Tag: law enforcement
Matt Gaetz

GOP Senators Rejecting Trump's Nomination Of Gaetz As Attorney General

Former Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) may be the next Attorney General of the United States if President-elect Donald Trump has his way. But even with a Republican-controlled Senate, Gaetz's future is uncertain.

On the social media platform Bluesky, journalist Joshua Friedman quoted Punchbowl News co-founder John Bresnahan who said that Republicans were "stunned — and not in a good way" by the prospect of Gaetz being in charge of the DOJ and its roughly 115,000 employees. He added that Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) was "so exasperated by reporters asking him about Gaetz that he stopped talking and stood there stone-faced for 30 seconds."

Senate Republicans' immediate reaction to the news of Gaetz being selected to head the Department of Justice were not positive. The Washington Post's Liz Goodwin tweeted a thread of various responses she got from Republicans after the news broke of the president-elect's pick for the nation's top law enforcement official.

Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) is one of the more moderate members of the Senate Republican Conference. She told Goodwin that there will likely be "many many questions" for the Florida Republican at his confirmation hearing in the Senate Judiciary Committee, and that she was personally "shocked" after hearing that Trump picked him.

Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), who is another GOP Senate moderate, gave nonverbal disapproval of Gaetz's nomination. Goodwin tweeted that she asked Murkowski: "Do you think he's a serious candidate?" The Alaska senator reportedly shook her head "no" before walking onto the Senate floor.

Republicans' apparent uneasiness about promoting Gaetz to head the DOJ didn't end with more moderate members of the conference. Sen. Katie Britt (R-AL), who delivered the official Republican response to President Joe Biden's State of the Union address in March, told Goodwin "I got nothing for you" when asked to give her thoughts on Gaetz.

Even the most positive responses to Gaetz's nomination were merely noncommittal. Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC) would only say he would give the Florida congressman an "honest look," though he also noted that Gaetz had "jousted" with Senate Republicans on several issues in the past. Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-ND) said that while he was typically "bullish" on the president-elect's Cabinet picks, he would still "have to noodle that one a little while" when asked about Gaetz as attorney general.

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) is preparing to become the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee once the Republican Senate majority is sworn in on January 3. But even he said that Gaetz would likely have to answer "tough questions" from committee members in his confirmation hearing. Goodwin reported that Graham said he was "surprised" by Trump's decision to tap Gaetz for DOJ.

If confirmed, Gaetz would be the first Attorney General of the United States to have been previously investigated by the DOJ. While Gaetz was ultimately not charged for alleged sex trafficking of minors, that didn't spare him from the Republican-controlled House Committee on Ethics. The committee announced in June that the allegations about their colleague "merit continued review," as it had identified "additional allegations" that weren't specified. (EDITORS NOTE: Gaetz resigned from the House on November 13, one day before the ethics committee was set to release its report on his alleged offenses.)

Republicans also have a fractious relationship with Gaetz due to his role in orchestrating the ouster of former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) in October of 2023. His work to strip McCarthy of the gavel led to a weeks-long public intra-party struggle that resulted in three separate House GOP leaders vying for the speakership before the job ultimately went to Rep. Mike Johnson (R-LA).

Reprinted with permission from Alternet.

The Real Meaning Of Trump's Threat Against Liz Cheney

The Real Meaning Of Trump's Threat Against Liz Cheney

In the context of calling Liz Cheney a “war hawk,” Trump says she should be given “a rifle” and face what amounts to a firing squad of “nine barrels.”

Let’s get something straight. This man has no idea what he’s talking about. As a draft dodger, Donald Trump successfully escaped being trained to use a military rifle. He wouldn’t know what to do with a rifle if you handed it to him. Ironically, Liz Cheney probably does.

In the closing days of this campaign, Trump is defaulting to threats of violence and arrest. In a post on his social media account, Trump threatened to arrest “Lawyers, Political Operatives, Donors, Illegal Voters, & Corrupt Election Officials. Those involved in unscrupulous behavior will be sought out, caught, and prosecuted at levels, unfortunately, never seen before in our Country.”

The New York Times reported this week that Trump’s threats against election officials appear to be having some effect. In an article entitled "The Army of Election Officials Ready to Reject the Vote," the Times describes efforts in Nevada, Arizona, Georgia, and Pennsylvania by election boards to reject certification of the vote if the election does not go Trump’s way. The people described in the article are partisan Republicans. When even they fear arrest and prosecution by their own candidate, something is seriously wrong in this country.

NPR reported this morning that “Military experts are preparing for possible election violence or unrest.” Earlier in the week, NPR reported that local police are “preparing for possible violence against election workers.”

The front line in the election for Liz Cheney is her own home in Wyoming. The front lines for election workers are the polling places where they will go to work next Tuesday. The idea of “battleground states” has become a reality, where armed police officers may be necessary to secure the Constitutional right to vote. One political party and one presidential candidate are responsible for turning this election into a warzone.

Lucian K. Truscott IV, a graduate of West Point, has had a 50-year career as a journalist, novelist, and screenwriter. He has covered Watergate, the Stonewall riots, and wars in Lebanon, Iraq, and Afghanistan. He is also the author of five bestselling novels. You can subscribe to his daily columns at luciantruscott.substack.com and follow him on Twitter @LucianKTruscott and on Facebook at Lucian K. Truscott IV.

Reprinted with permission from Lucian Truscott.

Schumer

Schumer To Senate Republicans:  Choose Trump -- Or Law Enforcement

The former popular-vote-losing, twice-impeached, insurrectionist Republican frontrunner for the White House has put his party in a bind following his arrest on 34 felony charges of falsifying business records. That part isn’t what Republicans are fretting over. No, it’s the former guy’s calls for defunding the FBI and Justice Department following his arrest that’s once more thrown them into disarray.

Enter Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, who is planning to introduce a resolution to formally reject Trump’s calls to defund federal law enforcement. “The former President and his allies in Congress must not subjugate justice and public safety because of their own personal grievances,” Schumer said. Trump’s demand that Congress strip funding for the Department of Justice is “a baseless, self-serving broadside against the men and women who keep our nation safe,” he said.

Those Trump allies in Congress are mostly in the House, and in power. Rep. Jim Jordan, the Ohio Republican who holds the chair of the Judiciary Committee, is all for it. “We control the power of the purse” Jordan said. “And we’re gonna have to look at the appropriations process and limit funds going to some of these agencies, particularly the ones who are engaged in the most egregious behavior.” That’s what he told Fox’s Maria Bartiromo following Trump’s indictment. “So the DOJ and the FBI?” Bartiromo asked. “Yeah,” Jordan confirmed.

Barely Speaker Kevin McCarthy is giving Jordan free rein to keep up his attacks on the Justice Department and FBI and the funding for them. His pinned tweet calls out the “outrageous abuse of power by a radical DA who lets violent criminals walk as he pursues political vengeance” and says, “I’m directing relevant committees to immediately investigate if federal funds are being used to subvert our democracy by interfering in elections with politically motivated prosecutions.”

That’s a headache for the Republican leader in the Senate, Mitch McConnell, who wants his team to be running on law and order in 2024. Saying that Democrats are the ones who want to defund the police and the GOP is the only thing standing between them and chaos and lawlessness is key to that effort.

An anonymous Senate Republican aide probably tied to McConnell toldThe Hill that there will not be support in the Senate for this. “I understand the former president is frustrated, but that’s not going to happen,” the source said.

GOP strategists are pretty unhappy with the push, too. “Just because Democrats want to defund police, I don’t think it’s smart politically or as a policy to say, ‘Well, we should defund the FBI,’” Matt Dole, an Ohio-based Republican strategist, told The Hill.

Another GOP strategist, Whit Ayers, pointed out that there’s a reality-based problem here. “The Department of Justice had nothing to do with this case, the FBI had nothing to do with this case, but we’re supposed to defund two entities that had nothing to do with the case. Does that really make any sense to anyone?” he said. Apparently Ayers has not met the House GOP.

Schumer is going to make the 49 GOP senators vote on whether or not they really do support law enforcement. His nonbinding resolution doesn’t have the effect of law, but will ask the GOP to “recognize the dedication of the people who serve in the law enforcement agencies, condemn calls to defund Justice and the FBI, and reject partisan attempts to degrade public trust in them.”

“The former President and his allies in Congress must not subjugate justice and public safety because of their own personal grievances,” Schumer said.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos.

Law Enforcement Agencies Bracing As Possible Trump Indictment Looms

Law Enforcement Agencies Bracing As Possible Trump Indictment Looms

NBC News has confirmed multiple law enforcement agencies are preparing for a possible Trump indictment in the hush money investigation of a $130,000 payment to porn actor Stormy Daniels.

Numerous agencies are reportedly involved, including the New York Police Department, the FBI’s Joint Terrorism Task Force, the Secret Service, and other court-related agencies.

Last week, former Trump attorney Michael Cohen appeared before the grand jury on two consecutive days and Stormy Daniels met with New York prosecutors, both strong indicators indictments are imminent.

Cohen appeared on Good Morning America after his grand jury testimony, telling host George Stephanopolous that prosecutors had all the information they needed: "I promise you and I promise the American people that all the information that is needed in order to create the indictment to get a prosecution and a conviction is in the hands of the district attorney."

Law enforcement are right to be concerned. After all, we have seen the lengths Donald Trump and his followers will go to trying to protect him and/or his reputation and power. He might be a con man, but he has motivated many to violence in the recent past.

In September he was asked about the classified documents case and he ominously warned, “I think if it happened, I think you’d have problems in this country the likes of which perhaps we’ve never seen before. I don’t think the people of the United States would stand for it.”

When asked what “problems” he meant, he said: “I think they’d have big problems. Big problems. I just don’t think they’d stand for it. They will not sit still and stand for this ultimate of hoaxes.”

I think we all know what he meant.

So buckle up and stay tuned.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos.

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Corona Virus

Trending

World