Tag: donald trump
Pam Bondi

Pam Bondi's Swan Song: Ex-Attorney General Scheduled For Oversight Testimony

In 2013, then-Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi personally solicited a $25,000 political donation from the Donald J. Trump Foundation for her re-election PAC – and soon received it. Days later, Bondi’s office abandoned plans to join a New York lawsuit investigating fraud allegations against Trump University.

It is against the law for charitable foundations to make political contributions. But in the universe of Trump corruption, $25,000 was laughable chump change. It just proved to him how cheaply Pam Bondi could be had.

Fast forward a few years. Bondi, no longer in elected office, got serious about money as a $115,000-a-month lobbyist with the DC-based influence giant Ballard Partners. Her client list included deep-pocketed private prison corporations and the government of Qatar (for whom she was specifically registered under the Foreign Agent Registration Act for “dealing with matters pertaining to combating human trafficking”). When Trump nominated her to be his attorney general in early 2025, she didn’t bother mentioning those clients in her statement of potential conflicts of interest.

So far so good: lies and omissions are standard operating practice in Trumpworld.

His initial pick for attorney general was Matt Gaetz, who might have been a more fitting choice to oversee the Epstein cover-up, having himself been investigated for child sex trafficking and found to have violated Florida’s statutory rape laws according to the House Ethics Committee. Gaetz had skated on all of it, but was ultimately too tainted even for the slavish Senate Republican majority that would have to approve the nomination.

Still, Bondi was something of an unusual choice for a Trump casting. His preferred front-of-house women tend to be more colorful and histrionic – Pirro, Loomer, Omarosa, Noem. Bondi, though from Florida herself, for some reason never went full Mar-a-Lago face, though it’s not clear self-mutilation would have saved her.

Managing the fake release of a fake politically-motivated conspiracy while simultaneously curating the cover-up of real files tied to a real conspiracy was always going to be a tall order. One day she was riding in the presidential limo with Trump to the Statue of the Union address. The next, she was out in the cold.

To add insult to injury, this week, Pam, the defenestrated private citizen recently diagnosed with thyroid cancer, will have to endure a day of questioning about her role in the Epstein cover-up. While her former DOJ deputy – Trump’s personal attorney Todd “Whiteout” Blanche – wins the Old Man’s heart by erasing January 6 criminals from the DOJ website and rewarding violent coup plotters like Stewart Rhodes with taxpayer money, Pam will, at least for a day and maybe longer, become the public face of the Justice Department’s Epstein files cover-up.

In advance of her star turn on the Hill, here is a Freakshow timeline of Bondi’s ignominious reign as the nation’s top law enforcement official, and how she became Trump’s Brer Rabbit in the tar pit.

January 2025

Shortly after Trump’s inauguration, the Justice Department orders the Southern District of New York, which has an active investigation still underway, to send all Epstein-related evidence to Washington. Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD.) would later state that “neither the survivors nor the SDNY prosecutors knew that the purpose of this transfer was to terminate the case.”

Despite the fact that Trump won the 2024 election in part by juicing the Epstein conspiracy and promising to reveal the sordid details, the Senate Judiciary Committee advances Bondi’s nomination without asking anything about the files.

February 4, 2025

The Senate confirms Bondi, by a vote of 54 to 46, with all Republicans and one Democrat – John Fetterman of Pennsylvania – voting in favor.

February 11, 2025

Republican Reps. Jim Comer (R-KY) and Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL), as chairs of House Oversight and the Task Force on the Declassification of Federal Secrets respectively, send a letter to Bondi requesting an ASAP briefing on documents related to the Jeffrey Epstein case.

February 21, 2025

Bondi goes on Fox and famously announces that the Epstein “client list” is “sitting on my desk right now to review” as part of a directive from President Trump himself.

February 27, 2025

Bondi incites an influencer revolt by inviting a pack of MAGA fake journalists, including Laura Loomer, to the White House and passing out binders labeled “The Epstein Files: Phase 1.” They pose for a photo op, thinking they are holding “declassified” material, only to realize that none of it was ever classified and much of it was already public (Epstein flight logs had been available since 2021).

Worse, the redactions are so badly mishandled that dozens of victims’ names – but not the names of their abusers – enter the public record.

With the stunt having failed, Bondi hops on with Fox News’ Mark Levin and shifts the blame to the New York federal prosecutor’s office, claiming they are “sitting on thousands of pages of documents regarding Epstein.” She promises that America will soon see “the full Epstein files” and then writes a letter to Kash Patel demanding delivery of the “full and complete Epstein files” to her office by 8 AM the next morning, while also demanding an “immediate investigation” into why her orders to the FBI were not followed.

February 28, 2025

James Dennehy, head of the FBI’s New York field office, is fired.

March 2025

Bondi tells Sean Hannity that the DOJ has received “a truckload of evidence” and department staff begin processing 100,000 pages of the Epstein files in Winchester, Virginia. The job takes too long, so two weeks later, Bondi reportedly pressures the FBI to increase staffing and intensify efforts. A whistleblower later reports that she and Patel put crime-fighters on 24-hour document redaction shifts, with instructions to look out for Trump’s name. Sen. Dick Durbin’s letter about this episode contains many questions Bondi has not yet been asked publicly.

May 2025

Bondi reportedly tells Trump during a briefing that his name appears in the Epstein files.

June 5, 2025

Elon Musk claims that the Epstein files have not been released because Trump is in them. “Time to drop the really big bomb: [Trump] is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public.” House Democrats immediately fire off a letter asking Bondi and Patel whether Musk’s claim is true.

July 4, 2025

A weekend of mysterious, panicked scrambling unfolds between Main Justice in Washington and the FBI’s New York office to get additional copies of Epstein file photos to Todd Blanche’s office.

July 7, 2025

The DOJ and FBI release an unsigned joint memo stating their “exhaustive review” found no co-conspirators, “did not uncover evidence that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties,” and that no further disclosure of documents was warranted. At the end of the letter, officials link to video footage of the MCC Epstein cell area. Bondi never releases any materials related to the “exhaustive review.”

July 15, 2025

Reps. Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna introduce the Epstein Files Transparency Act.

July 16, 2025

Trump posts that the Epstein files are a “Democrat hoax” on Truth Social, then repeats that claim in person from the Oval Office. That same day, Maureen Comey, lead prosecutor in the New York Epstein investigation, is fired.

July 17, 2025

The Wall Street Journal publishes the first of its “birthday book” stories, revealing that Trump gave his old friend Jeff a lewd drawing as a gift. Trump denies that it’s real and eventually files a $10 billion lawsuit that is later tossed by a judge. As another distraction, Trump instructs DOJ to seek release of Epstein grand jury materials. A day later, Bondi and Blanche ask the federal court to release the transcripts.

July 22, 2025

Pam Bondi posts a statement from Todd Blanche announcing that she directed him to communicate with Ghislaine Maxwell’s attorneys.. “If Ghislane [sic] Maxwell has information about anyone who has committed crimes against victims, the FBI and the DOJ will hear what she has to say.”

Two days later, Blanche meets with Maxwell in Tallahassee. Meanwhile, House Speaker Mike Johnson, trying to head off a vote on the Epstein Transparency Act, shuts down House business for the rest of the summer.

August 1, 2025

The Bureau of Prisons, a DOJ agency, transfers Maxwell to a low-security prison despite BOP guidelines for convicted sex offenders.

October 7, 2025

Pam Bondi appears before the Senate Judiciary Committee. She seems flummoxed by questions about photos of Trump in Epstein’s safe, as described by Michael Wolff, and deflects questions about DOJ failures to investigate Epstein’s finances by blaming Democratic administrations.

November 14, 2025

At Trump’s behest, Bondi asks New York U.S. Attorney Jay Clayton (a lawyer previously brought into Epstein associate Leon Black’s hedge fund for reputation rehab) to “take the lead” on investigating Epstein’s involvement specifically with Democrats, including Bill Clinton, Larry Summers, Reid Hoffman, and other institutions.

December 21, 2025

Bondi tweets that the Justice Department will bring charges against “anyone involved in the trafficking and exploitation of Jeffrey Epstein’s victims.” She claims the DOJ has already met with “many victims” and urges others to reach out to her, Blanche, or the FBI “and we will investigate immediately.”

(NOTE: Victims have repeatedly said that Bondi never talked to any of them and the DOJ has so far not prosecuted anyone other than Ghislaine Maxwell.)

February 11, 2026

Bondi testifies before the House Oversight Committee – prickly, cornered and occasionally unhinged – while refusing to acknowledge a group of Epstein victims in the audience. The spectacle likely ended her run in the Trump cabinet reality show.

As The Daily Beast’s Joanna Coles put it:

These hearings, like so much political theater now, are staged for an audience of one: the great and powerful Donald Trump. So while Bondi thought she was playing the role of loyal defender, her sneering responses and burn book takedowns turned her into something else: the Angry Woman. And that is not something her boss would order from Central Casting.

February 17, 2026

American Freakshow reports the existence of three missing FBI interviews related to a sexual assault allegation against Trump by a woman whose redacted name is marked with the unusual label “protect source.” The story gets picked up by NPR, and after two weeks of denials, the DOJ finally acknowledges the three interviews. But questions remain about what other materials might be similarly withheld.

April 2, 2026

Trump fires Bondi over her handling of the Epstein files. There’s a difference between suave, brazen disregard for the law in quiet practice and full-frontal rudeness to the legislative branch. It’s a difference her replacement, Acting AG Blanche, having auditioned as Trump’s Roy Cohn for the last several years and grown increasingly willing to put his client’s kingly immunity into practice, understands.

He immediately announces that there will be no more Epstein file releases.

.Nina Burleigh is a journalist, author, documentary producer, and adjunct professor at New York University's Arthur L. Carter Journalism Institute. She has written eight books including her recently published novel, Zero Visibility Possible.

Katie Chenoweth is associate professor of French at Princeton University and an investigative researcher
Reprinted with permission from American Freakshow

E. Jean Carroll

Latest Target Of Trump's Weaponized Justice Is Successful Rape Accuser Carroll

President Donald Trump is committing impeachable offenses at a dizzying clip, weaponizing the federal government against his enemies and lining his pockets with taxpayer dollars.

In his latest offense, Trump’s Department of Justice is criminally investigating E. Jean Carroll, the writer whose lawsuits led to Trump being found liable for sexual abuse and defamation.

According to CNN, the DOJ is investigating Carroll for perjury, claiming that she lied in a 2022 deposition in her ultimately successful lawsuit against Trump. DOJ prosecutors say Carroll perjured herself when she said her lawsuit against Trump wasn’t being financed by any outside entities. But before the trial was set to begin, Carroll’s lawyers told the judge and Trump attorney Alina Habba that billionaire Reid Hoffman covered some of the trial expenses.

Habba—whom Trump later appointed to serve as a U.S. attorney until a judge kicked her out—had accused Carroll’s lawyers during the trial of having “conspired to conceal the truth for nearly six months.”

Yet a judge blocked Trump’s legal team from asking about how Carroll’s lawsuit was being financed during the trial, which Carroll went on to win.

Trump’s DOJ going after Carroll is clearly a revenge effort. He is livid that she was awarded nearly $90 million in damages between two separate cases—$5 million for damages related to the alleged sexual abuse and another $83 million for defamation. (Trump has been appealing both decisions for years and is now hoping the Supreme Court, which he stacked with right-wing hacks, will throw out the cases and prevent Carroll from receiving the funds awarded to her.)

“This is an unbelievable abuse of power,” Democratic Rep. Adam Smith of California told CNN on Wednesday.

Sen. Adam Schiff, the California Democrat who is also a target of Trump’s weaponized DOJ over bullshit mortgage-fraud allegations, also slammed the DOJ probe into Carroll.

“First, Trump weaponized the DOJ to target his political enemies. Now, perversely, he’s targeting E. Jean Carroll, the woman who credibly and successfully sued him for sexual assault,” Schiff wrote in a post on X. “He’s using the power of the DOJ to go after his own victims. It’s a vile attack on the rule of law and a disgusting insult to victims everywhere.”

Should charges be brought against Carroll, it will be the just latest vindictive prosecution effort by the DOJ.

Already, Trump forced the DOJ to charge former FBI Director James Comey twice on dubious charges—once for supposed perjury and again for allegedly making threats against Trump. The first case has been thrown out because the court determined the U.S. attorney who sought the charges—Lindsey Halligan—was not legally serving in her role when she sought the indictment.

Trump also sought charges against New York Attorney General Letitia James for bogus mortgage-fraud charges, which were thrown out by a federal judge for the same reason as in Comey’s case. Trump’s DOJ tried to indict James again but failed when a grand jury declined to pursue charges—something that rarely happens.

Trump went after James because she successfully prosecuted him for charges of falsifying business records, which now makes him forever a convicted felon.

And a federal judge last week went as far as to throw out criminal charges against Maryland resident Kilmar Albrego Garcia—whom Trump wrongfully shipped off to a torture prison in El Salvador—due to vindictive prosecution. Again, that is a ruling that almost never happens since it is so difficult to prove.

If Carroll were ultimately charged, she would almost certainly seek to have the case thrown out on similar grounds.

Ultimately, Trump’s use of the DOJ as his revenge squad is not popular, with majorities of Americans saying that indictments of Trump’s perceived enemies have been unjustified.

What’s more, a majority of Americans now believe Trump should be impeached.

Should Democrats win control of the House this fall, you can be sure they will probe these investigations—and possibly move forward with impeachment.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos


James Talarico

Hispanic Voters Abandon MAGA, Threatening Trump And GOP In Midterm Elections

President Donald Trump might be celebrating for now, but according to a new report from The Hill, he could be cruising for his most embarrassing defeat of the 2026 midterms, all thanks to a key voting bloc that is ditching him en masse.

Earlier this week, Ken Paxton prevailed over incumbent John Cornyn in the GOP primary for his Texas Senate seat, marking another win for Trump's influence over the MAGA voting base, as it came shortly after he endorsed the state Attorney General in the race. This came after a string of similar incumbent losses where the president endorsed a primary challenger, but concerns are now mounting that Paxton's scandal-plagued background will sour voters in the general election and hand the seat to Democrats.

Given how deep-red Texas has been for decades, such a loss would surely mark one of the most embarrassing blunders for Trump and the GOP for the 2026 midterm cycle, and according to a Thursday report from The Hill, the race could be decided by one key group of voters. Unfortunately for the president, it is a group that has been ditching him consistently since they broke for him in an unprecedented way in 2024.

"[The] outcome of Paxton’s November matchup with Democratic Senate nominee James Talarico could hinge on Hispanic voters, who moved sharply toward Republicans during Trump’s 2024 campaign but have recently shown signs of drifting back toward Democrats in the polls," The Hill explained

It added later: "Recent national surveys have found Democrats regaining support among nonwhite and Hispanic voters, after Trump made significant gains with those voting blocs last cycle. A Pew Research Center survey released this month found Trump’s approval rating among Latinos who voted for him in 2024 down 27 points since the start of his second term — falling to 66 percent in April. The same survey found Trump’s overall approval among Latinos down 14 points — at 22 percent — fueling Democratic hopes they can regain ground with the critical voting bloc in the Lone Star State."

“The Latino vote is the biggest swing vote in Texas, so whoever wins them in big numbers is going to be victorious,” Brandon Rottinghaus, a University of Houston political science professor, told the outlet.

A Wednesday report from Axios also affirmed the continuing trend of "buyer's remorse" among Latinos who voted for Trump in the last presidential election. Citing the latest findings from the firm, UniDos, the outlet reported that 25 percent of Latino voters said that they would not vote for him again if they could. This, the outlet argued, shows that the demographic remains "highly movable," signaling major troubles for "Republicans in Latino-heavy battleground districts where both parties are watching for signs of a post-2024 snapback."

"The erosion of Latino support for President Trump, combined with dissatisfaction with the economy, signals danger for competitive GOP-held seats in the 2026 midterm elections," Axios explained.

Reprinted with permission from Alternet


JD Vance

JD Vance's Racist 'Fraud Task Force' Conceals Real Fraud In Trump White House

JD Vance’s first claim to national attention as vice president was when he admitted to making up lies about pet-eating Haitian migrants. Vance justified the lie by saying that he was prepared to lie if that was needed to push Trump’s anti-immigrant agenda. With his anti-fraud task force, Vance is continuing his practice of pushing racist lies.

To be clear, there is fraud in government social programs and some of it is done by immigrants from developing countries. But there is no plausible story where this fraud accounts for a large share of the budget, or that immigrants are especially likely to be fraudsters. And there is no remotely plausible story where, as Trump henchman Stephen Miller claimed, that eliminating fraud could balance the budget. It is also absurd to imagine that the Biden administration was not pursuing fraud.

In fact, the vast majority of the fraud is not done by the beneficiaries of these programs, but by businesses that profit from them. For example, the Government Accountability Office estimates that in 2023, there was over $100 billion worth of improper payments in the Medicare and Medicaid programs, roughly seven percent of total spending.

Most of this was not fraud. It was often overpayments for procedures, or in some cases, simply a failure to properly document a payment request. In any case, this was money being paid to providers, hospitals, nursing homes, and doctors’ offices, not undocumented immigrants from Latin America or Africa.

It doesn’t seem like JD Vance has much interest in going after these people. In fact, Donald Trump has been getting a lot of money from issuing pardons to these fraudsters.

It’s also again worth pointing out that eliminating fraud will not come close to balancing the budget. The government was looking at a deficit of almost $1.9 trillion this year on $7.4 trillion in total spending, and that was before Trump started his war with Iran.

A more vigilant crackdown on fraud would be lucky to get into double-digit billions, reducing the size of the deficit by maybe one percent, and that would be high-end. For folks with bad memories, it was just a year and a half ago that Trump enlisted Elon Musk to crack down on waste, fraud, and abuse. He mostly came up empty-handed, although he did fire a number of people at government agencies, who they then had to hire back. He also dismantled USAID, contributing to tens of thousands of deaths due to AIDS, and also leaving the world unprepared to deal with the Ebola outbreak.

The government also has inspectors general (IG) attached to most departments and agencies. Their job is to ferret out fraud and waste. One of Trump’s first acts was to fire most of these IGs, presumably because he didn’t want people calling attention to his own fraud, waste, and abuse.

If Vance seriously wanted to crack down on fraud and reduce the deficit, he could be working with the I.R.S. to collect some of the $600 billion in taxes that go unpaid each year. But this would mean disproportionately going after white people who are Trump’s campaign contributors, not the look Trump wants for the fall elections. Also, Musk disproportionately went after workers at the I.R.S., leaving it less able to crack down on tax cheats.

It should be apparent to all but the hopelessly naïve that the point of Vance’s fraud task force to stir up racist resentment for the fall election. With his war with Iran going badly, his tariffs an economic disaster, and inflation jumping to rates not seen since the worst of the pandemic, Trump desperately needs a distraction.

Racism has been Trump’s strong suit since his earliest political forays, such as calling for the death penalty for the Central Park Five, Black teenagers who were charged and did prison time for a brutal rape. They were later exonerated. More recently, we were treated to his nuttiness on President Obama’s birth certificate. Trump may not be very good at running a business or the country, but he is a superstar when it comes to exploiting racism, and JD Vance is a willing and able sidekick.

Dean Baker is a senior economist at the Center for Economic and Policy Research and the author of the 2016 book Rigged: How Globalization and the Rules of the Modern Economy Were Structured to Make the Rich Richer. Please consider subscribing to his Substack.

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Corona Virus

Trending

World