Tag: elon musk
Millions Leaving Elon Musk's 'X' For Fascism-Free Bluesky Social

Millions Leaving Elon Musk's 'X' For Fascism-Free Bluesky Social

Elon Musk’s social media toilet X is facing a new exodus by journalists and organizations fed up with both the tanking quality of the site and the upcoming changes to its terms of service set to take effect November 15.

X’s new service terms require users who wish to sue the company to file in specifically the “U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas or state courts located in Tarrant County, Texas.” These courts are a favorite of conservative activists as they are stocked with Republican appointees.

On Wednesday, The Guardianannounced it would no longer post on the site, though it would not block X users from sharing its articles. “Social media can be an important tool for news organisations and help us to reach new audiences,” the media outlet writes, “but, at this point, X now plays a diminished role in promoting our work.”

Journalist Don Lemon, who is in the midst of a lawsuit with Musk for alleged breach of contract, also posted a statement on Wednesday about leaving the site. “I once believed it was a place for honest debate and discussion, transparency, and free speech, but I now feel it does not serve that purpose,” he wrote.

The Washington Postreports that the location of the courts X specifies—which are not in the district of the company’s headquarters—are a red flag to many experts who say the move is a clear gambit to force litigation into Musk and conservative-friendly courts:

Georgetown University law professor Steve Vladeck accused Musk of “quintessential forum shopping”—the practice of identifying a court or district where one believes they will receive a favorable ruling. He noted that 10 of the 11 active judges in the Northern District were appointed by a Republican president, compared with six of 11 judges in the Western District of Texas [where the company is located].

Musk’s preferred courts include such judges as Reed O’Connor, who owns between $15,000 and $50,000 worth of stock in electric vehicle maker Tesla (also owned by Musk) but who has refused to recuse from Musk’s lawsuit against watchdog group Media Matters.

Tech journalist Kara Swisher said she is leaving X for good and deleting her account because of the new terms of service. Swisher has followed Musk for a long time and has recently been very critical of Musk’s potential role in a Trump administration.

“We all know that government doesn’t work in lots of ways, but it's not meant to be like a startup,” Swisher told CNN after Donald Trump’s election win. Swisher also predicted that Musk would merge X with Trump’s Truth Social platform, turning their social media sites into “meme stock” for their financial benefit.

“[Musk will] use it as a propaganda organ, which is precisely why he bought it,” Swisher added.

A recent computational analysis by researchers at Queensland University of Technology and Monash University found that after Musk endorsed Trump in July, X changed its algorithm to disproportionately pump his and other Republicans' posts into people's feeds.

People have been moving over to platforms like Bluesky or Threads, but the energy needed to build up followings (hey, here’s me on Bluesky!) is daunting. Writer Cory Doctorow has said he does not believe he can invest his time and energy into investing in any privately owned social media site that can “enshittify” its site based on a CEO’s whims.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos.

Top Tech Reporter Explains Why Musk Is Unfit For Government Position

Top Tech Reporter Explains Why Musk Is Unfit For Government Position

Tech reporter Kara Swisher on Wednesday refuted CNN conservative strategist Scott Jennings’ effusive praise of billionaire Elon Musk, arguing you “can separate” the billionaire X owner’s “heinous behavior” from his entrepreneurship — “if you have half a brain.”

Musk on Tuesday watched election returns with Donald Trump at Mar-a-Lago as the country overwhelmingly elected the former president to another four years in the White House. As the Washington Post reported Wednesday, Musk has future political ambitions, and has “repeatedly discussed with Trump the idea of joining a new commission to slash federal spending by as much as $2 trillion" when the he takes office next year.

Jennings on Wednesday implored his fellow panelists to “be nice” to Musk, arguing voters “want unconventional” — and Musk will bring just that to the Trump Administration.

Swisher, who’s interviewed Musk over 30 times, had less praise for the billionaire.


“I'm looking at a lot of things,” Swisher said. “The instability and the decisions that he makes are sometimes haphazard and strange, often.”

The tech reporter said Musk “is allowed to blow up rockets because he can do it and take those risks and the shareholders go along with him,” but argued “it’s a different thing when it comes to the federal government.”

“People's lives depend on it,” Swisher said. “I know you think its funny and I don't think that it's funny at all.”

The reporter went on to argue that if Trump and Musk treat the federal government like a startup, “the least among us suffer — and that’s just the way it is.”

“[Musk] has a history of doing that, lack of safety at certain of his facilities, and he has a history of firing people,” Swisher said. “And a history of not paying people. And he has a history of being haphazard and firing someone who talks back against him. And for someone who is for free speech, he clamps down on speech a lot it when he doesn't like it. So if you want that too, that's great and hah, hah if you want to do it that way.”

Swisher suggested Musk could merge X with Trump’s social media company Truth Social.

“That could be interesting and incredibly corrupt and he'll use it as a propaganda organ which is precisely why he bought it,” she said. “This was a great investment by Elon Musk in Donald J. Trump.”

Jennings argued that Musk “wasn’t elected” and merely “supports Donald Trump, and now he's going to have influence because his side won.”


“Honestly, I hear all of this carping about Elon Musk and it sounds like sour grapes from the side of the ball that shunned this guy and now they're paying for it,” he said, later arguing “you can't begrudge this man, his opportunity to participate in the political system in the way that he sees fit.”

“Nobody begrudges his ability to speak,” Swisher shot back. “What they begrudge is the flood of misinformation and all kinds of things that happen on that platform — which is uncontrolled and it's not about free speech, because he decides when and where to do it.”

Swisher noted Trump and Elon “may not be able to coexist in the same place” as they’re both “very petulant” and like attention.

"He and Trump will clash at some point, much in the same way that he clashed with the Biden Administration,” Swisher predicted.

The tech reporter added that while Trump gets credit for his space exploration and electric cars, “what he doesn't get credit for [is] his heinous behavior and bringing people down — and that troubles me.”

“And you can separate it from the entrepreneurship if you have half a brain,” the reporter added.

Reprinted with permission from Alternet.

Elon Musk

Corruption Unlimited: Donald Trump's New American Oligarchy

When he bounded onstage at the Trump vulgarfest in Madison Square Garden on Sunday night, Elon Musk declared himself to be not just MAGA, but "dark, gothic MAGA."

Believe him.

The sorry spectacle of leading industrialists, newspaper owners, tech executives, Silicon Valley entrepreneurs and others seeking to ensure their good standing with Trump reflects a blend of cowardice and cupidity. Mark Zuckerberg, whom Trump labeled a "true enemy of the people" as recently as March, and called "Zuckerschmuck," demonstrated that there are no hard feelings where money and power are concerned. He let it be known that he was moved by Trump's survival of an assassination attempt, claiming that it stirred his patriotic heart to see a "badass" pump his fist.

Jeff Bezos, whose businesses span the globe and make him about as bulletproof as a figure can be in the face of a would-be autocrat, decided that his interest in government contracts for Blue Origin outweighs his dedication to American democracy.

This is what a second Trump term would bring: fat cats getting theirs. Trump is the most corrupt figure ever to disgrace the White House and has made no secret of his intention to reward friends and punish enemies if he regains power. The would-be oligarchs recognize the new game and are preparing to operate in a world where government impartiality and above-board decision making are relegated to the dustbin of history.

The Supreme Court has greased the already slippery skids of Trumpian favor-granting by bestowing unreviewable immunity on presidents for official acts and presumed immunity for all but purely private acts. Put those things together and you have a perfect recipe for massive official corruption.

Consider tariffs. Trump claims to believe that they are the magic elixir for every ill (including subsidizing the costs of child care and obviating the necessity for income taxes) and denies that they will raise prices for American consumers. That's all ludicrous, of course. What he doesn't say is that they are also an engraved invitation to favor-seeking from large companies and other interests.

Trump asserts that he has vast discretion to impose tariffs unilaterally, without the consent of Congress, and for once, he's correct. Under the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, the Trade Act of 1974 and other laws, the president can impose sweeping tariffs in the name of national security. This was the rationale Trump relied upon in 2018 to slap tariffs on steel coming from that major national security threat called Canada.

And tariffs are only one of the scores of paths for official corruption. There are government licenses, approval of mergers and acquisitions, leases for oil and gas development, and much more. Trump has already made his family and himself a huge pile through access to power and stands ready to open the floodgates in January.

Earlier this year, Musk said he would not contribute to or support anyone for president. A few months later, he was leaping into the air at Trump rallies. It's a safe bet that he has seen an opportunity. Trump may think he has co-opted Musk, but it's far more likely that Trump is the one being used.

Musk is younger, smarter, and far richer than Trump. He controls a business empire that dwarfs not just Trump's holdings, but those of every other capitalist. Starlink now owns nearly two-thirds of all commercial satellites in orbit around Earth and provides Musk the power to grant or withhold internet access to crisis areas of the globe on a whim. The U.S. government begged him not to withdraw access from Ukraine, which uses Starlink as its chief provider of battlefield communication, and for now, Musk has agreed, but as a Pentagon official told the Week, "We are living off his good graces. That sucks."

Boeing can't compete with him. Nor can NASA, which was recently obliged to go hat in hand to Musk to launch a rescue operation for two stranded astronauts on the International Space Station.

Then there's Tesla, which controls 57 percent of the EV market (and has a huge manufacturing presence in China). And Musk owns X (Twitter), whose global influence persists despite Musk's decision to open it to fascists, antisemites and assorted disinformation peddlers.

The Wall Street Journal recently reported that Musk has been in frequent contact with Vladimir Putin since 2022. The Journal further reports that Putin has asked Musk to deactivate Starlink over Taiwan as a favor to China, one of Putin's chief allies in the war on Ukraine.

Whom does Musk support — the United States, Russia, China or whoever is best for business at the moment? It's a measure of how dangerous this moment is that we need to ask. Even if Kamala Harris wins the election, the unprecedented global power of private oligarchs like Musk will be difficult to rein in. If Trump wins, we're entering uncharted territory where private actors with vast wealth and power join with a corrupt president to pursue their own ends and not those of the people of the United States. Welcome to oligarchy, American style.

Mona Charen is policy editor of The Bulwark and host of the "Beg to Differ" podcast. Her new book, Hard Right: The GOP's Drift Toward Extremism, is available now.

Reprinted with permission from Creators.

Elon Musk

When Republicans Warn Us About Their Ruinous Agenda, Better Believe Them

It’s a lesson that we all should have learned many years ago: When Republicans tell you what they mean to inflict on you and your family, better believe them.

The most painful example in recent years of the public’s failure to comprehend what was coming -- despite dozens of announcements -- is the Republican right's successful assault on reproductive freedom. Donald Trump loudly and repeatedly promised a majority of Supreme Court justices who would overturn Roe v. Wade, as did the Republican senators who confirmed them. And still many Americans seemed to be surprised when the high court ripped down principle and precedent to undo that fundamental right.

Now, in the final days of this election campaign, we are hearing from Republicans (and their billionaire masters) what they plan to do if Trump returns to the White House. They have a sweeping agenda to impoverish the middle class while pursuing power and privilege for themselves.

House Speaker Mike Johnson just issued a clear warning that they still yearn to cripple America's health care system in the name of their "free market" utopia. While he and Trump both deny that they will try again (for the 62nd time!) to repeal the Affordable Care Act, Johnson vowed that “health care is going to be a big part of the agenda” should Republicans win – and that their aim will be “massive reform” that “takes a blowtorch to the regulatory state.” This blather portends the end of the reforms that protect people with pre-existing conditions and allow the young to get coverage on their family’s insurance until age 26. Neither those nor other crucial ACA protections would survive those massive changes that neither Trump nor Johnson will specify before the election.

And that’s merely the opening gambit in the Trump Republican scheme to ruin their fellow Americans.

The far-right financiers surrounding Trump have realized that his obsession with tariffs can be repurposed to line their own pockets – so they’re suddenly eager to abandon the principles of free trade they once cherished. For billionaires like Elon Musk and Peter Thiel, the tariff scheme is attractive simply as a form of regressive taxation, siphoning hundreds of billions of dollars from ordinary consumers in the form of far higher prices. Those tariff revenues could replace the proceeds of the progressive income tax – which the rich hate to pay -- while shifting the burden onto middle-class and poor families.

But Musk has even more nasty surprises in store, as he recently suggested on his X social media platform. He has invested vast sums – upward of $75 million or more – in Trump’s campaign, for which he expects to be named reichsmarshall of "government efficiency,” with unaccountable power to slash programs and fire employees. The world’ richest man breezily advised middle-class Americans that we should expect to suffer “hardship” in the early days of a Trump presidency, owing to the enormous cuts and layoffs he will dictate. (Of course he also promises a “sustained recovery” in the wake of economic disaster, although historically that isn’t how things work out under Republican administrations. You can look it up.)

According to Musk, his objective in a Trump regime would be to cut $2 trillion from future spending – even as Trump has promises trillions more in tax cuts for the billionaires. How does that math work? It doesn’t work at all unless, as J.D. Vance recently confided to a podcast host, Musk’s “government efficiency commission” sharply reduces Social Security and Medicare payments. “I’ve spoken with Elon a little bit about [the task force],” said the Republican vice presidential nominee. “And the thing that’s complicated about this, man, is it’s going to look much different in, say, the Department of Defense versus Social Security.”

We know Trump won’t cut defense spending, which he has always sought to increase with his Space Force and other boondoggles. The only alternative will be enormous cuts in Social Security and Medicare, which account for about $2 trillion in spending annually.

Optimists may imagine that Musk, who no doubt considers himself a “stable genius,” will come up with new ways to save trillions without harming the American people or the economy. Unfortunately his record as an executive is not reassuring. Upon purchasing Twitter (later renamed “X”), he dismissed about 80 percent of the staff and turned the site into a haven for neo-Nazis and the other extremists and conspiracy theories he apparently admires. The company's market value has never recovered and his investment has roughly the same value as if he had put a blowtorch to $44 billion in cash.

The truth about Musk as a businessman is that his profits have depended heavily on government subsidies from the beginning.

But that arrangement can still prop him up, so long as he and his cronies control the government. Musk, Thiel and the rest of the MAGA billionaires will tell you they are backing Trump because they want to “kill the woke mind virus” or “protect freedom” or some such cliched piffle. In fact they are driving a campaign to further enrich and empower themselves – and the rest of us are just road kill.

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Corona Virus

Trending

World