Tag: los angeles
Right-Wing Media Insist It's "DEI" -- Not Climate Change -- Behind LA Wildfires

Right-Wing Media Insist It's "DEI" -- Not Climate Change -- Behind LA Wildfires

Right-wing media are trying to delegitimize climate change as a real and growing threat to the West Coast, just as that threat becomes most evident. Several unusual January wildfires have been burning in Los Angeles County since January 7. Despite the clear connection between global warming and the increasingly dry conditions that lead to fire hazards, right-wing media are following their familiar playbook and blaming what they call California’s “failed” policies for the ongoing crisis.

  • Californians are struggling to control ongoing fires, as U.S. communities are ill-prepared for year-round extreme weather

    • The two largest fires, Palisades and Eaton, have collectively burned over 164,000 acres of Los Angeles County. Nearly 173,000 people are under evacuation warnings or orders in LA County, at least 25 people have died, and over 17,000 structures have been damaged or destroyed. The Palisades fire was 19% contained and the Eaton fire was at 45% containment as of publication. [Los Angeles Times, 1/14/25; Cal Fire, accessed 1/15/25; ktla.com, 1/14/25; NBC Los Angeles, 1/14/25]
    • Like in many other cities, LA’s municipal water system is not designed to handle multiple massive fires at once. Reports that the hydrants being used to put out the fires were running low spurred misinformation about water shortages due to a lack of reservoirs or related to California’s water policies that divert water from Northern California to Southern California. These rumors proved to be misleading: Even though there is enough water, there isn’t enough pressure to get water to go where firefights need it most. As the LAist has noted in the past, “Fire hydrants have also run dry in the case of other wildfires that spread to urban areas, including the 2017 Tubbs Fire, 2024’s Mountain Fire and 2023’s Maui wildfires.” [Media Matters, 1/10/25; The LAist, 1/9/25, 8/15/23]

    • Forecasters were predicting more of the dry and intense Santa Ana winds that were fueling the fires. The winds, which typically occur during the colder months, are severely impeding efforts to contain the fires. NBC Los Angeles reported that “planes dumping water and retardant on impacted areas have been unable to take to the sky at times since the fires began because of the dangerous conditions presented by the winds.” On January 14 and 15, Los Angeles was expecting winds of up to 65 mph. As of January 14, the National Weather Service had declared red flag warnings, signaling “an increased risk of fire danger,” as well as a “particularly dangerous situation” for parts of the area, which National Weather Service meteorologist Rose Schoenfeld said is “one of the loudest ways that we can shout.” [National Weather Service, accessed 1/14/25, 1/14/25; NBC Los Angeles, 1/13/25; NPR, 1/8/25; Los Angeles Times, 1/13/25]
    • U.S. communities and infrastructure are ill-prepared for the climate-fueled extreme weather events that are now happening year round. On X, CBS national correspondent Jonathan Vigliotti posted, “American homes were built for an environment that no longer exists. This - like all of the disasters this century, from Florida to Hawaii - must be a call to action. This is the second time in one month Malibu was hit by fire.” Chad Hanson, a forest and fire ecologist and the president of the John Muir Project, told the Los Angeles Times, “The fact is that forest management is not stopping weather- and climate-driven fires.” Carlos Martín, an expert on housing adaptation and climate change, told Fast Company that cities are relying on the federal government because “the resources just aren’t there locally, and the damages are way more than anybody ever anticipated.” Martín said climate change mitigation and adaptation will be key in preparing for future disasters. “It’s like taking a pill to prevent the disease versus getting the disease treated afterwards. That’s the way we have to start thinking about these events: What we used to think of as individual crises [are now] chronic things,” he added. [Media Matters, 1/10/25; Twitter/X, 1/8/25; Los Angeles Times, 8/21/21; Fast Company, 1/11/25]
  • There is ample evidence that climate change is creating hazardous conditions that supercharge existing wildfires in the Western US

    • On MSNBC, UCLA climate scientist and Southern California climate expert Daniel Swain explained that “the level of vegetation and landscape scale dryness” was at “highly anomalous, even record-breaking levels.” Swain continued: “This year, there has been virtually no rainfall at all in the LA region, even as we head towards mid-January. That is extremely unusual.” He added that strong winds typically arrive after the first rainfall of the season. On top of that, “the extreme heatwaves that we saw in the same region this past autumn” set the stage for intense winds to cause extensive damage. [MSNBC, Chris Jansing Reports, 1/8/25]
    • One peer-reviewed 2016 study found that “human-caused climate change caused over half of the documented increases in fuel aridity since the 1970s and doubled the cumulative forest fire area since 1984.” The study found drought as a result of human-caused climate change caused vegetation to become significantly more dry and flammable over the span of about 45 years, leading to more forested areas burning. [The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 10/10/16]
    • Attribution studies have shown that climate change has increased the severity or likelihood of extreme heat, drought, and wildfires on the West Coast. According to Carbon Brief, which covers climate science, “Attribution studies calculate whether, and by how much, climate change affected the intensity, frequency or impact of extremes.” In one such 2023 study, California researchers found that “nearly all of the observed increase in BA [burned area] over the past half-century is attributable to” human-caused climate change. [Carbon Brief, 11/18/24; The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 6/12/23]
  • Right-wing media misleadingly told viewers that climate change had no impact on the fires and has simply been a distraction from more important problems

    • In reaction to a CNN segment that questioned why more people aren’t searching for the term “climate change” on Google as the fires make headlines, Daily Wire host Michael Knowles falsely claimed, “That’s happening because there is no connection between the wildfires and climate change.” He continued: “They’re not drawing the connection between those two things because those things are unrelated.” [The Daily Wire, The Michael Knowles Show, 1/14/25]
    • On Fox Business, anchor Cheryl Casone highlighted the Wall Street Journal editorial board’s attack on meteorologists for pointing out concerning weather patterns that lead to wildfires because “California has had those types of seasons” and “ a hundred years ago … nobody was talking about carbon emissions.” Calling it a “scathing, scathing attack on Gavin Newsom and the state’s failed policies,” Casone emphasized a part of the editorial that says to “look out for the word — the phrase ‘hydroclimate whiplash.’ They’re going to start blaming the seasons. The Journal points, you know, it was wet, it was wet winter, and then it was a dry summer. Well guess what? The Journal says, you know what, California also had those types of seasons in the 1910s and the 1920s.” [Fox Business, Mornings With Maria, 1/14/25]
    • On Fox News, OutKick’s Clay Travis misleadingly claimed that because wildfires in California were also widespread in the 1800s, “this isn’t climate change.” According to the University of California, Davis, an estimated 4.5 million areas burned annually in California before the gold rush, but this included widespread controlled burns carried out by Native Americans. In 2020, the New York Times reported “more than five million acres charred in Oregon, California and Washington State.” The Times did not mention controlled burns, and the paper called the fires an “inescapable crisis.” [Fox News, Jesse Watters Primetime, 1/13/25; University of California, Davis, 10/1/20; The Mercury News, 8/24/20; The New York Times, 9/15/20]
    • On the podcast Elijahstreams, which claims to host “prophets” and “prophetic guests,” host Steve Shultz and Christian podcast host Johnny Enlow attacked those who are speaking about climate change in connection with the fire, claiming that they’re on “the opposite side of righteousness.” Shultz, a conspiracy theorist who has pushed conspiracy theories, attacked Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) for voicing these concerns, saying: “So he’s saying this is global warming, I mean, not global warming — they use, this is climate change. … Isn’t it true that when you hear someone shout out that’s what this is, isn’t that almost proof that they're on the opposite side of righteousness?” Enlow also said, “The voice of ‘this is global warming,’ … that’s the big lie. If you want to know the one clear lie of every lie that’s out there is that this has to do with global warming.” [Rumble, Elijahstreams, 1/13/25; Politico, 2/18/21; Media Matters, 10/18/24]
    • On Fox Business, Casone said, “I’m sorry, but this has been going on for centuries.” She continued: “The Santa Ana winds have been there for centuries. This isn’t climate change; this is the weather.” [Fox Business, Mornings With Maria, 1/13/25]
  • Daily Wire host Andrew Klavan called the idea of climate change impacts in California “nonsense” because John Steinbeck described drought conditions in his 1952 novel East of Eden. “If you read the great American novel East of Eden, it starts out describing the weather in California,” he said. “The weather in California has not changed. There’s seven years of drought, there’s seven years where it doesn't have drought.” He also claimed that scientists say “climate change has moved the storms to Alaska so we're not getting as many storms. Nonsense. Read the book. It was written a long time ago and yet it describes the weather just as it is.” [The Daily Wire, The Andrew Klavan Show, 1/10/25]
  • Daily Wire host Matt Walsh claimed that politicians mentioned climate change as one cause of the fires only because “the climate change narrative gives them an excuse to do nothing.” He continued: “It allows them to sit back and do nothing. That’s why they always want to view every problem as some kind of, you know, huge, all-encompassing systemic issue.” [The Daily Wire, The Matt Walsh Show, 1/10/25]
  • Fox host Laura Ingraham claimed there was “zero proof that man-made carbon dioxide caused these fires” and that they would be used to justify “rezon[ing] certain residential neighborhoods.” She continued: “But, perhaps, this reimagining cities will work to achieve this epic dream of theirs for more high-density housing, putting single family homes out of reach for victims and everyone but really the super rich. All to protect us — it’s for your own good from the ravages of climate change.” [Fox News, The Ingraham Angle, 1/10/25]
  • Fox host Greg Gutfeld complained about Democrats “offering platitudes” about climate change in response to the fires, and right-wing comedian Adam Carolla joked that sea levels are “not rising fast enough to put out the fires.” Carolla said, “They’ve been talking about the ocean sea levels rising for 50 years along with climate change, but the sea isn’t rising fast enough to put out the fires that they started through mismanagement.” [Fox News, Gutfeld!, 1/9/25]
  • Newsmax host Rob Finnerty said of the fires: “This is actually the opposite of climate change. This is the climate staying the same.” [Newsmax, Finnerty, 1/9/25]
  • In a radio interview with Fox host Sean Hannity, former Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich used climate change denial to try to legitimize his critique of environmental policy in California. Brnovich called the scientific consensus on human-caused climate change “the arrogance of human beings to think that somehow we are radically, you know, changing the environment.” He claimed that “neo-marxist socialists have latched on” to climate change “because they understand this is how you can emotionally control people” and convince them that “we need a bigger federal government, or we need less trees. We need to save snails instead of desalinizing water in Southern California.” [Premiere Radio Network, The Sean Hannity Show, 1/9/25]
  • Conservative website PJ Media featured an article titled “People Who Blame All Natural Disasters on Climate Change Should Be Clubbed Like Baby Seals.” [PJ Media, 1/9/25]
  • On Fox News at Night, climate denier Steve Milloy said the situation in California happened because Californians don’t prioritize “real life versus all these environmentalist fantasies, the delta smelt being in danger, then climate change.” Milloy blamed the fires on “a lack of reservoirs” because of “environmentalists and the cost, which is because of environmentalists as well. … The whole thing is just a cluster and until Californians start prioritizing real life versus all these environmentalist fantasies, the delta smelt being in danger, then climate change, I'm afraid we're just going to see more of this.” [Fox News, Fox News at Night, 1/8/25; Media Matters, 10/31/21]
  • Finnerty said, “These are not once-in-a-generation wildfires. This is not climate change. This is death by DEI.” [Media Matters, 1/9/25]
  • Daily Wire host Ben Shapiro said on his show, “When you hear Democrats shout from the rooftops that it’s climate change, understand: That is a misdirect.” He continued: “Even were that true, it would not alleviate their responsibility to mitigate the effects.” [The Daily Wire, The Ben Shapiro Show, 1/9/25]
  • Knowles said, “Obviously the sun monster is not to blame for the fires in California. Climate change is the leftist version of ‘the dog ate my homework.’” [The Daily Wire, The Michael Knowles Show, 1/9/25]
  • Newsmax host Chris Plante said, “The explanation for the fires in California is not climate change and global warming.” He continued: “It's Democrats and their policies, not grooming and cleaning forests. They groom children but not forests.” [Newsmax, Chris Plante The Right Squad, 1/8/25]
  • Newsmax host Greg Kelly said that after the fires in LA, he thinks climate change is “all a scam.” Reacting to a video of California Gov. Gavin Newsom discussing how climate change impacts the state, Kelly said, “You know, I never really had my mind made up about climate change. OK climate change, I can accept that. But after this fire and after their behavior, I think it's all a scam. It's — something's wrong here. It is a power grab. It is a money grab.” [Newsmax, Greg Kelly Reports, 1/8/25]
  • Fox host Sean Hannity and Leo Terell, whom Trump recently tapped to be senior counsel for the Justice Department, claimed that the idea that climate change played a role in the fires is “a lie.” “It seems like there has been zero forest management by the government at all. Zero. None whatsoever,” said Hannity. Terell later said, “It’s not a priority to the far left. … They focus on denying their responsibility by yelling out climate change. … That’s a lie! It's poor management on the part of the Democrats. They do not look at fire prevention.” [Fox News, Hannity, 1/8/25; Politico, 1/9/25]
    • Carolla said on Hannity that “they want to blame everything on climate change but it's really their inaction. That's why we are in this predicament.” “We had a major fire in Malibu three and a half weeks ago,” he said. “It’s not like it was three and a half years ago. This is an ongoing issue, and Newsom likes to say it's now year-round because he wants to talk about climate change, so he’s the first guy who’s aware of it. They want to blame everything on climate change, but it's really their inaction. That's why we are in this predicament.” [Fox News, Hannity, 1/8/25]
    • New One America News host and disgraced former Republican lawmaker Matt Gaetz claimed that Gov. Gavin Newsom was using the fires as an excuse for “photo ops” and to “blame climate change.” “Wildfires have plagued Newsom's tenure as governor, but instead of acknowledging poor forestry management practices, he's used these disasters as photo ops. He never misses a chance to parade around in his drainpipe jeans and French Laundry-issued, rosé-all-day aviators. Nor would he miss an opportunity to blame climate change, like he did in 2020.” [One America News, The Matt Gaetz Show, 1/8/25]
    • Ingraham dismissed the role of climate change to disparage California leaders: “Now the scope of this loss is unfathomable. Although, thankfully, the death toll currently is fairly low, there are many more injured. But forget the climate fanatics. Because natural disasters are always going to happen. Hurricanes, floods, mudslides, droughts, and, yes, wildfires. But disasters in leadership can make what is naturally occurring even worse. And California has suffered more than it should because it has screwed up priorities from top to bottom.” [Fox News, The Ingraham Angle, 1/8/25]
  • Right-wing media often downplay climate change during destructive fires

    • In the summer of 2023, which was plagued by record-breaking heatwaves and fires, right-wing media tried to convince people that concerns about climate change were overblown. When wildfire smoke from Canada choked New York in June 2023, Fox hosts mocked reports and politicians that connected the fire to climate change and blamed environmentalists and poor forest management. Right-wing media tried to convince their audience that extreme summer temperatures were “normal.” [Media Matters, 6/9/23, 7/20/23]
    • In August 2023, when fires killed over 100 people in Lahaina, Hawaii, right-wing media similarly dismissed climate change. Fox host Tammy Bruce complained that “some people are already moving into a political dynamic talking about climate change” while herself posing the question, “For really an ancient land that this hasn't happened before, why did it happen now?” [Media Matters, 8/11/23, 8/23/23]

Reprinted with permission from Media Matters.

Is Los Angeles As Toxic As Manhattan After 9/11?

Is Los Angeles As Toxic As Manhattan After 9/11?

While I've been mainlining local news to see if my house, on the edge of an evacuation zone, was going to survive, my daughter (who I've been staying with) has been doing research on the air. As depressing as it has been to see these fires destroying my adopted hometown, it's been worse to hear my daughter's reports on the air around us, and to be reminded of what we should have learned from 9/11.

"L.A. is Toxic, and We Need to Talk About It" is the title of my daughter's post on Substack. Read it, and then think about those pictures you've seen of people returning to their burnt out neighborhoods, combing through the rubble in their flip-flops, with no masks. It's terrifying. Would you go wading in a toxic dump unprotected? Is "protection" good enough?

This is what we know from 9/11, when only two buildings — granted, two very big buildings — were destroyed. More people have died from exposure to toxic pollutants in the air after 9/11 than died in the collapse of the Twin Towers and the crashes of the planes.

According to the New York Times in 2021, more than 400,000 people who lived, worked or studied in Lower Manhattan were exposed to toxic materials from "the pulverized towers" leading to health issues, many of which took years to emerge and diagnose. Two buildings — in Los Angeles, thousands and thousands of structures and cars have been equally pulverized. The CDC, in 2018, released a list of hazardous 9/11 chemical agents put together by the World Trade Center Health Program. The list is 19 pages long and includes some 352 chemical compounds. In Los Angeles, there is no list, and also no reason it would be significantly shorter. Why is no one talking about it? Why is the only question people seem to be asking is when the fires and hot spots will be controlled enough for civilians to return to their homes?

In New York, anyone who spent time within a one-and-a-half mile radius of the World Trade Center within an eight-month period after 9/11 is eligible to apply for federal health benefits. Is Los Angeles also going to be toxic for eight months?

As of 2024, there were 127,567 people enrolled in the WTC Health Program, 82,000 of them first-responders and volunteers who took part in the rescue and clean up. As of 2023, some 7,000 of them were dead from illnesses linked to the disaster. In September 2024, the New York Fire Department announced that it had lost more members to WTC-related illnesses than it lost on 9/11 itself.

At the time, though, no one warned them. At the time, it apparently seemed best for city officials to tell people that the air, the water and the food supply were safe — that the best course was to keep on keeping on, just as Los Angeles officials are saying that the first priority is to get people back to their homes and begin the process of rebuilding. Really? It took the New York City Council until this past fall — the 23rd anniversary of the attacks — to take up a bill aimed at finding out when and what city officials knew at the time about the toxins in the air after 9/11. How long will it be before we find out what officials know — or should know — about the air in our toxic site here?

It's not clear what we do with the information. The fires stretched across the city, and the winds blew ash and debris everywhere. Three million people can't up and move away for 8 months. But we can wear masks and protective gear. We desperately need professionals to do the cleanup. Children should not be rifling through the rubble. Reporters covering the fires should be dressed the way firefighters are.

First responders deserve protection and health care in the future. Thirty percent of the firefighters are convicted criminals. Kim Kardashian is right: They should be fairly paid for risking their lives and their health. We owe them nothing less. And city, state and federal officials owe us the truth, as we have learned it from 9/11, about the risks we face and the steps we can take to mitigate those risks.

Reprinted with permission from Creators.

Amid Propaganda Firestorm, Mainstream Media Privileges Trump's Lies

Amid Propaganda Firestorm, Mainstream Media Privileges Trump's Lies

The right-wing propaganda machine’s opportunistic and unhinged response to the wildfires sweeping the Los Angeles area provide an instructive but foreboding look at what the next four years could look like.

Firestorms have swept parts of Los Angeles Country and its environs since last Tuesday, as a “perfect storm” of dry conditions (spurred in part by human-caused climate change) and winds gusting over 80 miles per hour sparked apocalyptic conflagrations and severely hampered firefighters’ response.

While the fires are not uniquely large, the fact that they are burning in a densely populated area has resulted in staggering costs — at least ten people are reported dead as of Friday morning, tens of thousands have fled their homes, and more than 9,000 structures are damaged or destroyed, with economic loss estimates in the tens of billions of dollars.

Political leaders would ideally respond to such horrific circumstances by putting aside partisan differences and standing together to help the victims rebuild. But something very different is happening this week in right-wing spaces.

President-elect Donald Trump is lying a lot in order to blame his political opponents for the fire. The president-elect's Truth Social feed this week is alternating between memes highlighting his purported plans to take over Canada and Greenland and falsehood-heavy rants about how “the gross incompetence and mismanagement” of President Joe Biden and California Gov. Gavin Newsom are responsible for the fire.

Trump’s MAGA media allies are aiding his effort by turning the right-wing information ecosystem into an unrelenting wave of bogus attacks related to the fires. When any major story breaks, the top priority for the hosts on Fox News, Trumpist social media influencers, and the rest of the echo chamber is to identify scapegoats for their audiences to rage against.

As destruction spreads across Southern California, they are chiming in with a familiar cast of enemies: Democrats, environmentalists, and diversity. These claims have in turn fueled attacks on media outlets for debunking right-wing falsehoods, as well as demands that Trump threaten to hold back desperately needed assistance to the region once he takes office later this month.

None of this is going to inform right-wing audiences about the unfolding disaster, much less reduce the risk that another one strikes in the future. But that’s not the point. The commentariat knows that their audiences are united in their hatred of the left, and by providing the usual villains, they keep viewers, listeners, and readers engaged for their movement’s political gain.

As SoCal burns, the right finds false scapegoats

Responding to natural disasters is a core function of government, and leaders’ response to such tragedies deserves careful scrutiny. But the evidence Trump and his allies are pointing to in order to claim that California’s fires stem from liberal mismanagement don’t hold up.

The main avenue the right has seized upon — blaming California Democrats and environmentalists for supposedly limiting the water supply used to fight the fire — is entirely false.

Trump alleged on Truth Social that there was “no water for fire hydrants” to fight the fire because “Newscum refused to sign the water restoration declaration put before him that would have allowed millions of gallons of water to flow” from northern to southern California because he wanted to protect populations of the delta smelt, a rare fish.

His right-wing propagandists quickly parroted his argument to their audiences. On OAN, Dan Ball claimed that “You liberal Democrats running that city, county, and the state have blood on your hands tonight,” before reading Trump’s post. On Fox, Jesse Watters claimed of Newsom that “there is no water coming out of the fire hydrant because this man mismanages the water there.” And Larry Kudlow said on his Fox Business show that the governor “cut the water flow that never got to Southern California, in defense of this obscure fish.”

But none of this is true.

It’s not a water shortage that is impeding the firefighting effort — Southern California’s reservoirs are full, and LA County officials say they filled “all available water storage facility tanks” before the fires started. Some water hydrants ran dry in the Palisades because the extraordinary high demand on the area’s tanks (“four times the normal demand of water was seen for 15 hours straight in the area of the fires”) depleted them faster and reduced the water pressure needed to replenish them.

The long-running dispute over protecting the smelt has nothing to do with the firefighting effort — beyond the fact that there wasn’t a water shortage, that dispute hinges on whether water resources should be used instead for farm irrigation in the South and Central Valley.

And the “water restoration declaration” doesn’t exist, according to Newsom’s staff.

The right regularly responds to disasters by fixating on efforts to hire a diverse workforce, and this case has proved no different. On social media, right-wing influencers targeted Los Angeles Fire Department Chief Kristin Crowley, the first woman and first openly LGBTQ person to serve in the role, claiming her leadership of the department shows that “DEI is quite literally getting people killed,” “DEI = DIE,” and “DEI has deadly consequences.”

Such attacks moved swiftly up the right-wing food chain. “This is the leadership of the LA Fire Department — I sure hope they know what they’re doing,” Fox star Jesse Watters said on Wednesday while shaking his head. He later claimed that “California is committing suicide before our very eyes. DEI is deadly.”

And at times, the discourse became nakedly conspiratorial with Fox personalities darkly alleging that “the homeless” or “outside agitators” were responsible for starting the fires and that the government was deliberately allowing them to burn unimpeded.

The right uses the same playbook after every disaster

The right treats every disaster as an opportunity to attack the left, with talking points bubbling up from the fever swamps or filtering down from Trump, then spreading swiftly through the ecosystem thanks to the all-encompassing nature of its propaganda machine.

We’ve seen the same pattern repeatedly over the last few years, following deadly natural disasters in North Carolina and Puerto Rico and California, among others.

But because this is such well-trodden territory, it is disturbing when legacy media outlets are unable or unwilling to bat down the false claims.

The New York Timeswrite-up of Trump’s remarks about Newsom’s water management is headlined “Trump Blames California’s Governor, and His Water Policy, for Wildfires.” Only in its final paragraphs does the story explain that the Trump claims detailed in its opening sentences are false.

Privileging the lie like this leaves Times readers poorly informed. The good news for the paper is that another opportunity for better coverage will surely follow the next natural disaster.

Reprinted with permission from Media Matters.

As Los Angeles Burns, Trump and Musk Play Politics

As Los Angeles Burns, Trump and Musk Play Politics

While Democrats are focused on safety and federal assistance, Donald Trump and Elon Musk are unsurprisingly making the fires rampaging Los Angeles all about political squabbling.

In an unhinged post on Truth Social, Trump blames California Gov. Gavin Newsom for the fires rapidly spreading across the Pacific Palisades, Malibu, Pasadena, and Sylmar.

“Governor Gavin Newscum refused to sign the water restoration declaration put before him that would have allowed millions of gallons of water, from excess rain and snow melt from the North, to flow daily into many parts of California, including the areas that are currently burning in a virtually apocalyptic way. He wanted to protect an essentially worthless fish called a smelt, by giving it less water (it didn’t work!), but didn’t care about the people of California. Now the ultimate price is being paid. I will demand that this incompetent governor allow beautiful, clean, fresh water to FLOW INTO CALIFORNIA! He is the blame for this. On top of it all, no water for fire hydrants, not firefighting planes. A true disaster!”

Musk also posted on X, saying that the fires “are easily avoidable, but nonsense regulations in California prevent action being taken, so year after year homes burn down and more people die.”

This was in response to reports of fire hydrants in the Palisades drying up due to what officials blame on “tremendous demand.”

Newsom said he was too busy overseeing firefighting and rescue efforts to engage with Trump, but his press office declared that his posts were pure "fiction."


While Democrats are focused on safety and federal assistance, Donald Trump and Elon Musk are unsurprisingly making the fires rampaging Los Angeles all ...

Trump has often abused his power during natural disasters by withholding federal aid to score political points. During his first term, Trump refused to provide California wildfire aid until he was told how many people in the state voted for him, an ex-aide told Politico. He did the same thing to Washington Gov. Jay Inslee, ignoring the Democrat's request for $37 million in federal assistance to contain the wildfires in September 2020.

The three raging fires have consumed more than 5,000 acres, have zero percent containment, and are spreading at unprecedented levels due to winds of up to 100 mph. So far, 85,000 residents have been impacted and five people were killed, and that number is expected to rise.

President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris, a California native, announced that they have been briefed on the fires and that FEMA has already approved assistance.

“My team and I are in touch with state and local officials, and I have offered any federal assistance that is needed to help suppress the terrible Pacific Palisades fire,” Biden said in a White House statement. “Earlier tonight, FEMA approved a Fire Management Assistance Grant to support areas that are impacted and help reimburse the state of California for the immediate firefighting costs. My Administration will do everything it can to support the response. I urge the residents of the Pacific Palisades and the surrounding areas of Los Angeles to stay vigilant and listen to local officials.”

Harris added, “Doug and I are praying for our fellow Californians who have evacuated, and we are thinking of the families whose homes, businesses, and schools remain in harm’s way,” said Harris. “As a proud daughter of California, I know the damage that wildfires have on our neighbors and communities. I also know that the impact is often felt long after the fire is contained. As we respond and as Californians recover, I will ensure that our administration is in constant contact with state and local officials.”

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries expressed his support and condolences for “everyone in the path of the horrific wildfires in Los Angeles County.”

“We are grateful to the firefighters and first responders who are putting themselves in danger while working to save lives and communities under extremely difficult conditions … May God watch over Los Angeles and everyone in harm’s way,” he wrote in a statement shared on X.

Meanwhile, Republicans have refused to take any meaningful action to mitigate fires, like addressing climate change. In fact, many of them are outright climate change deniers.

How could anyone deny this?

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Corona Virus

Trending

World