Tag: donald trump
Tim Scott and Donald Trump

Not Joking! GOP Senator Praises Trump's Compliance With 'Ethics Standard'

Republican patsy Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC) appeared on Fox Business to push the Digital Market Asset Clarity Act—a huge crypto deregulation bill that threatens to legally enshrine the weak oversight and poor consumer protections of cryptocurrency markets.

“Let’s remind ourselves President Trump has done something no other president in the history of our country said ‘yes’ to,” Scott said, “which is complying to the ethics strategy and standard for all elected officials. We’ve never had a president ever say ‘yes’ to that issue, that question, so it’s good news.”

The “ethics strategy and standard for all elected officials” Scott is referring to amounts to a paper-thin bit of oversight framework that Republicans have cooked up, placing enforcement of cryptocurrency conflicts-of-interest rules under the control of the president himself. It means that oversight would ultimately fall to the same Department of Justice that Trump has weaponized to target his political enemies while extending clemency and paying off political allies doing his bidding.

There are very few parts of Trump’s agenda that are not soaked in corruption. Cryptocurrency, however, has become one of the Trump family’s most lucrative ventures, generating billions of hard-to-trace dollars since jumping into the racket. The Clarity Act is set to clear the way for more money to flow into their biggest grift yet.

Comical Feud Erupts Between Pirro And Burgum Over Reflecting Pool Fiasco

Comical Feud Erupts Between Pirro And Burgum Over Reflecting Pool Fiasco

U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Jeanine Pirro, who is now feuding with Interior Secretary Doug Burgum over his role in failed prosecutions for the alleged vandalism of the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool, previously touted Burgum as a “straight shooter” and endorsed him to become Donald Trump’s 2024 running mate in her prior role as a Fox News host.

Pirro said that Trump’s pick would come down to one of JD Vance, Marco Rubio, and Burgum during a discussion of his vice presidential shortlist on the June 6, 2024, edition of Fox panel show The Five.

“Trump actually got more Hispanic votes in Florida than Rubio did,” she said. “And you know, JD Vance is good but I really think it's Burgum. I do.” Noting that she had “met him several times,” she claimed that “there's something about him that he just seems like a straight shooter.”

Two years later, Pirro, who was once described by her own executive producer as “nuts” and a “reckless maniac,” is no longer a Fox host — she’s a top federal prosecutor. And rather than a “straight shooter,” she now reportedly thinks Burgum is “an incompetent liar.”

Pirro slammed the Interior Department in her motion to dismiss charges on Friday against David Hearn — the only person to face a felony charge over damage to the Reflecting Pool — effectively blaming Burgum’s agency for both slow-walking the production of evidence showing the damage “was the result of flawed installation by the contractor … and the rush to complete the project” rather than of vandalism.

Since her decision undermined Trump’s previous claims that the damage had been the work of “Deranged Vandals,” the president publicly claimed Pirro was “100%” wrong, reiterated that it had been a “pure case of VANDALISM,” maligned her for having “choked,” and reportedly considered replacing her. Burgum, meanwhile, dismissed Pirro’s argument, saying on social media, “The evidence is clear, vandals have repeatedly caused damage to the Reflecting Pool.”

The feud came to a head on Monday during what The New York Times described as an “Oval Office showdown” attended by Trump, Pirro, and Burgum.

“During the meeting on Monday, Ms. Pirro, her voice raised at times, directly confronted Mr. Burgum, accusing him of misleading the president,” the Times reported. “She made the case that Mr. Burgum had promoted a self-serving cover story to conceal his own missteps.”

Curiously, Pirro’s former colleagues at Fox seem to be avoiding taking sides in the fracas. The network’s coverage is noticeably muted, with her former “opinion side” stablemates in particular ignoring it (or in the case of Laura Ingraham, mentioning it in passing only to mock unnamed commentators for “obsessing about things like Trump’s Reflecting Pool drama”).

Reprinted with permission from Media Matters

mike lindell

Minnesota Republicans Seeking To Squash Trump Pick Lindell's Candidacy

Poor, poor Minnesota Republicans. All they want to do is install a hardliner MAGA chud like their endorsed candidate for governor, Kendall Qualls, atop a blue state that has vexed President Donald Trump mightily. But Trump himself created the problem they now face, and that problem is named Mike Lindell.

Trump endorsed the hapless pillow salesman/world champion election denier for the governor gig, and Lindell has proved nothing but trouble. Hilarious trouble.

Now, with Minnesota’s primary only one week out and Lindell leading in multiple polls, the state GOP has to do something. In a hilarious bit of political theater, they are now begging the Democratic Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon, whom they loathe, to rescue them from Lindell.

The state GOP chair wrote to Simon late last month to “request urgent guidance from your office regarding the constitutional residency standard applicable to candidates for Governor.”

Wait, is this about how Lindell seems to have been registered to vote in Texas, and not registered in Minnesota, up until just a few weeks ago? Nope! This is a different Lindell problem.

Per the chair, “serious questions” have been raised about Lindell’s residence eligibility and the GOP is very concerned about “the need to ensure that the standard applied is clear, uniform, and consistent with the text of the Minnesota Constitution.”

LOL, come on. You know full well that if Lindell were not a walking chaos machine and stood an actual chance of winning if he got the GOP nod, the state Republicans would be howling with rage if anyone besmirched the honor of Lindell and where Lindell insists he lives. Instead, they’re performatively fretting, informing Simon that “the Lindell Campaign appears to rely on a constitutional provision that does not exist rather than dispute whether they meet the actual standard in the Minnesota Constitution."

A … constitutional provision … that does not exist. Whew. We’re gonna have to work up to that. Let’s start where the state GOP starts instead.

Minnesota’s residency requirement in the affidavit for candidacy for governor reads “I will be at least 25 years old on the first Monday of the next January and a resident of Minnesota for not less than one year on Election day.”

Much as it pains us to agree with Minnesota Republicans, that seems pretty straightforward: Lindell would have to be a resident of Minnesota for not less than one year come Election Day, November 3, 2026.

But Lindell’s lt. governor running mate, Phillip Parrish, has advanced a novel reading of this, saying that Lindell’s fine and only needs to have been a resident one year before the date he takes office, because of the actual text of the Minnesota Constitution, Article V, Section 3, which Parrish quotes:

The governor and lieutenant governor shall be elected for a term of four years. They shall be elected on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November in the year 1958 and every four years thereafter. They shall be elected by the qualified electors of the state. To be eligible for the office of governor or lieutenant governor a person must have attained the age of 25 years and, at the time of taking office, must have been a resident of Minnesota for one year.

Article V, Section 3 of the Minnesota Constitution is actually about the powers and duties of the governor and says nothing about residency requirements at all, but maybe Parrish just got his cite wrong?

Urm, nope. Article V, Section 2 is about qualifications, but doesn’t say what Parrish says it does. Rather, it says this:

The term of office for the governor and lieutenant governor is four years and until a successor is chosen and qualified. Each shall have attained the age of 25 years and, shall have been a bona fide resident of the state for one year next preceding his election, and shall be a citizen of the United States.

Setting aside the fact that it seems like kind of a big problem that your running mate is just making up constitutional provisions, what’s the big deal about whether Lindell is required to have lived in the state for one year before Election Day in November 2026 versus one year before when he would assume office in January 2027?

And you see, the state GOP is doing this for everyone, out of the goodness of their heart, stating:

The Republican Party of Minnesota anticipates that the D.F.L. Party will file a complaint before the Minnesota Supreme Court challenging Mike Lindell’s residency and eligibility to hold office. The Republican Party of Minnesota does not want Minnesotans who vote for any candidate for Governor to find, after the fact, that their vote was effectively wasted because the candidate did not meet a constitutional qualification that could and should have been clarified in advance.

Translation: Dear Democratic Secretary of State, please, please, please save us from ourselves and our cult leader whom we won’t stand up to and get rid of this walking nightmare on a residency technicality so we don’t have to openly defy Trump.

Of course, Lindell has far more problems than this: He was uncertain whether he was registered to vote in Minnesota. He’s drowning in millions in court judgments. He’s facing a credible campaign finance complaint. He’s a real winner all around.

Trump sure can pick 'em.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos


trump and max miller

Republicans Look Away As Trump Expresses Sympathy For Alleged Abuser Miller

While Rep. Max Miller (R-OH) grapples with the fallout of accusations that he brutally beat two former romantic partners and his own two-year-old child, his fellow Republican lawmakers are publicly waffling on their position about Miller’s political future -- even as some privately urge him to resign.

“Trump and some White House aides are said to privately want Miller out of the race, according to a person familiar with the situation,” wrote Semafor's Shelby Talcott and Burgess Everett on Monday. “Miller ‘clearly only cares about himself,’ a second person close to the White House said. ‘He’s down by 6 in the latest poll. If he cared about the president and the party, he’d drop out.’”

They added, “Most GOP senators, who are still in town for the summer, declined comment. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) said, ‘I don’t have any observations.’” They similarly quoted Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-AL), who said, “I haven’t seen it. I don’t deal with them people over there [in the House]; there are too many of them.” Similarly Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA) said that “it’s not good … It’s none of my business, but it doesn’t help. It just gives people one more reason to be disgusted with Congress.”

Semafor reported that, because of Miller’s presence on the Republican ticket, the GOP is now more vulnerable in Ohio.

The scandal could drag down Republicans in his state, including the reelection campaign of Sen. Jon Husted, who declined to comment about Miller on Monday,” Semafor reported. “Husted and GOP gubernatorial candidate Vivek Ramaswamy are both in difficult races in red-leaning Ohio, where they’re fighting to hold off former Ohio Sen. Sherrod Brown and Democratic gubernatorial nominee Dr. Amy Acton, respectively.”

They later added, “At this point, there’s just one thing that could change Miller’s mind about reelection: a direct demand from Trump. Barring that, which seems unlikely as of now, and this is a real debacle for Republicans — who can’t afford one in such a tight election season.”

Miller is accused of abusing his ex-wife Emily Moreno, the daughter of Sen. Bernie Moreno (R-OH), by beating her in front of their 2-year-old daughter in February, bruising her arm, elbow and torso in the process; throwing a pot of boiling water on Moreno, which left visible injuries on her chest; holding a gun to Moreno’s head; and breaking his daughter’s collar bone. Former Trump press secretary Stephanie Grisham also accused Miller of being abusive during their relationship.Despite these accusations, Trump expressed sympathy for Miller.

“It's a very sad thing; I know Max,” Trump told reporters during an Oval Office press conference on Monday. “He's a good person. I mean, I always thought he was a very good person. And I'm going to let the families figure that out. You know, those families, I know they're working on it. It's a very sad thing, but it's accusations, and I'm going to let them figure that out.”

By contrast, Sen. Bernie Moreno (R-OH) released a statement on X on Sunday saying that his son-in-law should resign, saying that he “holds his breath” every time his grandchild is left alone with Miller. By Monday, Moreno said he was done answering questions.“I hope you never have to go through this situation, because you wouldn’t ask that kind of f----- question,” Moreno told one reporter as to why he took so long to issue a statement. He added that reporters would need to ask Miller why he has not resigned yet, adding that the situation is "pretty grotesque" and a "personal family situation."

In his original statement, Sen. Moreno said that “our priority has always been protecting our daughter and our granddaughter. Out of concern for the safety of my family, I hoped to keep this matter private but Max Miller’s increasingly erratic and dangerous behavior has made that impossible.”

He added, “As he has admitted privately, Max Miller needs serious psychological help. He is a danger to my daughter, and I hold my breath every minute he has custody of my granddaughter.”

Reprinted with permission from AlterNet

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Trending

World