Tag: women
Donald Trump

Trump's Win Is A Presidential 'First' In So Many Embarrassing Ways

If Vice President Kamala Harris had won the 2024 election, inauguration day in 2025 would have seen several landmark firsts in American history: the first woman, the first Black woman, and the first Asian woman—sworn in as president.

Instead, Donald Trump won, and he will be the “first” in far more embarrassing ways.

Trump will be the first president in American history who will be sworn in after having been impeached. Twice. Trump was impeached for his plot to use the powers of the presidency to pressure Ukraine into smearing President Joe Biden. Later, Trump was impeached for his role in whipping up his supporters to attack the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

Trump will also be the first inaugurated U.S. president with two federal indictments under his belt. He has been indicted for attempting to interfere in the electoral process in the 2020 election following his defeat against Biden. Trump was also indicted for improperly taking classified documents and keeping them at his Mar-a-Lago estate, notably in the bathroom next to the toilet.

At a more local level, Trump’s conviction in New York on 34 felony counts will go with him into the Oval Office. Trump made history when he was convicted by a jury of his peers for trying to influence the outcome of the 2016 election via hush payments to adult film star Stormy Daniels.

That presidential first will be paired with Trump’s upcoming sentencing for those convictions—the kind of thing even former President Richard Nixon did not have to contend with.

Trump will also be the first president to be found liable for sexual abuse. In 2023, a New York jury awarded writer E. Jean Carroll $5 million for Trump abusing her in 1996. The jury also found that Trump had defamed Carroll in repeated public statements personally attacking her and her allegations.

There has never been a president sworn in with racketeering charges hanging over their head, but Trump has broken through that barrier. He is currently facing charges in Georgia related to his schemes to subvert the 2020 election in that state. The Georgia prosecutor who brought the case against Trump, Fani Willis, was reelected on Tuesday night.

These blots on Trump’s record were known for months and in spite of them—perhaps even because of them—Republicans chose him as their nominee and never backpedaled even as more details of his actions became public.

Now he and the party are breaking new ground ahead of his second inauguration, but it is a far cry from breaking the glass ceiling.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos.

Republicans Enraged Their Wives Might 'Secretly' Vote For Harris

Republicans Enraged Their Wives Might 'Secretly' Vote For Harris

Right-wing Republicans are up in arms over a new campaign ad that reminds women their vote is private and they do not need to vote for former President Donald Trump just because their husbands want them to.

"In the one place in America where women still have a right to choose, you can vote any way you want, and no one will ever know," actress Julia Roberts narrates in the ad. "Remember, what happens in the booth, stays in the booth. Vote Harris-Walz."

Pastor Doug Pagitt, the executive director of Vote Common Good, the group that made the ad, told The Wall Street Journal that he often hears from evangelical women that they feel obligated to vote the same way as their husbands. This ad, he said, gives those women the permission structure to vote for Vice President Kamala Harris.

The ad has Trump-supporting Republicans pissed.

Charlie Kirk, whose Turning Point USA organization is working on the turnout operation for Trump’s campaign, said it's horrible that women would “undermine their husbands” even though the husband “works his tail off to make sure that she can have a nice life.”

Fox News' Jesse Watters went even further, saying Wednesday night that he would consider it a form of cheating if his wife voted for Harris.

“If I found out Emma was going into the voting booth and pulling the lever for Harris, that's the same thing as having an affair,” Watters said of his wife, who at one point was his mistress during his first marriage.

After seeing the Julia Roberts ad, John McEntee, a former Trump White House aide and Project 2025 author joked that giving women the right to vote should be repealed.

“This video has made me rethink the 19th Amendment,” McEntee said.

Trump-supporting “Christian influencer” Dale Partridge explicitly said women must vote how their husbands tell them. “In a Christian marriage, a wife should vote according to her husband’s direction. He is the head and they are one. Unity extends to politics. This is not controversial,” Partridge wrote on X.

The Republican rage that women would dare to vote Harris over Trump is yet another sign that they still do not understand that women are angry about Trump abortion bans across the country.

The Associated Press reported that women worried about reproductive freedom could swing the election to Harris in battleground states. Polling shows that women are supporting Harris by large margins, while men are backing Trump.

“In modern presidential politics, the gender gap has never been wider,” Democratic pollster Celinda Lake and Republican pollster Amanda Iovino wrote in a joint New York Times op-ed published Wednesday.

Democratic strategists added that the male reaction to the Julia Roberts spot is evidence that the ad needs to exist.

“This type of sentiment is likely not new, but it's troubling that they're so willing to be out there with it,” Christina Reynolds, communications director of EMILY’s List, which backs female candidates who support abortion rights, wrote on X. “This is why we are reminding people their vote is private.”

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos.

Voting By Women

'Best News For Democrats': Surge In Early Voting By Women

On Election Night 2024, decision desks will be paying especially close attention to the vote count in Pennsylvania — a crucial swing state that has 19 electoral votes and will help decide the outcome of the presidential race.

National and battleground state polls have been showing a very close race in the Keystone State, where Republican Donald Trump and Democratic Kamala Harris are tied in CBS News and CNN polls released in late October. A Quinnipiac University poll released on October 30 showed Trump with a two percent lead in Pennsylvania. A Marist poll released on November 1 showed Harris two points head there.

Early voting is underway in Pennsylvania. And according to Politico reporters Megan Messerly and Jessica Piper, Democrats view a heavy turnout among female voters as a very good sign for Harris.

"Across battlegrounds, there is a 10-point gender gap in early voting so far," Messerly and Piper explain in an article published on October 29. "Women account for roughly 55 percent of the early vote, while men are around 45 percent, according to a Politico analysis of early vote data in several key states. The implications for next week's election results are unclear; among registered Republicans, women are voting early more than men, too. But the high female turnout is encouraging to Democratic strategists, who expected that a surge in Republican turnout would result in more gender parity among early voters."

Messerly and Piper add, "It's impossible to know who these women are voting for, including whether Democrats are winning over unaffiliated or moderate Republican women disillusioned with former President Donald Trump. But the gender gap has been one of the defining features of the 2024 campaign, and Harris allies see the lack of a surge of male voters as an encouraging sign."

Tangle News' Issac Saul tweeted that Politico's "analysis of early voting data in Pennsylvania found that women registered as Democrats made up nearly a third of early votes this year from people who did not vote in the state in 2020." And this, Saul added, is the "best news for Dems in weeks."

Democratic strategist Tom Bonier told Politico, "In some states, women are actually exceeding their vote share from 2020, which is, at this point, shocking to me. I never would have bet on that.”

Messerly and Piper report, "According to TargetSmart’s analysis, Black and Latino women under the age of 30 are not only showing up at higher rates than their male peers — but by even a larger margin than they did in 2020."

The Politico reporters add, "That finding is echoed by internal data shared with Politico by the progressive, women-focused organization Supermajority, which is targeting many of these women: More than a third of the 3.6 million low-propensity women the organization is focused on turning out have already voted, which Democrats see as a good sign given that infrequent voters tend to vote later or on Election Day."

Reprinted with permission from Alternet.

Sorry, But Usha Vance Can't Clean Up Her Husband's 'Cat' Box

Sorry, But Usha Vance Can't Clean Up Her Husband's 'Cat' Box

Republicans handed Usha Vance the unenviable task of cleaning up her husband's history of hostile comments regarding women. Alas, she tried.

Specifically, Usha attempted to dismiss J.D. Vance's trashing of "childless cat ladies" as a "quip." A "quip" is a witty or clever remark, often characterized by its brevity. Had Donald Trump's running mate left it at that, one could make that argument, however stretched. But, no, J.D. went on to say that they "are miserable at their own lives and the choices that they've made, and so they want to make the rest of the country miserable, too." That was not brief, and humor is not J.D.'s strong suit.

Usha then dug the hole deeper.

"What he was really saying," she explained, "is that it can be really hard to be a parent in this country."

There may be truth in that, but he said no such thing.

Usha said her husband "would never" want to offend people who are struggling to have children while acknowledging that some people choose not to start families for "very good" reasons.

Oh?

The reason people choose to start or to not start families is no business of hers or of J.D.'s. Vance is one of those tech bros who believe their pile of money makes their opinions on how others, especially women, conduct their lives very, very important.

Three years ago, Vance produced a fundraising email stating, "We've allowed ourselves to be dominated by childless sociopaths - they're invested in NOTHING because they're not invested in this country's children." Oh, "childless sociopaths" is not insulting, right?

Our military cemeteries are populated by men who invested everything in their country before they were old enough to start families. These are Trump's "suckers and losers," a reason he gave for skipping a planned visit to the Aisne-Marne American Cemetery — burial ground for American soldiers who died in World War I. It was also raining.

To quote from Project 2025, the wish list for Trump's second term closely tied to Vance, "Married men and women are the ideal, natural family structure because all children have a right to be raised by the men and women who conceived them."

The first half of that sentence is OK. The traditional family is an ideal. But then we get into the conception part. Just suppose the source of the sperm or of the egg is a violent alcoholic or druggie. Adopted children can do just fine, as can children raised by a grandparent. In sum, children have a right to be raised by responsible adults.

Birth rates are falling in most of the industrialized world. The reasons are complex. Even societies that offer ample child care and guarantee parental leave are seeing fewer babies. But Project 2025 would actually take away supports. It would kill the Head Start program, designed to help low-income children prepare for school and free parents to go to work.

The tech bros can sit around their ski chalets in Utah and "phone it in." A nanny may be with their kids, wherever their kids may be, assuming they have any. Most working Americans, male and female, do not have that luxury. The nurse doing the hospital night shift has to stay till dawn. Police officers must show up at grisly scenes at all hours. Buses still need drivers.

Topping off J.D. Vance's longtime critiques of women is his singling out of Simone Biles in 2021 for withdrawing from competition over mental health issues. He accused the media of supporting Biles, America's greatest gymnast ever, during her "weakest moment." Somehow, the words "weak" and Biles don't go together.

Usha has her work cut out for her.

Froma Harrop has worked as a reporter and editor for Reuters business desk, The New York Times News Service and the Providence Journal. She has won numerous awards and written for many publications including The New York Times, Harper’s Bazaar and Institutional Investor.

Reprinted with permission from Creators.

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Corona Virus

Trending

World