Tag: christopher wray
Christopher Wray

FBI Director's Abrupt Resignation Blasted As 'Obeying In Advance'

On Wednesday, FBI Director Christopher Wray announced that he would be resigning from his post after President Joe Biden's term ends on January 20, 2025. His decision has been met with swift condemnation from various experts, journalists, commentators and activists.

Wray's resignation is particularly noteworthy as FBI directors serve 10-year terms and cannot be easily replaced by a new president. Then-President Donald Trump appointed Wray in 2017, and he continued to serve under Biden after he took office in 2021. Wray could have served in that role through the bulk of Trump's second term had he chosen to remain in his position.

"In my view, this is the best way to avoid dragging the Bureau deeper into the fray," he told the FBI's rank-and-file. "It should go without saying but I'll say it anyway — this is not easy for me. I love our mission and I love our people — but my focus is, and always has been, on us and doing what's right for the FBI."

Bowdoin College political science professor Andrew Rudalevige disagreed with Wray's argument, countering: "This does not 'protect' the Bureau — just the opposite."

"[Wray] is undermining the post-Watergate reforms that sought to place the FBI and DOJ above partisanship," he wrote.

President-elect Trump celebrated Wray's resignation on Truth Social as "a great day for America," telling his millions of followers that the FBI "illegally raided my home [after he refused multiple requests to hand over classified documents]" and "worked diligently on illegally impeaching and indicting me." Attorney and writer Luppe B. Luppen, who posts as "nycsouthpaw" on X and Bluesky, observed: "If Chris Wray thought advance compliance with the incoming authoritarian regime's wishes would earn him a handshake and a graceful exit, he miscalculated even in that."

In a post to Bluesky, Renato Mariotti — who was a federal prosecutor between 2007 and 2016 — lamented that the outgoing FBI director was simply greasing the skids for Trump. He pointed out that Wray could have stayed on in his role for over two more years.

"It is not normal for a president-elect to threaten to fire the FBI Director," he wrote. "Wray could have stayed on until Trump [fired] him, but he is making things easy for Trump."

Ian Bassin, who is the founder and executive director of the organization Protect Democracy, referenced author Timothy Snyder's book On Tyranny, in which he encourages those fighting against authoritarian regimes to not "obey in advance." He urged Wray and others who have resigned ahead of Trump's inauguration to rethink their decisions.

"To Jack Smith, Chris Wray, and anyone else thinking of just obeying in advance: STOP," he wrote on Bluesky. "Our system depends on there being a political cost for breaking things. If Trump wants to fire the FBI Director or fire the Special Counsel prosecuting him, make him do it. Stop doing his work for him!"

American University assistant professor David Ryan Miller wrote that Wray is "just the latest political elite whose reaction to Trump's win and pre-inaugural attempts to break what remains of the institutions and the rule of law is to throw up his hands and let Trump have his way," and added: "The 'compliance in advance' of the political class has been deeply disappointing."

Reprinted with permission from Alternet.

Christopher Wray

Why Wray's Capitulation To Trump Is So Damaging To The Rule Of Law

The Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation announced today that he will resign from the bureau in advance of Donald Trump taking office on January 20. He made the announcement at an emotional town hall with FBI employees in the building his proposed successor, Kash “I’m kissing your ass as fast as I can boss” Patel has sworn to close down and turn into a “museum of the deep state,” whatever the hell that is.

Wray’s resignation is a complete capitulation to a man his own agency established was a felon many times over. Wray’s FBI provided the agents who, under court order, searched Trump’s resort/hotel/residence, Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach Florida, where Trump stored hundreds of classified documents in a bathroom and ballroom open to the public, as well as in a basement storage room that was so poorly-secured that a Department of Justice official, having inspected the room, ordered that the door be secured with a padlock.

Wray’s FBI agents were also involved in the investigation of the events surrounding the January 6 assault on the Capitol and Trump’s attempt to delay and overturn the certification of the 2020 election by the Congress. Using evidence accumulated by the FBI, the Department of Justice empaneled two grand juries in Washington D.C. which brought indictments of the former president for violating at least three federal crimes, including his attempt to use falsified electoral ballots to confuse and delay the certification of actual, legal electoral ballots by the Congress.

Evidence gathered by the FBI, including video surveillance tapes and interviews with Mar-a-Lago employees, was used to indict Trump for obstruction of justice when he instructed his employees to conceal classified documents from the FBI and order the destruction of other evidence, chiefly video tapes of Trump employees moving boxes of classified documents from one room to another before the FBI searched the premises in August of 2022.

The classified document indictments were dismissed by Trump’s hand-puppet, Florida Judge Eileen Cannon, in July of this year on a discredited and demonstrably false legal theory that Special Counsel Jack Smith had been illegally appointed. Smith was appointed by Attorney General Merrick Garland under a provision of Department of Justice policy that has been used multiple times in the past, including during Watergate and the investigation of the Iran-Contra scandal. No court has ever found the appointment of a Special Counsel to be outside the bounds of established DOJ procedure and law.

Special Counsel Smith filed a motion in late November to dismiss the charges against Trump for plotting to overturn the results of the 2020 election, acting in accordance with DOJ policy that a sitting president cannot be indicted for violating federal crimes. Since Trump was elected on November 5 and will be inaugurated on January 20, Smith concluded that Trump will soon be a sitting president and thus cannot face indictment. In his motion to dismiss, however, Smith noted that the prohibition of indicting Trump as a sitting president “is categorical and does not turn on the gravity of the crimes charged, the strength of the Government’s proof, or the merits of the prosecution, which the Government stands fully behind.”

Wray’s resignation sets a distressing precedent for any future investigations of federal crimes committed by senior government officials or powerful and wealthy public figures. Trump and his mouthpieces have wielded a battering ram of public criticism of Wray and FBI agents, accusing them of violating the law in the manner by which they went about investigating Trump’s January 6 actions and his removal of classified documents from the White House. Trump made Wray and the FBI an issue throughout his campaign for the White House, claiming falsely that he had been singled out for investigation and prosecution by an “out of control” DOJ and FBI.

At least three grand juries heard evidence of crimes Trump committed in the January 6 and classified documents cases and returned indictments based on that evidence.

Multiple Trump associates have pleaded guilty in cases involving the January 6 plot to overturn the election, including at least three of Trump’s attorneys, two of whom were charged with facilitating the fake elector scheme. Trump associates, including his attorneys, still face state indictments in Arizona, Georgia, Wisconsin, and Michigan. Trump has sworn to pardon the insurgents convicted of crimes on January 6, including more than 100 charged with violence against police officers. He will not be able to pardon his associates and lawyers who face indictments for committing state crimes.

Trump had appointed one of his chief lackeys, Patel, to serve as the replacement of Wray after he fired the FBI Director. That Wray has said he will resign before being fired is a total capitulation to Donald Trump’s wringing the last meaning from the rule of law in this country, which has held, since the signing of the Constitution, that no one is above the law. Trump’s Supreme Court destroyed that long-time American principle by ruling that Trump, and any other president, is absolutely immune from prosecution for crimes they commit as part of their “official duties” and presumed immune from crimes committed during unofficial acts while in office.

In addition, the Supreme Court found that evidence of crimes resulting from Trump’s conversations with government officials, such as employees of the DOJ, cannot be used to prove that such crimes were committed. One Supreme Court justice pointed out that evidence of bribery would be inadmissible if Trump used a government employee to collect a bribe.

That is how total the disintegration of the rule of law has become, because Donald Trump was able to appoint three of the arch-conservative justices on the Supreme Court who have carried out his will in the immunity decision and in others. The resignation of Christopher Wray is yet another nail in the coffin of our system of laws and Constitutional norms. By resigning even before Trump fired him, Wray will not be present as head of the FBI between now and January 20 to help protect the agency to which he has given his professional life.

Trump has screamed at his rallies and given interviews denouncing the FBI and the DOJ as parts of the so-called “deep state” and vowed to wreak retribution on the people who work there. Wray could use the time before Trump takes office to give speeches defending his agency and the FBI agents who have worked under him and followed his orders to carry out the investigation of Trump and others for breaking the law. While Wray cannot do anything to stop Trump from indicting the FBI agents who have worked under him, he could stand up to Trump and tell the world that his FBI agents are innocent men and women and were only doing their duty and following their oaths to support and defend the Constitution.

Wray’s resignation is like leaving a wounded comrade on the battlefield and running for cover. Maybe Wray can use his status as a former FBI director to help raise money to pay the lawyers that will be needed to defend the agents who worked under him when they searched Mar-a-Lago and found hundreds of classified documents. Trump has sworn to prosecute those agents, and Kash “I’ll follow any order you give me” Patel has said he will use the FBI to carry out retribution against any “enemy” Trump points him at.

This is a sad day for the FBI and for this country. If more government officials act the way Christopher Wray acted today, we will have many, many sad days ahead of us. This is the way that great nations fall: when people give in to authoritarian despots before they are even under their rule.

Lucian K. Truscott IV, a graduate of West Point, has had a 50-year career as a journalist, novelist, and screenwriter. He has covered Watergate, the Stonewall riots, and wars in Lebanon, Iraq, and Afghanistan. He is also the author of five bestselling novels. You can subscribe to his daily columns at luciantruscott.substack.com and follow him on Twitter @LucianKTruscott and on Facebook at Lucian K. Truscott IV.

Reprinted with permission from Lucian Truscott Newsletter.

Reprinted with permission from Lucian Truscott Newsletter.

Bannon: Biden's 'Deep State' May Be Planning To Assassinate Trump

Bannon: Biden's 'Deep State' May Be Planning To Assassinate Trump

As Republicans cash in on right-wing outrage over the FBI raid on former President Donald Trump’s winter home Mar-a-Lago — pelting Trump supporters with fundraising emails and pleas for donations — Trump ally Steve Bannon is taking things a step further, leveling bogus accusations against the FBI and invoking the “deep state.”

Bannon, a former Trump White House strategist indicted and then pardoned by Trump, appeared on a recent version of Infowars with conspiracy theorist Alex Jones, and performed a bogus rant. He accused the FBI of planting evidence against Trump at Mar-a-Lago and claimed that the Biden government had plans to assassinate the ex-president.

“I do not think it’s beyond this administrative state and their deep state apparatus to actually try to work on the assassination of President Trump. I think – I think everything’s on the table,” Bannon told Jones in the interview.

The “deep state” is a prominent term in the QAnon lexicon used to describe a fictitious group of actors in the highest levels of government independently running the United States in secret.

“I think security ought to be at the highest it’s ever been. And honestly, I think he ought to – and I think he should – have flown down [to] Mar-a-Lago this morning, walked out there at noon today, and said, ‘hey, I’m running for president, United States. Suck on that,’” Bannon added.

Bannon, who was arrested on federal charges of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and money laundering but later pardoned by Trump, was convicted of contempt of Congress for defying a congressional subpoena and faces up to two years in prison.

Bannon also denounced the FBI raid as a “desecration” on “one of the great buildings in this country” that has seen “many iconic moments.”

“We need...you [Donald Trump] need to get to Mar-a-Lago, the exact place that they desecrated, because it was a desecration. They did it on purpose. They understand how Mar-a-Lago resonates with not just MAGA, but to the American people,” Bannon said on the show.

Referring to the notable figures that Trump hosted at Mar-a-Lago, Bannon continued his tirade, saying, “So many important things happened there – to go and desecrate it the way they did, particularly over this administrative issue at the National Archives... clearly they’re, as you know, Alex, on a fishing expedition or on a planting expedition, I wouldn’t put it past [them] to have planted stuff ... this is criminal.”

Then, the former strategist labeled the FBI — led by Christopher Wray, a Trump appointee — and the DOJ “lawless criminal organizations.”

Trump, his allies, and almost all senior Republicans have expressed outrage at the raid, which, according to multiple reports, concerns classified documents Trump kept at Mar-a-Lago from his tenure in the White House.

“MAR-A-LAGO was RAIDED,” Trump messaged his supporters on Tuesday morning. “The Radical Left is corrupt. Return the power to the people! Will you fight with me? Donate.”

The feigned outrage followed a familiar script: anger at the raid, claims of political persecution, QAnon-style accusations against the Biden administration -- and an invitation to send money.

'Red Flags Everywhere': New Report Shows FBI, DHS Ignored January 6 Warnings

'Red Flags Everywhere': New Report Shows FBI, DHS Ignored January 6 Warnings

Reprinted with permission from AlterNet

A new report from the Washington Post published on Sunday detailed a deep dive into the extensive warnings the federal government received of potential violence and efforts to interfere with Congress's counting of the Electoral College votes on January 6. Despite this ample foreshadowing, the administration and law enforcement agencies were still unable or unwilling to prepare adequate defenses to keep the mob from storming the Capitol that day.

The FBI, in particular, comes off looking inept — if not driven by politically inspired cowardice or indifference.

"The FBI received numerous warnings about January 6 but felt many of the threatening statements were 'aspirational' and could not be pursued," the report found. "In one tip on December 20, a caller told the bureau that Trump supporters were making plans online for violence against lawmakers in Washington, including a threat against Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah). The agency concluded the information did not merit further investigation and closed the case within 48 hours."

Donell Harvin, the head of intelligence at the homeland security office in Washington, D.C., did raise the alarm, according to the report. It explained how he "organized an unusual call for all of the nation's regional homeland security offices" — a call joined by hundreds of officials sharing their concerns. They were reportedly warning of an attack on January 6 at 1 p.m. at the U.S. Capitol, just when the insurrection occurred. The planning was happening all over social media, after all — inspired by then-President Donald Trump's own tweets and rhetoric. Harvin reached out to the FBI and other agencies to warn them of what was coming, the report found.

He feared a "mass casualty event," according to the Post.

"While the public may have been surprised by what happened on January 6, the makings of the insurrection had been spotted at every level, from one side of the country to the other," it said. "The red flags were everywhere."

Despite specific warnings of the exact nature of the attack that was coming — the planning of which would certainly be illegal — it appears the FBI limited itself for fear of infringing on First Amendment-protected activity. The Post also suggested that FBI Director Christopher Wray, who was often under fire from Trump, feared angering the man who appointed him by speaking out about the potential for violence.

"The FBI chief wasn't looking for any more confrontations with the president," the Post found, citing current and former law enforcement officials.

Wray remains in his position to this day.

Meanwhile, the Post reported, the Department of Homeland Security did not put out a security bulletin to alert other agencies of the dangers, despite receiving, "sobering assessments of the risk of possible violence on January 6, including that federal buildings could be targeted by protesters."

As has previously been reported, officials in the U.S. Capitol Police were aware of at least some of the danger posed by Trump supporters still angry about the election in the run-up to January 6. These warnings, however, didn't make it to Chief Steven Sund, and he failed to effectively coordinate with the National Guard to get protection for the Capitol. The Capitol Police itself was woefully under-prepared for the assault, as has been widely reported. Sund resigned following the attack, one of the few officials to face real accountability for the failures that led up to that day.


Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Corona Virus

Trending

World