Tag: white house
Jimmy Carter

Jimmy Carter Dead At 100; President Biden Will Deliver Eulogy

The 39th president of the United States, James Earl Carter Jr., died yesterday after receiving care at his home in Plains, Georgia, where he resided with his wife, Rosalynn Carter, until she passed on Sunday, November 19, 2023. On that day, the former President refused hospital care, saying he wanted to go out holding Rosalynn's hand, according to historian Michael Beschloss

"Number one, this was one of the great marriages in American history, even if they weren't president and first lady," said Beschloss. "Not only the length of this marriage, (77 years) but the closeness of it — that partnership. And you know, everyone who has said this in the last two minutes is absolutely right. They love most of all being with each other. I am told by someone who is very close to both Carters, that last winter, when Jimmy Carter was told that he was very sick and there was not very much that could be done for him, he was told, probably the best thing is for you to go into the hospital where you can get the best care. And I am told that President Carter said, no, I want to get home, and be in bed with Rosalynn, and just sit holding hands, and that's the way I'd like to close my life. And that's really the way it happened."

Last May, one of Jimmy Carter’s grandsons said that the former president's life is “coming to the end.

He's "doing OK. He has been in hospice, as you know, for almost a year and a half now, and he really is, I think, coming to the end that, as I’ve said before, there’s a part of this faith journey that is so important to him, and there’s a part of that faith journey that you only can live at the very end and I think he has been there in that space," Jason Carter said.

According to earlier reports, President Joe Biden will deliver Carter's eulogy.

In recent years, Carter had received various hospital treatments, including when he revealed in August 2015 that he had brain cancer and was undergoing radiation treatment — an illness he recovered from, seemingly against the odds.

In addition to being president, the 100-year-old was a U.S. Navy submarine officer, a farmer, a diplomat, a Nobel laureate, a Sunday school teacher and one of the world’s most well-known humanitarians.

Carter won the presidency in 1976, following the Nixon and Ford administrations, at a time of grave political and social tumult not unlike our own. During his tenure, the Democrat prioritized human rights and social justice, enjoying a solid first two years, which included brokering a peace deal between Israel and Egypt dubbed the Camp David Accords.

But his administration hit numerous snags — the most serious being the taking of U.S. hostages in Iran and the disastrous failed attempt to rescue the 52 captive Americans in 1980.

The blowback from the U.S. boycott of the 1980 Summer Olympics, held in the former Soviet Union in response to that country’s invasion of Afghanistan, may have also hurt Carter.

Richard Moe, who served from 1977 to 1981 as chief of staff to Vice President Walter Mondale, offered an alternative view of Carter’s presidency in 2015, citing numerous achievements.

As worthy as Jimmy Carter’s post-presidency has been, it shouldn’t overshadow his time in office, which has been too often overlooked, and which stands in sharp contrast to what we see in the [Trump administration],” Moe said.

In November 1980, Republican challenger Ronald Reagan beat Carter, relegating him to a single term of office on a wave of staunch conservatism.

“We told the truth, we obeyed the law, and we kept the peace,” said Vice President Walter Mondale at the end of Carter’s term.

In the introduction of his 2015 book, A Full Life, Carter repeated the Mondale quote, adding, “We championed human rights.”

As the years passed, a more nuanced image of Carter emerged, taking into account his post-presidential activities and reassessing his achievements.

He founded the Carter Center in 1982 to pursue his vision of world diplomacy and received the 2002 Nobel Peace Prize for his efforts to promote social and economic justice.

Carter said basic Christian tenets such as justice and love served as the bedrock of his presidency, and the ex-president taught Sunday school at Maranatha Baptist, his church in Plains, well into his 90s.

Sen. Raphael Warnock of Georgia, who is also a senior pastor at Ebenezer Baptist Church where Martin Luther King, Jr. preached, wished the Carter family comfort as the former president entered hospice.

"Across life's seasons, President Jimmy Carter, a man of great faith, has walked with God," Warnock tweeted. "In this tender time of transitioning, God is surely walking with him."

Both Jimmy and Rosalynn Carter made plans to be buried at their family home in Plains, near “a willow tree at the pond’s edge, on a gentle sloping lawn, where they will be buried in graves marked by simple stones.”

The Carters’ property has already been deeded to the National Park Service.

With additional reporting from AFP.

Reprinted with permission from Alternet.

'Better Do It Soon': Shaking Down Big Companies For Trump Inaugural Donations

'Better Do It Soon': Shaking Down Big Companies For Trump Inaugural Donations

Donald Trump is keeping a close eye on which companies are donating money to his upcoming inauguration, and issued a veiled threat to those that don't, Rolling Stonereported on Wednesday.

The report said Trump has been asking whether specific companies have given money to his inaugural committee, which is planning the events surrounding Trump’s swearing-in ceremony. When Trump was told that an unnamed "big corporation" had yet to give funds, Trump reportedly said, “Well, they better do it soon then"—a comment that sure as hell sounds like a threat.

A number of major companies are donating $1 million a pop to Trump’s inauguration, including Uber, Meta, Amazon, and major automakers like Ford, General Motors, and Toyota.

In fact, The Wall Street Journal reported that at least 11 companies that denounced the Trump-incited January 6 insurrection at the Capitol are now donating to his inauguration.

The Journal reported that Trump’s inaugural committee is seeking major donations from these companies as “a means for extracting a mea culpa from corporate America for its shunning of Trump.”

The capitulation to Trump before he even steps foot back in the White House is a sign that corporate America fears being on Trump’s bad side, knowing that he has a vindictive personality and seeks revenge against those he believes have wronged him.

Indeed, Trump targeted companies during his first term in ways that would hurt their financial bottom line. One of the best examples of Trump using his office to inflict pain upon someone he disliked is Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos.

During his first stint in the Oval Office, Trump threatened to raise prices for the United States Postal Service to hurt Amazon's business, took away a major defense contract from Amazon, and threatened The Washington Post, which Bezos owns. Now, Bezos is sucking up to Trump and he chipped in $1 million to Trump's inaugural festivities.

Other companies are also capitulating to Trump to try to curry favor (and avoid his wrath) after Jan. 20.

ABC News gave $15 million for Trump's future presidential library to get Trump to drop what experts said was a weak lawsuit against the news organization.

Morning Joe co-hosts Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski also visited Trump’s gaudy Mar-a-Lago estate to make amends with Trump after their coverage of the 2024 election.

And tech giant SoftBank Group announced a $100 billion “investment” in U.S. projects during an elaborate Dec. 16 press conference with CEO Masayoshi Son and Trump at Mar-a-Lago.

It’s all an ominous sign that corporate America is “obeying in advance,” a term author Timothy Snyder coined in his book On Tyranny, which he describes as a “guide for surviving and resisting America’s turn towards authoritarianism.”

“Most of the power of authoritarianism is freely given,” Snyder wrote in the book. “In times like these, individuals think ahead about what a more repressive government will want, and then offer themselves without being asked.”

That sure looks like what is happening now, as corporate leaders travel to Mar-a-Lago to meet with Trump and fork over millions so the wannabe despot can throw himself a lavish celebration after he takes the oath of office.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos.

 Donald Trump

Trump's Greenland Daydreams: Is There Method Behind His Imperial Madness?

In a slew of social media posts on Christmas Day, President-elect Donald Trump reiterated something that he suggested last month following his victory over Kamala Harris: that the United States "should own Greenland, annex Canada, and reclaim the Panama Canal."

In a Thursday Politico report, breaking news reporter Myah Ward asserts that "if Trump’s overtures are evidence that his America First policy agenda may have an interventionist component, they also served as an early reminder of how the incoming president conducts foreign policy: Lots of threats, confusion, freewheeling and a dose of unpredictability."

Ward writes, "And Republicans are largely writing it off as saber rattling, an approach that sometimes helped Trump get what he wanted out of allies and adversaries during his first term, but also at times threw his administration into chaos or sowed confusion like the famous late-night 'Covfeve' tweet."

Matthew Bartlett, Republican strategist Matthew Bartlett — who served under Trump's first administration — told Politico, "I was there at the State Department when a tweet would be issued, and then, every intellectual in the building had to somehow figure out if there’s any logical sense to this and policy to this and if there’s any upside, or if this actually is Covfefe."

He added, "But from a foreign policy context, crazy worked just fine the first time. If leaders are like, we may not respect you but we absolutely think that you’re bonkers, and we don’t know what’s coming at us next, great. Full send. And if that leads to better peace and prosperity in Ukraine, in Israel, with terrorists on watch, with foreign states. Great. They should be put on notice."

Another GOP strategist, Dave Carney, told the news outlet that the president-elect could be "trying to soften the ground for negotiations," Ward reports, "recalling his threats during his first term to withdraw from NATO — which some Republicans credited with pressuring other countries to increase their defense spending."

Carney suggested that "Trump’s unpredictability can be an asset in some scenarios," Ward added.

"With the president, there’s, I think, always the possibility that other countries think, ‘holy shmoly, he may actually do that, we should try to accommodate him,’” the former Trump appointee said.

Reprinted with permission from Alternet.

Scott Jenning

Do You Want Donald Trump To Succeed -- Or America?

Those 38 Republicans who frustrated Donald Trump's demand that he be freed from the inconvenience of a debt ceiling vote early in his term were truly impressive. These are guys with whom yours truly disagrees much of the time.

What Trump's smarter knee-jerk defenders really believe is a matter of speculation. Scott Jennings used to work for normie President George W. Bush. He clearly sees his current job as left tackle, defending Trump from charges of lunacy, whatever their merit.

Thus, he turned on these deficit hawks for not submitting to the demand that they remove a stumbling block for Trump's evident plans to cover his tax cuts and spending with new borrowing. Jennings put it diplomatically, saying that Trump "had to convince them that teamwork matters."

It does, but you first have to decide what team you're on. Is it Team Trump or Team America? They are not necessarily the same team.

Rep. Chip Roy of Texas took issue with colleagues willing to let Trump off the debt ceiling hook. "I'm absolutely sickened by a party that campaigns on fiscal responsibility," he said, "and has the temerity to go forward to the American people and say you think this is fiscally responsible."

Roy is surely not on board with preserving the Affordable Care Act as I am, but that would be good for Team America. Trump will very likely work to eviscerate, if not kill, it. He tried the first term and almost succeeded.

We should all agree that restoring law and order in our immigration program would be good for Team America. Trump talked a big game about doing this. I have my doubts.

His vow to also go after undocumented migrants who have broken laws, apart from entering the country illegally, is low fruit. Who could be against that? For the record, Barack Obama deported many more "criminal aliens" than did Donald Trump in his first term.

Trump now says he would also send home recent arrivals, including those who otherwise haven't broken the law. But then Trump runs afoul of the moneyed interests who say they need the labor and who are his people.

Most important is sending a message that, henceforth, anyone who sneaks over the border doesn't get to stay. What rouses most pessimism about Trump's dedication to stopping future illegal immigration has been his refusal to support E-Verify. E-Verify is an online database that lets employers know whether a new hire may legally work in this country. Thus, they could no longer accept fake documents or assume that no authority would bother them.

E-Verify or something like it is the only way to cut off the job magnet at the root of illegal immigration. As long as the undocumented can get a job in the U.S., they're going to come here. And some already say that if Trump does send them home, they'll just slip back in again.

Asked about E-Verify during his first term, Trump responded, "E-Verify is so tough that in some cases, like farmers, they're not, they're not equipped for E-Verify." The notion that farmers don't know how to use computers is nonsense. Also insulting to farmers.

Back to the present, Jennings poses "a core question." (That sounds so principled.) "What does the constituent want?" he asked. "Do they want you to execute your ideology or do they want Donald Trump to succeed?"

It was quite refreshing for some of the dissenting Republicans to say they represented their constituents, not Trump. Much of America has come a long distance, and not in a good way, to equating one man's interests with America's.

Do they want Trump to succeed or America?

Reprinted with permission from Creators.

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Corona Virus

Trending

World