Tag: donald trump
Trump and Darline Graham

Gambling On Graham's Sister In South Carolina, Trump Risks Big Embarrassment

This Tuesday night, Republican voters in South Carolina will choose a nominee for the deep red state's 2026 U.S. Senate race. And the outcome, according to Politico, will be a crucial test for President Donald Trump's kingmaker skills, risking a "massive embarrassment."

Trump is campaigning for Sen. Darline Graham, appointed to the seat by GOP Gov. Henry McMaster after the death of her brother, the late Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina). But a Graham victory is far from a given, and her primary opponent, Rep. Ralph Norman (R-SC), has plenty of supporters.

Politico reporters Alec Hernandez and Aaron Pellish explain, "Donald Trump is facing one of his biggest tests of the midterms — and it's of his own making. The president has spent a significant amount of time and money trying to help Sen. Darline Graham defeat Rep. Ralph Norman in Tuesday's snap GOP Senate primary. He's done more for Graham than he has for the battleground Republicans whose general election fights will determine control of Congress: Not only did he push her to run for a full term, he also held a rare in-person rally for her and tapped into his MAGA Inc. war chest during the final days of the race."

Hernandez and Pellish add, "If, after lending all that support, Graham fails, it would be Trump's most embarrassing loss of the cycle. A win, however, would let him flex his ability to power an unknown political figure to office."

GOP strategist Matthew Bartlett, who served in the State Department during the first Trump administration, stresses that the primary's importance goes way beyond Graham and Norman.

Bartlett told Politico, "If Darline does come up short, it would be just a massive, massive embarrassment to the White House and to the president. Just an utter rejection."

Another GOP strategist, Andrew Boucher — who chairs the Charleston County Republican Party in South Carolina — told Politico, "The fact that he came to the state on short notice to do a rally, and we haven't seen that in a lot of endorsements, I think that sends a very strong message that he's all in."

But a Republican operative, interviewed on condition of anonymity, argues that Graham "wouldn't even be in this place if she didn't have" Trump's support — adding, "The outside help she's had has kind of made this competitive."

Another GOP operative, also quoted anonymously, describes Sen. Tim Scott's (R-South Carolina) endorsement of Graham as a major advantage for her.

The operative told Politico, "Sen. Scott engaging in the race, the congressional delegation, all these portions of it. Congressman Fry engaging in the race is a big deal. You could almost say that's the opposite of what you had in the governor's race."

Reprinted with permission from AlterNet

As Trump's Power Wanes, Canadians Are Not Alone In Calling His Bluff

As Trump's Power Wanes, Canadians Are Not Alone In Calling His Bluff

Oh good, another war. This time a trade war with Canada and for no other reason than ... what? To give Donald Trump a new stage for big-league bullying? To divert attention from the Jeffrey Epstein files? Who knows. Whatever. Trying to humiliate our closest ally does not serve American interests, ya think?

I say "trying" because Trump's powers are much diminished. Canadians are calling Trump's bluff, as are other countries and even some formerly supine Republican lawmakers. And it's getting harder to ignore the loose screws rattling around his head.

We won't go into the particulars of this latest trade dispute. Canada as well as the United States appeared to have thrown in last-minute demands. And Trump's new tariffs on $20 billion worth of Canadian goods affect only about 5% of Canada's exports to the U.S.

The bigger story here is the willingness of Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney to defend his nation's honor even at a cost to his economy.

Moments after the tariffs went into effect, Trump recycled a golden oldie of abuse by posting on Truth Social, "Canada wants the benefits of being a State, without being one!!! They have also charged our great farmers, for many years, massive amounts of Tariffs. No More!!!"

About our great farmers, Trump has just lowered taxes on foreign beef in an obvious attempt to cut prices for steaks and hamburgers before the midterm elections. The higher prices were a godsend to American cattle ranchers already coping with wildfires, droughts and restrictions on shipments of young Mexican cattle to be fattened in U.S. feedlots.

"You don't put America first by putting U.S. cattle producers last," U.S. Cattlemen's Association President Justin Tupper said in response.

Trump keeps saying that the U.S. doesn't need Canadian products. But guess what his new round of tariffs doesn't include? Canadian oil or gas.

Talk of turning Canada into a state is perhaps Trump's most hostile assault on Canadian pride. Trump had referred to former Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau as Gov. Trudeau. (He's quite the card.) He called the border between our two countries "an artificially drawn line" and said he would use "economic force" to make a takeover happen.

While visiting the Oval Office last year, Carney said that Canada "is not for sale" and "won't be for sale ever." Trump responded, "Never say never."

Over the weekend, Trump's first vice president, Mike Pence, provided a dose of sobriety. "American consumers pay American tariffs," he said. "My hope is, for the sake of American families and for the sake of the American economy, that what we're looking at here is negotiation and not confrontation in a trade war."

Though Trump's tantrums should fly over the northern border like bad weather systems that will pass, the abuse has long-term effects that have already come back to bite us. Against Trump's wishes, Canada is now doing its separate deals with China. He has threatened a 100 percent tariff on Canada over that.

A recent Angus Reid survey of Canadians found that more than 75 percent wanted Carney to hold his ground, even as 90 percent worried about economic costs. The Canadian pollster has also found that 79 percent of Americans still liked Canadians. But even if Canadians don't think Americans dislike them, the fact remains that the voters elected Trump twice.

Trump just said he'll tack 50% tariffs on vehicles and parts from Canada. A silver lining is that Trump's broadsides have become so unhinged, the prospects of his Republican enablers retaining that much power after November are much reduced.

Trump may be seeming more temporary, but in the meantime, we have another war, a ridiculous trade war.

Body Horror: Donald Trump, Natalie Harp And The Political Uses Of Revulsion

Body Horror: Donald Trump, Natalie Harp And The Political Uses Of Revulsion

Georgia Sen. Jon Ossoff is, for the moment anyway, the Democratic Party’s living legend in effective rhetoric. And he struck a hell of a nerve just by stating the obvious: Trump, he said, “doesn’t want to do the job. He wants to build his ballroom and travel with Natalie on their apparently defenseless flying palace gifted by the emir of Qatar.”

On its face, that statement is difficult for any sentient political observer, right or left, to disagree with. It has been obvious for months that Trump would much rather spend his days on his Bob the Builder projects, take a few public naps, and spend the wee hours exulting and giggling over racist memes and AI renderings of himself as Genghis Khan or Jesus – delivered by Natalie Harp, the woman his own staff calls his “Binky,” his security blanket.

Even Forbes, The Capitalist Tool, noticed, publishing a story headlined, “Natalie Harp Seen Everywhere With Trump Lately.”

Meanwhile, his lawfully wedded spouse of two decades hasn’t been spotted anywhere, let alone anywhere near him, for almost a month.

Cat’s away, mice will play! Oops…

But the right has gone crazy. Scandalized pearl-clutching all around!

Trump himself feebly insulted Ossoff, calling him Pee-wee Herman. His allies, however, rushed to the defense of his chivalry and Harp’s honor in a ferocious eruption of performative hypocrisy.

Megyn “blood coming out of her wherever” Kelly went to the mat – figuratively, if not literally – for the disgusting cad.Kelly was joined in moral outrage by the whole gang, playing the same tune in concert, like the Philharmonic, from Newt Gingrich – who famously discussed his divorce papers with his hospitalized wife – to Rep. Anna Paulina Luna of Florida, who, like Kelly, accused Ossoff of “sexism.”

Mentioning in a political speech that the President is spending time with “Natalie” is apparently a level of offense above that of mainstream journalists quoting solid White House sources claiming Harp is so devoted to Trump that she:

  • Slept in a Trump golf club locker room for a summer rather than be exiled from his glorious presence.
  • Left him mash notes that alarmed even his devoted chief of staff, including, “You are all that matters to me,” “I don’t ever want to let you down,” and “I want to bring you joy.”
  • Was one of the chosen ones invited aboard the sneaky Presidential food cart on the tarmac in Ankara, conveying him away from possible harm, leaving reporters and Cabinet members behind as live decoys for the Iranians Israel had promised were coming to get him.
  • Apparently reads him to sleep at night with racist and sexist memes and conspiracy theories he can push out on “Trump Social.”
  • Inspired the White House nickname “Binky,” because, as the Times’ Maggie Haberman said, “She is sort of his binky, for lack of a better way of putting it, a comfort blanket.”

As we noted almost a year ago in The Body Horror of the Trump Years, after that tense weekend during which Trump disappeared, a brown something was seen tossed out of the White House residence window, and rumors were rife that he was dead or dying at Walter Reed:

The MAGA movement has undeniable aspects of body horror, a subgenre of horror that involves grotesque degeneration, mutation, or transformation of the human body … The doddering old man’s body is metaphor for the ghastly corrupting effect he has had on our country: a decade-long descent of our public discourse into profane spectacle, the jettisoning of common decency and empathy in favor of rudeness and cruelty, the daily rituals of public humiliation, open racism and sexism, and the craven terror of the disfigured Republican Party.

Natalie Harp’s arrival in Trumpworld is itself body-horror adjacent. She emerged, fully formed as a useful political prop, out of California around 2018, when she first tweeted support for Trump. The following year, she appeared on Fox and Friends, claiming she had a bone cancer that standard chemo was not helping. She credited Trump’s “Right to Try” law with giving her access to an experimental treatment that supposedly saved her life. (Her story has been convincingly challenged, but letting facts get in the way of a good political story is not the MAGA way.)

Trump, watching his favorite show, was enchanted by the Ivanka-Marla lookalike Liberty University graduate. He soon invited her onstage at one of his speeches. Before long, she was on national alt-right fake-news TV, spouting Bible verses and eventually Big Lie election trash as an anchor on OAN. She also landed a coveted speaking slot at the 2020 Republican convention.

By the summer of 2024, she was bunking in the locker room at the Trump National Golf Course Bedminster, so as to not let too much daylight get between her and The Donald. Melania was said to be irked and the staff alarmed, but nothing put a dent in her clutch behavior, least of all the object of her devotion.

Last week, Michael Wolff shared one of his best Inside Trump’s Brain reflections on Instagram, challenging one of the anti-Trump world’s most cherished certainties: the ubiquitous meme that Trump wears a diaper. Wolff is convinced it isn’t true, and there is little reason to doubt his access to Trumpworld insiders; the Epstein files made that crystal clear. He blames our universal attachment to the Trump diaper on a psychological syndrome that afflicts us all: the utter disbelief that obese, vituperative, rambling Trump “exists at all – an 80 year old man who lives on junk food and has never exercised a day in his life.”

As Wolff put it, we are riveted by the survival of this visibly decaying man: “How is that possible?”

The diaper, in other words, is less a medical claim than a tangible symptom of the Body Horror of Trump. And it is indeed horror. The kind that sticks.

Which is why Ossoff’s comment so unnerved the Red Team.

I am not alone in sharing this piece of feminine wisdom, dear Freakshow fans: There is no ladylike sensibility in the nation that doesn’t recoil at the thought of those giant, swollen, bruised paws coming anywhere near a young one’s flesh. And there is not a woman alive whose stomach doesn’t churn in unison with that of any young woman – even a devotee there by choice – confronting those flaccid turkey giblets (to steal a metaphor from the poet Anne Sexton), let alone interacting with that in any way.

Ossoff didn’t need to spell anything out. He didn’t need an allegation, a punchline, or even an adjective. He just said “Natalie” and everybody filled in the blanks of their own volition.

That is also what makes the ensuing Republican outrage so spectacularly funny. The party that has coalesced around a decaying, profane misogynist – who introduced America to the coarsest level of political discourse and misbehavior toward women in living memory – accusing a Democrat of gutter politics for simply mentioning the name of a woman constantly at the president’s side is one of the best laughs of Summer 2026.

Enjoy it while it lasts.

Nina Burleigh is a journalist, author, documentary producer, and adjunct professor at New York University's Arthur L. Carter Journalism Institute. She has written eight books including her recently published novel, Zero Visibility Possible.

Reprinted with permission from American Freakshow

Worrying About $40 Trillion In Debt?  Trump's Corruption Is A Far Worse Threat

Worrying About $40 Trillion In Debt?  Trump's Corruption Is A Far Worse Threat

Yesterday, I wrote that I was far more concerned about Donald Trump’s regime of rampant corruption than the $40 trillion debt. I had a lot of pushback from people telling me that the $40 trillion debt is actually a really big deal.

I’m used to people complaining that I don’t take debt and deficits seriously enough, so I guess I would be disappointed if my post didn’t prompt some criticism. Anyhow, this gives me the opportunity to explain again why I’m not especially troubled by the $40 trillion debt. I will also explain why people really should be hair on fire over Trumpian corruption.

Debt Needs to be Understood as Part of a Larger Economic Picture

We all know that $40 trillion is a really big number, but after we give it a big salute, the question is what does it mean for the economy and for our pocketbooks? Most of the debt discussion didn’t really do this, or at least do this in a way that makes much sense.

First, we should express the debt relative to the size of the economy. The $40 trillion debt is equal to about 125 percent of Gross Domestic Product. Arguably the more appropriate measure is the publicly held debt, which excludes bonds held by the Social Security trust fund and various other public funds. This is roughly $32 trillion, or just over 100 percent of GDP. That’s large, but the debt-to-GDP ratio was considerably larger just after World War II, and that didn’t prevent us from having the most prosperous quarter century in our history. It also didn’t have investors here and elsewhere fleeing the dollar and government debt.

If we needn’t be scared by the government debt, what about the trillion dollars (3.3 percent of GDP) that we are paying out each year in interest payments? That’s a good chunk of change, but it is worth putting on our thinking caps instead of panicking.

Donald Trump just proposed, and may well get, a defense budget for fiscal 2027 of $1.5 trillion, roughly five percent of GDP. The last Biden budget for 2025 called for spending $864 billion for the military. This means Trump wants us to spend $636 billion more for the military each year, roughly 2.0 percent of GDP, than we did under Biden.

Virtually everyone thought the level of military spending under Biden was fine to meet our defense needs. If the new real or imaginary enemies that Trump has us combatting requires spending another two percent of GDP on the military, how is that better than spending another two percent of GDP on interest on the debt?

To put this simply, there are a lot of people getting hysterical about spending 3.3 percent of GDP on interest, who were fine, or at least not equivalently alarmed about Trump’s plan to increase military spending by two percent of GDP. If we make enemies in the world that require us to spend another two percentage points of GDP on the military, that is at least as bad as spending another two percentage points of GDP on interest on the debt. But only the latter will get the deficit hawks excited

In the same vein, our decision to ignore global warming is imposing high costs in dealing with wildfires and flooding. Most likely this is not close to two percent of GDP on an annual basis, but if the current path continues, we might be there before too long. In any case, if we are worried about the ongoing burden on the economy, the additional spending required to deal with the problems created by climate change is every bit as much a burden as interest on the debt.

Also, if we’re being serious, we have to recognize that spending money is not the only way the government pays for things. It also issues patent and copyright monopolies to support innovation and creative work. The annual sums transferred as a result of these government-granted monopolies are easily over $1 trillion a year. In the case of prescription drugs and other pharmaceuticals alone, it is over $500 billion.

The idea that we should worry about the debt and the interest we pay on it, but ignore the higher prices we pay for drugs, medical equipment, software, and other products because of the government-granted monopolies is something only a policy pundit could take seriously. If we’ve paid off the government debt, but a whole range of items cost twice as much as they would in a free market because we gave out patent monopolies lasting a century, would our kids have reason to thank us? In that case, they don’t have to worry about paying interest on the debt, just about paying massive patent rents on everything they buy.

Trump Corruption Threatens the Dollar, not Government Debt

For more than a century, investors, both foreign and domestic, felt comfortable having their money in the United States because they knew it was governed by the rule of law. This meant, for example, if there was a contract dispute, they could reasonably expect it would be decided in a court based on the merits, not based on political connections. The same is true for regulatory rulings, such as the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) ruling on corporate filings or the Federal Drug Administration’s (FDA) approval of drugs.

Under Trump, this is no longer true. If a company lied about its profits on its financial statements, investors could present evidence to the SEC and expect that it would impose sanctions if there was a solid case, but not under Trump. If the company is a big Trump contributor, it’s likely he will instruct the SEC to ignore the complaint or rule in favor of the perp.

The same applies with all the bureaucracies, as the Supreme Court has said Trump can tell them to do whatever he likes. The FDA can refuse to approve the drug of a company whose CEO has criticized him. The Federal Aviation Administration can refuse to recognize the safety of an airplane manufactured by a company that Trump dislikes.

The story goes on. Trump has a green light to use all parts of the government to punish companies and individuals that anger him and to favor those who hand him money.

This is an infinitely greater threat to the credit of the U.S. government and the strength of the dollar than the debt. That fact should be obvious to anyone who is not an elite pundit.

Dean Baker is a senior economist at the Center for Economic and Policy Research and the author of the 2016 book Rigged: How Globalization and the Rules of the Modern Economy Were Structured to Make the Rich Richer. Please consider subscribing to his Substack.

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Trending

World