Tag: ten commandments
Louisiana Mandates Posting The Ten Speedbumps On Classroom Walls

Louisiana Mandates Posting The Ten Speedbumps On Classroom Walls

Let’s begin our descent into this black hole of legal religiosity with the story of the resignation on Tuesday of Pastor Robert Morris from his perch at the pulpit of the massive Gateway Church in the Dallas, Texas suburb known as Southlake. Two days ago, Morris, who founded the megachurch in 2000, was forced to resign after it became known last week that he had sexually abused a 12-year-old girl on Christmas night in 1982 at a so-called “youth revival.” The abuse continued for the next five years, according to the victim, Cindy Clemishire.

The Gateway Church has more than 100,000 members. Morris has had a religious television program that reaches 190 countries. According to a biography that was scrubbed from the Gateway Church website earlier today, Morris’ radio program airs in more than 6,800 cities. He served as an official “spiritual adviser” to Donald Trump during his time in office.

In an interview on Sunday, Morris admitted to “inappropriate sexual behavior with a young lady 35 years ago. It was kissing and petting and not intercourse, but it was wrong,” Morris told Dallas station WFAA-TV. In a statement to the news station, the Gateway Church claimed that Morris has been “open and forthright about a moral failure he had over 35 years ago,” and claimed that he had committed “no other moral failures.” In the interview, Morris explained that after his “transgressions” were first discovered some years ago, “I submitted myself to the Elders of Shady Grove Church and the young lady's father. They asked me to step out of ministry and receive counseling and freedom ministry, which I did.”

Here's where we get to the good stuff. Morris explained away his “transgressions” by telling the Dallas television interviewer, “This situation was brought to light, and it was confessed and repented of.”

See how that works? You are a pastor, a so-called “man of God,” and you sexually abuse a girl when she is 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16 years old, and all you have to do is confess your sin and repent and the whole thing is over with.

By any rational reading of the Ten Commandments, Morris broke three of them: the Seventh, forbidding adultery, because he was married at the time of his sexual “transgressions” with the underage girl; the Ninth, forbidding lying, because he lied about it for years; and the Tenth, against coveting, because Morris clearly coveted something, sex with an underage girl, which kept him, in the words of the Bible, from “putting God first.”

But that’s okay, because 35 years later, Morris went on TV in his hometown and confessed his sins and explained that he repented.

See what I mean? It’s not the ten commandments. It’s the ten speedbumps. All you’ve got to do when you break them is slow down and if you’re Catholic, say a few Hail Mary’s, or if you’re a Protestant, confess your sins and say you won’t do it again, and all is forgiven. There’s no cop. There’s no reckless driving ticket for speeding and endangering the life of another. Having sex with a 12-year-old girl and lying about it for decades is just a speedbump in an otherwise spotless life because the statue of limitations on sexual abuse of minors ran out years ago in the state where Morris committed his crimes, Oklahoma.

It's just a speedbump for Morris, who not only sinned against the word of God, but broke the laws of man by sexually abusing a 12-year-old girl. The whole thing about their pastor having committed multiple sins over multiple years and broken multiple laws is just a speedbump for the Gateway Church, too.

NBC News was given a recording of a meeting that was held on Tuesday when the Gateway Church staff was informed of the Morris resignation over his “transgressions.” Kenneth W. Fambro II, a member of the Gateway Church Board of Elders, got up before 150 employees of the church and first, warned them not to record what he was about to say. Then he told them that accepting the resignation of Pastor Morris “has been one of the most difficult decisions in my life.” NBC News reported that Fambro, speaking on behalf of the rest of the Board of Elders, told the church staff that “Pastor Robert did a phenomenal job of being open and transparent about his transgressions and his past, his moral failures. What we did not know was that she was 12 years old.”

But hey! Just a speedbump! Fambro is there in an auditorium with the doors closed to the outside world, believing that nobody else is listening, and he can speak freely, right? So what is to be done about this crisis, when a church with 100,000 members learns that for 24 years they have been led by and listening to an inveterate liar and a sinner?

Not to worry: “If you’ve been here long enough, you’ve heard Pastor Robert say, ‘Before we can move, we need to hear God,’” Fambro assured his staff. “So yes, there is an anointing on this house. Yes, there is an anointing on Pastor Robert. But both and yes? There was some stuff that was done. They both can exist. Pastor Robert wants to see Gateway Church succeed in the body of Christ. Pastor Robert wanted to resign to not be a distraction.”

Another church elder stepped up to explain the counseling services that would be available to church employees.

Yeah, you heard that right. Nothing about counseling for the victim. Not a word about reporting the crimes admitted to by their leader, Pastor Robert. Fambro wanted the church employees to “focus on what they can do to help the church succeed,” according to NBC News.

“I can dwell on the past,” Fambro told the staff. “You guys can, as well. Or I can choose to say: ‘That’s a data point. How can I affect the future?’ How do we move forward?”

So, there it is. Three of the Ten Commandments broken by the leader of the Gateway Church, and it’s a “data point,” a fucking speedbump on the way to making God happy by collecting more money and supporting fellow speedbumpers like Donald Trump.

These are the Ten Commandments the state of Louisiana today said must be displayed in every classroom from Kindergartens to state colleges. Announcing the passage of the law, the governor of Louisiana told reporters, “If you want to respect the rule of law you got to start from the original law giver, which was Moses. I can’t wait to be sued.”

He will be. The American Civil Liberties Union, Americans United for the Separation of Church and State, and the Freedom from Religion Foundation announced today that they will file a federal lawsuit challenging the Louisiana law. The Ten Commandments of course are a part of the Christian and Jewish faiths and have nothing to do with any other religion. So, mandating the posting of Christian and Jewish religious doctrine in public classrooms is on its face promotion of the faith of two religions over all others and a violation of the First Amendment.

Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito and the rest of the the court’s Christian soldiers will doubtless look for some way to overturn the 2005 Supreme Court precedent outlawing public displays of the Ten Commandments in Kentucky courthouses. They will surely find their solution in the “history and tradition” doctrine they recently hatched. They’ll cast around and find some reference to Ten Commandments being displayed somewhere in the 1700’s or 1800’s, so because this country has a “history and tradition” of favoring one religion over another, the Louisiana law will no doubt be allowed to stand.

But not to worry, folks. To old Moses, the The Ten Commandments may have been laws, but these days, they’re just speedbumps. Any questions? Just ask the folks at the Gateway Church in Southlake, Texas who, confronted with wholesale violations of the so-called Ten Commandments by their own pastor, are ready to move on.

Lucian K. Truscott IV, a graduate of West Point, has had a 50-year career as a journalist, novelist, and screenwriter. He has covered Watergate, the Stonewall riots, and wars in Lebanon, Iraq, and Afghanistan. He is also the author of five bestselling novels. You can subscribe to his daily columns at luciantruscott.substack.com and follow him on Twitter @LucianKTruscott and on Facebook at Lucian K. Truscott IV.

Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore Ousted Over Gay Marriage Defiance

Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore Ousted Over Gay Marriage Defiance

(Reuters) – The chief justice of Alabama’s Supreme Court was effectively ousted on Friday by a judicial panel that found he unethically resisted U.S. court rulings that legalized same-sex marriage.

Chief Justice Roy Moore, 69, violated judicial ethics with an order seen as directing probate judges to withhold marriage licenses from same-sex couples, defying federal court decisions, the Alabama Court of the Judiciary ruled.

It was the second suspension for the outspokenly conservative Moore. Earlier, he was sanctioned for refusing to remove a monument of the Ten Commandments in a state building.

Moore on Friday blasted the decision that followed a trial earlier this week.

“This was a politically motivated effort by radical homosexual and transgender groups to remove me as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court because of outspoken opposition to their immoral agenda,” he said in a statement on social media.

His lawyer, Mat Staver, said he plans to appeal the unanimous decision to suspend Moore without pay for the rest of his term, effective immediately. Staver said it essentially removes Moore from the bench, as the chief justice will be too old to seek re-election at his term’s end in January 2019.

Civil rights proponents hailed the move. “The people of Alabama who cherish the rule of law are not going to miss the Ayatollah of Alabama,” Richard Cohen, president of the Southern Poverty Law Center, said in a statement.

The Alabama Court of the Judiciary said in the ruling that Moore’s Jan. 6 order showed “disregard for binding federal law” after the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark June 2015 decision giving gay and lesbian couples the right to marry.

The judiciary court rejected the chief justice’s argument that he was providing a status update. Moore has insisted there was uncertainty after conflicting opinions on gay marriage from state and federal courts.

“I think this ruling is an abuse of power,” Moore’s lawyer, Staver, said by phone. “It’s a de facto removal.”

The ruling noted the state judiciary court had removed Moore from the bench in 2003 for defying a federal order to take down a Ten Commandments monument he installed in the state’s judicial building. Voters re-elected him as chief justice in 2012.

He was charged after the Southern Poverty Law Center filed ethics complaints.

“It undermined the integrity of the judiciary, the spectacle of a chief justice telling other judges not to follow a court order,” the SPLC’s Cohen said by phone.

(Reporting by Letitia Stein in Tampa, Fla.; Editing by David Gregorio and Matthew Lewis)

IMAGE: A same-sex marriage supporter holds a sign referring to Alabama’s Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore, during a protest outside the Jefferson County Courthouse in Birmingham, Alabama February 9, 2015.  REUTERS/Marvin Gentry

Oklahoma’s Ten Commandments Case Is Part Of An Age-Old Battle In U.S.

Oklahoma’s Ten Commandments Case Is Part Of An Age-Old Battle In U.S.

By Natalie Schachar, Los Angeles Times (TNS)

The Oklahoma Supreme Court ruling last week that a Ten Commandments monument must be removed from the grounds of the state Capitol prompted outrage, drew praise and posed a question: Will controversy over religious displays ever end?

For many legal scholars, the outsize role that religion plays in America made the possibility unlikely.

“It’s a symbolic fight about how people understand their country,” said Charles Haynes, director of the Religious Freedom Center in Washington.

“There are very many Americans who believe that unless we acknowledge our roots and Christian tradition as a country, we will fail,” he said, pointing to Oklahoma. “This is one of a number of efforts that have been made over the course of our history to reassert that understanding of America.”

The Oklahoma case was not the first involving the Ten Commandments.

The U.S. Supreme Court has taken up the topic as well and in 2005 issued two rulings with pointedly different conclusions.

The first decision, in McCreary County vs. ACLU, concerned displays of the Ten Commandments in Kentucky courthouses. Other documents were displayed as well, such as the “endowed by their creator” passage from the Declaration of Independence. The court barred the displays, saying they clearly promoted the commandments, rather than educated viewers about historical documents.

The second decision, in Van Orden vs. Perry, found that a 6-foot-tall monument at the Texas Capitol inscribed with the Ten Commandments was constitutional.

In that case, the court said the monument, erected decades earlier, was one of 21 historical markers and 17 monuments on the vast lawns of the Capitol and, in that context, more historical than religious.

“In certain contexts, a display of the tablets of the Ten Commandments can convey not simply a religious message but also a secular moral message,” wrote Justice Stephen G. Breyer, the court’s swing vote in both 5-4 cases, in a concurring opinion.

It was that case that led Oklahoma lawmakers to believe they had leeway in building a Ten Commandments monument in Oklahoma City.

The Legislature passed a bill in 2009 calling for a 6-foot-tall monument identical in design to its Texas counterpart — one carved from granite, embellished with the Star of David and Greek letters. It would be located near monuments bearing Native American symbols.

Hiram Sasser, a defense attorney for the Oklahoma Capitol Preservation Commission, said he thought the monument was legally sound. The Legislature was aware of the narrow window opened by the Supreme Court with Van Orden allowing religious monuments in public spaces.

“Never in a million years was anyone ever anticipating they’d strike it down,” said Sasser, referring to the Oklahoma Supreme Court decision declaring the monument unconstitutional. “The only way I can put it is that I feel like I have a stack (of cases) about 10 feet high that says why this monument is OK.”

Although the Oklahoma case seemed similar to the Van Orden case, a different issue was at stake in Dr. Bruce Prescott, James Huff, Donald Chabot and Cheryl Franklin vs. Oklahoma Capitol Preservation Commission. The question was whether the Ten Commandments monument violated the Oklahoma Constitution — not the First Amendment.

Earlier rulings suggested the Oklahoma Supreme Court might call the monument constitutional. In 1959, the court allowed the use of public funds to build a chapel on government-owned property; the chapel was nondenominational, so it did not endorse a particular faith.

In 1972, the court ruled that a 50-foot-tall Latin cross installed on government property in Oklahoma City was constitutional because its placement would not benefit any particular institution.

The court did not mention either of those decisions when it ruled 7 to 2 on June 30 that placement of the Ten Commandments monument, just feet from the Capitol, violated a clause in the Oklahoma Constitution prohibiting the use of public money for the indirect or direct benefit of any religion.

“As concerns the ‘historical purpose’ justification, the Ten Commandments are obviously religious in nature and are an integral part of the Jewish and Christian faiths,” wrote the majority in their opinion.

It was a decision that highlighted an age-old controversy over religious displays, frequently played out in the courts, which have come to define American life.

Sarah Gordon, a professor of constitutional law at the University of Pennsylvania, said the political import of such displays stemmed from the Cold War, fueled in part by Hollywood.

In 1954, two words, “under God,” were added to the Pledge of Allegiance, and in 1956, “In God we trust” replaced “E pluribus unum” as the country’s motto. President Dwight D. Eisenhower enacted both changes.

After Charlton Heston starred in the Academy Award-winning epic “The Ten Commandments,” one of the most successful films of all time, the Fraternal Order of Eagles began to erect Ten Commandments monuments to deter juvenile delinquency, leaving a lasting mark around the country. According to Gordon, the political value of such monuments was clear.

“They really were very closely identified with defending conservative American values in front of radical communist threats,” she said.

The Ten Commandments monuments will remain a point of contention — intrusive religious displays to some, valuable reminders of history and culture to others.

“It’s a continuing clash of people who have diametrically opposed views,” said the Religious Freedom Center’s Haynes. “It’s not going away.”

Neither will the Oklahoma monument.

Last week, Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt, with the support of Republican Gov. Mary Fallin, filed a petition requesting a rehearing of the Ten Commandments case.

“Additionally,” Fallin said in a statement Tuesday, “our Legislature has signaled its support for pursuing changes to our state Constitution that will make it clear the Ten Commandments monument is legally permissible. If legislative efforts are successful, the people of Oklahoma will get to vote on the issue.”

In the meantime, the monument still stands as the legal wrangling continues.

(c)2015 Los Angeles Times. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Photo via Flickr

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Corona Virus

Trending

World