Tag: election 2024
How Trump Will Betray -- And Beguile -- The Workers Who Elected Him

How Trump Will Betray -- And Beguile -- The Workers Who Elected Him

Working-class voters put Donald Trump over the top, thinking he would look out for their interests. How does the administration he's putting together look for them?

Not great.

Roman emperors maintained control over the populace by giving them "bread and circuses" — free bread and lavish entertainment to distract them. Trump appears to be following that strategy except that "the bread," that is, economic benefits, seems destined for the billionaire elite. The masses, however, get a three-ring spectacle.

Note that Trump chose a respected financier, Scott Bessent, to run the Treasury. The markets, nervous that Trump would explode deficits and do scary things with tariffs, were somewhat calmed by the pick. Stock prices rose at Bessent's naming. Trump wasn't about to mess with investors.

The broader American public, on the other hand, is getting quite a show. Trump himself seems much amused by his nomination of crackpot Robert F. Kennedy to run Health and Human Services. "Bobby" is a vaccine "skeptic" whose skepticism has little basis in science. He told Samoans that measles vaccines shipped to their country were of lower quality than those sent elsewhere. A few months later, 83 people, most of them children, died from measles.

Trump told "Bobby" to "go wild" with health care. What a card!

Back at the bread buffet, Trump has tasked Elon Musk to cut $2 trillion out of the federal budget. Musk became the world's richest man thanks, in part, to the American taxpayer. Over the decade, Musk has collected over $15 billion in federal contracts for SpaceX alone.

And so out of whose hide do you think a funding-ectomy would be taken? A good guess would be "not Elon's."

Project 2025, a right-wing document written for a second Trump term, calls for weakening the Affordable Care Act. It wants to let insurers discriminate against preexisting conditions. It would deregulate Medicare Advantage, coverage provided by private companies, and make it a default option. The intention is to discourage participation in traditional Medicare, which many beneficiaries prefer because it doesn't limit them to doctors in a network and require referrals to see specialists.

When the shocking details of Project 2025 became well-known, Trump swore up and down the campaign trail that "I had nothing to do with it." Also, "I have no idea who is behind it." He's now hiring a number of the architects behind it.

Trump and Musk seem especially keen to gut the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, created to shield ordinary folks from abusive lending practices. Some of the most respected names in finance have made fortunes trapping unsophisticated borrowers in contracts swimming with snakes.

The bureau has proposed limiting late fees on credit cards, which would save consumers $10 billion a year. And it would remove medical debt from consumer credit reports, resulting in higher credit scores for those buying a home or car. Wall Street wants the CFPB off its back.

How might Trump hide the reality that the economic winners in his second term will be the tech and finance bros who bankrolled him and the losers will be you-know-who? Provide the losers with ever more gaudy circuses. He's already twirling culture war baubles, witness his hollering about plans to go after Ivy League colleges engaged in DEI. Whatever you think about diversity, equity and inclusion programs, chances are good that Harvard's admission policies don't really affect you.

Trump's naming of outrageously inappropriate department heads may be part of the distraction process. He has the media fulminating about the unqualified collection of misfits proposed to run our intelligence, defense and medical establishments.

Advice to average Americans: Be vigilant. When you're at the circus, it's wise to watch your wallet.

Froma Harrop has worked for Reuters, The New York Times News Service and the Providence Journal. She has written for such diverse publications as The New York Times, Harper’s Bazaar and Institutional Investor.

Reprinted with permission from Creators.

Donald Trump

Would-Be Despot Trump Renews His Assault On Press Freedom

"The press freedom fire is at our door step now," said one Washington Post journalist on Thursday night after news broke that two months before President-elect Donald Trump is set to take office, he has already begun to wage legal warfare against on the news media.

The Columbia Journalism Review (CJR) reported that days before the election, a lawyer for Trump, Edward Andrew Paltzik, sent a letter to The New York Times and Penguin Random House demanding $10 billion in damages for publishing articles and a book that were critical of the president-elect, who was convicted of 34 felony counts earlier this year.

Trump's legal team took issue with a book by Times journalists Susanne Craig and Russ Buettner titled Lucky Loser: How Donald Trump Squandered His Father’s Fortune and Created the Illusion of Success. They also said they were demanding damages over "false and defamatory statements" in the October 20 article "For Trump, a Lifetime of Scandals Heads Toward a Moment of Judgment" by Peter Baker and the October 22 piece "As Election Nears, Kelly Warns Trump Would Rule Like a Dictator" by Michael Schmidt.

The former article covered numerous wrongdoings by the president-elect and accusations against him, pointing out that he "is the only president in American history impeached twice for high crimes and misdemeanors, the only president ever indicted on criminal charges, and the only president to be convicted of a felony (34, in fact)," and that he has also boasted about sexually assaulting women and spearheaded numerous businesses that went bankrupt.

The latter article detailed comments by Trump's former chief of staff, John Kelly, who told the Times that the definition of fascism accurately describes Trump.

The president-elect himself said while campaigning that he planned to govern as a dictator only on "Day One" of his term in office.

"Governments and powerful figures threatening journalists and media outlets with costly legal battles and bankruptcy is a common tactic against press freedom in repressive countries."

Paltzik told the newspaper that the articles demonstrate the Times' "intention of defaming and disparaging the world-renowned Trump brand that consumers have long associated with excellence, luxury, and success in entertainment, hospitality, and real estate, among many other industries, as well as falsely and maliciously defaming and disparaging him as a candidate for the highest office in the United States."

The CJR reported that the Times responded to Paltzik's letter, telling him the newspaper stood by its reporting on Trump.

As Barry Malone, deputy editor-in-chief of the Thomson Reuters Foundation, said on social media on Friday, Trump's legal threats may be designed not to actually win billions of dollars in damages but "to tie the media up with time-consuming and often prohibitively expensive cases."

The Times and Penguin Random House threats were reported two weeks after Trump suedCBS News for another $10 billion, claiming an interview with Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris, who lost the November 5 election, was unfairly edited to present her in a positive light and qualified as "election interference."

CBS said it would "vigorously defend" its journalistic practices and called the lawsuit "completely without merit"—a similar response to the one by The Washington Post, which was accused by Trump on the same day of making an illegal in-kind donation to Harris.

Anne Champion, an attorney who has represented several journalists and CNN in legal cases initiated by Trump, told the CJR that the legal threats will likely have "a mental chilling effect" on reporters and news outlets in the United States as Trump prepares to take office.

"It is both conscious and unconscious," said Champion. "Journalists at smaller outlets know very well that the costs for their organization to defend themselves could mean bankruptcy. Even journalists at larger outlets don't want to burden themselves or their employees with lawsuits. It puts another layer of influence into the journalistic process."

Trump has a longstanding disdain for the media, saying numerous times during his first term that journalists were the "enemy of the people." During one campaign rally just before the election he said he wouldn't "mind" if reporters at the event were shot, and he called the media the "enemy camp" during his victory speech last week.

During his first term he also threatened to "take a strong look at our country's libel laws"—which are actually controlled by states, not the federal government—and ensure that "when somebody says something that is false and defamatory about someone, that person will have meaningful recourse in our courts."

The American Civil Liberties Union pointed out at the time that the First Amendment and the lack of federal libel laws would stand in Trump's way, but on Thursday Lachlan Cartwright wrote at CJR that "the drumbeat of legal threats signals a potentially ominous trend for journalists during Trump's second term in office."

As Washington Post columnist Karen Attiah noted on the social media platform Bluesky, "governments and powerful figures threatening journalists and media outlets with costly legal battles and bankruptcy is a common tactic against press freedom in repressive countries."

Reprinted with permission from Alternet.

Trump Picks RFK Jr. (And His Brain Worm) To Oversee Public Health

Trump Picks RFK Jr. (And His Brain Worm) To Oversee Public Health

President-elect Donald Trump announced Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as his pick to head the Department of Health and Human Services Thursday via his Truth Social account.

“Mr. Kennedy will restore these Agencies to the traditions of Gold Standard Scientific Research, and beacons of Transparency, to end the Chronic Disease epidemic, and to Make America Great and Healthy Again!” Trump said about the former Independent presidential candidate, who recently told marketing industry podcaster Joe Polish that Trump’s diet “is really, like, bad” and characterized a lot of the food Trump eats as “poison.”

None of that seems to matter to Trump, who chose the brain worm victim, whale decapitator, and serial adulterer to lead public health. Kennedy's history of pushing pseudoscience and debunked claims about vaccines is long and distressing, and his ideas to “Make America Healthy Again” are dubious at best.

Kennedy wrote in a Nov. 2 post on X that on inauguration day, the “Trump White House will advise all U.S. water systems to remove fluoride from public water.” Most experts agree that adding fluoride to water helps reduce childhood cavities and tooth infections in young children. Kennedy’s belief that fluoridation has led to worse public health outcomes is not supported by most of the research that has been done.

The infamous “vaccine skeptic” has vaguely promised to "investigate" vaccine research once he’s in a position of power. Kennedy and the anti-vaxxer movement’s unwillingness to believe even their own research debunking myths about vaccines causing autism does not build much confidence that he will do anything productive in that regard.

Kennedy’s one halfway-decent public health idea is to promote healthier diets with less processed food for Americans. The Democrat-turned-Independent-turned-Trump toady will now be working for the same GOP that lost their collective minds when former first lady Michelle Obama attempted to improve the dietary standards of children's school lunches.

And considering that it was Trump’s first administration that rolled back Obama-era nutrition regulations on school lunches, it will be interesting to see if Kennedy is even allowed to bring carrots into the White House.

The two men make a strange duo—until you realize that they're both narcissistic rich kids with bad ideas, underdeveloped emotions, and outsized egos.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos.

Trump Aides Mulled Courts-Martial For Retired Generals Who Criticized President

'Hitler's Generals': Trump Prepares To Purge Top Military Ranks

Despite winning the election just a week ago, President-elect Donald Trump and his transition team aren't wasting any time preparing to staff the federal government — and the military in particular – with diehard loyalists.

The Wall Street Journal reported Tuesday that the Trump transition team is currently preparing an executive order that would allow him to pave the way for new military leadership that is squarely in the MAGA camp. The draft order would create a so-called "warrior board" made up of retired senior U.S. military personnel who would recommend the firing of generals and admirals who are "lacking in requisite leadership qualities."

The Journal's Vivian Salama, Lara Seligman and Nancy A. Youssef wrote that while the commander in chief can technically already fire any military official, his new warrior board could "create a chilling effect on top military officers, given the president-elect’s past vow to fire 'woke generals,' referring to officers seen as promoting diversity in the ranks at the expense of military readiness."

According to the paper, the draft order would establish credentials for new military leaders based on "leadership capability, strategic readiness and commitment to military excellence." But the finer details of how the board plans to evaluate candidates for military leadership based on those criteria have not been revealed. One legal expert posited that this is merely cover for Trump to appoint generals based on how loyal they would be to both his political agenda and him personally.

"This looks like an administration getting ready to purge anyone who will not be a yes man,” former U.S. Army lawyer Eric Carpenter, who teaches military law at Florida International University's College of Law, told the Journal. “If you are looking to fire officers who might say no because of the law or their ethics, you set up a system with completely arbitrary standards, so you can fire anyone you want.”

The draft order also appears to mirror what Marquette University professor Risa Brooks warned about in an article for the Council on Foreign Relations' Foreign Affairs publication earlier this year. She wrote in March that "politicians may seek to impose ideological litmus tests in promotions and appointments of senior officers," and that "the result would be profound damage to national security."

"Today, military leaders strive to be impartial in offering advice to the president, lawmakers, and other civilian officials about the use of force. In the future, they may instead tailor their recommendations to the interests of their preferred political party," she wrote. "Apart from undermining the rigor of the advisory process, such internal politicization would erode the overall unity of the military as partisan tensions spread through the ranks. And the American people’s trust in the military would decline as they came to see it as just another politicized institution, as many already see the Supreme Court."

The executive order is also squarely in line with what Trump previously communicated to then-chief of staff John Kelly, a four-star Marine general who was his longest-serving chief of staff, according to an interview he gave to the Atlantic's Jeffrey Goldberg in October. In 2018, Trump told Kelly that he wanted the same kind of generals "that Hitler had," because they were "totally loyal."

Trump also had a tense relationship with Gen. Mark Milley, whom he appointed as chairman to the Joint Chiefs of Staff in 2019, putting him in charge of the entire U.S. military. Milley told journalist Bob Woodward that Trump was "fascist to the core," and "the most dangerous person in America." Should Trump sign the executive order creating the "warrior board," it's unlikely he'll have any top military brass who are out of step with him politically for the next four years.

Reprinted with permission from Alternet.

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Corona Virus

Trending

World