Tag: trump inauguration
As Darkness Looms, Here's A Reason For Hope (And Laughter)

As Darkness Looms, Here's A Reason For Hope (And Laughter)

There is no metaphor for what is about to happen in Washington, D.C If we erased every threat, every lie, every theft, every crime, every con, even the inexplicably self-satisfied look on his face as he bopped awkwardly to “YMCA” at that town hall with Kristi Noem last fall, nothing, and I mean nothing, could have prepared us for the gigantic national ignominy of having a felon and rapist take the oath of office under the dome of the Capitol he had his hordes trash four years ago nearly to the day in his attempted coup.

We have reached a nadir when the only comparison to this moment that seems even marginally adequate is the shelling of Ft. Sumter by a Confederate battery that began the Civil War, which in addition to costing the lives of 600,000 American citizens, cleaved this country in ways that persist to this very day.

Lamentations by Democrats filled online spaces this morning – doom and gloom and finger-pointing and regret and anger – the eleventy-seven stages of grief that follow a political loss. But I’m going to ask you a question now that I hope will aid you in dealing with the hideous display of the inauguration and the chest-beating war dance of outrage and illegality that will be the executive orders he has promised and will certainly follow.

Have you cried, in public or in private, at the seemingly unbearable tragedy of a political loss previously in your life? I have. It was years ago. The candidate and the office at stake don’t matter, but it happened, and it was real, and my tears shocked me. What was I doing crying because one of our good guys lost to one of their bad guys? It had happened before, and it would happen again, and in the interim, the good guy would win other offices, so what was the big deal? Elections are baked into our national politics and way of life. Somebody wins, which means somebody else has to lose. That’s the way the game of politics is played.

The tragedy of the particular political loss that happened years ago came and went, along with many, many others that have happened since then. Bad things came to pass, like wars and preventable deaths from disease and poverty, but good things happened, too, like advances in civil rights and the passage of the Affordable Care Act and the expansion of health insurance to tens of millions who had never had it. Life went on.

Is this time really so different that our despair should be so deep, our sense of doom so complete?

My answer is no, and to understand why, I point you to what just happened with Trump’s big plan to execute immigration raids in Chicago later this week. It was reported that the plans for the raid “leaked,” so they have been put on hold, which is code for cancelled, at least for now.

But that is not what happened at all, and what did happen is illustrative of why there is hope even at this dark moment. It seems that Trump’s “Border Czar,” Tom Homan, was at a political party in Chicago last month and was bragging about the immigration enforcement the new Trump administration was planning, as ever, for “day one." Homan told the assembled Republican fat cats that it would begin “right here” in Chicago because the city had lots of immigrants and Trump and his minions had a bone to pick with the mayor, who they claimed had turned Chicago into a “sanctuary city.” The raids were promoted on right wing social media as part of Trump’s “shock and awe” plans for Inauguration Day.

Oh, how the arrogant and incompetent work their magic, let us count the ways!

Here is what you don’t do if you want to carry out something you’re calling a “raid.” You don’t advertise what you’re going to do in advance, because then it’s not a surprise. You don’t include the online right wing in your planning, because they’re a bunch of loudmouths and what they say is right out there for everyone to read. Which means if you’re an immigrant, and you’re in Chicago, and you read there’s going to be a raid on Tuesday, you might consider taking a quick trip to Rockford or maybe Cedar Rapids and cool your heels for a while.

Trump has not even been inaugurated. He doesn’t run the Department of Homeland Security or Immigration and Customs Enforcement yet. The people working in those departments report to Biden administration officials, who still occupy their offices and pull down federal paychecks.

Let’s consider this: Trump has been flapping his jaws about how much he hates the federal workforce and how he wants to fire people wholesale and replace them with his loyalist hacks. So, do you think there might be some federal employees in the agencies associated with immigration enforcement who are not looking forward to the reign of Tom Homan and Kristi Noem, she of the nervously-smiling-through-the-“YMCA”-dance-along? Do you think that some of these federal employees, over whom Trump does not yet have authority, might have helped to leak the Homan plans for the Chicago raids?

See how this works? If you want to do stuff like Trump has been bragging he’ll do, such as disassemble whole sections of the federal government and cut not billions but trillions from the budgets that pay for the jobs of people Trump has promised to fire, you had better have your shit together, because there are a lot more of them than there are of you, and many of these federal employees Trump is so disdainful of love their jobs and count on their paychecks to pay their mortgages and their kids’ college tuitions.

It goes beyond the misbegotten immigration raid. Take Trump’s nominee for Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth, who has made no secret of his disrespect for the service of women and gay people in our military. The first thing Hegseth is going to have to do when he sits down at his big desk on the E-Ring of the Pentagon is deal with the severe recruitment problem the Army, Navy, and Air Force are having. The point being, you can’t have an effective military if you don’t have the warm bodies to fill the ranks. So, whatchagonna do, Petey boy? With holes in the ranks of serving troops already, you’re going to drive women and gays and trans soldiers out of the service because they get the message you think they aren’t up to the task of being what you insist on calling “warriors,” without a reason beyond your own Christian Nationalist prejudice.

That makes a hell of a lot of sense, doesn’t it?

Trump’s people just aren’t very good at the job of being avenging assholes for Donald Trump. I read today that a total of 19 former Fox News hosts, contributors, staffers, on-air commentators and executives will be filling jobs in the new Trump administration. They aren’t even in office yet, and already like Hegseth, they are well-endowed with the useful qualities of arrogance and ignorance and incompetence, and already they are alienating the people who actually run the operations of the government they are taking control of and will seek to bend to their will.

We have a tendency to look at Trump and the politics of Trumpism as if it happens in a vacuum. We are accustomed to listening to Trump make pronouncements as if the words coming out of his mouth are actions. You need look no further than Trump’s campaign promises to deport “ten million” immigrants, “the largest deportations in this country’s history.” Even today, there was a story about Trump bragging that he will deport more immigrants than Eisenhower. Who knew that was even a thing, and yet there he is, with more words, more bragging, and of course, more lies.

Above all, remember the lies. Lies are his oxygen. He can’t breathe without lying, and so a lot of what we will see and hear from Trump in the coming days will simply be lies. He will issue executive orders that are lies, things that cannot be done by executive fiat, things that will immediately come under fire from administrative challenges and lawsuits, things that have no meaning, such as “shutting down” the windmills and “ending” electric cars. Even “drill baby drill” is already imperiled: the Biden administration put up leases in the arctic for auction, and there were no takers. Nobody wants to drill for oil up there at a time when drilling down here is at record levels.

Things are not good in this country of ours with Donald Trump on his way into office. We would be a lot better off if that were not the case. It’s not that despair isn’t an option. There is nothing wrong with a little hand-wringing at a time like this.

But think of it as if you are Muhammed Ali. Do you remember what he would do in the ring just after the bell rang? He would skip around, shaking his arms at his sides from the shoulders, seemingly defenseless, until his opponent would do something stupid, like taking a shot at Ali. His left would flash upwards, then again, then a right, and punches would connect and it was a fight.

We’re in the arm-shaking stage. The fight begins tomorrow. Get ready to be hit and to hit back. This is politics. We’re good at it. We’re fighters. We’re Democrats. It’s what we came for.

It's Inauguration Day! Welcome To The Grifters Ball

It's Inauguration Day! Welcome To The Grifters Ball

Legalized bribery is still bribery — and there is no other way to describe the celebration that marks the second presidential inauguration of Donald Trump.

With the menacing manner of a mob boss, Trump has extorted million-dollar contributions from dozens of corporations that fear federal retribution against their shareholders or management (as in the case of Meta boss Mark Zuckerberg, who coughed up his million after Trump literally threatened him with "life in prison" not so long ago).

No doubt many of the corporate and billionaire donors are keen to prove their loyalty to a new administration that promises to uphold their interests. They know better than to worry about Republican proclamations that their party now represents "working class" Americans. Nobody who has glanced at Project 2025 or read Elon Musk's posts could harbor any such illusions — and surely the inaugural donors from outfits such as General Motors, the pharmaceutical lobby, Pratt Industries, Uber, Amazon and Microsoft do not.Many of the corporations currently greasing Trump withheld donations from his 2016 festivities, apparently repelled by the racism, misogyny and propensity for violence he had flaunted during the campaign. Some combination of fear and greed has overcome any such scruples this year.

Ralph Nader's Public Citizen, a nonprofit that monitors corporate influence, is tracking the payments of tribute, and even its jaded staffers are shocked by the Trump inaugural's brazen style. Said Craig Holman, a government ethics expert at the Nader group: "The record-breaking cesspool of special interest financing for the Trump-Vance Inaugural Committee raises serious concerns about the ability of corporations and wealthy special interests to purchase influence over public policy or lucrative government contracts." Remember last spring when Trump told oil executives that they could have whatever they want, so long as they raised a billion dollars? He just appointed one of them, a fracking magnate and climate denier named Chris Wright, to take over the Department of Energy.

Estimates of the amount that the presidential inauguration committee will collect from both eager and reluctant donors range up to $200 million, a record sum that has prompted boasting from Trump and his minions. Impressive as it is, the inaugural hoard only represents a down payment on what portends to be four years of unprecedented and gluttonous corruption.

If you wonder why Trump needs $200 million for this little event, so does everyone who ever ran a prior inauguration. Due to frigid weather in Washington, the 47th president will take the oath of office indoors at a ceremony paid for by the taxpayers. Then the Trump-Vance committee will host only three inaugural balls — a tiny schedule compared with the number of balls held by his predecessors — plus a few events at his Trump National Golf Club, miles from the capital.

In other words, they're spending almost none of that big haul.

Yet while the actual expense of parties and fireworks will be nominal, the opportunities for grift are vast. As in so many instances during Trump's first presidency, those golf club events are siphoning big money from the inaugural fund into his business accounts. The Trumps ran a similar scam eight years ago, when the 2016 inaugural committee inked massively overpriced contracts for rooms and services purchased from the Trump International Hotel in Washington.

That pattern continued during his administration, with big profits booked from taxpayers footing the bills at Trump resorts for Secret Service agents protecting the president and members of his family.

Where will all the money go this time? In 2017, the Trump inaugural raised $107 million, a total far in excess of what the committee spent on its events. The committee — whose top staff included notorious crooks like Rick Gates and Elliot Broidy — never presented any accounting of its expenditures, let alone an audit. Tens of millions of dollars simply disappeared.

The official story is that funds not spent on this week's festivities will be transferred to the newly formed Donald J. Trump Presidential Library Fund Inc. — ostensibly to establish a repository and museum memorializing his presidency.

Maybe that will happen someday. But the sordid history of the Trump Foundation, ordered to shut down after the New York state attorney general proved its myriad abuses, showed that the Trumps are familiar with every trick for looting a nonprofit. Nobody audits the inaugural committees, which are not required to disclose their spending. The likelihood is that most or all of the tainted inaugural lucre will wind up somehow in their pockets.

Day One won't see a peace agreement between Ukraine and Russia, a drop in grocery prices, or anything else that Trump promised during his campaign. The customary grifting will resume promptly, however, as soon as he takes his hand off the Bible. In fact, it has already begun.

Joe Conason is founder and editor-in-chief of The National Memo. He is also editor-at-large of Type Investigations, a nonprofit investigative reporting organization formerly known as The Investigative Fund. His latest book is The Longest Con: How Grifters, Swindlers and Frauds Hijacked American Conservatism.






Ivanka Trump arrives at former President Trump's inauguration.

‘Major Grifting’: Ivanka Testified Falsely In Inauguration Probe

Reprinted with permission from Alternet

Ivanka Trump in sworn testimony claimed she "really didn't have an involvement" in the planning of her father's January 2017 inauguration event, but according to Mother Jones she "testified inaccurately during her deposition" in a lawsuit brought by Washington, D.C. Attorney General Karl Racine.

Racine is accusing the Trump family of misusing charitable funds to enrich themselves (something of which the Trump family allegedly knows a thing or two.)

"As Racine put it," Mother Jones reports, "the lawsuit maintains 'that the Inaugural Committee, a nonprofit corporation, coordinated with the Trump family to grossly overpay for event space in the Trump International Hotel… The Committee also improperly used non-profit funds to throw a private party [at the Trump Hotel] for the Trump family costing several hundred thousand dollars.' In short, the attorney general accused the Trump gang of major grifting, and he is seeking to recover the money paid to the Trump Hotel so those funds can be used for real charitable purposes."

Ivanka Trump "was part of the decision-making for various aspects of the inauguration, including even the menus for events," despite her sworn testimony that she "really didn't have an involvement" in the planning aside from giving "feedback" if her "opinion was solicited." The report cites "documents filed in that case and material obtained by Mother Jones."

Emails between several individuals suggest Ivanka Trump distanced herself from the events after they were unable to attract "A-listers."

Other parts of the deposition show Ivanka Trump "downplayed her relationship with" Stephanie Winston Wolkoff, apparently a friend of both Ivanka and Melania Trump who later would write a scathing exposé that included then-First Lady Melania Trump's now infamous profanity-laden tirade about kids, cages, and Christmas.

Ivanka Trump "described Winston Wolkoff as 'a person I knew in New York who does events,' adding, 'I didn't know Stephanie Winston that well. I just knew she was very good at planning. I just knew her in that capacity.'"

Emails appear to show that too was false.

Read the entire report here.

Did Don Jr. Lie To Prosecutors Under Oath? Watch The Videotape

Did Don Jr. Lie To Prosecutors Under Oath? Watch The Videotape

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos

The news cycle during the last White House administration was a never-ending stream of corruption and nepotism. The Trumps (and Kushners) participated in such transparent acts of self-dealing and corruption that it became clear they believed their positions in government would immunize them from any prosecution of their actions. Added to this cocktail of criminality and power, is the fact that the Trump family is filled with starkly third-rate people, like Donald Trump Jr. It isn't hard to see how they have broken the laws, stolen Americans' money, and abused their positions in government.

In January of 2020, Washington, D.C. Attorney General Karl Racine filed a civil complaint against the Trump Organization and the Presidential Inaugural Committee. Racine alleged that these two Trumpian groups acted a lot like money laundering operations. A year later, while the Trump and Republican machine tried to overthrow our democratically elected government, Racine was asking for depositions from both Ivanka and Junior. Reportedly, Racine was asking the conman's progeny about money purportedly spent by Trump's Inaugural Committee on the Trump Organization—the latter technically being the family business. Ivanka worked the Inaugural Committee while Junior worked the Trump Organization. At the time, Racine reportedly said Trump Jr.'s deposition "raised further questions," that his office would continue to pursue.

Mother Jonesreports that some of the questions raised during Junior's deposition may revolve around him lying during his testimony.

Donald Trump Jr.'s deposition is filled with his inability to "recall" whether or not he was involved at all in the deals and moves being made to bring together Donald Trump's 2017 inauguration. One might say he pleads ignorance to most questions asked of him by attorneys. And even though the words "ignorance" and "Donald Trump Jr.," go together like peanut butter and chocolate, Junior possibly being a liar is more believable.

In documents and video obtained by Mother Jones, Donald Trump, Jr. seems to have lied or at the very least misled, prosecutors when he was asked about knowing close Melania Trump friend, Stephanie Winston Wolkoff, who raised concerns about price-gouging by the Trump organization, when the Trump hotel was charging the Inaugural Committee "twice the market rate for event space." According to Racine, the committee's deal with the hotel ended up being well above market rates.

During his deposition, Trump Jr. was asked about Winston Wolkoff: "Do you know her?" He replied, "I know of her. I think I've met her, but I don't know her. If she was in this room I'm not sure I would recognize her." He added, "I had no involvement with her."

Stephanie Winston Wolkoff, you might remember, is the former senior adviser to Melania Trump. She's the lady who wrote the tell-all memoir about her time with the former first lady. Mother Jones has video from inauguration night of Junior telling a camera how great Winston Wolkoff is, and they also have text exchanges showing that Winston Wolkoff and Junior likely spoke on the phone a bit, and emails from Trump Jr. to Winston Wolkoff asking about helping out with inauguration festivities.

Winston Wolkoff didn't comment on Junior's testimony but she told Mother Jones: "I did not think it was right for the Trump Family or the Trump Family's businesses to be financially profiting from the presidential inauguration. It was a gross mismanagement of funds and an abuse of authority, and I made it very clear to people in the Trump Family and the inauguration committee how I felt."

The video where Trump Jr. is praising Winston Wolkoff also happens to be at an inauguration event that Junior also didn't recall attending. Video evidence says he definitely attended it. Most of Junior's testimony is evasive. Many of the questions directed at him were about private Trump organization events that seem likely to have been paid for, or in part funded by, the Trump Inauguration Committee—something that would be the definition of self-dealing. Prosecutors have receipts for all of these expenditures and whether or not it matters if Junior is lying or simply an ignoramus, will be a legal question decided by the courts.

To be clear, the Republican Party is fully complicit in self-dealing under the guise of self-promotion. And both the Trumps and the GOP use made-up cultural changes to try and obfuscate the real issues of their corruption and impotence as leaders. But lawyers don't care about your incitements to overthrow the government on Fox News when they are investigating whether or not you stole money.

Here's Trump Jr. talking about how great a person he told lawyers he didn't really know was, at an event he couldn't recall attending.


Watch Donald Trump, Jr. Praise Stephanie Winston Wolkoffwww.youtube.com

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Corona Virus

Trending

World