Tag: public health
Why Did Trump Silence Public Health Officials -- Again?

Why Did Trump Silence Public Health Officials -- Again?

Within days of Donald Trump entering the Oval Office, he decreed by executive order that the United States will withdraw from the World Health Organization. He ordered the National Institutes of Health, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Food and Drug Administration and the Department of Health and Human Services to stop communicating with the public and other scientific organizations. And he withdrew the security protecting Dr. Anthony Fauci, the retired federal infectious disease expert.

Why would Trump issue these reckless orders, which appear ill-timed and foolish as the H5N1 virus — bird flu — begins to spread across the nation? Having already killed millions of chickens, this disease appears now to have killed at least one American male — and could soon mutate into a form transmitted from human to human.

To anyone who remembers how Trump mishandled the COVID-19 pandemic during his final year in office, his actions during the first week of his second term are deeply ominous. The U.S. death toll was the highest in the world, with over a million Americans struck down by the virus, despite the fact that we had access to vaccines before many other countries.

Despite Trump's laudable effort to encourage production of vaccines, he also became the principal obstacle to an effective response. Politics dictated Trump's actions from the very beginning, when he downplayed the pandemic threat and pretended that coronavirus would disappear before Easter. He discouraged testing, again because he wanted to minimize the threat. Listening to extremist advisers, he promoted quack cures, scoffed at effective health measures like masking, and undermined trust in public health authorities. His statements and actions resulted in countless unnecessary fatalities — ironically concentrated among his own Republican supporters.

Now Trump appears to be deflecting blame for his own failures onto international and federal agencies — and onto Fauci, whose undeserved status as a whipping boy for the far right has brought death threats against him and even his family.

It's not that WHO and the U.S. health agencies didn't make mistakes in coping with COVID-19 — a new form of illness that kept mutating and defying measures to bring it under control. Even the wise and experienced Fauci didn't get everything right. But the errors and missteps by Trump and his administration were far more consequential — and worse, were plainly motivated by political self-interest.

While the actual impact of Trump's executive orders has yet to be determined, their effects could severely undermine our defenses against the next pandemic, which seems likely to arrive sooner than expected. As a member of WHO, the United States benefits from the WHO global surveillance network that monitors perilous diseases such as influenza and Ebola — providing timely data, genetic material and other crucial information to our scientists. Removing U.S. funding and support will seriously undermine that system and endanger the entire world, including us.

Silencing or chilling communications from federal health agencies — and halting their exchanges with other scientists both here and abroad — poses a different risk. Prohibited from publishing scientific reports, issuing health advisories or updating their websites, the CDC and NIH won't be able to send out public alerts and recommended procedures, with potentially grave effects on our collective response to a pandemic.

These dictates from the new Trump regime are a spooky echo of the old Trump regime's bad behavior.

Recall that in late February 2020, a top CDC official publicly warned of an imminent pandemic and urged Americans to prepare for the shutdown of schools and workplaces. The president instantly threatened to fire her and forbade the CDC from delivering briefings on measures to combat the virus.

Instead, Trump took over the briefings and constantly misinformed the public. On masking, for instance, he said, "You don't have to do it. I'm choosing not to do it." Trump not only contracted the virus and became gravely ill — surviving only thanks to special care at Walter Reed Army Hospital — but made many others in his orbit sick as well. He nearly killed his former friend Chris Christie by exposing him to the virus (although typically Trump claims it was Christie who infected him).

We may soon relive that nightmare. Sadly, this president appears to have learned nothing from experience, except how to deflect responsibility. That won't protect any of us — not even Trump.

Joe Conason is founder and editor-in-chief of The National Memo. He is also editor-at-large of Type Investigations, a nonprofit investigative reporting organization formerly known as The Investigative Fund. His latest book is The Longest Con: How Grifters, Swindlers and Frauds Hijacked American Conservatism.

Reprinted with permission from Creators.



Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

As Bird Flu Looms, Trump Orders Public Health Agencies Silenced

Donald Trump’s administration on Tuesday ordered federal health agencies to cease all public-facing communication, The Washington Postreported, a move that will leave Americans in the dark about everything from viral outbreaks to the spread of possible food-borne illnesses.

The directive to halt all communication with the public comes amid a particularly bad virus season, with influenza A, COVID-19, RSV, and norovirus tearing through communities across the country.

It also comes as a bird flu outbreak is causing an egg shortage, leading to spiking egg prices.

Currently, the outbreak is mostly contained to animals like poultry and cows. And humans who have contracted bird flu got it from infected animals, not other humans.

In December, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention—an agency Trump has now essentially placed a gag order on—announced that a human in Louisiana was in critical condition after contracting bird flu from exposure to a backyard flock of infected birds.

“It has been determined that the patient had exposure to sick and dead birds in backyard flocks,” said the CDC. “This is the first case of H5N1 bird flu in the U.S. that has been linked to exposure to a backyard flock. … No person-to-person spread of H5 bird flu has been detected.”

However, scientists are warning that the virus is mutating and could cause yet another public health crisis under Trump's watch.

According to the Washington Post, the CDC was set to issue three reports this week about the bird flu outbreak but now will not.

People within the public health agencies are reportedly not sure why Trump ordered all communication with the public to cease.

One official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to avoid reprisal from the new administration, told The Washington Post they are hopeful this communications pause is just the sign of a badly run transition and not something more nefarious.

“We have tried to assume good intentions here, and that they’re just disorganized,” the official said.

However, it’s worth noting that in 2017, during Trump’s first presidency, he ordered a similar pause in public-facing communication from the Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Agriculture, and the Interior Department, ordering them to, as the Washington Post reported at the time, “convey only information that supports the new president’s agenda.”

Trump also has a history of trying to keep public health information from the public.

During his botched response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Trump wanted people to stop testing themselves for the virus because a high number of cases would make him look bad.

It’s unclear how long Trump’s administration will gag public health agencies or whether the agencies will be able to release factual information when the order is lifted.

Even more troubling is that Trump’s pick to lead the Department of Health and Human Services—which oversees the CDC and its communication on disease outbreaks—is Robert F. Kennedy Jr., an anti-science quack who falsely believes vaccines cause autism and drinks raw milk, which can expose humans to bird flu.

Experts are speaking out about the new gag order, saying it endangers public health.

“More cases of H5N1 [bird flu] are occurring in the United States than in any other country. Pausing our health communications at a time when states are scrambling to contain this virus is dangerously misguided,” Jennifer Nuzzo, a professor of epidemiology at Brown University, wrote in a post on X. “This will make America less healthy and will worsen the virus’s economic tolls.”

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos.

Poll: Americans Don't Trust Trump, Oz Or RFK Jr. To Protect Public Health

Poll: Americans Don't Trust Trump, Oz Or RFK Jr. To Protect Public Health

Donald Trump and his picks to lead American health care policy do not have the support of the public, according to a poll released Wednesday.

The Axios/Ipsos American Health Index poll shows that only 32 percent of Americans trust Trump on health issues. Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Trump’s nominee to lead the Department of Health and Human Services, fares even worse with only 30 percent. And only 23 percent of Americans trust Mehmet Oz, Trump’s choice to lead the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

Trump’s picks to lead the National Institutes of Health, Jay Bhattacharya, and the FDA, Marty Makary, fare even worse with support levels of 15 percent and 14 percent, respectively. But it’s likely that many Americans have no idea who those two people are, and that’s why they don’t trust them.

By contrast, Anthony Fauci, the former director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases director, enjoys 45 percent trust. Trust is even higher for existing health agencies, with 66 percent of Americans trusting the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and 62 percent backing the National Institutes of Health.

His years of attacking the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare, certainly doesn’t help Trump’s trustworthiness on health care. Since he began his political career in 2015, Trump has pushed for repealing the program while offering nothing (to this day) to replace it. Trump backed legislation in 2017 that would have left millions of Americans without coverage and was thwarted by a unified Democratic Party and three breakaway Republican senators.

The history of his nominees on health issues also brings significant negatives to the table.

Kennedy has peddled debunked conspiracy theories on a host of medical issues, most notably his false assertion that childhood vaccination is connected to autism. Oz, a failed Senate candidate and former TV host, has been criticized for peddling dubious pills and supporting the privatization of Medicare.

Bhattacharya is an economist at Stanford University who proposed largely allowing COVID-19 to spread—despite the virus’ significant public health risk—while Makary, a professor at Johns Hopkins University, opposed mandatory vaccination, even though vaccination was ultimately key to restoring normalcy across the world.

Arguably, the biggest failure that Trump is associated with in his first presidential term was related to health care. On his watch, over 396,800 Americans died from COVID-19—following months of Trump repeatedly misinforming the public on the severity of the virus and denying states the resources they needed to fight infections.

This new poll from Axios/Ipsos shows that Trump’s narrow election win has not given him any kind of boost on the key issue of public health, and the low quality of his nominees isn’t helping.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos.

'Public Health In Jeopardy': 75 Nobel Laureates Urge Senate To Reject RFK Jr

'Public Health In Jeopardy': 75 Nobel Laureates Urge Senate To Reject RFK Jr

A group of over 75 Nobel laureates on Monday submitted a letter to the US Senate, according to The New York Times, urging lawmakers to reject President-Elect Donald Trump's Department of Health and Human Services lead nominee: Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

Per the report, Richard Roberts, who won the 1993 Nobel in Physiology or Medicine said the group of laureates typically shies away from politics, but Kennedy's nomination called for a change in protocol.

Roberts told the Times that the letter "marks the first time in recent memory that Nobel laureates have banded together against" a president-elect's Cabinet pick.

"Placing Mr. Kennedy in charge of DHHS would put the public’s health in jeopardy and undermine America’s global leadership in the health sciences," the letter reads.

"The leader of DHHS should continue to nurture and improve — not to threaten — these important and highly respected institutions and their employees," it continued.

When Kennedy was nominated last month, Georgetown University’s O’Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law director Lawrence Gostin told TIME, "I can’t think of a darker day for public health and science itself than the election of Donald Trump and the nomination of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as secretary of health."

He added, "To say that RFK Jr. is unqualified is a considerable understatement. The minimum qualification for being the head of the Department of Health and Human Services is fidelity to science and scientific evidence, and he spent his entire career fomenting distrust in public health and undermining science at every step of the way."

Reprinted with permission from Alternet.

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Corona Virus

Trending

World