Tag: mike johnson
House GOP Caucus Will Re-Elect Failed Speaker Mike Johnson

House GOP Caucus Will Re-Elect Failed Speaker Mike Johnson

Rep. Mike Johnson of Louisiana is expected to return as speaker in 2025, leading yet another narrow GOP majority that can barely agree on what color the sky is, let alone pass legislation.

NBC News, ABC News, and CNN all projected on Wednesday that Republicans will maintain control of the House, after the party clinched the 218 needed for a majority. And later that same day, Johnson secured the nomination of the House Republican caucus.

Some right-wing House members crowed about wanting to put up a challenge to Johnson, who became speaker in 2024 basically by accident after Republicans ousted Kevin McCarthy and had an internal civil war about whom to replace him with—and Johnson coming out of nowhere to win that fight. But this time, the hard-line conservatives were unable to figure out who would challenge Johnson, according to The Hill.

But after Trump told House Republicans on Wednesday that he supported Johnson for another term as speaker, that opposition melted away.

That's unsurprising since when Trump says "jump," Republicans respond with "how high?"

“If Donald Trump says ‘jump 3 feet high and scratch your head,’ we all jump 3 feet high and scratch our heads,” Republican Rep. Troy Nehls of Texas, clad in fugly gold sneakers and a Trump tie, told reporters on Wednesday.

When all is said and done, Republicans will likely have between 220 and 222 seats, virtually unchanged from this current Congress. The fact that the race for the House was basically a wash was thanks to strong Democratic recruiting and fundraising, which led Democrats to pick off Republican lawmakers in states like New York and California, despite a vicious gerrymander in North Carolina that alone cost Democrats three seats.

With such a narrow majority, Johnson will have little room for error to pass bills.

And Trump is already narrowing that majority further. Recently, he nominated Reps. Elise Stefanik, Mike Waltz, and Matt Gaetz for roles in his administration. If they are confirmed, that will leave three House vacancies for a few months, until special elections can be held.

Given that the House Republican conference is filled with a bunch of lunatics who would rather watch the world burn than pass actual legislation, that will be a problem for Johnson.

During this current Congress, with a similarly small majority, Johnson has needed to plead with House Democrats to vote for legislation to fund the government because he could not get enough of his own conference to vote for must-pass spending bills. That gave Democrats negotiating power.

Ultimately, now that Republicans will have unified control of Washington, any chaos that comes out of Capitol Hill will cause blowback to the GOP that Democrats can capitalize on for the 2026 midterms.

And knowing this cast of clowns, there will be chaos. Buckle up.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos.

Liz Cheney Smacks Down Speaker Johnson's Excuses For Trump

Liz Cheney Smacks Down Speaker Johnson's Excuses For Trump

Former Rep. Liz Cheney (R-WY) and her father, former Vice President Dick Cheney, are among the many right-wing conservatives who are supporting Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris in the United States' 2024 presidential election — a group that also includes former Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-IL), former Mike Pence national security aide Olivia Troye, and former Trump White House Press Secretary Stephanie Grisham, among others. Liz Cheney has even spoken at some of Harris' campaign rallies.

Meanwhile, House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA), once a Liz Cheney ally, remains a staunch Donald Trump supporter. Johnson has said that he and Liz Cheney have "agreed to disagree" over whether or not Trump is a threat to democracy. But according to Axios reporter Juliegrace Brufke, Johnson and the former congresswoman recently "engaged in a tense text exchange."

Brufke, in an article published on October 21, explained, "Cheney disputed Johnson's characterization of the exchange, telling Axios that she and the speaker 'used to be friends, but we did not 'agree to disagree.' Zoom in: Johnson said he had not spoken to Cheney in a 'very long time,' but decided to text her after 'she said some very uncharitable things.'"


Former Rep. Cheney, during an NBC News appearance on October 13, warned, "I do not have faith that Mike Johnson will fulfill his constitutional obligation."

Unlike many other far-right MAGA Republicans, Johnson is not known for inflammatory rhetoric and has a reputation for being polite to political opponents — at least publicly. And he has sometimes been described as soft-spoken.

Johnson told Axioshe was "disappointed" that Liz Cheney chose to "make things personal, because I've not done that."

The House Speaker added, "We had a little debate in conversation, on text message, back and forth and agreed to disagree."

But the arch-conservative Liz Cheney told Axios, "Had Mike been acting as a lawyer representing Trump, he would have been sanctioned, disbarred or indicted for taking those positions — just as several Trump lawyers were. The courts, including several conservative judges appointed by Trump, rejected each legal argument Mike makes. Mike does not have constitutional authority to overrule the courts. Ignoring those rulings is tyranny Trump's own White House lawyers testified against him."

The former Wyoming congresswoman continued, "Trump's campaign lawyers testified against him. Trump's Justice Department officials testified against him. So did his VP. If Trump is somehow elected, neither Mike nor anyone else will be able to control him."

Read Axios' full article at this link.

Reprinted with permission from Alternet.

Mike Johnson

Speaker Johnson Confronted On CNN For Evading Trump's Latest Vulgarity

During Sunday morning's episode of CNN State of the Union, host Jake Tapper discussed Donald Trump's latest "off the cuff" remark with House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA), and whether or not it will impact the GOP nominee's campaign with two weeks until Election Day.

Tapper cited that the Associated Press reported, "Donald trump's campaign suggested he would begin previewing his closing arguments Saturday night with Election Day barely two weeks away, but the former president kicked off his rally with a detailed story about Arnold Palmer, at one point, even praising the late legendary golfer's genitalia."

The former president told MAGA fans attending the Saturday, October 19 Pennsylvania rally that when the late golfer, Arnold Palmer, "took the showers with other pros, they came out of there. They said, 'Oh my God. That’s unbelievable.'"

According to The Daily Beast, when he was alive, Palmer was "appalled" by the former president.

Johnson, on the other hand, is not.

"Mr. Speaker, you're crossing all over the country. You're working hard to get Republicans over the line in this election. You're talking about substantive issues. Is this really the closing message you want voters to hear from Donald Trump? Stories about Arnold Palmer's penis?" the CNN host asked the Louisiana lawmaker.

"The headline that I read about the rally in Pennsylvania yesterday was the big question, and it's the one that Kamala Harris has not been able or willing to answer," Johnson replied. "And that is, 'Are you better off now than you were under the Trump administration four years ago?' And no one can answer that question with a yes."

Johnson then proceeded to claim that "everywhere" he travels across the country, people are "fed up and they're fired up about the cost of living that's unaffordable now, rising crime rates everywhere, and the weakness on the world stage, and the wide open border."

Tapper replied, "I'm sure that you think that a policy debate would be better than a personality debate, but if President Biden had gone on stage and spoke about the size of a pro-golfer's penis, I think you would be on this show right now saying you were shocked and appalled and you would suggest it was evidenced of his cognitive decline."

The CNN host added, "I wonder how Trump's remarks — not just the one about Arnold Palmer on his 'manhood' — but everything we've heard from Trump this week, how it fits in with the analysis that The New York Times offered a few days ago. They looked at his speeches from 2015 and 2016, and looked at his speeches today, and said, 'With the passage of time, the 78-year-old former president's speeches have grown darker, harsher, longer, angrier, less focused, more profane, and increasingly fixated on the past.'"

"I know you want to talk about policy and I respect that," Tapper continued, "but the reason that Donald Trump is not up ten points is because of comments like that one, where people do have concerns about his fitness, his acuity, and his stability. Why is he talking about Arnold Palmer's penis in front of Pennsylvania voters?"

The GOP leader replied, "Jake, you seem to like that line a lot."

Tapper interrupted, saying, "Let me just say something. I don't want to be talking about this. Donald Trump is out there saying it."

Johnson shot back, "You continue to talk about it."

"Because you won't address it," Tapper replied.

The speaker then said, "I'll address it. Don't say it again. We don't have to say it. I get it. When President Trump is at a rally, sometimes he'll speak for two straight hours. You're questioning his stamina, his mental acuity. Joe Biden couldn't do that for five minutes. He couldn't fill the room. Donald Trump does. You know why? Because they see him as a change agent, and they understand he has a record of performance."

Watch the video below or at this link.

Reprinted with permission from Alternet.

Mike Johnson

House Republicans Revolting Against Their Speaker -- Again

Republican Speaker of the House Mike Johnson is facing a revolt from inside his own party. Again.

This time, the subject of the uprising is a continuing resolution aimed at extending government funding past the end of September. While Republicans are always gleeful about holding a gun to the government’s head, bringing services to a halt just one month before the election seems to many like a bad idea. Even so, House Republicans thought this would be a great time to engage in a big political stunt by slipping into the funding legislation a poison pill aimed at addressing the nonexistent threat of noncitizen voting.

Now Johnson finds himself in a trap. A group of the most obstinate Republicans are trying to use this opportunity to force Johnson into cutting government funding. He can’t get his own party to go along with his leadership, and he can’t go begging to Democrats because the proof-of-citizenship stunt makes this legislation untouchable.

Somewhere, ousted Speaker Kevin McCarthy is smiling.

While Fox News presents the revolt as coming from House conservatives, those who have said they would vote against the bill range from extremists in the House Freedom Caucus to more moderate Republicans who have voted with Johnson in the past.

Johnson’s plans began falling apart almost the moment the House returned from its August recess. The Republican speaker had proposed a six-month extension of government funding. To get the support of hard-liners in his party, Johnson decorated the legislation with proof-of-citizenship requirements. The plan was endorsed by Donald Trump.

But even though the scheme had Trump’s blessing, Republicans began to splinter away by insisting that Johnson go for a longer period of funding. The reason isn’t that these Republicans have a concern over six months being too short. It’s because earlier legislation included a requirement that any funding period longer than six months would automatically trigger a cut in government funding.

However, there are already House members who have made it clear that they don’t want this because, among other things, it would represent a cut to the military. So giving in on this point would gain Johnson some votes but cost him others.

By Monday, at least five Republicans had now come out against the six-month resolution. Given Republicans’ majority in the House, that’s more than Johnson can afford to lose. Five House Democrats earlier voted to require proof of citizenship when voting as part of the SAVE Act. But it seems unlikely any of those Democrats would step forward to save Johnson now, not when Republicans have put themselves in such an effective trap.

However, things got worse on Tuesday. Johnson said he was sticking to this plan (six-month funding, poison pill included), even though the number of Republicans in opposition has now grown to at least six.

As Punchbowl News reports, “Every move Johnson makes to pick up votes in one place loses him votes somewhere else.”

Democrats have bailed out Johnson when his fractious caucus threatened to disrupt vital government functions. But in putting a poison pill in the funding legislation, Johnson may have made that impossible. Democratic leadership in the House is whipping against the bill as Johnson’s brilliant idea to unite his party turns out to be another story of Republicans in disarray.

Even if by some miracle Johnson managed to get the bill out of the House, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer has made it clear the resolution won’t stand a chance in his chamber. Still, that could give Republicans the chance to avoid taking the full blame for going into Election Day with a government shutdown. President Joe Biden has already said he would veto the measure if it comes to his desk (it won’t).


But the growing revolt among Republicans leaves Johnson searching for votes in the House. If he expects those votes to come from Democrats, it will mean removing the proof-of-citizenship requirements. However, another group of Republicans expressed that they are voting for the continuing resolution only because they want those requirements.

So if Johnson were to cut this portion of the legislation, it would make him even more dependent on Democrats to get the funding passed.

Add to this a high rate of absenteeism as legislators sneak away to campaign back home—and with more missing Republicans than Democrats—and Johnson’s real margin to get something passed may be only two votes. Or less.

If Johnson wants to keep from being the proud owner of a highly visible shutdown—like Trump is gunning for—he’s going to either have to find new skills of persuasion or come up with a bill that doesn’t make it an automatic no for Democrats.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos.

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Corona Virus

Trending

World