@KailiJoy
J.D. Vance

Vance Will Keep Spreading Racist Lies That Harm His Home State

Ohio Sen. J.D. Vance doesn’t care that his racist lies about Haitian immigrants are endangering his own constituents—he’s going to keep telling them anyway.

That was his message to supporters at a rally in North Carolina on Wednesday when he complained about the media describing the Haitian immigrants in Springfield as legal—which they are.

“And what they mean is that Kamala Harris used two separate programs: mass parole and temporary protected status,” Vance said. “She used two programs to wave a wand and to say, ‘We're not going to deport those people here.’ Well, if Kamala Harris waves the wand illegally and says, ‘These people are now here legally,’ I'm still going to call them an illegal alien."

First of all, Vice President Kamala Harris didn’t wave any wands, magic or otherwise, because she’s not president and has no such authority. Which Vance, who is seeking that very same office, should know.

But worse, Vance knows full well that those immigrants are here legally and he knows full well that his continued smears of them have dangerous consequences, with bomb threats, school and building closures, and a general atmosphere of fear throughout immigrant communities across the country.

But he doesn’t care about any of that. He’s running with Donald Trump, and spreading fear and hate about immigrants is a major plank of his platform. So Vance is going to keep on doing it, no matter who gets hurt—including his very own fellow Ohioans.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos.

Nearly Every GOP Senator Votes Against Right To Contraception Act

Nearly Every GOP Senator Votes Against Right To Contraception Act

Sure, the Republican Party wants to convince voters they really aren’t that radical when it comes to reproductive rights. But voting against a bill to protect access to birth control isn’t the way to do it.

On Wednesday, almost every Senate Republican voted to block the Right to Contraception Act—legislation that should be uncontroversial and unobjectionable. Only two Republicans, Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski, voted to let the bill move forward.

“The right to contraception is a fundamental right, central to a person’s privacy, health, wellbeing, dignity, liberty, equality, and ability to participate in the social and economic life of the Nation,” the bill states. So yes, you can see why Republicans—who don’t value any of those things—took issue with it.

Of course, that’s not the justification they’re giving.

“This is a show vote. It’s not serious,” Texas Sen. John Cornyn said. “It’s a phony vote because contraception, to my knowledge, is not illegal. It’s not unavailable.”

Sure, it’s not illegal or unavailable now. But that’s hardly the point.

The point is that there are plenty of Republicans who’ve said it should be illegal or at least unavailable or at least highly restricted.

One of those Republicans is Donald Trump. Perhaps Cornyn’s heard of him? Just last month, Trump said that contraception, like abortion, should probably be decided by the states. He also promised a “very comprehensive” plan he’s yet to deliver.

Another one of those Republicans Cornyn might know? Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, who has not been quite as explicit as Trump. But pretty close. In his concurring opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health—the case that overturned Roe v. Wade—he wrote that the court should next overturn Griswold v. Connecticut, the case that recognized a right to birth control.

And it’s because of those threats to birth control that Senate Democrats want to act now to protect the right to contraception before it’s too late.

"Today, we live in a country where not only tens of millions of women have been robbed of their reproductive freedoms. We also live in a country where tens of millions more worry about something as basic as birth control," Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said Wednesday. "That's utterly medieval."

It’s not just utterly medieval; it’s also a threat. First, abortion and next up: birth control.

"If Roe v. Wade can fall, anything can fall,” House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said in a recent “60 Minutes” interview. That’s the lesson Democrats have had to learn the hard way.

The lesson Republicans are now learning the hard way is that fighting to get rid of a freedom the majority of Americans supports is really unpopular. Really super very unpopular. Which is why they’ve been scrambling to find a way to talk about it without sounding like the radical extremist freaks they are.

And it’s why Senate Republicans are now pretending they don’t have a problem with contraception—they just don’t like the bill to protect it.

“We will have an alternative that will make very clear that Republicans are for contraception,” GOP Whip John Thune said. Yeah, sure they will. And what will make their bill better?

According to Iowa’s Joni Ernst, who’s supposedly working on her own bill, it will be better because it will cover less contraception. No, that’s not a joke.

“It does not include Plan B, which many folks on the right would consider abortive services,” she said. The fact that “many folks” consider emergency contraception “abortive services” does not make it so. And that’s according to actual doctors, not radical right-wing activists.

But it’s those radical right-wing activists Republican senators can’t resist, even as they’re trying to convince voters they really aren’t that radical. So they’ve blocked a bill to protect contraception, with only the empty and vague promise to voters that there’s no need to worry, it’s perfectly safe. For now.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos.

Nancy Jacobson No Labels

With No Candidate And No Campaign, No Labels Is Zeroed Out

Well, well, well. It seems that No Labels has no future. At least, not in the 2024 presidential election.

The supposedly centrist, supposedly bipartisan group that tried desperately to find someone—literally, anyone—to run on a “unity” ticket against President Joe Biden is admitting defeat, according to The Wall Street Journal.

“No such candidates emerged, so the responsible course of action is for us to stand down,” said Nancy Jacobson, founder and CEO of No Labels in a statement.

It’s not for lack of trying. Like, really trying—by basically begging everyone they could think of. As Daily Kos reported just a few weeks ago, the list of people who said no to No Labels was quite long:

  • Former Rep. Liz Cheney of Wyoming
  • Former Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan
  • Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp
  • Former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie
  • Former Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels
  • New Hampshire Gov. Chris Sununu
  • Failed Republican presidential candidate Nikki Haley
  • Former Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick
  • Businessman Mark Cuban
  • Retired Navy Adm. William McRaven
  • Actor Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson

You might notice that most of the people on that list are Republicans, though the group was apparently desperate enough to ask the Democratic former governor of Massachusetts if he’d be willing to give it a go.

But that’s no accident. In December, the group’s chief strategist admitted that the “unity” ticket didn’t need to have any Democrats on it. A Republican and an independent would do just fine!

Well, it turns out the No Labels ticket won’t have a Democrat on it after all. Or a Republican. Or anyone at all. Or an independent. What a shame.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos.

No, Biden Didn't 'Ruin Easter' -- And Daily Caller Has Egg On Its Face

No, Biden Didn't 'Ruin Easter' -- And Daily Caller Has Egg On Its Face

Oh, how awkward. After spending their Easter weekend rending their garments because President Joe Biden ruined Easter, Republicans might need to retract their outrage because it turns out, nope, he didn’t.

The story that had so many Republicans, including House Speaker Mike Johnson, in a tizzy was published by the Daily Caller last week and declared that the president had quite blasphemously and, the story suggested, for the first time ever in history, “banned religious Easter eggs” from the White House’s annual Easter Egg Roll.

Just one problem, as the Daily Caller noted in its retraction of the story:

The ban of religious symbolism on eggs as part of the White House Easter egg art contest has been longstanding, dating back decades, and the Biden administration did not make any modifications to this rule. While the Caller did not explicitly state at any point that the rule was new, this additional context rendered the main thrust of the article misleading to readers, who could reasonably have come to the conclusion that the rule was new.

Oops.

Johnson is not the only Republican who was quick to jump on the now-retracted story as evidence that Biden—the practicing Catholic president who very regularly attends church services—hates Easter, Jesus, and apple pie. As congressional reporter Jamie Dupree noted, Minnesota Republican and House Majority Whip Tom Emmer used the story to declare that Biden “proudly leads the charge” in the “radical left’s war on Christianity.”

Raging about the longstanding rule that Biden in no way invented or was responsible for was only one part of the GOP’s weekend of rage. Many Republicans were furious that the 15th annual Transgender Day of Visibility coincided with Easter this year—something Biden also did not decide.

At least they can take some comfort in knowing that Biden didn’t personally destroy the sanctity of Easter eggs after all. Their heartfelt apologies will surely be coming any minute now …

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos.

Rep. Michelle Steel

GOP Rep. Steel Got Pregnant With IVF -- Then Sponsored A Bill To Ban It

It's been a really rough week for Republicans who hate reproductive rights, and Republican Rep. Michelle Steel of California is no exception.

"As someone who struggled to get pregnant, I believe all life is a gift. IVF allowed me, as it has so many others, to start my family," she tweeted Thursday. "I believe there is nothing more pro-life than helping families have children, and I do not support federal restrictions on IVF."

Great! Just one teeny tiny little problem with that, as Inside Elections editor Jacob Rubashkin noted: Steel actually does support federal restrictions. Steel is one of the co-sponsors of the Life at Conception Act, a House bill that "declares that the right to life guaranteed by the Constitution is vested in each human being at all stages of life, including the moment of fertilization, cloning, or other moment at which an individual comes into being."

And as Rubashkin points out, there is no carveout in the bill for in vitro fertilization. Oops!

Ever since the Alabama Supreme Court ruled that "unborn children"—including frozen embryos created for IVF—"are children," and multiple hospitals and clinics have announced they are pausing IVF treatment because of it, Republicans like Steel have been scrambling to figure out how to respond.

It's a real problem for the GOP, and it's only going to get worse. On the one hand, they've spent years pushing legislation, like the bill Steel cosponsored, to declare that life begins at conception, every sperm is sacred, and an embryo is the exact same thing—and entitled to the exact same legal rights—as a live human being with a name and a Social Security number.

On the other hand, the ruling out of Alabama is absolutely batshit insane, and even Republicans know it, which is why they're now trying to pretend this isn't the direct consequence of their actions and rhetoric to convince everyone—or at least conservatives in the judiciary—that, as the Republican-controlled Alabama Supreme Court held, "unborn children are children."

The problem is that IVF is popular because, as Steel notes, it has helped so many people to be able to start their families. And starting families is supposed to be a Republican value.

But darn the luck, it's a slippery slope from "unborn children are children" to "frozen embryos are the exact same thing as children" to double oops, sorry, you can't use IVF to start your families anymore. As Republicans are now learning the hard way.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos.

Barr Deserts Sinking Ship Before Trump Can Push Him Off

Barr Deserts Sinking Ship Before Trump Can Push Him Off

On Monday, just minutes after Joe Biden secured the 270 Electoral College votes necessary to become president, Donald Trump announced that Attorney William Barr was leaving.

"Just had a very nice meeting with Attorney General Bill Barr at the White House. Our relationship has been a very good one, he has done an outstanding job!" Trump tweeted. Barr will officially leave his post before Christmas, with Deputy Attorney General Jeff Rosen taking his place for the remaining month of the Trump administration.

Read NowShow less
Donald Trump

WATCH: Highly Contagious, Trump Returns To White House — And Removes His Mask

Donald Trump returned to the White House Monday night, after spending three days at Walter Reed Medical Center to receive treatment for COVID-19. He left the hospital even though his medical team said he had not finished his treatment yet, and even his doctor made clear he should not yet be leaving the hospital.

Trump took to the balcony of the White House, removed his mask, posed for the cameras, and then after several minutes, walked inside — without his mask.



Trump has downplayed the virus — and specifically, the importance of wearing masks to reduce the spread of the disease that has killed nearly 210,000 Americans. Even while hospitalized, he has minimized the seriousness of the illness from which he is now personally suffering.

On Sunday, Trump took a joyride to drive by his fans outside the hospital, putting the Secret Service agents in the car with him at great risk. He insisted Monday that it would have been "rude" for him not to do so.

"I will be leaving the great Walter Reed Medical Center today at 6:30 p.m.," Trump tweeted Monday afternoon. "Feeling really good! Don't be afraid of COVID. Don't let it dominate your life."

At least 11 people who work in the White House have tested positive in recent days, including his press secretary, Kayleigh McEnany and several of her aides. Many other members of Trump's inner circle who attended the White House ceremony a week ago to nominate Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court have also tested positive.

On Monday, Trump's physician, Sean Conley, refused to say what the protocol will be to keep others safe as the virus continues to spread throughout the White House. It is also not clear what precautions Trump will take — if any — to avoid further infecting the people who serve him.

Published with permission of The American Independent Foundation.

Donald Trump

How Trump Plans To Remain In Power: ‘Get Rid Of The Ballots’

Donald Trump has been escalating his attacks on voting ahead of the November election, but at Wednesday's press conference, he called for getting "rid of the ballots" altogether.

"Win, lose, or draw in this election, will you commit here, today, for a peaceful transferral of power after the election?" a reporter in the White House press corps asked.

Read NowShow less
McConnell Got Pandemic Funds For Kentucky — But Opposes ‘Blue State Bailouts’

McConnell Got Pandemic Funds For Kentucky — But Opposes ‘Blue State Bailouts’

Last month, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell asked the federal government for emergency funding to help his state of Kentucky combat the coronavirus.

"As of March 24, 2020, Kentucky has confirmed 124 cases of COVID-19 and 4 fatalities," McConnell and the other members of Kentucky's congressional delegation wrote to Donald Trump.

Read NowShow less
virus test shortages, inspector general, Donald Trump

Trump Threatens Inspector General Who Reported Virus Test Shortages

Donald Trump is attacking a report released Monday that found hospitals are the country are "unable to keep up with COVID-19 testing demands" and experiencing "severe shortages."

The Office of Inspector General at the Department of Health and Human Services conducted phone interviews with administrators from 323 hospitals across 46 States to prepare its report.

Asked about the report's findings at his daily coronavirus press briefing, Trump immediately launched into an attack on report because it was prepared by an inspector general.

"It's just wrong," Trump said of the report's finding on testing shortages. "Did I hear the words 'inspector general'? Really? It's wrong. They'll talk to you about it. It's wrong."

When the reporter noted that the report came from Trump's "own government," Trump repeatedly demanded to know the inspector general's name.

"Give me the name of the inspector general," Trump said. "Could politics be entered into that?"

Last Friday, Trump fired another inspector general: Michael Atkinson, who had served as inspector general of the intelligence community and had notified Congress of the anonymous report detailing Trump's pressure on Ukraine that led to his impeachment. Over the weekend, Trump called Atkinson "a disgrace to IGs."

Later in the Monday briefing, ABC reporter Jon Karl did provide the inspector general's name: Christi A. Grimm. Trump then demanded to know when she was appointed. Told that she was appointed earlier this year, Trump was demanded further information about how long she had served in government.

When Karl confirmed that Grimm had served in the previous administration, Trump launched into a lengthy attack on Karl, calling him a "third-rate reporter" for not stating that Grimm had served in the Obama administration.

Grimm has served in various roles in the federal government for more than two decades, under former Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama.

Trump never addressed the substance of the inspector general's report about the shortage of testing around the country.

Published with permission of The American Independent Foundation

Biden Tells Trump: ‘Do Your Job, Stop Personalizing Everything’

Biden Tells Trump: ‘Do Your Job, Stop Personalizing Everything’

During a CNN town hall on Friday night, former Vice President Joe Biden had a stern message for Donald Trump about his attacks on governors pleading for help from the federal government.

“This is not personal,” Biden said. “It has nothing to do with you, Donald Trump. Nothing to do with you. Do your job. Stop personalizing everything.”

Trump has repeatedly lashed out at Democratic governors who have criticized the federal government’s slow response to the coronavirus. On Twitter, in interviews, and during his daily press briefings, he has said that some governors — he often does not bother to name them — complain too much, have not done enough, and have not demonstrated sufficient appreciation for his efforts.

During a Thursday night phone interview with Fox News host Sean Hannity, Trump targeted Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, though he apparently could not remember her name.

“She’s not stepping up,” Trump said to Hannity. “All she does is sit there and blame the federal government. She doesn’t get it done. And we send her a lot.”

He added that she is “a new governor, and it’s not been pleasant.”

During his Friday press briefing, Trump was asked specifically what more he thinks certain governors should be doing for their states.

“I want them to be appreciative,” Trump said.

He said that he had also instructed Vice President Mike Pence not to even return phone calls from governors Trump considers insufficiently appreciative, including Whitmer and Washington Gov. Jay Inslee.

“If they don’t treat you right, I don’t call,” Trump said.

Published with permission of The American Independent Foundation.

Sen. Ernst Admits GOP Aiming To Harm Biden Candidacy

Sen. Ernst Admits GOP Aiming To Harm Biden Candidacy

Donald Trump’s impeachment defense team, and many of his staunchest allies, have repeatedly argued that he was not really trying to pressure to Ukraine to investigate Joe Biden for the purpose of damaging his presidential election chances — it’s just that Trump is really concerned about corruption.

But on Monday evening, Sen. Joni Ernst (R-IA) seemed to suggest that in fact the entire point was indeed to turn off Democratic voters.

“Iowa caucuses, folks, Iowa caucuses are this next Monday evening,” Ernst said to reporters. “And I’m really interested to see how this discussion today informs and influences the Iowa caucus voters, those Democratic caucus goers. Will they be supporting Vice President Biden at this point?”

Much of Trump’s defense team spent Monday’s Senate impeachment trial focusing on the former vice president and his son, Hunter Biden, trying to argue that Trump was justified in seeking investigations into the Biden family because of their alleged corrupt and nefarious acts. Despite many insinuations by Trump and his allies, there is no evidence to support Trump’s claims about the Bidens.

And despite the Trump team’s defense, plenty of evidence — including a Sunday bombshell from former national security adviser John Bolton’s forthcoming book — shows that Trump was indeed focused on the Biden family in particular.

Neither Trump nor anyone in his administration has offered any evidence to show that Trump has a general interest in rooting out corruption. Asked in October whether he had asked any foreign leaders to investigate “corruption” of anyone who was not a political opponent, Trump couldn’t name a single example.

“You know, we would have to look,” he said.

It certainly looks as if Trump wanted to damage Biden, who numerous polls show has a good chance of beating Trump in November if he becomes the Democratic nominee for president.

Now Ernst is making clear that the message she thinks voters should take from Trump’s impeachment trial isn’t about Trump, but about the baseless accusations against Biden.

It’s reminiscent of an infamous moment when Republican Kevin McCarthy, now House minority leader, admitted that the purpose of the endless Benghazi investigations in 2015 was to damage Hillary Clinton’s presidential chances.

“Everybody though Hillary Clinton was unbeatable, right?” McCarthy asked during an interview with Fox News host Sean Hannity. “But we put together a Benghazi special committee, a select committee. What are her numbers today? Her numbers are dropping. Why? Because she’s untrustable. But no one would have known any of that had happened, had we not fought.”

Now it seems Ernst has made a similar blunder — suggesting that the real motivation of Trump’s Ukraine dealings was not to combat corruption but to damage Biden with voters.

Published with permission of The American Independent Foundation.

Rep. Hunter Will Resign ‘After The Holidays’

Rep. Hunter Will Resign ‘After The Holidays’

Days after pleading guilty to one count of misusing campaign funds, Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-CA) announced he will resign “shortly after the holidays.”

Prosecutors accused the Republican congressman of using hundreds of thousands of dollars in campaign funds to subsidize a lavish lifestyle for himself and his family, including a family vacation to Italyprivate school tuition for his kids, and even flying the family’s pet rabbit across the country.

Hunter also allegedly used campaign cash on extramarital affairs with multiple women, some of whom were congressional staff members.

His wife, Margaret, who had been his campaign manager, pleaded guilty earlier this year to one count of criminal conspiracy and agreed to testify against her husband.

Hunter is the second House Republican to plead guilty to federal crimes this year. Former Rep. Chris Collins of New York resigned from Congress in early October before pleading guilty to charges related to insider trading.

Collins and Hunter were the first and second members of Congress to endorse Donald Trump during the 2016 election cycle.

Hunter faces a prison sentence of up to five years as well as a fine of $250,000 fine when he is sentenced March 17, according to KGTV.

On Thursday, the House Ethics Committee sent a letter to Hunter warning him not to cast any more votes in Congress after his guilty plea.

“This provision of House Rules was promulgated to preserve public confidence in the legislative process when a sitting Member of Congress has been convicted of a serious crime,” Reps. Ted Deutch (D-FL) and Kenny Marchant (R-TX) wrote.

“We emphasize in the strongest possible terms that if you violate the clear principles of this provision [by casting a vote], you risk subjecting yourself to action by this Committee, and by the House, in addition to any other disciplinary action that may be initiated in connection with your criminal conviction,” the letter stated.

Published with permission of The American Independent Foundation.

President Rants About Toilets Flushing ’10, 15 Times’

President Rants About Toilets Flushing ’10, 15 Times’

On Friday, Donald Trump hosted what the White House described as “a roundtable on small business and red tape reduction accomplishments.”

He used the time to express concerns about a number of things, including energy-efficient lightbulbs, which he said make him look orange.

“I don’t want to look orange,” he said.

He also went on a rather lengthy diatribe about overly regulated water systems that require people to flush toilets “10 times, 15 times” — something he said he was having the EPA look into.

“We have a situation where we’re looking very strongly at sinks and showers and other elements of bathrooms, where you turn the faucet on in areas where there’s tremendous amounts of water, where the water rushes out to sea because you could never handle it. And you don’t get any water. You turn on the faucet — you don’t get any water. They take a shower, and water comes dripping out, it’s dripping out very quietly, dripping out,” Trump said.

“People are flushing toilets 10 times, 15 times, as opposed to once. They end up using more water. So EPA is looking at that very strongly, at my suggestion. You go into a new building or a new house or a new home, and they have standards where you don’t get water. You can’t wash your hands, practically, there’s so little water comes out of the faucet. And the end result is you leave the faucet on, and it takes you much longer to wash your hands. You end up using the same amount of water.”

Trump went on. “So we’re looking at, very seriously, at opening up the standard, and there may be some areas where we’ll go the other route. Desert areas. But for the most part, you have many states where they have so much water that it comes down — it’s called rain — that they don’t know what to do with it,” he said.

“So we’re going to be opening up that, I believe. And we’re looking at changing the standards very soon. And that’s a little bit like the lightbulb. Where you get a bulb that’s better for much less money. We go back but you have the other alternative. And you’ll keep the other alternative with sinks and showers et cetera too. But that’s been a big problem.”

Published with permission of The American Independent Foundation.

Georgia’s Sen. Isakson To Retire, Improving Democratic Chances In 2020

Georgia’s Sen. Isakson To Retire, Improving Democratic Chances In 2020

Republican Sen. Johnny Isakson of Georgia announced Wednesday that he will resign at the end of the year because of “mounting health challenges” related to his Parkinson’s disease.

“I have concluded that I will not be able to do the job over the long term in the manner the citizens of Georgia deserve,” he said in a statement.

Isakson will step down at the end of the year, and Georgia’s Republican governor, Brian Kemp, will name his replacement until the state holds a special election, likely next year.

Isakson’s retirement has huge implications for the fate of the Senate, with Republicans having to defend 22 of the 34 Senate seats up in 2020. Isakson’s seat open makes it 23. With Democrats needing to pick up three or four Senate seats — depending on who wins the White House — this gives Democrats another opportunity to take back control of the Senate from the GOP and from the self-described “Grim Reaper”of popular legislation, Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.

David Perdue, Georgia’s other Republican senator, is also up for reelection next year, and he’s a top target for Democrats. It’s an uphill battle for Democrats in Georgia, but there have been signs in the last year that it’s not impossible. Stacey Abrams nearly defeated Kemp in last year’s gubernatorial race, and Lucy McBath picked up Georgia’s 6th Congressional District — a seat Republicans had held for decades.

As Jeff Singer of Daily Kos Elections writes, “A Democratic victory in one of the Peach State’s two seats would go a long way toward helping Team Blue turn its 53-47 deficit in the Senate into a majority, and it now has the tantalizing possibility of taking both.”

Published with permission of The American Independent.

Trump Brands American Jews ‘Disloyal’ For Supporting Democrats

Trump Brands American Jews ‘Disloyal’ For Supporting Democrats

Trump took his attacks on American Jews to a new low Tuesday when he accused them of being “disloyal” for supporting the Democratic Party.

“I think any Jewish people that vote for a Democrat — I think it shows either a total lack of knowledge or great disloyalty,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office.

Trump has a long and ugly record of anti-Semitic remarks and behavior, though certainly his most infamous was his insistence in 2017 that rioting neo-Nazis in Charlottesville were “very fine people.”

He regularly conflates American Jews with Israeli politics, insisting that American Jews should support him because of his support for Israel’s right-wing prime minister. In April, while addressing a group of Jewish Republicans, he referred to Benjamin Netanyahu as “your prime minister.”

Trump has repeatedly tried to turn American Jews against the Democratic Party, even though they are overwhelmingly Democratic and liberal. A poll earlier this year found that just 25 percent of American Jews identify as Republicans.

That poll also found that 71 percent of American Jews disapprove of how Trump has handled the rise of anti-Semitism, while nearly 60 percent say Trump “bears at least some responsibility for the shootings at synagogues in Pittsburgh and Poway, [California].”

“The Jewish American electorate remains overwhelmingly opposed to President Trump, motivated largely by the Jewish community’s positions on domestic policy issues,” the Jewish Electorate Institute wrote in a summary of its poll findings. “These include immigration and health care, as well as concerns about rising anti-Semitism, gun violence, and rise of white nationalism, which respondents partially attribute to President Trump.”

Trump has never taken any responsibility for, or even addressed, the rise in anti-Semitic attacks during his time in office. He has made it quite clear that the only issue he thinks American Jews care about is Israel, and that his embrace of Netanyahu’s policies means American Jews should be supporting him.

But now, he’s gone a step further and accused his fellow Americans of disloyalty, though it’s not clear to whom he thinks American Jews should be loyal. To Israel? To Trump? To the GOP?

Accusing American Jews of insufficient loyalty is an outrageous claim for any politician to make, but it’s especially audacious coming from a man who regularly gives a wink and a nod to anti-Semitic white supremacists and has called the very people who riot against Jews “very fine people.”

Published with permission of The American Independent.

White House Says Trump ‘In Meetings’ As He Posts Enraged Tweets

White House Says Trump ‘In Meetings’ As He Posts Enraged Tweets

While the country continues to reel from two mass shootings that claimed the lives of more than 30 people over the weekend, Trump has other things on his mind.

White House spokesperson Hogan Gidley told reporters Tuesday afternoon that Trump has no public events on his schedule for the day because he’s “meeting with staff on a wide range of policies, having conversations in prepping for his trip to these communities.”

Trump is planning to visit El Paso, Texas, and Dayton, Ohio, later this week — the two cities devastated by deadly shootings, although in his carefully scripted statement Monday, Trump referred to “those who perished in Toledo.”

“This is a very, very serious moment in our country’s history,” Gidley said Tuesday. “This president recognizes the gravity of this moment. You saw that manifest in his speech in the Diplomat Room.”

But as Gidley was insisting to reporters that Trump was focused on, and aware of, the gravity of the moment, Trump was rage-tweeting about Google’s involvement in the 2016 election and accusing it of “very illegal” behavior.

Trump claimed that Google CEO Sundar Pichai assured him “that they didn’t help Crooked Hillary over me in the 2016 Election, and that they are NOT planning to illegally subvert the 2020 Election despite all that has been said to the contrary.”

Trump’s citation for this allegation is Fox host Lou Dobbs, whom Trump frequently quotes on Twitter. Trump also cited Peter Schweizer, the right-wing author of the widely debunked book Clinton Cash, tweeting that Schweizer “stated with certainty that they suppressed negatives stories on Hillary Clinton, and boosted negative stories on Donald Trump. All very illegal. We are watching Google very closely!”

As Matt Gertz of Media Matters noted, Trump’s baseless theories about Google — which he was tweeting about earlier in the morning but for some reason decided to tweet again in the middle of the day — come from watching Dobbs on Fox.

“The Trump-Fox feedback loop is particularly salient in giving the president targets for his ire, and the network’s obsession with tech platform bias has repeatedly resulted in angry Trump tweets,” Gertz explained. “This is at least the third time Trump has responded to Fox segments by tweeting that his administration would take action against Google.”

It’s bad enough that Trump is baselessly accusing companies of “very illegal” behavior just because he saw it on Fox News. But for the White House to insist that Trump is in fact spending his day having conversations that show he understands the “gravity of the moment” — when that is demonstrably not true — is insulting to the American people and to those communities Trump is supposedly thinking about.

Published with permission of The American Independent.