Donald J. Trump. Ho-kay. Bye, Dan.

So, Mrs. Roberts, I barely knew ye, and for that I am truly grateful.

Connie Schultz is a Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist and professional in residence at Kent State University’s school of journalism. She is the author of two non-fiction books, including ...and His Lovely Wife, which chronicled the successful race of her husband, Sherrod Brown, for the U.S. Senate. Her novel, The Daughters of Erietown, will be published by Random House in Spring 2020. To find out more about Connie Schultz (schultz.connie@gmail.com) and read her past columns, please visit the Creators Syndicate webpage at www.creators.com.

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Corona Virus

Trending

World