Tag: corporate america
Alleged Assassin Of United Health Care Boss Nabbed At McDonald's

Alleged Assassin Of United Health Care Boss Nabbed At McDonald's

DIY sleuths and amateur gumshoes (including yours truly) spent the five days since the murder of the CEO of what turns out to be one of the most hated companies in America debating whether the killer was a hired hitman, a corporate black bag job pro, or a DIY radical.

My very first thought at news of the shooting was, this is the first shot in the M4A* revolution, the shooter a 21st Century John Brown, ready to kill for single payer socialized medicine.

But as facts dribbled out - the gun with the silencer, knowledge of exactly which door and at what time CEO Brian Thompson would arrive at the Hilton in pre-dawn darkness, the use of cash and burner phone, the clever getaway by bike into camera-free Central Park - I started to waver. The mind wandered into cinematic territory: A billionaire Doctor No behind the United Health Care C-suite’s insider trading scandal, hiring a professional with a non-extraditable national passport. A fellow corporate suit with a personal vendetta, a love triangle, a dirty secret involving massive medical malpractice.

A few nights after the “hit” I cued up a movie that seemed in the spirit of the moment. Michael Clayton is a classic of corporate evil, Tilda Swinton as the pinched corporate lawyer who hires a pair of professional killers to commit a murder and hide the fact that her chemical agribusiness client has been poisoning farmers with a toxic product. George Clooney as the fixer is terrific. Swinton won an Oscar for it.

Corporate intrigue seemed possible. Black bag team. High end hit man already on a flight back to Belarus.DIY sleuths and amateur gumshoes (including yours truly) spent the five days since the murder of the CEO of what turns out to be one of the most hated companies in America debating whether the killer was a hired hitman, a corporate black bag job pro, or a DIY radical.

My very first thought at news of the shooting was, this is the first shot in the M4A* revolution, the shooter a 21st Century John Brown, ready to kill for single payer socialized medicine.

But as facts dribbled out - the gun with the silencer, knowledge of exactly which door and at what time CEO Brian Thompson would arrive at the Hilton in pre-dawn darkness, the use of cash and burner phone, the clever getaway by bike into camera-free Central Park - I started to waver. The mind wandered into cinematic territory: A billionaire Doctor No behind the United Health Care C-suite’s insider trading scandal, hiring a professional with a non-extraditable national passport. A fellow corporate suit with a personal vendetta, a love triangle, a dirty secret involving massive medical malpractice.

A few nights after the “hit” I cued up a movie that seemed in the spirit of the moment. Michael Clayton is a classic of corporate evil, Tilda Swinton as the pinched corporate lawyer who hires a pair of professional killers to commit a murder and hide the fact that her chemical agribusiness client has been poisoning farmers with a toxic product. George Clooney as the fixer is terrific. Swinton won an Oscar for it.

Corporate intrigue seemed possible. Black bag team. High end hit man already on a flight back to Belarus.

But this morning, it turned out, my initial instinct was kind of on target: The suspect is an all-American boy who, as an NYPD chief of detectives put it drily, “does seem to have some ill-will toward corporate America.” He even had an anti-insurance “manifesto” on his person when arrested.

Luigi Mangione, 26, charged with murder in a so-far sealed New York criminal complaint, is presumed innocent until proven otherwise, obviously. But the reported clues to his involvement are pretty damning. He was arrested with a ghost gun - possibly made with a 3D printer - that matched the one the killer used. He had on his person the fake ID the killer used to check into the New York hostel police had traced him to, and where, flirting with a female clerk, he had pulled down his otherwise ubiquitous face mask to flash a grin. And he looks like that guy.

Early reports are that either an “elderly customer” or the Altoona McDonald’s staff themselves recognized the patron and called cops.

Either way, online fans of the murderer (whose numbers are legion, who have started selling merch commemorating him, and whose existence has provoked reams of concerned analysis) apparently went on an immediate bad-review rampage, posting that the kitchen was rat-infested, etc. The fact that McDonald’s doesn’t offer its employees health insurance also came up.

The truth, as is often the case, turns out to be stranger than fiction.

Mangione reportedly studied computer science at the University of Pennsylvania. He was enough of an intellectual to have on his Goodreads account quotes from Bertrand Russell. (“Luigi’s favorites” include Russell’s: “Of all forms of caution, caution in love is perhaps the most fatal to true happiness.”

He read Michael Pollan’s book on hallucinogens - How to Change Your Mind: The New Science of Psychedelics - earlier this year. His “want to read” list also included a tome called The Great Conversation: Volume I: Pre-Socratics through Descartes.

He gave Unabomber Ted Kaczynski’s manifesto four stars and reporters have cherry-picked his commentary of that book because it seems relevant:

It’s easy to quickly and thoughtless[ly] write this off as the manifesto of a lunatic, in order to avoid facing some of the uncomfortable problems it identifies. But it’s simply impossible to ignore how prescient many of his predictions about modern society turned out.
He was a violent individual - rightfully imprisoned - who maimed innocent people. While these actions tend to be characterized as those of a crazy luddite, however, they are more accurately seen as those of an extreme political revolutionary.

He added: “When all other forms of communication fail, violence is necessary to survive. You may not like his methods, but to see things from his perspective, it’s not terrorism, it’s war and revolution.”

The New York Post, Murdoch rag, was first out of the gate with the predictable assessment that Mangione is a radical leftist. But even a cursory glance at his digital trail indicates it’s not that simple. He was engaged with the online male right, was an Elon Musk fan, seemed antagonistic to DEI, and even had Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged on his “want to read” list.

He was the 2016 class valediction at Baltimore’s top boys’ prep school. My friend investigative journalist and author Dave Troy, happened to have a son who graduated in the same class of the Gilman School, and he first shared a video of the speech on X. In it, a composed younger Mangione - the same man in a hoodie and a mask New York City street surveillance cameras recorded shooting a man in cold blood and calmly walking away - wears a navy blue suit with a white boutonnière, surrounded by a sea of young men in suits.

His speech isn’t fiery at all. No politics even though it was an election year. No whiff of radicalization. He is not yet a murderer, just a thoughtful, poised young man, on the road to success, one of America’s more promising, poised and brainy Gen Z men, about to step out into an amoral world.

On the knife edge of adult understanding and his destiny.

Poignant, tragic and deeply uncanny - the video can be viewed on Youtube here. “The rush is on,” journalist Troy posted. “Was he a 'leftist', or radicalized by the 'online right'? Facts, as always, are more nuanced. Evidence suggests he is a smart, mixed-up kid with questions, who got turned inside out by a nasty world and did something terrible. Other takes are incomplete.”

As I write this “FREE HIM” is trending on social media.

*M4A - Medicare For All, the slogan that supporters of nationalized healthcare have been using since at least 2016, when Bernie Sanders ran on it, lost to Hillary Clinton, who then lost to Donald Trump.

Nina Burleigh is a a journalist, author, documentary producer and adjunct professor at New York University's Arthur L. Carter Journalism Institute. She has written eight books including her recently published novel, Zero Visibility Possible. This post is reprinted with permission from her American FreakshowSubstack. Please consider subscribing.

Reprinted with permission from American Freakshow.

Corporations Won Olympic Gold in 'Downhill Ethical Backflip'

Corporations Won Olympic Gold in 'Downhill Ethical Backflip'

By far the top team performance in this year's Winter Olympics in Beijing was corporate America's breathtaking double-twist ethical backflips.

This is a group of leading brand names that have so loudly been touting their code of ethics, pledging to stand against repressive regimes that abuse human rights. But here came the Olympic games in China, posing their first test, and it was not really a tough one. They were not asked to do anything, but merely to NOT do something — specifically, don't provide ethical legitimacy to the brutally repressive Chinese regime by sponsoring their propagandistic use of the Olympics.

Human rights advocates worldwide had called on global corporate giants to use their economic leverage to send a powerful message of disapproval to the Chinese dictatorship that is routinely committing acts of genocide and political suppression against Uyghurs, Tibetans, Hong Kong citizens, and any other dissidents under their rule. Corporate leaders would not have to march, picket or otherwise muss up their high-dollar suits — just don't pay millions of shareholders' dollars to link arms and reputations with rank repression.

Well, if you watched any of the Olympic broadcasts, you witnessed the corporate choice: a collective backflip from the high ethical bar of human rights into the pits of crass, unprincipled commercialism. Look, there's the flag of Coca-Cola, and Visa, and Pizza Hut, AirBnb, Intel, Procter & Gamble... and a who's who of America's corporate all-stars. They paid more than a billion dollars to be proud sponsors of the regime's Olympic show, choosing access to China's leaders and markets over soft goals like ethics.

Well, sniffed one sponsor, raising testy political issues "would not advance the cause of sport in which our commitment lies." Really, how sporting is genocide? Another barked that "nobody, nobody cares what happens to Uyghurs, OK?" No, it's not OK, and also not true. And yet another clueless corporate boss cavalierly dismissed ethics by declaring, "Ski and sport have no business in politics... It's common sense."

No, it's cowardice, stupidity, and un-Olympian.

Corporate America's CEOs are mostly well-heeled money people who would hardly be considered athletic. Yet, every now and then a few of these soft elites bust out as championship players of an old game called Duck & Dodge.

It's a sport of political finesse played when social conditions reach a boiling point, threatening problems for the corporate order. In those moments, a few leading executives suddenly come out as social activists to side with the aggrieved. Ducking and dodging their own responsibility for grievances, these players claim that they will fix the system. When public attention drifts, however, so do the fixers, returning to business as usual.

You might recall, for example, the huffing and puffing leaders a year ago when our very democracy was under siege, not only by seditious right-wing extremist groups that stormed the U.S. Capitol, but also by a clique of pusillanimous, right-wing Congress critters who joined the coup attempt to overthrow the people's democratic vote. "Outrageous!" shouted some 700 corporate powerhouses in unison, pledging that they would save our democracy. How? By cutting off the huge campaign donations they'd been giving to those 147 Republican lawmakers who voted to overturn the election.

Let's pause here for a hypocrisy check: Aren't these born-again democracy champions the very same corporations that've been using their unlimited special-interest cash to purchase lawmakers wholesale and steal the people's political power? Yes... yet they now want us to believe they're our saviors.

But they've quickly reverted to their true selves. Within weeks of so sternly chastising members of Congress' "sedition caucus," the corporate donor class — shhhhh — quietly returned to lavishing bribery bucks on them. AT&T, Boeing, Citigroup, GM, Pfizer and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce are among the corporate phonies that slipped $2.4 million in donations last year to members of Congress they had publicly condemned as un-American. It'd make more sense to trust a coyote to guard your last lamb chop than to think that corporations value anything but their own profit.

Populist author, public speaker and radio commentator Jim Hightower writes The Hightower Lowdown, a monthly newsletter chronicling the ongoing fights by America's ordinary people against rule by plutocratic elites. Sign up at HightowerLowdown.org.

Protestors demand living wage.

Why Is The ‘Quits Rate’ Skyrocketing Now?

As a writer, I get stuck every so often straining for the right words to tell my story or otherwise make the kind of progress I want on the piece I'm writing. Over the years, though, I've learned when to quit tying myself into mental knots over sentence construction and instead step back and rethink where my story is going.

This process is essentially what millions of American working families are going through this year as record numbers of them are shocking bosses, politicians and economists by stepping back and declaring: "We quit!" Most of the quits are tied to very real abuses that have become ingrained in our workplaces over the past couple of decades — poverty paychecks, no health care, unpredictable schedules, no child care, understaffing, forced overtime, unsafe jobs, sexist and racist managers, tolerance of aggressively rude customers and so awful much more.

Meanwhile, corporate bosses across America have been sputtering in outrage at workers this summer, spewing expletives about the fact that while the U.S. economy has been coming back ... workers (i.e., you) haven't!

"Labor shortage," they squeal, lazily accusing the workforce of mass laziness. Apparently, they charge insultingly that millions of workers got used to laying around during the pandemic shutdown, for there is now an abundance of jobs open for everything from restaurant work to nursing to construction work. So, the bosses and their political dogs bark that you people need to get back in the old harness and start pulling again.

Adding a nasty bite to their bark, several GOP governors cut off unemployment benefits to people, hoping to force them to work. Other businesses have proffered signing bonuses, free dinner coupons and other lures, while such notoriously mingy outfits as McDonald's and Walmart have even upped their wage scales in an effort to draw workers.

Yet ... no go. In fact, to the astonishment of the economic elite, the employment flow this year is going the other way! Record numbers of current workers in all sorts of jobs in every section of the country are voluntarily walking away. There's even an official economic measurement of this phenomenon called the "quits rate," and it is surging beyond anything our economy has experienced in modern memory — in April, 4 million workers quit; in May, another 3.6 million left, in June, 3.9 million said "Adios!" At a time when conventional economic wisdom dictates that, after a devastating 18-month downturn, people would be clinging to any paycheck they can get! The "quits" are so unexpected and so widespread that pundits have started dubbing this year "The Great Resignation."

What's wrong with people, why are such staggering numbers of Americans failing to do their jobs? But wait — maybe that's the wrong question. Maybe the corporate system's "jobs" are failing the people. Consider this: The most common comment by those who're walking out is, "I hate my job."

Specific grievances abound, but at the core of each is a deep, inherently destructive executive-suite malignancy: disrespect. The corporate system has cheapened employees from valuable human assets worthy of being nurtured and advanced to a bookkeeping expense that must be steadily eliminated. It's not just about paychecks, it's about feeling valued, feeling that the hierarchy gives a damn about the people doing the work.

Yet, corporate America is going out of its way to show that it doesn't care — and, of course, workers notice. So, unionization is booming, millions who were laid off by the pandemic are refusing to rush back to the same old grind, and now millions who have jobs are quitting. This is much more than an unusual unemployment stat — it's a sea change in people's attitude about work itself ... and life.

People are rethinking where their story is going and how they can take it in a better direction. Yes, nearly everyone will eventually return to work, but workers themselves have begun redefining the job and rebalancing it with life.

To find out more about Jim Hightower and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators webpage at www.creators.com

Sen. Ted Cruz

Ted Cruz Openly Advertises Demand For Corporate Bribery

Reprinted with permission from Alternet

Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas, now 50, has spent much of his career vigorously defending corporate America. But now that Delta Airlines, Coca-Cola, Dell Computer and other major companies are speaking out against GOP voter suppression bills, Cruz is railing against "woke" corporations and threatening to punish them via the United States' tax code. And Walter Shaub, who headed the U.S. Government Office of Ethics under President Barack Obama, is slamming Cruz's threat as "openly corrupt."

In a Wall Street Journal op-ed published on April 28, Cruz wrote, "This time, we won't look the other way on Coca-Cola's $12 billion in back taxes owed. This time, when Major League Baseball lobbies to preserve its multibillion-dollar antitrust exception, we'll say no thank you. This time, when Boeing asks for billions in corporate welfare, we'll simply let the Export-Import Bank expire."

The very fact that Cruz is using the term "corporate welfare" in 2021 is ironic. In the past, that term was used primarily by liberals and progressives — and Fox News' Sean Hannity was among the far-right Republicans who claimed that there was no such thing as corporate welfare. But that was before Trumpism, with its pseudo-populism, overtook the GOP.

On May 2, Shaub slammed Cruz on Twitter, posting:

Here are some other comments from Cruz critics that have been posted on Twitter:

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Corona Virus

Trending

World