Tag: law
House Republican Furious Over New York Social Security Office Closing

House Republican Furious Over New York Social Security Office Closing

One House Republican in a swing district is now publicly rebuking President Donald Trump's administration after one of his budget cuts directly impacted his constituents.

Acting Social Security Administration (SSA) head Leland Dudek recently announced that he would be not be renewing the lease on the agency's office in White Plains, New York when it comes up on May 31, and that he was rejecting a bipartisan effort by Reps. George Latimer (D-NY) and Mike Lawler (R-NY) to keep it open. Dudek attributed the closure to persistent mold issues in the building that the General Services Administration (GSA) had been unable to address.

In a letter to Dudek, both Latimer and Lawler emphasized that the White Plains office was the only one serving residents in the Lower Hudson Valley, and that closing it would make it that much harder for their constituents to be able to attend hearings that will determine their benefits. He tweeted: "Concerns about mold don’t justify abandoning folks in the Lower Hudson Valley."

"The decision to close the only Social Security Hearing Office in the Hudson Valley is a slap in the face to thousands of my constituents who rely on these services," Lawler stated. "This office handles over 2,000 backlogged cases and conducts hundreds of in-person hearings every year. Telling my constituents that they now have to travel hours to Lower Manhattan, New Haven, the Bronx or Goshen is completely unacceptable."

According to South African centibillionaire Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), the lease on the White Plains office is approximately $511,000 per year. And that lease is one of nearly two dozen cancelled for the SSA across multiple states. Like Reps. Latimer and Lawler, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) has cautioned against closing the White Plains office, stressing that the building is vital for thousands of New Yorkers who rely on SSA benefits.

"As the only hearing office in the lower Hudson Valley region, it’s closure will negatively impact thousands of constituents who reside in these seven counties," Gillibrand wrote in a February letter. "If SSA does not open an alternative site, beneficiaries will be required to travel between 24 and 135 miles to be serviced by the closest office in New York City, Albany, New Jersey and Connecticut."

Lawler's public stance against one of Trump's budget cuts is particularly noteworthy, given that he recently lauded the administration's efforts to cut out "waste, fraud and abuse" in government agencies during a tele-town hall. The New York Republican didn't specifically talk about DOGE's cuts to the SSA, but he did tell constituents: "There are things they're doing that I think are beneficial. There are other things where I think they're going very fast, and they need to dot their i's and cross their t's before pulling the trigger."

Reprinted with permission from Alternet.

Murdoch Newspapers Split With Fox News Over Trump's Lawless Chaos

Murdoch Newspapers Split With Fox News Over Trump's Lawless Chaos

In recent days, Fox News has vociferously defended President Donald Trump for deporting some 250 people to El Salvador and attacked the judge who tried to stop the flights. In contrast, the network's sister outlets The Wall Street Journal and New York Post have published strong editorials and op-eds supporting the role of the judiciary, arguing that Republicans and the Trump administration are employing a “terrible tactic” and entering into a “disreputable racket” by advocating for the judge’s impeachment.

After invoking the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 — which allows the government to deport people without the due process of immigration law and was previously used to intern Japanese Americans during World War II — to target the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua, the Trump administration deported some 250 alleged gang members to El Salvador. Many of the deported migrants reportedly had no criminal records in the U.S. After civil rights organizations filed a lawsuit, U.S. District Court Judge James Boasberg ordered that the deportations be halted and flights already in progress return to the U.S. The Trump administration nevertheless continued the flights in “possible defiance” of the judge’s order.

Since this legal skirmish, the Trump administration has escalated its rhetoric against the judiciary. Trump “border czar” Tom Homan told Fox News on March 17, “We’re not stopping. I don't care what the judges think. I don’t care what the left thinks. We’re coming.” Trump himself attacked Boasberg, calling for his impeachment on Truth Social.

Homan’s views appear to be normative at Fox, with network figures attacking Boasberg’s credibility and seemingly coalescing around the idea that he lacks the authority to issue such an order. On March 18, Fox News legal editor Kerri Urbahn said Boasberg “was not elected president of the United States and therefore does not have authority over matters pertaining to immigration, national security, and foreign policy.”

She continued, “You have judges who are unilaterally inserting themselves into the executive branch, interfering with the president and his team’s ability to carry out his agenda.” Fox host Jeanine Pirro called Boasberg “stupid” for thinking he can stop Trump’s deportation actions. Her co-host Dana Perino belittled the judge, saying Boasberg’s ruling is like “when a low-level security officer gets a whistle, and then they just want to blow it all the time, and they feel powerful with the whistle.”

One of Fox News’ prime-time hosts, Jesse Watters, seemed to suggest that Boasberg could have a “conflict of interest” in the case due to the political leanings of his family members.

Fox News also praised the Trump administration’s deal with El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele to utilize a Salvadoran mega prison — which, according to human rights’ agencies, has been responsible for repeated human rights violations — to house the deported migrants. Fox News contributor Sara Carter, who visited the prison in 2024, called it “incredible” on Hannity and praised Bukele, saying he “was able to clean up his nation and remove these nefarious, horrible people off the streets that were holding his citizens prisoner.” She added, “The cooperation you’re seeing between President Bukele and President Trump is so significant. We cannot stop this problem in the Western Hemisphere without this type of cooperation.”

By contrast, Murdoch print outlets seem to be taking Trump’s attacks on the judges seriously.

While the Wall Street Journal expressed support for the deportations of alleged gang members, it noted in its March 17 editorial that it is “troubling to see U.S. officials appear to disdain the law in the name of upholding it.” The outlet took particular issue with the Trump administration’s “reliance” on Bukele, calling it “troubling” and noting: “Gang violence [in El Salvador] is down and he’s popular, but his methods border on the barbaric. The country was desperate, but Mr. Bukele has destroyed independent legal institutions rather than restore the rule of law.”

The New York Post published a similar opinion the next day, saying, “Playing footsie with judicial disobedience — and calling for retribution against judges whom the administration dislikes — is a terrible tactic.” The piece also noted, “It’s more important than ever for the judiciary to remain an independent force capable of standing in the breach.”

On March 18, as Trump and Republicans continued to escalate tensions with the judiciary, calling for Boasberg’s impeachment, Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts put out a rare statement rebuking such calls. Roberts wrote, “For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision.” Later that night, Trump doubled down on his attack and called Boasberg a “Radical Left Lunatic Judge [who] wants to assume the role of President.”

The next day, the Wall Street Journal published an editorial titled “Chief Justice Roberts Rejects GOP Calls to Impeach Judges” that called the impeachment of judges the Trump administration disagrees with a “disreputable racket.” The Journal’s editorial board wrote that such an action is “rare and is typically pursued only amid evidence of corruption,” and warned, “If impeachment is the remedy for every adverse judicial ruling, we wouldn’t have a judiciary left.”

Yet again, Fox News went to bat for the president. Pirro, a former judge herself, said it was “inappropriate” for Roberts to put out a statement, adding that he “should recognize that he is a very important player in all of this, and he shouldn't get involved in politics, and that is what he is doing. He is getting involved in politics. He is setting up a negative situation.”

The Five’s self-identified comedian co-host Greg Gutfeld took a more aggressive stance against Roberts, telling him to “shut the f up” because Trump is the “f-ing president of the United States who protects 300 million plus people. He is a leader who does not have the luxury of opening up his little books to read, oh, my God, maybe he didn't do it the right way.” Fox News host Mark Levin told Roberts to “grow a pair” and suggested Roberts was the aggressor: “This government exists for we the people. It doesn't exist for John Roberts, the judges, Congress, or anybody else.”

Reprinted with permission from Media Matters.

John Roberts

Is Chief Justice Ready To Confront Trump Regime's Lawlessness?

"For more than two centuries," Chief Justice John Roberts wrote Tuesday in an extraordinary statement, "it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision. The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose."

"Not appropriate," huh? That's really going to scare them.

The chief justice's statement, which might have been enough to give a former president pause, is not likely to make much of a difference with this crowd. It comes in the face of what appears to be open defiance of an order by the chief judge of the District of Columbia District Court, James Boasberg, to return planes carrying migrants alleged to be members of a Venezuelan gang to the United States while he considered whether their removal was lawful. The planes did not turn around.

Rep. Brandon Gill, R-Texas, said on social media on Tuesday that he had filed articles of impeachment against Boasberg, asserting that the judge's rulings amounted to "high crimes and misdemeanors."

This followed President Donald Trump taking to social media himself to condemn the Judge as a "Radical Left Lunatic of a Judge ... This judge, like many of the Crooked Judges' I am forced to appear before, should be IMPEACHED!!!

Boasberg is a highly respected federal judge. He is the definition of a bipartisan appointee. He has been on the bench for 23 years, having first been appointed by President George W. Bush in 2002 to the D.C. Superior Court, and to the U.S. District Court by President Barack Obama.

He is not about to be impeached: Only eight judges in American history have been impeached, none of them for making a decision the administration doesn't agree with. While it takes only a majority of the House of Representatives to pass articles of impeachment, it takes two-thirds of the Senate — which Republicans don't have — to convict.

The real question is whether his — and other federal judges' orders — will be followed by an administration that seems determined to bend the law in its direction and defy the rule of law, and what John Roberts is going to do about it.

"We're not stopping," border czar Tom Homan told Fox News on Monday. "I don't care what the judges think — I don't care what the left thinks. We're coming."

The administration is still playing games in court, arguing that the planes took off before the judge's written (as opposed to verbal) order was handed down and that the judge lacked jurisdiction to order them to turn around once they were in international airspace. That might avert a constitutional crisis this time around, but it will not avert the coming constitutional crisis.

The chief justice is going to have to do more than comment about what is "not appropriate." The rhetoric that might have moved former presidents is not going to move Donald Trump and Tom Homan. Roberts may think his warning, and that of other federal judges in recent weeks, will make a difference, but there is simply no evidence that Trump is listening. Like Homan, he keeps on coming.

Roberts has no one to blame but himself for affording broad immunity to the president to disobey the law. The chickens are coming home to roost. Federal district judges need to know the Supreme Court will stand behind them and their rulings. It is one thing to defy and demonize a single federal judge, as they are trying to do with Boasberg. It is another to defy the Supreme Court. That is where this is headed. John Roberts had best be ready. Our democracy is depending on him.

Reprinted with permission from Creators.

'I'm -- We Are The Federal Law"' Sputters Trump As He Threatens Maine Governor

'I'm -- We Are The Federal Law"' Sputters Trump As He Threatens Maine Governor

Just 48 hours after declaring himself “king,” President Donald Trump, in a highly public display, launched a verbal attack on Maine Democratic Governor Janet Mills over his stance on transgender girls in sports. He threatened to cut all federal funding — literally defund the entire state — and vowed to end her political career, in what is being called a “terse” exchange.

“The president directly threatened Mills over the state’s refusal to comply with a recent executive order that would bar transgender athletes from competing on women’s sports teams,” NBC affiliate NewsCenter Maine reports.

Speaking to a bipartisan group of governors at the White House, Trump asked Governor Mills (video below) if her state would not “comply” with his executive order.

“Is Maine here? Is the governor of Maine here? Are you not going to comply with it?”

“I’m complying with state and federal laws,” Mills replied.

“Well, I’m — we are the federal law,” Trump angrily shot back. “Well you’d better do it. You better do it, because you’re not going to get any federal funding at all if you don’t. And by the way, your population, even though it’s somewhat liberal, although I did very well there, your population doesn’t want men playing in women’s sports. So you’d better comply, because otherwise you’re not getting any — any — federal funding.”

“See you in court,” Mills responded.

“Good, I’ll see you in court. I look forward to that,” Trump said. “That should be a real easy one. And enjoy your life after governor, ’cause I don’t think you’ll be in elected politics.”

Governor Mills later released a statement.

“If the President attempts to unilaterally deprive Maine school children of the benefit of Federal funding, my Administration and the Attorney General will take all appropriate and necessary legal action to restore that funding and the academic opportunity it provides. The State of Maine will not be intimidated by the President’s threats.”

Critics are slamming the president.

“An incredibly revealing exchange, but especially a window into Trump’s view when he says ‘We are the federal law.’ As opposed to, you know, actual laws (& constitutional provisions) that authorize and limit what he can do,” noted CNN senior political analyst Ronald Brownstein.

“L’etat c’est moi as Louis XIV might (or not) have said,” Brownstein added, which loosely translates into “I am the state,” or, “I myself am the nation.”

“Not so easy to cosplay as a king when you aren’t hiding behind a phone screen,” Human Rights Campaign national press secretary Brandon Wolf commented.

“The distance between the most benign possible interpretation of Trump’s public statements and clear autocracy has narrowed to the width of a hairline fracture. Yet Republicans continue to insist that what he ACTUALLY meant was something totally cool and not autocratic,” observed veteran Democratic political strategist Tom Bonier.

“THIS IS HOW YOU DO IT. Right in the White House, Maine Gov Janet Mills goes toe to toe with Trump. Wow,” remarked veteran journalist turned media critic Jennifer Schulze.

Democratic former Washington governor Jay Inslee applauded the Maine governor: “Governor Janet Mills has brought thousands of heat pumps to Maine and now has brought some righteous heat to Donald Trump. Way to bring the heater Janet!”

Trump has signed at least four executive orders threatening the civil rights of transgender people in America.

Watch the video below or at this link.

Reprinted with permission from Alternet.

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Corona Virus

Trending

World