{{ site.specific_data.Twitter }}
GOP Senators Spent $100M Calling Paxton 'Unfit To Serve' But Now Endorse Him

GOP Senators Spent $100M Calling Paxton 'Unfit To Serve' But Now Endorse Him

In a cowardly move that should surprise no one, Republican lawmakers are lining up behind Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton in the state’s Senate race, endorsing a man whom many were very recently calling an amoral crook who belongs nowhere near the United States Congress.

The first to throw their support behind Paxton was none other than Sen. John Cornyn himself, the longtime Texas Republican senator who Paxton beat in Tuesday’s primary runoff.

“I’ve spent most of my time in the Senate building the Republican Party in Texas and in the U.S. Senate, and I’ve always supported the Republican ticket, and I intend to do so again in this general election,” Cornyn told reporters on the night of his defeat.

Your first thought may be that it’s hard to fathom how Cornyn could immediately throw his support behind someone he and his allies spent more than $100 million in ads against, slamming Paxton for everything from having been impeached by the GOP-controlled state House, indicted on felony fraud charges, cheated on his wife, and for making Texas less safe by giving sweetheart deals to pedophiles.

In fact, Cornyn continued to bash Paxton even on the runoff day, when it was already clear Cornyn was going to lose.

“He’s gotten away with so much for so long and not been held accountable for it, but I think he is an embarrassment, his misbehavior. And he’s completely unrepentant,” Cornyn told CNN.

But then you remember that Cornyn also backs President Donald Trump, the even more corrupt and amoral fraudster, and it becomes clear that Republicans like Cornyn will throw away their morals and convictions in order to hold onto power.

Other Republicans have equally fallen in line.

Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC), the chair of the National Republican Senatorial Committee that not only backed Cornyn’s reelection but actively campaigned against Paxton over his conduct, has now endorsed Paxton’s bid. In fact, the NRSC Scott runs has now deleted its past criticism of Paxton from its website, though as any tech savvy person knows, the internet is forever.

“There’s been no better warrior for our party than John Cornyn. I was blessed to have served with him and I look forward to his continued fight for our great country. But now I stand united with President Trump, Ken Paxton, and Texans who want to protect our Republican Majority,” Scott wrote in a post on X.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune, who begged Trump for months to help push Cornyn over the finish line, also quickly backed Paxton’s candidacy, telling right-wing bootlicker Hugh Hewitt on Wednesday that he will “pivot and go all in” for Paxton.

“Losing is not an option when it comes to the state of Texas and what it means for our majority in the Senate,” Thune said.

Senate Majority Whip John Barrasso (R-WY) also endorsed Paxton, writing in a post on X, “A vote for @KenPaxtonTX in November is a vote for a safer, stronger, and more prosperous America. He has my endorsement and support.”

Of course, while they endorse him now, the millions in attack ads Republicans spent to try to prevent Paxton from winning the nomination can now be repackaged and used by Democratic nominee James Talarico. Like this ad Cornyn’s campaign ran highlighting a disgusting plea deal Paxton gave a sex offender who abused a child. Or this one pushing the same message.

In fact, Talarico has been bringing up the pedophile attacks since Texas Republicans made Paxton’s nomination official.

Ultimately, Paxton’s abhorrent behavior and checkered past puts Texas’ Senate seat in play, with political handicappers moving the race to a more competitive rating now that Paxton is the nominee.

Republicans are praying that their quick acceptance of a man they all said is not fit to serve will be emulated by their base.

If not, blue Texas could become a reality this fall.

E. Jean Carroll

Latest Target Of Trump's Weaponized Justice Is Successful Rape Accuser Carroll

President Donald Trump is committing impeachable offenses at a dizzying clip, weaponizing the federal government against his enemies and lining his pockets with taxpayer dollars.

In his latest offense, Trump’s Department of Justice is criminally investigating E. Jean Carroll, the writer whose lawsuits led to Trump being found liable for sexual abuse and defamation.

According to CNN, the DOJ is investigating Carroll for perjury, claiming that she lied in a 2022 deposition in her ultimately successful lawsuit against Trump. DOJ prosecutors say Carroll perjured herself when she said her lawsuit against Trump wasn’t being financed by any outside entities. But before the trial was set to begin, Carroll’s lawyers told the judge and Trump attorney Alina Habba that billionaire Reid Hoffman covered some of the trial expenses.

Habba—whom Trump later appointed to serve as a U.S. attorney until a judge kicked her out—had accused Carroll’s lawyers during the trial of having “conspired to conceal the truth for nearly six months.”

Yet a judge blocked Trump’s legal team from asking about how Carroll’s lawsuit was being financed during the trial, which Carroll went on to win.

Trump’s DOJ going after Carroll is clearly a revenge effort. He is livid that she was awarded nearly $90 million in damages between two separate cases—$5 million for damages related to the alleged sexual abuse and another $83 million for defamation. (Trump has been appealing both decisions for years and is now hoping the Supreme Court, which he stacked with right-wing hacks, will throw out the cases and prevent Carroll from receiving the funds awarded to her.)

“This is an unbelievable abuse of power,” Democratic Rep. Adam Smith of California told CNN on Wednesday.

Sen. Adam Schiff, the California Democrat who is also a target of Trump’s weaponized DOJ over bullshit mortgage-fraud allegations, also slammed the DOJ probe into Carroll.

“First, Trump weaponized the DOJ to target his political enemies. Now, perversely, he’s targeting E. Jean Carroll, the woman who credibly and successfully sued him for sexual assault,” Schiff wrote in a post on X. “He’s using the power of the DOJ to go after his own victims. It’s a vile attack on the rule of law and a disgusting insult to victims everywhere.”

Should charges be brought against Carroll, it will be the just latest vindictive prosecution effort by the DOJ.

Already, Trump forced the DOJ to charge former FBI Director James Comey twice on dubious charges—once for supposed perjury and again for allegedly making threats against Trump. The first case has been thrown out because the court determined the U.S. attorney who sought the charges—Lindsey Halligan—was not legally serving in her role when she sought the indictment.

Trump also sought charges against New York Attorney General Letitia James for bogus mortgage-fraud charges, which were thrown out by a federal judge for the same reason as in Comey’s case. Trump’s DOJ tried to indict James again but failed when a grand jury declined to pursue charges—something that rarely happens.

Trump went after James because she successfully prosecuted him for charges of falsifying business records, which now makes him forever a convicted felon.

And a federal judge last week went as far as to throw out criminal charges against Maryland resident Kilmar Albrego Garcia—whom Trump wrongfully shipped off to a torture prison in El Salvador—due to vindictive prosecution. Again, that is a ruling that almost never happens since it is so difficult to prove.

If Carroll were ultimately charged, she would almost certainly seek to have the case thrown out on similar grounds.

Ultimately, Trump’s use of the DOJ as his revenge squad is not popular, with majorities of Americans saying that indictments of Trump’s perceived enemies have been unjustified.

What’s more, a majority of Americans now believe Trump should be impeached.

Should Democrats win control of the House this fall, you can be sure they will probe these investigations—and possibly move forward with impeachment.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos


burnJeffries and Cly

Republican Scheme To Rig Midterm Elections Blocked In Alabama And South Carolina

Republican efforts to rig the 2026 midterm elections by further gerrymandering House districts at the behest of President Donald Trump were dealt two massive blows on Tuesday.

In Alabama, a panel of three federal judges—two of whom were appointed by Trump—blocked the state from using a map that would eliminate one of the state’s two majority-Black districts. The panel ruled that the new map illegally discriminates against Black voters—despite the Supreme Court’s recent ruling that weakened the Voting Rights Act—and that it cannot be used in 2026.

In South Carolina, the state Senate rejected Trump’s demand that the state eliminate its one majority-Black congressional seat, which is held by longtime Democratic Rep. Jim Clyburn.

For now, these actions undercut Republican efforts to fight off an impending blue wave this fall.

In Alabama, the three-judge panel wrote in their decision, “Ultimately, we cannot see our way clear to requiring Alabamians to cast their votes in the 2026 elections under a districting plan tainted by intentional race-based discrimination.”

The ruling continued, “And under the unusual circumstances of this case, we conclude that a limited order requiring the Secretary to continue using this Court’s race-blind map will not disrupt Alabama’s elections (all candidates ran under the race-blind map until fifteen days ago, and all voters remain districted under the race-blind map in electoral computer systems).”

Alabama is already appealing the ruling to the Supreme Court, which has regularly helped stack the deck in favor of Trump and his Republican Party. It is entirely possible the nation’s highest court, filled with right-wing hacks, will reinstate Alabama’s racist map.

“[I]n my mind, it is not a matter of whether we win this case, only when,” Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall, a Republican, said in a statement, telegraphing that he expects the partisan court majority to bless his state’s redraw.

At the moment, however, that represents one fewer seat rigged in favor of Republicans as they desperately try to maintain their narrow House majority.

Meanwhile, South Carolina will officially keep its one Black-majority district after a redraw failed by a vote of 20-24 in the state Senate, with 12 Republicans voting against it.

One Republican who voted against it was conservative Sen. Richard Cash, who said his vote was because voting had already begun in the state’s June 9 primary.

“Neither my conscience nor the common sense will allow me to stop an election that is already underway,” Cash said on the Senate floor.

Democrats taunted Republicans after the GOP’s two election-rigging attempts failed.

“Donald Trump and extreme MAGA Republicans have failed the American people. As a result, the GOP has concluded that the only way they can win in November is to cheat,” House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said in a statement. “Today, their desperate power grab hit a wall.”

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos

Jerome Powell

Nine Americans Who Actually Deserve Money From That Trump Slush Fund

President Donald Trump’s disturbingly corrupt fund to disburse nearly $1.8 billion to traitorous insurrectionists and other Trump loyalists who tried to steal the 2020 election may be on the rocks, as even the sycophantic Republicans in Congress know that letting Trump pay people who broke the law is political suicide.

But what if I told you there are people who actually deserve some of the $1.776 billion that Trump “negotiated” with himself to give out to people who have been the target of a weaponized Department of Justice?

None of them are the domestic terrorists who beat up law enforcement officers at the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. Nor are they Trump allies who conspired with him to steal the election. Those people were correctly prosecuted for their conduct, and were not victims of the DOJ, as Trump and other Republican monsters have deludedly convinced themselves.

Instead, the people who deserve compensation are the perceived “enemies” that Trump has either threatened with criminal investigations or actually indicted for the apparent “crime” of not supporting Trump.

They are also the average Americans who Trump’s out-of-control and actually weaponized DOJ has tried to jail for the non-crime of protesting his immigration goons or daring to be born into a minority group.

The following list is not exhaustive. In fact, you may think of others that I missed, and I encourage you to list them in the comments. (For example, New Jersey Democratic Rep. LaMonica McIver, Newark Mayor Ras Baraka, and Sen. Mark Kelly (D-AZ) could easily have made this list, but for the sake of brevity were left out.)

Nevertheless, here are just some of the people who should get some of Trump’s slush fund.

1. Maureen and James Comey

Former FBI Director James Comey and his daughter, Maureen Comey, have both been the target of Trump’s weaponized DOJ.

James has now been indicted by Trump’s DOJ twice—both on bogus charges.

The first indictment was on a bullshit charge of lying to Congress about the Russia investigation. That indictment was thrown out after a judge ruled that the incompetent attorney who sought the charges—now-former United States Attorney Lindsay Halligan—was illegally appointed, and thus the indictment she obtained was also unlawful.

Yet Trump never gave up his desire to punish Comey, and the former FBI director was indicted again in April on yet a new and even dumber fake charge.

The second indictment was over an Instagram post in which Comey published an image of the numbers “86 47” made out of seashells in the sand. The DOJ ridiculously claimed that the image constituted a “threat to take the life of, and to inflict bodily harm upon the President of the United States.”

Even Republicans say the charge is bogus, and amounts to a violation of Comey’s First Amendment right to free speech. Like the first charge, this too will likely be thrown out.

Nevertheless, the weaponized DOJ is costing Comey time and money to fight Trump’s malicious prosecutions, and thus he should be compensated by the slush fund Trump created.

Meanwhile, Maureen was unjustly fired from her job as a federal prosecutor—where she successfully prosecuted Jeffrey Epstein co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell—simply because she shares the same last name as her father.

She is suing the DOJ for her wrongful termination. And she should win.

2. New York Attorney General Letitia James

As New York’s top prosecutor, James successfully prosecuted Trump on charges that he falsified business records in the Empire State, which will ensure that Trump in perpetuity will be known as a convicted felon.

And that enraged Trump, who sought revenge on James by indicting her on made-up charges of mortgage fraud.

Like Comey’s indictment, James’ charges were thrown out by a judge, as the same dumb and illegally appointed prosecutor obtained the indictment.

Unlike Comey, James has not been indicted again—at least as of yet. Still, for having to challenge her indictment, James should be awarded compensation for her time and money.

3. Former Trump national security adviser John Bolton

Bolton served in Trump’s first administration as his national security adviser. But he left on bad terms and has since accused Trump in a book of being a malignant narcissist who abused the power of the presidency and gave aid and comfort to America’s enemies.

That book riled up Trump, who not only criticized Bolton but sought his indictment over the very book that made Trump so mad. The DOJ accused Bolton of taking classified information to write the book.

This case has not been thrown out, and Bolton has vowed to fight the charges in court.

“I look forward to the fight to defend my lawful conduct and to expose his abuse of power,” Bolton said after the charges were brought.

4. Former Federal Reserve Board Chair Jerome Powell

Trump sicced sloshed sycophant Jeanine Pirro, the former Fox News host who he appointed as U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, on Powell likely as a way to get Powell to resign early.

Pirro said that the DOJ was investigating Powell over cost overruns for renovations at the Federal Reserve Bank. Trump wanted Pirro to launch the bogus investigation because he loathed Powell, who did not bend to Trump’s will on lowering interest rates.

Indeed, Trump threatened to fire Powell multiple times. But when the stock market reacted negatively to Trump’s attempts to nix the Federal Reserve’s independence, he instead took the mob-boss route of threatening to make Powell’s life so miserable that Powell would view resigning as a better move than sticking around.

Powell, however, held firm and stuck around while he challenged the probe.

And one lone GOP senator’s protest ultimately helped push the DOJ to drop the probe into Powell. But for the stress of being the target of an unjust investigation, Powell should be compensated.

5. Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook

Not content with ousting just Powell, Trump also decided to go after Federal Reserve Board members who also do not support his desire to lower interest rates at a time of high inflation.

Last August, Trump tried to fire Cook, accusing her of the same fake mortgage fraud as he charged Letitia James with. Cook, however, refused to step down. She challenged her firing in court, and won. And for that time and effort, she should be compensated.

6. Kilmar Abrego Garcia

Perhaps no one has been treated worse than Venezuelan immigrant Kilmar Abrego Garcia, whom Trump falsely accused of being a criminal and wrongly deported him to a torture prison in El Salvador.

Garcia successfully fought the accusations and made his way back to the United States.

But since his return, he has been tormented by Trump, who has continued to falsely accuse him of being a criminal. And Trump’s immigration goons have continued their effort to try to deport Garcia to horrible places where he would face extreme danger, although a judge finally dismissed his bogus human smuggling charges on Friday.

His treatment amounts to torture, and he should be compensated for his suffering.

7. ChongLy Thao

Trump’s incompetent immigration goons created a lasting and disturbing image when they marched ChongLy Thao out of his home in freezing temperatures wearing just boxer shorts and a blanket after they wrongly confused Thao of being a wanted undocumented immigrant.

Thao was, however, not the person ICE was seeking. Instead, he is a law-abiding naturalized U.S. citizen who was ripped from his home by authorities who didn’t even have a warrant. Even worse, the person ICE was seeking to arrest was already in jail.

Thao has said he will sue the government for violating his civil rights. And he should win.

8. D.C. sandwich thrower Sean Dunn

Sean Dunn became a pop culture icon, after he was captured on video hurling a sandwich at federal immigration officers trying to abduct people off the street in the nation’s capital.

Trump’s Department of Justice charged him with felony assault for “forcefully” throwing the sandwich at officers.

“I just learned that this defendant worked at the Department of Justice — NO LONGER. Not only is he FIRED, he has been charged with a felony,” former Attorney General Pam Bondi said in a statement that is somehow real and not an Onion article. “This is an example of the Deep State we have been up against for seven months as we work to refocus DOJ. You will NOT work in this administration while disrespecting our government and law enforcement.”

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos

Shady 'Left' PAC With GOP Ties Pushes Anti-Semitic Kook In Democratic Primary

Shady 'Left' PAC With GOP Ties Pushes Anti-Semitic Kook In Democratic Primary

With their House majority in peril, Republicans appear to be resorting to dirty tricks.

Aside from trying to gerrymander their way to victory, Republicans also seem to have created a shady PAC to prop up less electable Democratic candidates, in an effort to take competitive seats off the map.

The ads come from a group called Lead Left, a name clearly intended to mislead viewers into thinking they come from a Democratic-run group when, in fact, the newly formed entity has ties to Republicans.

Currently, Lead Left has spent nearly $1 million to prop up candidates like Maureen Galindo, an antisemitic kook, over Johnny Garcia, the candidate national Democrats are behind, in Texas’ 35th District.

That seat shouldn’t be competitive. Texas Republicans redrew it last year to give it a GOP lean. However, it is a heavily Hispanic seat, which poses problems for Republicans since Hispanic support for President Donald Trump and the GOP has fallen off a cliff thanks to Trump’s cruel immigration agenda and his poor stewardship of the economy.

GOP operatives told Politico that having Galindo as the nominee could help avoid losing a seat they purposefully drew to favor their party.

“None of these seats are easy wins for Republicans,” Vinny Minchillo, a Texas-based Republican operative, told Politico. “If we could get [Galindo] in the general, it would be a great opportunity.”

Democrats, meanwhile, have condemned Galindo after she posted a batshit-crazy statement to Instagram last week in which she said she wanted to convert an immigration detention facility into a prison for “American Zionists” and pedophiles, who she said are also Zionists.

At the same time, Democrats pointed out that Republican-tied groups, like the shadowy Lead Left, are running ads to try to boost her campaign in the May 26 runoff.

“House Republican leadership must immediately cease propping up this antisemitic candidacy,” House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and Suzan DelBene, chair of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, said in a statement.

Garcia is even making Lead Left’s ratfucking attempt an issue ahead of the Tuesday runoff, running his own ad exposing Galindo for being a lunatic whom Republicans want to face off against because she is unelectable.

But Texas’ 35th District isn’t the only place Lead Left has meddled.

The group also ran ads in Pennsylvania’s Seventh District, trying to prop up no-name and underfunded Democratic hopeful Lamont McClure over labor leader Bob Brooks, a populist Democrat backed by Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro, and the DCCC.

However, those efforts failed. On Tuesday, Brooks easily won the primary, while McClure took third.

Meanwhile, Lead Left and another conservative group, American Action Network, ran ads against Democrat John Cavanaugh in Nebraska’s Second District, attacking him for supposedly being aligned with Trump.

While Cavanaugh narrowly lost the primary to Democrat Denise Powell, the outcome there may not dramatically change the race this November. Unlike Galindo and McClure, Powell is a serious candidate who raised enough money to compete. And Nebraska’s Second District is a Democratic-leaning district that political handicappers have said has a good chance of flipping.

Ultimately, Lead Left’s meddling is a desperate ploy from Republicans to try to hold onto power and yet another instance of how big money is corrupting our politics.

But sunlight is the best disinfectant, as they say. The more people know about who is behind the ads they watch, the less effective they may be.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos

GOP Representative Targeted By Trump For Opposing January 6 Slush Fund

GOP Representative Targeted By Trump For Opposing January 6 Slush Fund

Emboldened by his successful efforts to oust multiple GOP lawmakers who defied his orders, President Donald Trump now has a new Republican target—and it may be his dumbest yet.

On Wednesday, Trump turned his ire to Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick, threatening to go after the Pennsylvania Republican who has come out against Trump’s corrupt slush fund to give reparations to traitorous rioters who attacked the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

Trump’s attacks came after Fitzpatrick’s fiancee, Fox News reporter Jacqui Heinrich, tried to ask Trump a question about Israel that he apparently didn’t like.

“Her husband votes against me all the time,” Trump replied to Heinrich, though Heinrich and Fitzpatrick are not yet married. “I don’t know what’s with him. You better ask him what’s with him. Her husband—she’s married to a certain congressman. He likes voting against Trump. You know what happens with that? It doesn’t work out well.”Fitzpatrick is one of just three House Republicans who hold districts former Vice President Kamala Harris carried in the 2024 presidential election. Harris won Fitzpatrick’s 1st District seat by less than one percentage point in 2024, while former President Joe Biden carried it by nearly five points four years earlier, according to data from The Downballot.


It’s in districts like these that Republicans need the leeway to deviate from their party’s immensely unpopular leader in order to secure reelection.

Fitzpatrick has marginally done that. He was one of two Republicans who voted against the cruel “One Big Beautiful Bill,” which ripped healthcare away from the poorest Americans in order to make room for tax cuts that overwhelmingly benefit the rich. And now Fitzpatrick is slamming Trump’s $1.8 billion fund to compensate Jan. 6 insurrectionists.

“A massive discretionary fund, with no oversight or approval from Congress, represents a dangerous backsliding in the transparency of our institutions and our commitment to the American taxpayer,” Fitzpatrick wrote in a letter to acting Attorney General Todd Blanche on Wednesday, demanding answers on questions about where the money is being diverted from and if people convicted of crimes will receive money.

Attribution: APRepublican Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, shown in 2018.

That has angered Trump, who demands fealty and loyalty at all costs.If Trump ramps up his attacks on Fitzpatrick, it could keep some Republican voters from backing Fitzpatrick this fall. And that would be devastating in a competitive seat like his, where he not only needs near-universal support from Republicans but also to convince Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents to vote for him. That will be hard when polls show Democrats and independents are chomping at the bit to punish Trump and his party.

Cowardly Republicans, afraid to get on Trump’s bad side and risk their political futures, anonymously slammed Trump’s revenge tour.“It seems like he’s given up on holding the majority and focusing on loyalty in the minority,” an unnamed House Republican told Politico.

The only ones who spoke publicly about the idiocy of Trump’s revenge campaign are those who are not running for reelection and thus have nothing to lose by speaking their minds.

“I believe that there are people in the White House who couldn’t care less about what happens in November,” Republican Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina, who last summer announced his retirement rather than run for reelection because he said he could not vote his conscience and win a primary at the same time, told Politico. “And that goes to show you how stupid they are, because if they don’t get Republicans reelected, they’re going to create the most miserable two years of this president’s life.”
Tillis may be angry, but I, for one, can’t wait to see Trump squirm when Democrats win the House majority—and possibly even the Senate.

FBI Paid For Patel's Secret Snorkel Trip Over Pearl Harbor Cemetery Site

FBI Paid For Patel's Secret Snorkel Trip Over Pearl Harbor Cemetery Site

FBI Director Kash Patel has been living large on your hard-earned tax dollars, using private jets and luxury vehicles to shuttle himself and his girlfriend to sporting and leisure events—including the Winter Olympics, where he shared some brewskis with the men’s hockey team.

According to The Associated Press, Patel took a secret “VIP snorkel” excursion around the USS Arizona during a trip to Hawaii—which the FBI claimed at the time was strictly for work purposes.

The famous battleship is deemed a military cemetery, as it’s the site of the killing of more than 900 service personnel during the bombing of Pearl Harbor.

Per the AP’s report:

“With few exceptions, snorkeling and diving are off-limits around the USS Arizona. The battleship, now a military cemetery reachable only by boat, has stood as one of the nation’s most hallowed sites since Japan bombed and sank it in 1941. Marine archaeologists and crews from the National Park Service make occasional dives at the memorial to survey the condition of the wreck. Other dives have been conducted to inter the remains of Arizona survivors who wanted to rest eternally with their former shipmates.”

Why Patel—an unqualified and egomaniacal right-wing hack with a Napoleon complex and possible drinking problem—would need to go snorkeling at a Pearl Harbor memorial is beyond comprehension.

No other FBI director has snorkeled at the site in more than 30 years, but that isn’t stopping the FBI from trying to justify Patel’s waste of tax dollars.

A spokesperson told the AP that it “was part of the Director’s public national security engagements last August with counterparts in New Zealand, Australia, our Honolulu Field Office, and the Department of War.”

Yes, Patel needed to take a risky and expensive snorkeling trip for “national security”—definitely not because he’s a thin-skinned loser who wants to look cool, even though everyone thinks he’s a cringeworthy dork.

Patel, for his part, is on thin ice in the Trump administration, as his incompetence, self-aggrandizement, and drunken antics seem to have annoyed Dear Leader—so much so that there’s talk of Patel soon being replaced.

And this latest report about Patel’s misuse of tax dollars is unlikely to help him in his pathetic bid to keep the gig that he never should have had in the first place.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos



Ken Paxton

Polling Memo Warns Paxton Nomination Could Sink Texas GOP In November

Texas Republicans are once again sounding alarm bells about the state’s U.S. Senate seat, saying that if Republicans nominate state Attorney General Ken Paxton in the May 26 primary runoff, it will create a drag on the entire Texas GOP ticket.

A polling memo commissioned by a super PAC backing Republican Sen. John Cornyn in the runoff said that nominating Paxton would be catastrophic, potentially costing Republicans the Senate seat, multiple House races, and possibly even control of the state House.

“A Paxton nomination creates measurable risk across every tier of the Texas ballot,” said the memo, which was obtained by Texas Tribune reporter Gabby Birenbaum. “The Senate race tightens significantly. Congressional pickup opportunities close. Republican-held seats that should be safe require active defense. And the Texas House majority—which took years to build—faces exposure it would not face with Cornyn at the top of the ticket.”

Among the poll’s findings is that the gerrymander Trump forced Republicans to undertake—which was supposed to net the GOP five U.S. House seats—could collapse if Paxton were the nominee.

The memo highlights four prospective GOP flips, saying, “With Paxton at the top of the ticket, all four opportunities effectively disappear. The drag is consistent across every key voter group—independents, suburban women, soft Republicans—and large enough to turn each district from a competitive opportunity into a likely Democratic hold.”

What’s more, the memo says that Paxton would jeopardize otherwise safe GOP House seats, including that of now-former Rep. Tony Gonzales and GOP Rep. Beth Van Duyne. The survey finds that suburban, independent, and Hispanic voters would likely turn away from the party in droves.

“The damage does not stop at lost opportunities. Redistricting produced several Republican-held congressional districts that should be safe holds under any normal electoral environment. With Cornyn at the top of the ticket, they are—comfortable margins, no defensive spending required, resources free for offensive races. Under a Paxton nomination, many of these seats become a problem,” the memo said, though it overstates Cornyn’s benefit to those seats, many of which are still competitive even if he is the nominee.

The Cornyn-supporting super PAC released the memo a little more than two weeks before the May 26 runoff in a desperate attempt to build support for Cornyn’s flailing candidacy.

The most recent public poll, commissioned by the University of Houston’s Hobby School of Public Affairs, found Paxton leading Cornyn, 48 percent to 45 percent.

However, the same survey found that electability arguments don’t seem to be working. When asked which Republican would be the strongest opponent to Democratic nominee James Talarico, GOP primary voters were split, with 43% saying Cornyn and 43% saying Paxton.

Cornyn, for his part, had been frantically trying to secure Trump’s endorsement, changing long-held positions and heaping embarrassing amounts of praise on Trump. And right after the initial primary, it seemed Trump was finally going to get off the sidelines and endorse Cornyn, according to reports at the time. But Trump has so far reneged on his pledge to make an endorsement.

It’s possible Cornyn’s supporters hope this memo scares Trump into backing Cornyn

In the process, though, they released a memo that shows Texas is competitive even if Cornyn is the nominee.

The poll showed Cornyn up only two points over a “generic Democrat” in the race, while Paxton trailed by four points. (Of course, Talarico is far from generic.) It also showed Democrats holding onto two of the gerrymandered U.S. House seats even with Cornyn atop the ticket.

Ultimately, the midterms will prove brutal for Trump and Republicans—whether or not Paxton is the Texas Senate nominee.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos

Greg Abbott

From Texas To White House, Republicans Are Bracing For The Blue Wave

With six months to go until Election Day, the White House seems to have already accepted that Republicans will lose control of at least one chamber of Congress.

A Washington Post report on Monday said that lawyers in Donald Trump’s White House are privately briefing Trump political appointees about how to handle congressional investigations—which Democrats are sure to launch if they flip the House, Senate, or even both in November’s midterm elections.

“It’s obvious to everyone that it’s very likely” Democrats will win the House, an unnamed Trump administration official who attended one of the briefings told The Washington Post.

The official added that the briefing on how to handle Democratic-led congressional oversight “was a sober-eyed conversation.”The Post went on to report that “At least some staff members have considered the briefings preparatory, given the growing sense across the Trump administration that the Republican Party is in trouble and that the time has come to prepare for worst-case scenarios.”

This is just the latest sign that Republicans have entered the acceptance phase of the stages of grief.

For example, Senate Republicans were publicly nudging aging right-wing Supreme Court justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas to retire before the midterms, as the GOP may not have a majority next year to confirm Trump’s nominees if a vacancy arises.

Senate Republicans were also urging Trump to fire the Cabinet officials he’s sick of now, because confirming replacements if the GOP loses its Senate majority would be difficult if not impossible.

On the House side—where Democrats are clearly favored to win control after November’s elections—Republicans are also showing tangible signs that they know their fate.

For example, Texas GOP Gov. Greg Abbott is refusing to set an election date to fill the vacancy created by skeevy Republican Rep. Tony Gonzales’ resignation—likely because the race would be competitive and his party could lose the seat in a special election. That would put Democrats one seat closer to the majority, and deal a major psychological blow to GOP donors and voters.

And Republican lawmakers are retiring at a massive clip, with the number of GOP departures rivaled only by those from 2018. That exodus is a tell that Republicans know they would be returning to Congress in the minority, and thus chose to hang it up and leave rather than suffer that indignity.

Meanwhile, Republicans are desperately rushing to pass new, gerrymandered congressional maps to try to stave off losses in the midterms—a corrupt move blessed by a Supreme Court that Trump and the GOP stacked with partisan hacks.

However, even if their gerrymanders succeed, Republicans are still likely to lose the House. In fact, the redrawn maps Republicans passed to try to rig the election for their candidates may not even work. Trump’s coalition is falling apart as voters turn on him over the war he launched in Iran that is spiking costs here at home.

And gerrymandering cannot save the GOP’s Senate majority, which is now at risk due to Trump’s unpopularity.

Ultimately, the midterms are going to be a disaster for the GOP—and they know it.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos



Steve Scalise

Terrified By Iran War's Impact On Gas Prices, Republicans Try Blaming Democrats

Gas prices surged this week amid oil scarcity and investors’ realization that the Strait of Hormuz is not close to reopening.

“If it feels like gas prices are suddenly jumping everywhere, you’re not imagining it—and in parts of the country, the increases have been nothing short of explosive,” Patrick De Haan, a gas price expert with Gas Buddy, wrote in a post on X. “As of Friday, the national average price of gasoline has surged to $4.42 per gallon, the highest level since summer 2022. Diesel prices are climbing even faster, now at $5.56 per gallon, within striking distance of their all-time high.”

Republicans are panicked, knowing that high gas prices will sink them in November’s midterm elections. And those prices rest solely at the feet of President Donald Trump. He launched a war of choice that led Iran to close the critical Strait of Hormuz waterway, which has shocked oil markets and continues to threaten the global economy.

Yet, rather than push Trump to fix the problem he started, they made an embarrassing attempt to gaslight America about high fuel prices and to concoct far-fetched scapegoats, including former President Joe Biden, oil companies, and Democrats.

Republican Rep. Buddy Carter of Georgia, who is running for his party’s Senate nomination and auditioning for Trump’s endorsement, blamed the nebulous “Democrats” for surging gas prices, even though Democrats are against the war causing those price hikes.

“Remember, President Trump promised he’d make us safer and more prosperous. … Now yes, we’ve seen some gas prices fluctuation. Gas prices will go back down. Remember—high gas prices are the work of the Democrats,” Carter told Fox Business, reminding viewers of high gas prices during 2022, which were falling until Trump’s war.

That talking point was obviously sent around to Republicans. House Majority Leader Steve Scalise made a similarly ridiculous plea for voters to remember 2022.

“People will remember, you go back two years ago, we were paying almost $6 a gallon for gasoline,” Scalise said Thursday. “Right now, it’s in the 3s.”

Even conservative CNBC host Joe Kernen pointed out that Scalise was making up numbers. Gas was not $6 a gallon when Biden left office in January 2025, and on the day Scalise made that comment, AAA reported the national average was $4.30 a gallon.

Other Republicans came up with dumber scapegoats.

“It has to do with the greed of the oil companies,” Republican Rep. Tim Burchett of Tennessee told reporters on Capitol Hill. “And I blame Congress because every dadgum time we do this, ‘Oh, we’re going to bring the oil executives down here,’ and they shake the money tree, and every time I say this, my contributions from the oil distributors goes down.”

Rep. Burchett (R-TN) refuses to put any blame on Trump for high gas prices.Burchett: It has to do with the greed of the oil companies. We buy zero oil from Iran. 90% of their oil they sell to China. They're just gouging us. And I blame Congress.

[image or embed]
— MeidasTouch (@meidastouch.com) April 30, 2026 at 11:04 AM

De Haan said Burchett fundamentally doesn’t understand the laws of supply and demand with that comment.

“That’s not how oil markets work,” De Haan said of Burchett’s assertion. “Prices are driven by global supply and demand—not just what we import or who we buy from. comments like this ignore basic economics. the rep badly badly needs an economics refresher class.”

Rep. Rich McCormick, Republican of Georgia, made a similarly dumb statement, claiming that the U.S. doesn’t get oil from the Strait of Hormuz. But McCormick added a bonus scapegoat, blaming the price jump on Biden for not building a pipeline.

“Remember, the United States is not as dependent on foreign oil as everybody else,” he said. “We do it just because it’s a quicker track, but we don’t have to do that. If we had the pipeline that we didn’t complete thanks to the Biden administration for so long, we’d be in a much better position.”

Rep. McCormick (R-GA) says he doesn’t worry about high gas prices because we don’t rely on oil from the Strait of Hormuz, and blames Biden.McCormick: If we had the pipeline that we didn't complete thanks to the Biden administration for so long, we'd be in a much better position

[image or embed]
— MeidasTouch (@meidastouch.com) April 30, 2026 at 11:38 AM

Of course, the Keystone XL Pipeline would have little to alleviate the situation we are in. That’s because about a third of global oil supply goes through the Strait of Hormuz, and that traffic has plummeted since the start of the Iran war. That has created a shortage and driven up prices. And the Keystone XL Pipeline would have merely transported oil from Canada to the United States, not increased supply.

Ultimately, gas prices are high because of the war Trump started. Full stop.

The majority of voters are well aware of that, too.
Republicans can try to gaslight all they want. But they are to blame for this mess, and they will pay the price for it at the ballot box in November.

As Redistricting Fiasco Unfolds, Raging Republicans Blame Everyone But Trump

As Redistricting Fiasco Unfolds, Raging Republicans Blame Everyone But Trump

Republicans were in full-on meltdown mode this week after they lost a redistricting ballot measure in Virginia that will axe as many as four GOP lawmakers from their congressional delegation.

And the finger-pointing was out in full force, with conservatives blaming the Virginia Republican Party, the Republican National Committee, former GOP Gov. Glenn Youngkin, and especially Democrats, who they called power-hungry cheaters while keeping a straight face.

But there was one person Republicans didn’t blame, even though he is squarely at fault for any House losses they suffer as a result of this race to the bottom that he started in the first place: their Dear Leader, Donald Trump.

If Trump had never pushed red states to redraw their congressional maps mid-decade in Texas and elsewhere, then Democrats never would have redrawn the maps in Virginia or California.Indeed, Trump likely thought that Democrats wouldn’t have the ability, nor the stomach, to engage in the kind of partisan gerrymandering that rule-followers usually hate.

But he underestimated Democratic leaders, who showed they had a spine and the guts to stand up and refuse to fight with one hand tied behind their back.

Still, Republicans couldn’t bring themselves to name Trump personally for the miscalculation.

Let’s take a look at some unhinged GOP reactions, shall we?

Republican Rep. Rich McCormick of Georgia proposed legislation that would redraw Virginia state lines, giving the Democratic-heavy Northern Virginia suburbs back to the District of Columbia.

“DC Bureaucrats hijacked Virginia… but we will restore it,” McCormick wrote in a post on X. “Arlington and Alexandria were always meant to be a part of DC. That’s why I introduced the Make DC Square Again Act, because it’s a simple concept: DC = [square].”

Of course, changing state lines would require the Virginia Legislature to agree—which it won’t, given that it’s controlled by Democrats.

Also, the Virginia redistricting ballot measure would have passed even without the Democratic strongholds in NoVA, so good try bro. Even more ironic is that McCormick is only in Congress because Georgia Republicans gerrymandered their House maps to make his seat easier for him to win. Funny that he wasn’t anti-gerrymandering then.

GOP Sen. Lindsay Graham of South Carolina reacted by calling on his state to gerrymander in response to Virginia’s gerrymander.

“After the Virginia Democrats’ efforts to redistrict in order to increase Democrat seats in the House of Representatives, South Carolina should consider fighting fire with fire,” Graham wrote in a post on X, even though this whole ordeal was started by Trump and not Democrats. “I would encourage South Carolina’s next Republican governor and the Republican legislature to seriously look at what our state’s response should be to Democrats in Virginia. Republicans in South Carolina should consider being bold and fighting back.”

Note: The filing deadline for candidates in South Carolina already passed and the primaries are in a little over seven weeks, so even if they do redraw their maps, that wouldn’t take effect this year.

National Republican Congressional Committee Chair Richard Hudson slammed Democrats for the Virginia redraw, and said that the narrow margin the ballot measure passed by is proof that the redraw is bad.

“Virginia Democrats can’t redraw reality. This close margin reinforces that Virginia is a purple state that shouldn’t be represented by a severe partisan gerrymander,” Hudson said in a statement.

You’ll be shocked to know he didn’t raise any objections when Republicans in his state redrew their maps to give the GOP as many as 11 of the state’s 14 House seats—despite the fact that Trump only won the Tar Heel State by four points.

Other GOP lawmakers used ridiculous hyperbole and lies to slam the maps, yet refused to say Trump needed to take any accountability for the mess he created.

“The Marxists want to destroy this country,” Republican Rep. Chip Roy of Texas told Fox Business. “That’s what [House Minority Leader] Hakeem Jeffries literally admitted yesterday. … We need the Virginia Supreme Court to hopefully save us by striking down this ridiculous redistricting map.”

Ultimately, Democrats finally fought back against Trump-fueled GOP power grabs—and Republicans can’t handle it.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos

Nasty Nancy Mace Launches Expulsion Bid Against An Even Worse Republican

Nasty Nancy Mace Launches Expulsion Bid Against An Even Worse Republican

Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) has launched a new crusade.

After the Republican firebrand cruelly tried to ban a transgender lawmaker from bathrooms on Capitol Hill and feuded with airport leadership in her home state of South Carolina—two battles where she was objectively in the wrong—she has now taken on a new foe. And this time, her target is valid.

Mace is trying to expel fellow House Republican and skeeze ball Cory Mills, who is accused of a whole host of horrific things including assault, domestic violence, revenge porn, stolen valor, and even illegally obtaining federal contracts as a member of Congress.“The swamp has protected Cory Mills for far too long and we are done letting it slide,” Mace said Monday in a statement after introducing a resolution to expel the Florida man from Congress. “We tried to censure him and strip him from his committee assignments. Both parties blocked it, but we are not backing down. The evidence against Mills is overwhelming: beating women and telling them to lie about it, cyberstalking women, lying about his military service, and profiting off his seat. Any Member who votes to keep him here is voting to protect a woman beater and a fraud. He needs to be expelled immediately.”

Mace resorted to an expulsion resolution because Mills is refusing to resign—despite multiple other GOP members of Congress urging him to do so.

“There’s absolutely no reason to resign,” Mills told CNN. “He [Johnson] told me not to resign, and he told me that this is why we have this process.”

Indeed, House Speaker Mike Johnson has been protecting Mills for months, and even admitted to CNN that he did actually tell Mills not to resign.

“It is not something I encourage, no. Look, we have a process here,” Johnson said about encouraging his members not to resign amid personal scandals. “So no, I’m not in favor.”

Of course, that’s not surprising in the least. Johnson was happy to keep now-former Rep. Tony Gonzales around after the Texas lawmaker was exposed as a serial sexual harasser, because Gonzales was a reliable vote in Johnson’s slim GOP majority.

Related | Vile allegations against GOP lawmaker? Mike Johnson says no biggie

But wait, the story gets even messier!

Rather than lay low and hope the scandal goes away, Mills has actually picked a fight with Mace, threatening to expel her from Congress.

And he’s taunting her on social media as well, firing off multiple posts on X on Wednesday attacking Mace for her own scandals.

“Hey Nancy, I have no restraining order or any criminal or civil cases open. Can you say the same?” Mills wrote in a post on X, even though he has had restraining orders against him in the past. “What about your restraining order for harassment of your ex fiancé? What about the current gag order issued by the judge in SC and pending cases?”

Mills posted subsequent screeds on X accusing Mace of being mentally unwell, of drinking alcohol, and of being “fake MAGA.”

Related | Nancy Mace’s ‘very nasty’ conduct revealed in police report

Ultimately, in this battle between two utterly detestable and morally repugnant people, Mace is right.

Mills is a pig who belongs nowhere near a position of power, let alone as one of 535 people who make our country’s laws.

As the saying goes, even a broken clock is right twice a day.

Republicans Signaling Fear That Midterm Will End Their House And Senate Majorities

Republicans Signaling Fear That Midterm Will End Their House And Senate Majorities

Republicans have expressed fears both publicly and privately that their congressional majorities are in serious danger in November, as voters angry with President Donald Trump’s war in Iran and the fact that it’s making life even more unaffordable in the United States threaten to punish the GOP at the ballot box.

But now they have moved on from merely talking about those fears to taking concrete steps that make it clear they know their prospects are dire and that they are on track to lose control of not just the House but the Senate, too.

On Tuesday, Senate Majority Leader John Thune said he is taking steps to ensure that Republicans will be ready to replace Supreme Court justice Samuel Alito should he choose to retire this summer, giving a little hint-hint to the 76-year-old with a lifetime appointment who was recently hospitalized with an unspecified illness.

“That’s a contingency I think around here you always have to be prepared for. And if that were to happen, yes, we would be prepared to confirm,” Thune told a reporter from the Washington Examiner.

Even Trump himself brought up the possibility of Alito, as well as famously corrupt Justice Clarence Thomas, retiring before the midterms, telling Fox Business’ Maria Bartiromo on Tuesday that the late Ruth Bader Ginsburg made a mistake by not retiring earlier because he got to fill her seat on the nation’s highest court.

“She decided that she was going to live forever, and about two minutes after the election, she went out, and I got to appoint somebody,” Trump told Bartiromo, in what sounded like yet another nudge at Alito and Thomas.

Indeed, pushing out an aging Supreme Court justice before the midterms is a massive tell that Republicans are worried they will lose the Senate majority, and thus their ability to confirm Trump’s judicial nominees. (It’s also wildly hypocritical, as now-former Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell stole a Supreme Court seat by claiming the vacancy came too close to an election, but I digress.)

Back in January, political analyst Jacob Rubashkin, deputy editor of the nonpartisan political handicapping outlet Inside Elections, said that this very situation would be a tell that Republicans were scared of losing the Senate.

“We’re still a ways away from this so keep it saved in your bookmarks, but one way we will know if Republicans become truly concerned about losing the Senate is if there’s chatter or even pressure on Thomas and/or Alito to retire this summer,” Rubashkin wrote in a post on January 6.

Welp …

Meanwhile on Tuesday, Punchbowl News reported that Florida GOP Gov. Ron DeSantis is getting cold feet about rigging—uh, sorry, redrawing -- his state’s congressional map.

While the Trump lackey was previously bullish that Republicans could extract as many as five more House seats in the state, DeSantis is now worried that the midterm environment—including shifts in Florida—will be so bad for Republicans that creating more nominally Republican seats could actually backfire. Spreading out GOP voters could turn Florida’s map into a dummymander—a political term that means an intended gerrymander actually winds up benefitting the other party.

What’s more, Republicans are sending Vice President JD Vance to campaign in Iowa, yet another sign that this otherwise reliably Republican area is slipping away from the GOP as Trump’s tariffs and war in Iran decimate the agricultural backbone of the state. Iowa was also the first state Trump himself traveled to on his midterm campaign tour.If Republicans are having to campaign in a state Trump carried by double digits in 2024, they are in some serious doo doo this fall.

Of course, sending Vance to campaign for vulnerable Republicans is likely not the best idea, as he’s not only unpopular but has also turned out to be bad luck for other candidates he’s stumped for.

Yet desperate times call for desperate measures.

So the midterms are shaping up to be a disaster for the GOP? Good.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos

Polls: Trump's Support Dwindling Down To His Base Of MAGA Diehards

Polls: Trump's Support Dwindling Down To His Base Of MAGA Diehards

President Donald Trump's approval rating is reaching new lows as Americans grow frustrated with the high cost of living and Trump's choice to mire the country in a new foreign war.

In fact, since Trump launched the boondoggle of a war in Iran, his average net approval rating has fallen roughly five percentage points, according to polling analyst Nate Silver. His approval rating now stands at an abysmally low 39.9 percent.

In fact, the latest Economist/YouGov poll, released Tuesday, finds Trump at just 35 percent approval—the lowest the organization has recorded in Trump's second term. It’s also near his all-time low in the poll, 34 percent, which he recorded in November 2017.

CNN Chief Data Analyst Harry Enten put it like this:

A steady fall into the abyss for Trump's net approval, as it falls into Death Valley. He's now at a term 2 low: -18 pts. Big reason why: Independents. Trump's at -45 pts. The worst for any prez at this point in term 2. Worse than Nixon (-36 pts) at the height of Watergate!

Indeed, the Economist/YouGov poll found Trump's support falling in almost every group. That includes self-identified Republican voters, whose approval has declined by 3 points since last week.

Trump's support from people who voted for him in 2024 also saw a precipitous drop since he launched the Iran war in late February.

In a poll conducted just as he started the Iran "excursion"—as he so eloquently described it—84 percent of Trump 2024 voters approved of the job he was doing as president. Now only 76 percent approve, marking a steep eight-point drop in about one month.

In fact, the only group where Trump's support has held steady is among self-proclaimed MAGA supporters, 92 percent of whom still approve of their Dear Leader. That's virtually unchanged from the 94 percent of MAGA supporters who approved of him as the war began.

That means we are quickly approaching a point where Trump's MAGA base may be the only ones who approve of the job he is doing in office. And that news should horrify Republicans, who were already battling extreme headwinds in the November midterms.

If Trump 2024 voters stay home or vote for Democrats, the electoral consequences for Republicans will be ugly.

And while there's a long way to go until November, Silver's analysis shows that even when Trump's approval rating likely improves after the self-inflicted messes die down, they may never fully recover. After all, Trump's approval rating shows a downward trajectory since Inauguration Day 2025.

Of course, an improvement in Trump’s approval assumes that the war in Iran and the fallout from it won't get worse.

Trump is clearly looking for an off-ramp, though his erratic missives about his plans are impossible to follow.

But even if the war ended today and Iran reopened the critical Strait of Hormuz oil passageway—which it has been blocking for more than four weeks—experts said fuel prices will take months to go back to pre-war levels. That's because it takes time for the commodity to be shipped across the world, as well as for refineries to restart their production and repair the damage they sustained from Iranian missile strikes.

Already, gas prices are now averaging more than $4 per gallon across the country—a high not seen since 2022, when Russia invaded Ukraine. And we all know how that worked out for Joe Biden and the Democratic Party.

And rising fuel prices have negative downstream effects on the economy. Companies and farmers have to contend with higher costs to ship and harvest their crops—costs they then pass down to consumers. Worse is that oil and natural gas are used in many other products, such as plastics, rubber, synthetic fabrics, and more. Thus rising oil prices make it more expensive to produce countless other necessary household items.

Given that inflation and the cost of living are the most important issues to Americans, that should have Republicans shaking in their boots.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos

Male Voters Who Returned Trump To The White House Souring On Him Now

Male Voters Who Returned Trump To The White House Souring On Him Now

President Donald Trump's job approval rating is now at the lowest level of his second term, but beyond that topline is an even grimmer reality for Trump and the Republican Party: Men, the lifeblood of the GOP coalition, are souring on the president.

As Americans express frustration with the struggling economy and his military quagmire in Iran, Trump’s approval rating is now 16 percentage points underwater, according to The New York Times’ polling average.

And multiple new polls show Trump now underwater with men, a group that backed him by a 12-point margin in 2024, according to data from the Pew Research Center. Trump’s high support among men helped him overcome the gender gap, in which women voted for then-Vice President Kamala Harris by a smaller seven-point spread.

If men shift away from Trump—even modestly—it could be devastating for his party in the November midterm elections.

"Donald Trump and Republicans won in 2024 because of support from male voters,” Harry Enten, CNN’s chief data analyst, said Tuesday in a segment on the cable network. “The only way they can win, given the gender gap in this country, is support from male voters, and male voters are abandoning Donald Trump.”

Indeed, the latest Economist/YouGov survey found 45 percent of men approve of the job Trump's doing, compared with 50 percent who disapprove. That's a 20-point slide in net approval among men from the Economist/YouGov poll conducted at the same point last year.

Meanwhile, a Reuters/Ipsos survey released on Monday found Trump at just 37 percent approval with men—the lowest rating among the gender bloc in all of his years in office.

Even Republican pollster Echelon Insights found Trump underwater with male likely voters. Forty-six percent approve of the job he's doing, while 53 percent disapprove—the majority of whom (46 percent) do so strongly.

Some surveys show why Trump's support from men is falling, too: Trump’s handling of the economy, inflation, and the war in Iran.

In the Economist/YouGov poll, 43 percent of men approve of Trump's handling of the economy—down from 50 percent last March—and a similarly low share approves of his handling of the Iran situation.

YouGov/The Economist polling dataChart by Andrew Mangan/Created with Datawrapper

Indeed, male influencers—whose support helped push Trump to victory in 2024—are now speaking out against his actions. A number say they were duped by Trump's now-broken promises to lower prices and stop foreign wars.

For instance, Joe Rogan, the popular podcaster, has a predominantly male audience and endorsed Trump in 2024. But now he says Americans are now feeling "betrayed" by him.

“It just seems so insane, based on what [Trump] ran on,” Rogan said in a podcast episode released earlier this month. “He ran on ‘No more wars. End these stupid, senseless wars.’ And then we have one that we can’t even really clearly define why we did it.”

Comedian Tim Dillon, who helped Trump win in 2024, also slammed Trump’s war in Iran.

“This is a geopolitical nightmare now. It’s an economic catastrophe,” Dillon said on a recent podcast, saying anyone who is “trying to justify this as anything other than a strategic blunder” is a shill.

Put simply, Trump has guy problems. And if he doesn't fix them, it will be a bad election night for the GOP.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos

Trump 'Credits' Hegseth For Iran War -- And Sets Him Up As Scapegoat

Trump 'Credits' Hegseth For Iran War -- And Sets Him Up As Scapegoat

Pete Hegseth, you in danger, girl.

President Donald Trump on Monday laid the groundwork to blame his secretary of defense for the unfolding disaster in Iran, saying that Hegseth convinced him to start the “excursion” that the administration still has yet to give a coherent rationale for.

Seated alongside Hegseth at an event in Memphis, Tennessee, Trump said that the stock market and economy were doing “fantastic” but that he had "unfortunately" called Hegseth and others to discuss whether to bomb Iran and Hegseth was "the first one" to say Trump should attack.

"You said, 'Let's do it’—because you can't let them have a nuclear weapon," Trump said of Hegseth.

Trump blames Hegseth for the war: "Pete, I think you were the first one to speak up. You said, 'Let's do it.'"

[image or embed]
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) March 23, 2026 at 12:58 PM

Sure sounds like Trump is laying the groundwork to can Hegseth.

Trump offered that insight into how he pulled the trigger on attacking Iran as the conflict is going off the rails. Iran has blocked a critical oil passageway and bombed other fuel infrastructure in neighboring Middle Eastern nations, leading to a spike in fuel prices that are shaking the global economy.

It's why Trump on Monday appeared to lie about negotiations with Iran to end the war. At least for the moment, it seemed to work as investors caused the stock markets to rise and oil prices to fall at the opening of the trading day. However, Iran has since said it wasn't speaking with Trump and has no plans to stop its aggressions, which may cause markets to trend back down.

Trump is clearly terrified about the chaos he unleashed—and new polling shows he has a reason to be.

A CBS/YouGov survey found 57 percent of Americans think the war is going "very" or "somewhat" poorly. Another 60 percent disapprove of Trump starting the conflict altogether.

As for Hegseth, he would be well-poised to start polishing his resume and reaching back out to his friends Fox News, where he worked before being confirmed to lead the Pentagon.

Trump has no qualms with firing officials to make them the scapegoats for his cruel and unpopular agenda. Kristi Noem found that out the hard way when she was unceremoniously fired as homeland security secretary earlier in March, after she was made the face of Trump's brutal anti-immigration actions.

In fact, Trump has toyed with axing Hegseth at least once before. Earlier in Trump’s new administration, Hegseth was embroiled in a controversy over use of an unsecured Signal chat—that inadvertently included a journalist—to discuss classified military operations. As the Signal controversy was unfolding, NPR reported that Trump's White House had begun the process of looking for Hegseth's replacement.

Nearly a year later, Trump is now publicly placing the war on Hegseth's feet, claiming Hegseth was a major advocate of the bombing operation.

Of course, the blame might not even be true.

Earlier in March, Trump said that Hegseth, Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner, Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio convinced him that an Iran attack was “imminent” and that he needed to start this war.

"Based on what Steve and Jared and Pete and others were telling me—Marco, so involved—that I thought that they were going to attack us,” Trump said on March 9.

But Trump can’t fire his family. Rubio is more popular than Hegseth. And Witkoff is a behind-the-scenes figure whose firing wouldn’t prompt the kind of news coverage that a Hegseth ouster would. Hegseth makes a better fall guy for Trump’s misguided war.

If there’s any consolation for Hegseth, though, it’s that his firing would let him unlock that liquor cabinet he claimed to have shut when he became the secretary of defense.

A scotch on the rocks may be in your future, Pete! At least you have that.

Rising Gas Prices Enraged Republicans Under Biden, But Not Any More

Rising Gas Prices Enraged Republicans Under Biden, But Not Any More

When the price of gas skyrocketed in 2022 after Russia invaded Ukraine, Republicans fell over themselves to blame then-President Joe Biden in hope of hurting his reelection bid as well as Democrats in the midterms—even though Biden was not at fault for the spike.

But now, with President Donald Trump squarely responsible for the exponential increase in oil and gas prices after he launched an ill-conceived war on Iran, Republicans have completely reversed course, claiming that high gas prices are a cost that they're willing to pay.

It’s a message taken directly from Dear Leader, who had the gall to argue this week that higher oil prices are actually good for Americans.

Get a load of Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio, who said Thursday that he’s totally fine with higher gas prices in order to let Trump wage war in Iran.

"If that means prices go up for a short time, I think Americans understand we can live with that," Jordan said on CNN.

But in 2022, Jordan was one of the loudest voices criticizing rising gas prices.

"Real America doesn’t care about the January 6th Committee,” he wrote on X at the time. “Gas is over $5 per gallon!”

And he was still on a tear about gas prices in 2023.

"Gas prices are up 63 cents this year. Groceries prices are still at record highs. Good luck affording a house with 7% interest rates. Bidenomics!" Jordan wrote on X at the time.

But Jordan is not singing the same tune today, with gas prices up 69 cents over the last month, grocery prices rising, and mortgage rates at more than six percent—all directly thanks to Trump’s war and illegal tariffs wreaking havoc on the economy.

Then there’s Rep. Mark Alford of Missouri, who told CNN this week that “there may be sacrifices to be made at the pump on a temporary basis."

"I think the people in my district are [willing to pay higher prices at the pump],” Alford said. "I'm willing to pay 30 percent or 30 cents more at the pump to make sure Iran doesn't have a nuclear weapon that's going to hit the U.S."

ALFORD: There may be sacrifices to be made at the pump on a temporary basisRAJU: Do you think Americans are willing to make it?A: I think the people in my district are. I'm willing to pay 30%, or 30 cents more at the pump to make sure Iran doesn't have a nuclear weapon that's going to hit the US

[image or embed]
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) March 11, 2026 at 2:50 PM

Just a few weeks ago, Alford was praising Trump for lowering gas prices.

"President Trump and House Republican’s [sic] America-First energy agenda is working—and it’s working so well that even networks usually quick to criticize are reporting the relief with a smile. When gas prices go down, American families go forward,” he wrote on X.

So then does Alford think that skyrocketing gas prices thanks to trigger-happy Trump make Americans go backward?

Sen. Rick Scott of Florida also said that Americans just have to get over surging gas prices because Trump's war is more important.

“We’d love to get gas prices back down, but the most important thing is [to] destroy Iran’s ability to produce a nuclear weapon, destroy their military, their ballistic missile capability," Scott told CNN. “We all want gas prices to come down. Nobody wants gas prices higher. This president doesn’t want gas prices higher. But we have to be realistic."

Of course, Trump said in June that the United States “obliterated” Iran’s nuclear capabilities, so it’s unclear how in just a few months the country became such a massive threat that war was necessary.

Given that a majority of Americans don't support Trump’s war and only wanted to see prices in the United States come down, it's hard to imagine that being a winning message for the GOP.

But that didn’t stop Sen. Roger Marshall of Kansas from pushing the same message.

"Freedom is not free. Americans are gonna have to make some sacrifices," Marshall said, even though the war in Iran has nothing to do with freedom in the United States.

However, there is one Republican sounding the alarm on Trump's war.

“If we are still bombing Iran with kinetic action—people don’t want to call it war—if there’s still kinetic action that causes oil to be over $100, I think you’re going to see a disastrous election [for Republicans],” Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky told Fox Business.

Rand Paul: "The 2026 elections, already we are behind the 8 ball. If you add in high gas prices, high oil prices, and if we're still bombing Iran with kinetic action -- people don't want to call it war -- I think you're gonna see a disastrous election."

[image or embed]
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) March 10, 2026 at 9:00 AM

Paul’s right: Rising gas prices are Trump's fault, and voters will punish the GOP for it come November.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos