Tag: texas abortion law
'Collateral Damage': Texas Abortion Ban Is Killing Pregnant Women

'Collateral Damage': Texas Abortion Ban Is Killing Pregnant Women

“It’s like a knife straight to your stomach,” Dr. Todd Ivey, a Houston-based OB-GYN at an academic hospital, told Courier Texas about a third woman dying in the state during a miscarriage.

“It’s just like, we’ve got to stop this. We’ve got to do something to stop this. Pregnancy is high-risk enough without putting all these complications on top of it.”

The “complications” that Ivey is warning Texas women about are the state’s two abortion bans, which outlaw abortions in Texas from the moment of conception.

The laws impose such harsh penalties on doctors that they are “terrified that they’re going to be criminalized,” said Dr. Austin Dennard, a Dallas-based OB-GYN.

And why wouldn’t they be terrified when they face a sentence of up to 99 years in jail if they perform an abortion that’s considered illegal? They’ll also be stripped of their medical licence, have to pay a $100,000 fine, and can also be sued civilly by anyone who wants to claim a bounty of $10,000 if they can prove a doctor provided an abortion.

“It’s hardly surprising that pregnant women have become the ‘collateral damage’ of Republican lawmakers’ mission to outlaw abortion no matter what the circumstances,” said Austin Kaplan, the Austin-based civil rights attorney who represented Texas mom Kate Cox.

Cox, 31, and a mom of two, unsuccessfully petitioned the Texas Supreme Court to allow her to get a legal abortion after she learned that her baby had a fatal anomaly and that continuing the pregnancy would endanger her future fertility and possibly her life.

Now, it’s been documented by ProPublica that since the first ban, known as Senate Bill 8, which went into effect on September 1, 2021, three young, healthy women pregnant with wanted babies have died in the state from miscarriage complications.

Nevaeh Crain, just 18, lost her life following a sepsis infection during a miscarriage less than 24 hours after her first visit to a hospital ER in Southeast Texas.

Just a day earlier, she was opening gifts at her baby shower and thrilled to be six months pregnant with a baby daughter that she planned to name Lillian.

But after she started vomiting and running a fever, she was sent home from two hospitals with a mistaken diagnosis before finally being admitted after a futile third visit on October 29, 2023.

Her mother was forced to desperately scream for someone to “do something” at the hospital to save her dying daughter’s life, but it was too late.

Josseli Barnica, a 28-year-old mom of a one-year-old daughter died of sepsis in a Houston hospital after doctors delayed what used to be standard miscarriage treatment for 40 hours, while she lay with her uterus open and exposed to bacteria.

Only when her 17-week fetus no longer had a heartbeat did doctors finally intervene to help complete her miscarriage. By then, it was too late and Barnica died of sepsis.

Porsha Negumezi, 35 and a mother of two sons, passed away during a miscarriage in a Houston hospital only 10 hours after arriving, hemorrhaging blood clots the size of grapefruits.

She bled so heavily that she required two transfusions and began experiencing chest pain. A coroner later ruled that she died of hemorrhage.

Courier Texas interviewed five doctors who provide reproductive healthcare in Texas about why they believe Negumezi, Crain and Barnica, all healthy young women, died and asked them for advice about how other pregnant Texans can do their best to survive a miscarriage in the state.

Doctors: Three miscarrying women in Texas died unnecessarily

The deaths of the women were tragically “unnecessary” according to Dennard.

“It feels like we’re in the ‘olden days,’” added Austin-based OB-GYN Dr. Nicole Moretti. “It’s a bizarre contrast … to know what you need to do in a scenario … knowing you can provide that treatment, you can physically perform the management that someone needs but then simultaneously feel like you are limited or could face repercussions. It’s maddening. It’s ludicrous.”

While none of the doctors interviewed had treated any of the women, nor had access to their medical records, they all have years of experience caring for women experiencing pregnancy complications in Texas.

And all agreed with Dennard that none of these women should have died or would have died before Texas lawmakers banned abortion.

“Women are literally losing their lives because management (of their care) is being delayed because of these bans,” added Dr. Emily Briggs, a family physician who provides obstetric care in Central Texas.

Moretti called it “crazy” that doctors are “delaying treatment to speak to a medical legal team” to find out if and when they can proceed with life saving treatment.

Texas’ abortion law bans abortions except if a woman has a life-threatening condition and is at risk of death or of “substantial impairment of a major bodily function.”

A Texas physician must also try to save the life of the fetus unless this would increase the risk of the patient’s death or impairment.

“If for whatever reason (a woman’s) body has decided that it’s time to push this pregnancy out… and there is still a heartbeat, we cannot as physicians in Texas move forward with assisting the mom with helping her uterus clamp down and cut off those blood vessels, so (instead) she keeps bleeding and bleeding and bleeding,” Briggs explained.

“A miscarriage is unintended,” Dennard pointed out. “The Texas legislature … because they don’t know anything about medicine, it didn’t realize that women have miscarriages and sometimes you need to do a D&C (dilation and curettage) procedure which I guess is being conflated with abortion.”

Even if miscarrying women in Texas don’t have a fetus with a heartbeat, there is “still a lot of confusion around this,” Ivey added.

“I don’t think our standard (of treating miscarriages) has changed. But how they’ve been handled has changed because of our restrictive abortion laws,” Ivey said. “There is a climate of fear in our state among physicians, among hospitals, among other health care providers.”

Specifically, according to all the doctors, there is now a reluctance among Texas doctors to provide a heavily bleeding and miscarrying woman with a dilation and curettage or dilation and evacuation, which are both used effectively to empty a miscarrying woman’s uterus of all the pregnancy remains. However, they do end a pregnancy, just as an abortion does.

“These aren’t even new cutting edge procedures, but they are lifesaving,” said Morretti, who pointed out that these procedures have been used as standard care in Texas and around the world for decades in order to help women complete difficult miscarriages.

Yet Negumezi, Crain and Barnica never received either procedure. Instead they suffered painful cramping, and in some cases ran fevers and bled out as their uteruses unsuccessfully tried to push their fetuses, which had no chance of survival, out of their bodies.

Negumezi was in dire need of a D&C to stop her life threatening blood loss, according to Dr. Nancy Binford, an Austin-based OB-GYN.

Gasping for breath, calling out for help

When the OB-GYN finally examined Negumezi seven hours after she arrived at Houston Methodist Sugar Land Hospital, he prescribed the drug misoprostol, which can be used to help complete miscarriages in certain circumstances.

But that could have made her condition worse, according to Binford.

“It would have made her uterus just do more of the contracting,” she said.

Binford said that because Negumezi was hemorrhaging and medical providers had already transfused her twice, she qualified as a “rush back” to the operating room.

“I’ve done a 100 rush backs in my 24 years (of practice) for an urgent issue like this to have a D&C,” she said.

But that’s not what happened to Negumezi, and even when she began having chest pains, no more tests were ordered. She began gasping for breath a couple of hours later and died as her husband frantically called out to hospital staff for help

“What happens when they’re bleeding out at a certain point, they’ve lost too much blood to support their cardiac activity,” Dennard concurred. “You lose so much blood your body is no longer able to create the clotting factors that are needed to support the blood that you have circulating in your body.”

The circumstances of the deaths of these three women have to be a warning to pregnant Texas women and their loved ones.

Young women who are having complications miscarrying can appear healthy before getting “sick very quickly,” Ivey explained.

How women can protect themselves

“If you are experiencing serious symptoms while miscarrying, you have to move very quickly to prevent (your) organs from failing,” Ivey said.

And while only three Texas women have been documented to have died from miscarriages since the state’s abortion ban has been in place, the number of Texas women who died from pregnancy or labor complications soared 56 percent from 2019 to 2022, according to a study by the Gender Equity Policy Institute.

Kaplan said he advises pregnant mothers in Texas to pack a “to go bag” so that “if you need to get out of this state to get the care you need, you’ll be ready to go. Always be thinking — if something were to go wrong, where am I headed outside of Texas.”

But what can a pregnant woman who can’t quickly leave Texas do if local hospitals or urgent care centers don’t appear to be taking the risk to their lives seriously?

“Go to the biggest city near you and go to the downtown-ist hospital and don’t care what it looks like,” Binford said. ”They have the most volumes of deliveries and with volume come pregnancy complications and that means experience in handling them.”

Binford also advised that hospitals affiliated with medical schools will have established ethics committees that will include a lawyer and that committee members will be reachable quickly if a doctor is unsure about whether they can go ahead with a procedure to remove a fetus from a woman’s body.

Texas health lawyer Leah Stewart, who advises doctors and hospitals about the abortion laws, agreed that if a woman thinks she is having a severe miscarriage or another dangerous complication like an ectopic pregnancy or if her water breaks long before viability, then she should go to a large urban hospital.

They see “every single thing that goes wrong … and are better equipped to connect the right provider and give the woman standard care.”

And if you aren’t getting the attention you need quickly, she added, “You have to keep ramping up your fit throwing.”

“You don’t think it’s going to happen to you,” said Ryan Hamilton, a Dallas-area father whose wife nearly died when she miscarried with what would have been their second child at 13 weeks pregnant.

After multiple visits to medical centers over three days and three rounds of treatment with misoprostol, Hamilton’s wife passed out unconscious on the bathroom floor in a pool of blood.

She only survived because Hamilton raced her to a hospital ER for treatment.

“”Women are dying… under the circumstances we went through.. If I wouldn’t have been home to find my wife, she would have been one of those women… I could have lost her….it’s like, ‘oh my God, I really could have.’ That’s reality and that’s hard,” Hamilton added.

Bonnie Fuller is the former CEO and editor-in-chief of HollywoodLife.com & former editor-in-chief of Glamour, Cosmopolitan, Marie Claire and USWeekly. She is now writing about reproductive freedom and politics.

Reprinted with permission from Courier Texas

How The Texas Abortion Ban Endangers Lives Of Pregnant Women

How The Texas Abortion Ban Endangers Lives Of Pregnant Women

It was several days after Kyleigh Thurman thought she was successfully treated for an ectopic pregnancy at the Ascension Seton Williamson Hospital in Round Rock, Texas.

She thought that the nightmare that she had been living through during January and February 2024, with over a month of suffering from bleeding, cramping, weakness and dizziness, was finally over.

But a week after receiving an injection of a drug that was supposed to stop the fertilized egg from growing inside her fallopian tube, Thurman was hit by a blinding pain in her right side.

She was all alone.

“I felt like I had been stabbed in my right side. It was terrible pain for one, but also just the rapid loss of blood, I nearly lost consciousness,” Thurman later told The Cut.

“I was in a location that I thought, man, if I pass out, I thought, I’m not sure anyone’s going to find me or get here. I was just like, don’t die, stay conscious,” she added.

Somehow, with her mom on the phone, she managed to stay alert and drive herself to a hospital in Burnet County. But the facility didn’t have the staff or resources to treat her now life-threatening condition. Her fallopian tube had ruptured.

Thurman was rushed to Ascension Seton Williamson Hospital an hour away, where she was told her fallopian tube needed to be removed. Even as she bled heavily and pooled blood filled her abdomen, she was reluctant to undergo the procedure. Thurman wanted to preserve her fertility.

“I want to have kids and I wanted to keep my fallopian tube,” she later recounted in a TikTok video. That’s why she was glad to receive an injection of methotrexate, which was supposed to stop the ectopic pregnancy from growing a week before. It was supposed to be slowly re-absorbing into her body.

Unfortunately, that had come too late after days of delayed treatment at the hospital where she now faced surgery.

When Thurman balked at going under the knife, her OB-GYN, who was on call at the hospital when she arrived, laid out the urgency of her dire circumstances.

“You need a blood transfusion, you’re getting dangerously close to losing your life,” she told Thurman. “You’re going to have to have surgery or you’re going to bleed out.”

Thurman later told the Associated Press in a tear-filled interview, “That’s when I just kind of was like, ‘Oh, my God, I’m dying.’”

The 35-year-old had already made multiple trips to hospital emergency rooms — twice to her hometown hospital and twice to the larger Ascension Seton Williamson Hospital in Round Rock.

But despite her own OB-GYN diagnosing an ectopic pregnancy based on blood tests and ultrasound results, the hospitals she visited kept discharging her without any treatment and told her to return a few days later.

Thurman’s experiences at the Ascension hospital were documented and filed in a complaint against the facility on Aug. 6 with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Thurman wants the agency to investigate the Texas hospital for refusing to provide her with treatment to stabilize her emergency medical condition and with failing to provide her with timely medical treatment to terminate her ectopic pregnancy.

She is represented by lawyers from the Center For Reproductive Rights, who contend in the complaint that the hospital violated the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act, a law passed in 1986 that requires all hospitals with emergency rooms that receive Medicare funding to provide health-stabilizing care even if it requires an abortion.

Delays turn dire

Thurman and Kelsie Norris-De La Cruz — a 25-year-old Arlington native whose fallopian tube nearly ruptured in an ectopic pregnancy — are the latest Texan women to file complaints or lawsuits after suffering harm to their reproductive health after the state enacted a near-total abortion ban.

Texas now has one of the strictest abortion bans to become law since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade after 50 years and ruled that women no longer had a federal right to abortion. State legislatures can now enact their own abortion bans and restrictions.

Texas has banned abortions for its seven million women of reproductive age, from the moment of conception with no exceptions for rape, incest or health of the mother or if the mother is carrying a fetus with a fatal fetal anomaly.

Former President Donald Trump has repeatedly bragged that his three right-wing justices he appointed helped strip women of their reproductive rights and people in states could vote on the issue. That’s not the case in Texas.

While Thurman and Norris-De La Cruz, who filed her complaint on August 6 against the hospital who treated her, were legally able to be treated for an ectopic pregnancy in Texas, both experienced the same delays at hospitals before their conditions became dire.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton issued an updated advisory in July 2022 that it was legal to remove an ectopic pregnancy in the state, despite the strict abortion ban. Then the Texas legislature passed House Bill 3058, providing doctors who terminate an ectopic pregnancy with an “affirmative defense” if they are prosecuted.

In other words, Texas doctors can still be charged for treating an ectopic pregnancy, but they have a legally recognized defense to the charge. But if a doctor loses, they face exceptionally harsh criminal penalties for performing an abortion, including up to 99 years in prison, the loss of their medical license, and a $100,000 fine.

Ectopic pregnancies aren’t viable. For Thurman and Norris-De la Cruz, the fertilized egg attached to their fallopian tubes where it was impossible for them to continue to grow.

In other cases of ectopic pregnancy, fertilized eggs can attach themselves to an ovary, on the cervix, in the abdomen or even in a scar from a previous C section instead of in the uterus.

Ectopic pregnancies can be deadly if not treated in time.They are the leading cause of death in the U.S. for pregnant women in their first trimester with a mortality rate of nine to 14 percent of all pregnancy-related deaths. Maternal mortality rates in Texas doubled between 1999 and 2019, even before the effect of the bans was felt in the state.

‘You can die from the bleeding’

Ectopic pregnancies become dangerous when “they grow big enough to rupture the fallopian tube causing a significant amount of bleeding internally into the abdomen,” according to Austin Dennard, a Dallas OB-GYN.

“You can die from the bleeding,” Dennard told Courier Texas. “These are pregnancies that needed to be acted on immediately.”

But that wasn’t what happened to Thurman when she first arrived with her partner at the Ascension hospital with instructions to ask for the methotrexate injection to treat her ectopic pregnancy.

She received an ultrasound that revealed a two-centimeter “rounded structure” on her right fallopian tube and no signs of a gestational sac in her uterus. In other words, there was no evidence of a pregnancy developing in her uterus.

Thurman’s OB-GYN also called the hospital and told doctors that her patient had an ectopic pregnancy and required the injection. Nevertheless, Thurman was sent home and told to come back for a check up in two days.

It was only on a return visit three days later when Thurman’s OB-GYN sent another doctor to the hospital to plead with the medical staff to provide the methotrexate injection, that it was finally administered.

Thurman said that before her own experience, she didn’t know about the state’s abortion ban and “it didn’t make sense to me why I couldn’t receive help. The experience was incredibly disempowering.”

Doctors ‘walking on eggshells’

But to Dennard, the experiences of Thurman and Norris-De La Cruz make sense given the abortion ban the legislature passed in 2021.

“When SB8 and the other bans were created, it gave physicians cold feet about treating abortions. These women are examples of how scared, terrified and confused providers are even with the Texas law redefining that it’s legal that an ectopic pregnancy is a medical exception,” Dennard said.

“There has been irreparable damage done from these abortion bans and not every physician is keeping up with the law. They’ve been told that abortions are banned in the state. It’s not the provider’s fault,” she added.

Doctors “are walking on eggshells,” Dennard added, concerned about another medical provider disagreeing with the diagnosis and raising a red flag about providing treatment.

Nancy Binford, an Austin OB-GYN, agreed that doctors are afraid to treat patients with reproductive health care issues due to the Texas abortion bans. She cited instances of doctors being afraid of their treatment being misunderstood and then potentially being reported to the hospital or another authority.

Binsford cited an example from her clinic in which a patient had a stillbirth and required a dilation and evacuation procedure to remove the fetus from the uterus. The correct medical terminology for a stillbirth is a “missed abortion,” and someone in the clinic misunderstood the diagnosis and reported the physician who treated the woman to the chief medical officer at the hospital, she said.

“But it’s never been against the law to care for a patient whose baby has already died,” Binsford said. “They’ve criminalized obstetric care in the state.”

Astrid Ackerman, an attorney for the Center For Reproductive Rights, said doctors face severe penalties for abortions so they are going beyond what’s been normally required to diagnose ectopic pregnancies. That slows down treatment.

“Even when there are exceptions to the law, doctors feel they have to over-document what care they are providing to prove they are ectopic pregnancies. The risk of prosecution is preventing doctors from doing their jobs to protect their patients,” Ackerman said.

Dennard and Binford said their pregnant patients are terrified of encountering a complication — whether it’s a miscarriage, a fatal fetal anomaly or a risk to their health — that may be difficult or not treatable in the state now.

“One hundred percent of my pregnant patients are afraid,” Dennard said. “It’s an extra stress to every stage of pregnancy. You don’t want it to, but these laws are stealing the joy out of pregnancy.”

“Women are afraid to get pregnant in Texas. There is a pervasive unease with pregnancy. Women in their 40s with high-risk pregnancies are very afraid. Those pregnancies are fraught with difficulties.”

Binford is also seeing women in their 20s asking for tubal ligations. “They don’t want to get pregnant in this world,” she said.

Cramping, bleeding and waiting

When Norris-De La Cruz had a positive pregnancy test in January, she and her boyfriend were excited. But once cramping and bleeding began, she went to an emergency room and learned she was either miscarrying or experiencing an ectopic pregnancy.

At Texas Health Arlington Memorial Hospital, she said she was denied care by two OB-GYNS for an ectopic pregnancy despite an ultrasound showing a six-centimeter mass, as well as complex fluid in her pelvis, and no gestational pregnancy sac in her uterus. Her fallopian tube was at risk of rupturing.

Norris-De La Cruz was told to return in 48 hours. But she and her mom, Stephanie Lloyd, were so desperate for treatment that they waited several hours until a new OB-GYN came on call. The emergency room physician recommended treatment for an ectopic pregnancy.

“I do not feel comfortable discharging her home and do not think that is in her best interest,” the doctor noted in her file.

Yet a third OB-GYN told her to go home and return in 48 hours. Lloyd told the Washington Post that she panicked, fearing that her daughter was going to die.

It was only through a stroke of luck that a friend’s OB-GYN agreed to examine Norris-De La Cruz and review her test results that afternoon. He immediately scheduled surgery at a different hospital.

The mass had grown so large that he was forced to remove most of her right fallopian tube and most of her right ovary. The fallopian tube had already started to rupture. If Norris-De La Cruz had waited much longer, she would have been “in extreme danger of losing her life,” Jeffery Morgan, the OB-GYN that treated her, told the Post.

“I was scared I was going to … lose my entire reproductive system if they waited too long,” Norris-De La Cruz said later. “I knew it could happen at any moment.”

Texas Health Arlington Memorial Hospital told the Post that the hospital’s top priority is “providing our patients with safe, high-quality care.”

“Treatment decisions are individualized based on a patient’s clinical condition and we believe the care provided to the patient in this case was appropriate,” the hospital said.

Ascension Hospital told The Cut that it declined to discuss the specifics of Thurman’s case but that it denied the allegations.

Ackerman said that the Health and Human Services department opened an investigation into the complaints that could last months. If the hospitals violated federal law, the facilities could lose their Medicare funding.

“We are hoping that with these complaints this won’t happen to other pregnant women in Texas,” she said.

Norris-De La Cruz said the state’s abortion ban is also to blame.

“The doctors knew I needed an abortion, but these bans are making it nearly impossible to get basic emergency healthcare. I’m filing this complaint because women like me deserve justice and accountability from those that hurt us,” she told the Associated Press.

Thurman, in a TikTok video, said she “lost a piece of my womanhood.”

“I had to fight like hell to get my care and even with all the fight I had, I still didn’t get it fast enough,” she added.

Bonnie Fuller is a contributing writer to Courier Newsroom, Ms. magazine. and The Free Press, covering politics and reproductive freedom. She is the former CEO of HollywoodLife.com and former editor-in-chief of US Weekly, Glamour, Cosmopolitan, Marie Claire and YM magazines. Please consider subscribing to Your Body, Your Choice, her free Substack newsletter.

Reprinted with permission from Courier News Texas

Texas Prosecutor Will Dismiss Charges In Self-Induced Abortion Case

Texas Prosecutor Will Dismiss Charges In Self-Induced Abortion Case

A Texas district attorney announced on Sunday that a 26-year-old woman charged with murder for a "self-induced abortion" should never have been indicted, and prosecutors will be filing a motion to dismiss the indictment on Monday.

Lizelle Herrera was arrested on Thursday by the Starr County Sheriff’s Office and held on a $500,000 bond after the sheriff's office reported that she “intentionally and knowingly cause the death of an individual by self-induced abortion.” She was held in the Starr County jail in Rio Grande City, which is on the U.S.-Mexico border, NPR reported. Now it seems District Attorney Gocha Allen Ramirez is attempting to correct the wrong by asserting in a Facebook post that “Herrera cannot and should not be prosecuted for the allegation against her.”

“Although with this dismissal Ms. Herrera will not face prosecution for this incident, it is clear to me that the events leading up to this indictment have taken a toll on Ms. Herrera and her family,” Ramirez wrote in the post. “To ignore this fact would be shortsighted. The issues surrounding this matter are clearly contentious, however based on Texas law and the facts presented, it is not a criminal matter.”


Read the district attorney’s complete Facebook post:

“Yesterday afternoon, I reached out to counsel for Ms. Lizelle Herrera to advise him that my office will be filing a motion dismissing the indictment against Ms. Herrera Monday, April 11, 2022. In reviewing applicable Texas law, it is clear that Ms. Herrera cannot and should not be prosecuted for the allegation against her.
In reviewing this case, it is clear that the Starr County Sheriff’s Department did their duty in investigating the incident brought to their attention by the reporting hospital. To ignore the incident would have been a dereliction of their duty. Prosecutorial discretion rests with the District Attorney’s office, and in the State of Texas a prosecutor’s oath is to do justice. Following that oath, the only correct outcome to this matter is to immediately dismiss the indictment against Ms. Herrera.Although with this dismissal Ms. Herrera will not face prosecution for this incident, it is clear to me that the events leading up to this indictment have taken a toll on Ms. Herrera and her family. To ignore this fact would be shortsighted. The issues surrounding this matter are clearly contentious, however based on Texas law and the facts presented, it is not a criminal matter.Going forward, my office will continue to communicate with counsel for Ms. Herrera in order to bring this matter to a close. It is my hope that with the dismissal of this case it is made clear that Ms. Herrera did not commit a criminal act under the laws of the State of Texas.”

Stephen Vladeck, a University of Texas law professor, told NBC-affiliated KXAN-TV before the motion to dismiss that homicide "doesn't apply to the murder of an unborn child if the conduct charged is 'conduct committed by the mother of the unborn child.'"

Vladeck later tweeted of the news Sunday that it is a “sobering reminder, among other things, to *always read the statute.*”

"It sure looks like the prosecutors just … forgot … that Texas’s murder statute expressly exempts from its scope a pregnant woman who terminates a pregnancy," Vladeck said in the tweet, linking to Texas penal code.

The penal code states that criminal homicide “does not apply to the death of an unborn child if the conduct charged is:

“(1) conduct committed by the mother of the unborn child; (2) a lawful medical procedure performed by a physician or other licensed health care provider with the requisite consent, if the death of the unborn child was the intended result of the procedure; (3) a lawful medical procedure performed by a physician or other licensed health care provider with the requisite consent as part of an assisted reproduction as defined by Section 160.102, Family Code; or (4) the dispensation of a drug in accordance with law or administration of a drug prescribed in accordance with law.”

Herrera’s arrest seems to exemplify exactly the kind of harm abortion rights activists have been warning of following a toxic Supreme Court decision last December. That’s when the court ruled to allow a Texas ban on abortions after six weeks with the provision that abortion providers have the right to challenge the Texas law in federal court. Many considered it early evidence of the high court's inclination to overturn the groundbreaking Roe v. Wade decision protecting abortion rights.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in a 48-page dissent at the time:

“My disagreement with the Court runs far deeper than a quibble over how many defendants these petitioners may sue. The dispute is over whether States may nullify federal constitutional rights by employing schemes like the one at hand. The Court indicates that they can, so long as they write their laws to more thoroughly disclaim all enforcement by state officials, including licensing officials. This choice to shrink from Texas’ challenge to federal supremacy will have far-reaching repercussions. I doubt the Court, let alone the country, is prepared for them.”


Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos



Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Corona Virus

Trending

World