Tag: pete hegseth
Pete Hegseth

Trump's Choice For Defense Secretary Is A Fervent Warmonger

President-elect Donald Trump has named Fox & Friends Weekend co-host Pete Hegseth as his choice for secretary of defense, in spite of claims from the Trump campaign and its allies in right-wing media that he would be an “anti-war” president. During his time at Fox News, Hegseth has espoused hawkish views on U.S. military policy, suggesting attacks on Iranian infrastructure and cultural sites and even floating a “preemptive strike” against North Korea.

Right-wing media echoed Trump’s attempts to frame himself as the “anti-war” candidate in 2024

  • During the Republican primary, Trump tried to “paint himself as an anti-war dove amongst the hawks,” and he later claimed that Vice President Kamala Harris was “guaranteed” to “get us into a World War III.” As Politico reported: “Those close to Trump’s campaign operation say he plans to try and paint himself as an anti-war dove amongst the hawks. They believe doing so will resonate with GOP voters who are divided on, but growing wary of, continued support for Ukraine in its war with Russia.” [Politico, 2/6/23; The Hill, 10/26/24]

  • Trump campaign surrogates including Tulsi Gabbard and Vivek Ramaswamy also claimed that Trump would be a better option than Harris for “anti-war” voters. Gabbard, who signed as a Fox News contributor in 2022 and was recently announced as Trump’s pick as director of national intelligence, said in August that she was “confident that his first task will be to do the work to walk us back from the brink of war.” [Twitter/X, 8/27/24; The Guardian, 8/26/24; Los Angeles Times, 11/14/22; NBC News, 11/13/24]
  • Right-wing media figures have insinuated that Trump was being prosecuted for his opposition to “the neocon war agenda” and because he “was the first president in 72 years with no new wars.” Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk, whose organization was later tapped to help the Trump campaign with voter turnout, added, “Tucker [Carlson] believes they hate Donald Trump largely because of his skepticism toward the war machine, and it’s hard to disagree with that.” [Newsweek, 6/13/23; Jacobin, 6/20/23; Real America’s Voice, The Charlie Kirk Show, 1/12/24; NPR, 10/24/24]
  • Responding to a social media post calling to “keep all neocons and war hawks out of the Trump administration,” podcaster and presidential son Donald Trump Jr. replied, “I’m on it.” [Twitter/X, 11/10/24]

Hegseth has argued the U.S. should attack sovereign nations and escalate military action

    • In 2016, Hegseth declared, “You better believe I'm willing to be the world's sheriff,” adding, “We can't be war weary.” Hegseth: “And I don't want to be the world's policeman forever. But you better believe I'm willing to be the world's sheriff, and I'm willing to be the world's leader until there is somebody that's capable to do it, because there isn't anybody else.” [YouTube, 4/15/16]
    • In 2017, Hegseth declared that “there's merit in a preemptive strike” against North Korea. He said: “There's merit in a preemptive strike. But you got to do it right. You got to — It's got to be decisive. How comprehensive is that first strike capability? But history shows us that when you let dictators get the worst weapons in the world, they wield a ton of influence.” [Fox News, Fox & Friends, 8/11/17]
    • Hegseth wrote that “just like the Christian crusaders who pushed back the Muslim hordes in the twelfth century, American Crusaders will need to muster the same courage against Islamists today.” In his 2020 book American Crusade, Hegseth also warned about the “Muslims’ birth rates” in states like Michigan, New York, and Minnesota and said that “Islamism is the most dangerous threat to freedom in the world. It cannot be negotiated with, coexisted with, or understood; it must be exposed, marginalized, and crushed.” [Media Matters, 11/12/24]
    • Hegseth again endorsed the Crusades, saying, “Without warriors who are willing to fight in foreign lands, there would be no Europe, there would be no America, there would be nothing of today.” [Rumble, 7/26/21]
    • Hegseth lamented that American troops are not allowed to conduct “aggressive offensive operations” and “take out bad guys.” Hegseth: “I’m hearing from guys too overseas, they're not allowed to conduct aggressive offensive operations to secure their perimeter and take out bad guys to secure themselves. So they're sitting ducks in that context. And then they're sitting ducks on a geopolitical context because the mullahs in Tehran believe they have free range.” [Fox News, Hannity, 1/29/24]
    • Hegseth praised the 2020 assassination of Iranian commander Qassem Soleimani and “speculated that Trump’s next target could be a ‘second general,’ or ‘how about their oil and gas?’” As The New Republic reported, in the immediate aftermath of the Soleimani strike, Hegseth became “not only one of Trump’s most slavish cheerleaders but also an influential adviser to the president.” [The New Republic, 1/31/20]
  • Hegseth later suggested targeting Iran’s energy production sites. Hegseth rhetorically asked, “Do they want their economic sites, their military sites, political sites and/or cultural sites targeted? How about their oil and gas?” [Fox Business, Varney & Co., 1/6/20]
  • Hegseth repeated this call on The Five, saying, “I don't care about Iranian cultural sites.” He added: “If they had the power, they would destroy every single one of our cultural sites and build a mosque on top of it.” [Fox News, The Five, 1/6/20]
  • Hegseth again suggested the U.S. could strike Iran in “nuclear sites, energy sites, infrastructure sites” in order to “truly cripple the regime.” Hegseth: “It is oil refineries, oil infrastructure, it is key missile sites, its nuclear development sites, throw in some ports, key infrastructure, and you know what? Why not a Quds headquarters for good nature on top of it. … I'm telling you, nuclear sites, energy sites, infrastructure sites — if it comes to that, that's where it needs to go. That's how you truly cripple the regime.” [Fox News, Hannity, 1/7/20]
  • Hegseth further pushed for massive strikes against Iran the next day, calling on Trump to set a clock before “we start taking out your energy production facilities.” Hegseth: “What better time than now to say, we're starting the clock, you've got a week, you've got X amount of time before we start taking out your energy production facilities. We take out key infrastructure.” [Fox News, Fox & Friends, 1/8/20]
  • Hegseth said the killing of Soleimani “sent as powerful a signal as you can imagine” to Iran. In an interview with former Trump Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, Hegseth said, “Qassem Soleimani, the Baghdad airport. I mean, that sent as powerful a signal as you can imagine.” He later claimed, “We saw those red lines in a previous administration before the Trump administration — when they were crossed and when you don't enforce them, you get more.” [Fox News, Hannity, 3/24/23]

Reprinted with permission from Media Matters.

Kremlin Sends Trump Congratulations -- And A Thinly Veiled Threat

Kremlin Sends Trump Congratulations -- And A Thinly Veiled Threat

As Donald Trump prepares to dismantle American national security – already badly compromised by his first White House stint – his allies in the Kremlin haven’t hesitated to remind the incoming president of his “obligations” to them.

Certainly Vladimir Putin is thrilled by the notion of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, a 37 year-old Fox News commentator with a checkered background, or Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, whose scant qualifications include little more than her skill in shooting a puppy. These are ultra-partisan hacks who will do whatever Trump orders.

But who will be telling Trump what to do?

On Russian TV’s most watched network, the hosts of a popular show immediately “congratulated” Trump on his victory by broadcasting images of his wife Melania in the nude that appeared in GQ magazine decades ago. Propaganda presenter Yevgeny Popov smirked as introduced the explicit photos, noting that in one shot, the future Mrs. Trump was “only wearing her underwear, lying on a blue carpet with the United States seal, as though the editors of the men’s magazine knew something in advance about the future of their model.” His co-host Olga Skabeeva ostentatiously suppressed a cackle.

Evidently Vladimir Putin didn’t think that message of domination was sufficiently clear, because on November 11 his top aide Nikolai Patrushev made the following remark to a Moscow newspaper:

“To achieve success in the election, Donald Trump relied on certain forces to which he has corresponding obligations,” Patrushev told the business daily Kommersant in response to a question about whether the outcome of the presidential election would bode well for Russia. “As a responsible person, he will be obliged to fulfill them” -- rather than any fleeting campaign promises or an oath to defend the United States against hostile foreign powers.

The Kremlin news agency Tass then made certain to distribute Patrushev’s statement globally.

But to make certain that Trump got the point, Patrushev went out of his way to raise an even more sensitive subject. “We know of two cases of attempts on his life during the election campaign,” said the Putin aide. “In general, throughout the history of the United States, attempts have been made on the lives of presidents and candidates regularly—more than 20 times. Four U.S. presidents have died at the hands of assassins while in office. Therefore, it is extremely important for U.S. intelligence agencies to prevent a repetition of such cases.”

By the way, acording to the Wall Street Journal, it was Patrushev – like Putin, a former Russian intelligence officer – who oversaw the aircraft explosion that killed rebellious Kremlin warlord Yevgeny Prigozhin in the summer of 2023.

Joe Conason is founder and editor-in-chief of The National Memo. He is also editor-at-large of Type Investigations, a nonprofit investigative reporting organization formerly known as The Investigative Fund. His latest book is The Longest Con: How Grifters, Swindlers and Frauds Hijacked American Conservatism.


Melania Touts Return To White House -- And Grudge Over 'Vogue' Snub

Melania Touts Return To White House -- And Grudge Over 'Vogue' Snub

Melania Trump teased a return to the White House in her first interview since Trump vacated the Oval Office for Joe Biden, echoing her husband’s repeated suggestions of a 2024 return to the political scene.

In a sit-down with Fox Nation’s Pete Hegseth, an interview that aired Sunday morning, the former first lady discussed her post-White House activities, said she believed the White House could be her home again, and lashed out at Vogue for putting Jill Biden on its cover.

“I like Washington, D.C. I know it operates completely different[ly] than any other city. To be the First Lady of the United States was my greatest honor, and I think we achieved a lot in the four years of the Trump administration,” she said, responding to Hegseth’s question about the possibility of her becoming the First Lady again.

“Never say never,” Trump added.

The former first lady said she enjoyed her time in the White House despite the wave of criticism she faced, especially in one instance in 2018 when she visited immigrant kids at a border detention center with a jacket emblazoned with the words “I really don't care, do u?”

Trump also discussed at length her NFT projects, which have been subject to controversy since their inception last year. Trump’s items can only be purchased with cryptocurrency, and nothing in her first lot of items, which was put up for sale earlier this year, met the $250,000 opening bid threshold, according to CNN.

In January, Trump held an auction for her “Head of State Collection, 2022,” with a minimum opening bid of $250,000 on the Solana blockchain. A portion of the proceeds, according to her website, would go towards securing “educational opportunities and scholarships” in the foster care system.

Things quickly went south when Vice, soon followed by other news outlets, reviewed the blockchain records and reported that the auction winner received funds for their winning bid from the auction’s creators themselves. “The winner of Melania Trump’s first NFT auction appears to be the former first lady herself,” according to Fortune.

Trump denied the allegations in a statement. “The nature of Blockchain protocol is entirely transparent. Accordingly, the public can view each transaction on the blockchain. The transaction was facilitated on behalf of a third-party buyer."

However, Trump declined to say who bought the NFT or why the NFT creator gave the auction winner crypto for the winning bid and seemingly got the funds back, per Vice. The former first lady has also refused to elaborate on what portion of her NFT proceeds has gone to charities, nor did she say which charities received the donations. “They need our resources, support, [and] empowerment to achieve that American dream,” Trump told Fox Nation, referring to purported contributions.

Trump also attacked Vogue for not featuring her on its cover during her husband’s tenure as president of the United States, a grudge she’s held onto tightly, despite exiting the White House over a year and a half ago.

“They’re biased and they have likes and dislikes, and it’s so obvious,” Trump said. “And I think American people, and everyone sees it.”

“I have much more important things to do—and I did in the White House—than being on the cover of Vogue,” she added, feigning indifference over the apparent snub.

However, in a tell-all book, Trump’s former senior adviser and BFF, Stephanie Winston Wolkoff, detailed how Trump rejected a Vogue shoot shortly after her husband took office because the magazine couldn’t guarantee her a spot on the cover.

'Fox & Friends' Just Couldn't Handle That Huge February Jobs Report

'Fox & Friends' Just Couldn't Handle That Huge February Jobs Report

A strong monthly jobs report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) beat expectations last week, but Fox & Friends struggled to characterize it, absurdly claiming that the numbers reported by the government had missed expectations while arguing with no evidence that the data were unreliable.

On March 4, the BLS released its initial jobs report for February 2022, which showed the economy creating 678,000 jobs last month as the national unemployment rate fell slightly to 3.8 percent. The report also included substantial positive revisions to the jobs estimates for December 2021 and January 2022, showing job creation over that period to be “92,000 higher than previously reported.” The topline job creation number for February easily exceeded expectations reported by MarketWatch and Reuters, which forecast 400,000-440,000 jobs created last month.

None of these facts were good enough for the team at Fox News, which honestly seemed almost unprepared to discuss the breaking news. The Fox & Friends studio at first struggled with audio issues when returning from commercial break, and then flashed a red upward arrow on screen seeming to indicate that the unemployment rate had climbed last month (the rate actually fell 0.1 points). After correspondent Carley Shimkus finished reporting the numbers, noting twice that the monthly jobs report beat expert expectations, all three co-hosts — Pete Hegseth, Brian Kilmeade, and Ainsley Earhardt — fumbled their transition to discussing the jobs report with Fox Business host Charles Payne.

The absurdity continued during Payne’s supposedly expert commentary, as he claimed without any evidence or reasoning that he “thought it was going to be a higher number,” saying the report was “really weird.” When pressed by co-host Pete Hegseth about the fact that the report actually beat expectations, Payne doubled down, falsely claiming “everyone thought it was going to be higher.” As Payne listed off made-up expectations and unnamed sources who thought the economy would add 770,000 or more jobs last month, a graphic again flashed on-screen demonstrating that the 678,000 jobs added last month were more than the 400,000 “predicted” by economists.


PETE HEGSETH (CO-HOST): Charles Payne is here, host of Making Money on Fox Business, who is going to help us break down these numbers. Your reaction, Charles?

CHARLES PAYNE (FOX BUSINESS HOST): I thought it was going to be a higher number, I really did. Now, this is not unusual that they missed, and this is really weird. Let me just explain to the audience.

HEGSETH: Okay now, higher number – this is a higher number than expected?

PAYNE: Than consensus, right. But, everyone thought it was going to be higher. I saw some folks on Wall Street at 770, and some even higher than that. Just so you understand how this consensus things [sic] works. Last month, it was 300,000 better, but the month before that they missed it by 200,000, the month before that they missed it by 340,000. In August of last year, they missed it by 515,000. Forget about it, go back to April 2020, and they missed it by 2.2 million. You know, so, the consensus thing, let's look past that for a moment.

We’ve got almost 11 million job openings, we’re still not at the participation rate we were at just before the pandemic. So, this is a good number, but it could have been even better than this. For me, what’s more important is participation, I don’t know what that is just yet, because we want people coming back to the labor force, right. Also, wages. Now, wages were expected to go up 5.8 percent. Normally that’s good, but we’re going to find out next week that inflation, during this same time period, probably up more than 8 percent. So that means any raise you got was evaporated.


Throughout Payne’s commentary, he seemed confused about how the BLS reporting process works, and he ignored a key component of the entire process by which numbers are revised over time. For example, Payne said that the previous jobs report for August 2021 had missed its expectations by 515,000 jobs, totally ignoring the fact that subsequent revisions had made up for half that gap.

Payne also struggled to explain how economic forecasters form “consensus” expectations, and complained about low labor force participation rates, even though the report he held in his hand showed an increase in that rate from month-to-month.

Eventually, the Fox & Friends team got their footing and returned to the bread and butter misinformation we’ve come to expect from Fox News. Unable to coherently describe the economic data in front of their eyes, the team pivoted to complaining about President Joe Biden’s energy policies and mocking teenage climate activist Greta Thunberg for somehow contributing to both increased gas prices and Russian aggression in Ukraine.

Fox’s almost comical hot takes on the routine data release stand as a reminder that the Fox News propaganda machine will never miss an opportunity to cast the economy in a negative light, so long as it reflects poorly on Democrats.

Reprinted with permission from Media Matters

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Corona Virus

Trending

World