@LucianKTruscott
True American Greatness Will Recover From The Disease Of Trumpism

True American Greatness Will Recover From The Disease Of Trumpism

We got hit bad on Tuesday night, but we’re Democrats. We get up. We stand up. We move forward.

I want you to remember that we did it before. Donald Trump was elected president, but the world didn’t stop turning on its axis. The sun came up the next morning – it’s up here in Northeast Pennsylvania despite the state’s failure last night – and it will come up tomorrow and the next day and the next.

Don’t forget how resilient this country is. We have survived worse than Donald fucking Trump and JD smirking Vance. In the days to come, it will be up to pundits and prognosticators and pollsters to explain the numbers and how it happened, but in the short term, we discovered last night that there are more angry people out there than we thought.

Here's the deal. This isn’t the time to mirror their anger. Now is the time to stand together and show them who are. We are Americans and we are a good people. What raised its ugly head in this election – hate and racism and xenophobia and every other ism you can think of – has been there all along. Trump gave it a focus, and he benefitted from it in an election.

But elections and even presidents do not define who we are. We do that with the way we live our lives, with our attitudes about each other, with our empathy and our drive to do better and be better.

I’m going to leave you on this bleak day with a happy thought. We are the ones people turn to when they want to feel better about themselves. We are the artists and the musicians and the playwrights and the actors and the screenwriters and the poets who have made a difference in the life of this nation and will continue to do so in the future. We are Patti Smith. We are Joan Didion. We are Bob Dylan. We are Bo Diddley. We are Georgia O’Keefe. We are Jerry Garcia. We are Jackson Pollock. We are Maya Angelou. We are Edward Albee. We are Muddy Waters. We are James Baldwin. We are Roz Chast. We are Margaret Atwood. We are Allen Ginsberg. We are Stephen Sondheim. We are Jules Feiffer. We are Taylor Swift.

We are all of them and we are even more.

The politics and the people we oppose do not produce this greatness. They produce Donald Trump. If you are looking for a reason that we will recover from this, it is right there.

They have hate. We have love and each other. We will resist. We will persist. We will prevail.

Lucian K. Truscott IV, a graduate of West Point, has had a 50-year career as a journalist, novelist, and screenwriter. He has covered Watergate, the Stonewall riots, and wars in Lebanon, Iraq, and Afghanistan. He is also the author of five bestselling novels. You can subscribe to his daily columns at luciantruscott.substack.com and follow him on Twitter @LucianKTruscott and on Facebook at Lucian K. Truscott IV.

Reprinted with permission from Lucian Truscott.

Kamala Harris

Saving A Nation Of Mistakes -- And Corrections -- Like No Other In The World

It didn’t start out so great. In fact, a case could be made that the United States was born a mistake, and our life as a people has been one of struggle to get it right.

We let the founders make a compromise that cost an entire people their freedom, even in chains as they were helping to build our country. It took a Civil War and the expenditure of 600,000 American lives, but we got it right.

We excluded more than half our population from the right to participate in decisions about their, and our, lives. But with women’s suffrage, we got it right.

We spent a hundred years keeping the heel of a massive boot on the lives of the people allegedly freed by the Civil War, but the Civil Rights and Voting Rights laws got it right, and the struggle to hold onto those rights continues.

We entered and fought in two world wars to save the world, but we didn’t save ourselves from our own discriminatory evil and made Black people fight in those wars in segregated units without full citizenship, but when Truman integrated the services in 1948, we got it right.

We got involved in a foreign war in which we had no interests and which we fought in ways both immoral and illegal, and we caused the deaths of tens of thousands of our soldiers and more than a million innocents, but a movement of young people and enlightened elders forced us to end the war in Vietnam, and we got it right.

We cursed ourselves and those around us by turning our heads from poverty and need, but we took steps beginning with Social Security for the aged and programs like food stamps and Women and Infant Children for the young, and with a continuing series of experiments to deal with this intractable problem, we’re still trying to get it right, and the struggle to help the needy among us continues.

We denied half the population control over their own reproductive health for most of our history, and with Roe, our Supreme Court got it right. Then a totalitarian movement stripped away women’s rights in more than half the states and criminalized what had been legal. Through ballot measures and a powerful movement of women and their supporters, we are attempting to recover what has been taken from our wives and sisters and daughters, and we have had successes in getting it right, and we’re still fighting.

We allowed ourselves to get involved in two more wars that we had no business in fighting and which cost us the lives of thousands of our sons and daughters and the lives of hundreds of thousands of innocents abroad, but we beat the man who lied us into those wars, and we got ourselves out of them, and we corrected our errors at home, if not abroad.

We spent a century and a half failing citizens who had spent their entire lives working to build this country with medical care many of them could not afford in retirement, and failed the needy who could not afford medical care for themselves and their children, but with Medicare, and then Medicaid, and then Obamacare, we began to get it right.

For more than 200 years, we consigned gay people to invisibility and disdain and made their love an illegal act and banned them from showing their patriotism in serving this country in the military and prevented them from marrying, but then our Congress and the Supreme Court got it right, and the struggle to secure those rights continues.

We are a country so prosperous and sorted out when it comes to opportunity and freedom that millions have wanted to come here to join our democracy and our economy, and over the last two and a half centuries, we have welcomed them, and periodically it has been a struggle to hold open our arms, but the struggle continues to get it right.

We allowed a huckster and conman to lie his way into the White House, and he went on to appoint criminals to high office. He proceeded to lie and steal and through criminal negligence helped to cause the deaths of hundreds of thousands of our fellow citizens in a terrible pandemic as he stole from the national treasury and rewarded cronies for crimes both large and small, but we beat him at the ballot box when he ran for reelection, and with good will and love of country and each other, we will get it right again.

Lucian K. Truscott IV, a graduate of West Point, has had a 50-year career as a journalist, novelist, and screenwriter. He has covered Watergate, the Stonewall riots, and wars in Lebanon, Iraq, and Afghanistan. He is also the author of five bestselling novels. You can subscribe to his daily columns at luciantruscott.substack.com and follow him on Twitter @LucianKTruscott and on Facebook at Lucian K. Truscott IV.

Reprinted with permission from Lucian Truscott.

The Real Meaning Of Trump's Threat Against Liz Cheney

The Real Meaning Of Trump's Threat Against Liz Cheney

In the context of calling Liz Cheney a “war hawk,” Trump says she should be given “a rifle” and face what amounts to a firing squad of “nine barrels.”

Let’s get something straight. This man has no idea what he’s talking about. As a draft dodger, Donald Trump successfully escaped being trained to use a military rifle. He wouldn’t know what to do with a rifle if you handed it to him. Ironically, Liz Cheney probably does.

In the closing days of this campaign, Trump is defaulting to threats of violence and arrest. In a post on his social media account, Trump threatened to arrest “Lawyers, Political Operatives, Donors, Illegal Voters, & Corrupt Election Officials. Those involved in unscrupulous behavior will be sought out, caught, and prosecuted at levels, unfortunately, never seen before in our Country.”

The New York Times reported this week that Trump’s threats against election officials appear to be having some effect. In an article entitled "The Army of Election Officials Ready to Reject the Vote," the Times describes efforts in Nevada, Arizona, Georgia, and Pennsylvania by election boards to reject certification of the vote if the election does not go Trump’s way. The people described in the article are partisan Republicans. When even they fear arrest and prosecution by their own candidate, something is seriously wrong in this country.

NPR reported this morning that “Military experts are preparing for possible election violence or unrest.” Earlier in the week, NPR reported that local police are “preparing for possible violence against election workers.”

The front line in the election for Liz Cheney is her own home in Wyoming. The front lines for election workers are the polling places where they will go to work next Tuesday. The idea of “battleground states” has become a reality, where armed police officers may be necessary to secure the Constitutional right to vote. One political party and one presidential candidate are responsible for turning this election into a warzone.

Lucian K. Truscott IV, a graduate of West Point, has had a 50-year career as a journalist, novelist, and screenwriter. He has covered Watergate, the Stonewall riots, and wars in Lebanon, Iraq, and Afghanistan. He is also the author of five bestselling novels. You can subscribe to his daily columns at luciantruscott.substack.com and follow him on Twitter @LucianKTruscott and on Facebook at Lucian K. Truscott IV.

Reprinted with permission from Lucian Truscott.

I Have An Important Announcement From One Of Trump's 'Enemies Within': Me

I Have An Important Announcement From One Of Trump's 'Enemies Within': Me

I assume that Donald Trump is keeping a list, so I want to make sure that my name is on it as one of those he calls the “enemy within.”

This is an easy decision. I’ve been what Trump calls “a vermin within the confines of our country” for just over 77 years now. Well, I was born in Japan and lived there for the first year of my life and spent three years living in Germany while my father was stationed there, so I guess I’ve been a vermin for only 72 and a half years, counting the six months I spent reporting on wars overseas.

As a journalist, I am also one of those Trump calls an “enemy of the people” and a “radical left thug,” and I want to make sure my name is on those lists, too. I got my start during the eight years I spent writing for the Village Voice. I was such an enemy of the people and outrageous part of the radical left that I attained a 200-page FBI report and Cointelpro file that included pages from Military Intelligence reporting on my service as second lieutenant in the Army.

During part of 1972, after I left the Army, I was assigned my very own personal FBI agent who followed me around New York City and one night followed me home to the barge I lived on in West New York, New Jersey. He parked his car overnight on River Road, and I woke him up in the morning to tell him I was on my way to work at the Voice and that there was usually good parking on East 9th Street between University and Broadway.

Donald Trump has said that people like me are “vermin who will do anything, whether legally or illegally, to destroy America and to destroy the American Dream.” I just want to make it clear that if it’s Donald Trump’s American dream, yeah, I’ll do pretty much anything to destroy it, so he should make sure I’m on that list.

I want to put myself down as one Trump has called a “grossly incompetent low IQ dummy,” a group that includes Vice President Kamala Harris, whom he has called “dumber than hell.” I want to state that I that, as Trump has also accused Harris, I proudly “laugh like a crazy person,” so that should be recorded on a list somewhere, too.

I have to say that the list I want to be put right at the top of is Trump’s “enemies within.” Trump called Adam Schiff and Nancy Pelosi “enemies within” the other day, and I want to make sure that my name is right there with theirs on his list. Trump emphasized the danger of the “enemy within” to Fox News’ Maria Bartiromo the other day, saying “I think the bigger problem are the people from within. We have some very bad people. We have some sick people. Radical left lunatics.” He promised that the presence of these terrible people “should be very easily handled by, if necessary, by National Guard, or if really necessary, by the military, because they can’t let that happen.”

As a veteran who comes from a family with four generations who have served, I want to make certain that I’m on the “enemy within” list so Donald Trump’s “military” can find me. I’ll welcome them into my home and show them the LIFE Magazine with my grandfather, Gen. Lucian K. Truscott Jr., on the cover. I’ll show them my father’s Silver Star, which he was awarded for heroism during the battle of The Gauntlet in what is now North Korea. I’ll show them the medal grandpa was awarded when he retired from 10 years’ service in the Central Intelligence Agency. I’ll even let them take a gander at my West Point class ring as I fix them a nice cup of coffee and offer them some buttered toast.

I am serious about this. I have been a thorn in the side of the United States government and the White House and the Congress and especially the Army for over five decades. I have written extensively advocating the right of gay people to serve in the military when it was still a crime to be gay and serve your country. I have almost three decades of history writing in favor of a sane gun policy in this country. I have written brutal critiques of three or four U.S. presidents and called at least one of them – you know who you are – a fascist. I believe in stuff like the right of women to control their own bodies, and I believe in equal rights under the law for everyone, and I believe that six of our nine Supreme Court justices are fascist fellow travelers.

I am indeed an enemy within if it is the America Donald Trump dreams of. So, Donnie, my boy, you fascist prick, if your minions are assigned to track down people like me and put them on lists, I want my name on every single fucking one of them.

Lucian K. Truscott IV, a graduate of West Point, has had a 50-year career as a journalist, novelist, and screenwriter. He has covered Watergate, the Stonewall riots, and wars in Lebanon, Iraq, and Afghanistan. He is also the author of five bestselling novels. You can subscribe to his daily columns at luciantruscott.substack.com and follow him on Twitter @LucianKTruscott and on Facebook at Lucian K. Truscott IV.

Good Morning! This Is What Fascism Looks Like

Good Morning! This Is What Fascism Looks Like

It crept in overnight, while we were sleeping. Fascism showed its face not with jackboots and concentration camps…not yet, anyway…but rather as just another day in Capitalist America. Two major media companies, The Washington Post and The Los Angeles Times, made decisions to capitulate to the man they fear will be elected president before a single vote has been counted. They decided not to run editorials endorsing their preferred candidate for president, Kamala Harris, because the owners of the companies, Jeff Bezos and Patrick Soon-Shiong, are afraid if they anger Donald Trump, he will hit them where it hurts: In their pocketbooks.

Bezos sees himself as particularly vulnerable to the wrath of Donald Trump. Before he left office in 2021, Trump appointed a puppet to run the United States Postal Service (USPS): Louis DeJoy, a long-time Republican fund-raiser and major Trump contributor who was appointed as one of three deputy finance chairmen of the Republican National Committee shortly after Trump took office in 2017.

The USPS prioritizes package delivery for Amazon and sets the price it pays for the service. Trump has threatened Bezos with jacking up his Amazon delivery prices before, in 2018. The postmaster general was then Megan Brennan, appointed during the Obama administration, who resisted Trump’s demand to raise delivery prices, but such resistance is unlikely to happen if Trump is elected and DeJoy is there to carry out his wishes.

This is the way it happens. An autocrat like Donald Trump, with his history of impulsive decisions and threats against perceived enemies, has two billionaires cowering in fear, and he didn’t even have to pick up the phone.

Fascism is not an all-at-once transformation. We’ve already had our brownshirt day, on January 6, 2021, when Trump’s MAGA army stormed the Capitol waving Confederate and Nazi flags and assaulting police officers and attempting to hunt down and kill Nancy Pelosi and Mike Pence, all of it, we now know, with Trump cheering them on from the White House. Fascism uses symbols – MAGA this time, swastika last time – to rally followers, and then it feeds them fear and lies and the demonization of minorities and others perceived as not like us.

I don’t even know that you can name the period of fascism we’re in right now. Giving it a name doesn’t matter. What matters is that it is happening right in front of our eyes, and little if nothing is being done about it, other than fascism finally being called out by political leaders such as Kamala Harris and other Democrats, and some news organizations have at last crossed the Rubicon of using the “F” word of fascism and the “H” word of Hitler in the same sentences with Donald Trump.

What can we do? We can all vote for Kamala Harris and whatever Democrat is running for whatever office in your district and state.

Journalists everywhere, but particularly at the Washington Post and LA Times, have a crucial role to play right now. It is journalism about Donald Trump’s crimes and political extremism that has revealed him as not just a totalitarian politician, but as a man consumed with a fascist lust for absolute power. It has been people like Timothy Snyder and Heather Cox Richardson who have put Trump’s rise in historical perspective and compared what is happening right now in this country to what happened nearly a century ago in Germany with the rise of Hitler, when German corporate titans of the day bowed down to him in fear.

Now the reporters and editors at the Post and the LA Times can help show the world what contemporary fascism looks like by refusing to countenance the craven subservience of their owners. There are leaders at the Washington Post, in particular Bob Woodward and Eugene Robinson and David Ignatius and Ruth Marcus and Karen Tumulty, who can show the way for their colleagues by leading a newspaper-wide walk out. With what we are seeing every day from Donald Trump, they can call it a “Strike Against Fascism,” or “A Call to Arms.”

You might accuse me as a freelancer of not taking seriously the possibility that people at both papers might lose their jobs for leading or participating in a walk-out. But people have already resigned in protest at both papers. This isn’t a time to show fear. It’s a time to stand up to power. The writers and editors have a lot to lose, but they have already been treated as expendable, and they’ve been told they are in danger of losing their jobs anyway.

The guy Bezos put in as publisher of the Post, former Murdoch hitman Will Lewis, bluntly told Post staffers when he was appointed, “We are losing large amounts of money. Your audience has halved in recent years. People are not reading your stuff. I can’t sugarcoat it anymore.” He could have been talking as well to the staffs of the New York Times and the three major television networks and cable news like CNN and MSNBC. All of them are in an existential crisis at this crucial moment in our history. Newspapers are closing across the country. Television networks and cable news shows are hemorrhaging viewers.

The arrival of Bezos and Soon-Shiong to “rescue” two major American newspapers has shown us how hollow were any hopes that billionaires will or even can make a difference in today’s economic and political climate.

But workers can make a difference. With ten days to go until the election, let’s see if a day with no newspaper in Washington D.C. and Los Angeles can make a difference. Maybe a strike will teach reporters and editors and the rest of us that we are beyond the point of being able to affect our lives and the lives of others. Or maybe rallying against the fascism that has been stealing our national politics will help to send more people to the polls to vote for Kamala Harris on November 5.

I do know this: When you are bullied, you STAND UP or you lose your self-respect and your dignity and your right to life. The fascism of Donald Trump would take away all three.

Lucian K. Truscott IV, a graduate of West Point, has had a 50-year career as a journalist, novelist, and screenwriter. He has covered Watergate, the Stonewall riots, and wars in Lebanon, Iraq, and Afghanistan. He is also the author of five bestselling novels. You can subscribe to his daily columns at luciantruscott.substack.com and follow him on Twitter @LucianKTruscott and on Facebook at Lucian K. Truscott IV.

Why Trump's 'Mass Deportation' Threat Is Just Another Bullying Lie

Why Trump's 'Mass Deportation' Threat Is Just Another Bullying Lie

Logistics is the reason Donald Trump will never, ever, even if he wins election and invokes the Alien and Sedition Act of 1798, be able to deport the 15 million, or 20 million, or 25 million undocumented immigrants – whatever the number he throws out seemingly according to his mood or state of mental deterioration.

Let’s take 20 million, the number in the middle, double the population of Los Angeles County, which occupies about 4,000 square miles.

Twenty million undocumented people means they are spread out over almost 4 million square miles. Do you know how big the continental U.S. is? It’s about 3,000 miles from Maine to Washington, and 1,700 miles from North Dakota to south Texas. Any way you look at it, the United States of America is big.

We know immigrants, undocumented and otherwise, live in every state, in large cities and small towns both. Most of them who are not children have jobs. They rent apartments and houses. They own cars. Their kids are in schools. Some of them even own businesses through partnerships with citizens or immigrants with documented status. Who knew a town in Ohio called Springfield had more than 100 Haitian immigrants before Trump and Vance began their lie-fest about immigrants kidnapping and eating neighbors’ pets? I sure didn’t.

I don’t know how many immigrants live in Dover, New Jersey, either, although I drove through there recently and discovered the town of 18,500 is a treasure trove of Mexican and Central American restaurants, so Dover must have quite a substantial immigrant population. Dover isn’t far from Morristown, New Jersey. I don’t know the immigrant population there, either, but I spent a night in a big hospital there recently, and just from that experience, I can tell you that the size of the immigrant population of Morristown is considerable.

So, Stephen “I’m chasing ‘em, boss, I’m chasing em’” Miller and his round ‘em up cowboys will be looking for their 20 million undocumented immigrants all over the place. Until now, at least, we haven’t been a “show me your papers” country. Even assuming they try to create a national requirement for some sort of domestic passport, that attempt will face countless legal challenges in federal and state courts, so that won’t be happening anytime soon. Which creates another obvious problem, that of distinguishing U.S. citizens from immigrants, and documented immigrants from undocumented ones.

Let’s assume that in the beginning, they are able to find a relatively large number of undocumented immigrants. What are they going to do with them? Sure, they have talked of building what amounts to concentration camps where they say the government will hold them until they can be deported. They did this before, remember, when they hastily threw up some wire-enclosed camps near the border, grabbed people coming across, and threw them into the camps, even separating parents from children and giving them plastic “space blankets” to sleep under on bare floors. At one point, they even had people fenced in under a freeway, out in the open, except for the shade provided by the overpass.

Their attempts then were haphazard and inhumane, and they might try the same thing again. Last time, however, it was just a few thousand people they captured right at the border and had to move only a few miles to the camps they threw up. This time they’re talking about rounding up 20 million people scattered throughout the whole country. If they were to make some sort of serious attempt, how would they do it? How would they move them? Where would they put the detainees, not only down near the border, but if and when they find large numbers in the center of the country, far from the border?

There is one organization in the United States with experience in moving large numbers of people from one place to another: the U.S. Army.

Let’s discuss what it takes to move, say, a brigade of 15,000 soldiers. The first thing you need to understand is that the organizational structure of this many soldiers is already in place. A brigade is broken down into three or four battalions. Each battalion has four companies of a hundred to two hundred soldiers. One of the companies, the headquarters company, is organized and trained for the purpose of doing things like mass movements.

The companies and battalions all have their own supply systems, including the ability to feed hundreds or thousands of soldiers during a move. They also have the vehicles necessary to move the soldiers and their equipment in trucks and personnel carriers, and they have the capability to house hundreds or even thousands of soldiers overnight or for more extended periods using tents and other temporary structures. The soldiers themselves carry the equipment for sleeping, such as ground pads and sleeping bags. They have the uniforms necessary to keep themselves warm in cold weather as well.

It is very, very difficult to move even 15,000 to 20,000 soldiers. It takes weeks of planning and preparation. All the equipment must be checked. All the vehicles must be in operating order. All the supplies necessary for the move such as gas, water, and food must be made ready. There will be breakdowns of vehicles and other equipment. Soldiers who can make necessary repairs must be present with all the tools and extra parts needed to effect the repairs.

The most important thing to realize about what I’m describing here is that this is about moving the soldiers themselves, and nobody else. If anyone who is not a soldier is included, every extra person takes extra effort and extra supplies and extra equipment. Even one additional person.

So, just to begin, for any immigrants Trump and his gaggle of brownshirts are able to find, starting on day one, they will have to be housed and fed. There will have to be vehicles in which to move them.

Trump and Vance and others have talked about “using the military” in some fashion to accomplish all their plans to round up immigrants. This is a fantasy. The military does not have domestic powers of arrest or imprisonment. Even when National Guard troops have been used along the border, it has been to supplement domestic law enforcement and border patrol agents. Soldiers are not empowered to arrest or detain for purposes of customs and immigration.

Trump has made noises of invoking the Alien and Sedition Act of 1798, the law that was used to place Japanese, Italian, and German immigrants in internment camps during World War II. That act, which has been widely condemned for its misuse during the 1940’s, creates a condition that this nation must be at war with enemy nations in order to be used. It also specifies that any “alien” must be served with an “order” to depart the country and given a time frame for this to happen, and only then can the “alien” be detained by a “marshal” reporting to the Secretary of State (!). If the “alien” is found to have violated the order, “upon conviction thereof” the “alien” can be imprisoned for a term not to exceed three years and then deported with no possibility of returning and seeking citizenship again.

No mention is made in the text of this terrible law of using the U.S. military as a police force to imprison and deport anyone who is not a citizen. And oddly, the Alien and Sedition Act appears to confer upon “aliens” many of the same rights immigrants have under our current immigration laws.

While Trump was in office, he was not able to use active duty, reserve, or National Guard soldiers as immigration cops on the border, and there is little reason to think that courts would allow the military to be used domestically for this purpose now.

But…let’s take a nightmare scenario…and assume that Trump somehow orders the military to be used in the “round up” and deportation scheme. Neither the active-duty army, reserves, or National Guard have the supplies and equipment necessary to do anything more than move themselves from one place to another.

Buses would need to be used to move undocumented immigrants. At 40 persons per bus, that would mean some 500,000 buses would be necessary to move 20 million people. There are about 500,000 school buses in this country that move school children to and from school every day. School buses amount to the largest transportation fleet in this country, but they are in use every day, and if Trump tried to commandeer them, chaos would result. I realize that “chaos” is Trump’s middle name, but not even Donald Trump is ready for what would happen if schools were shut down because school buses were somehow nationalized to move undocumented immigrants.

And who would drive them? A commercial license is necessary in most states to drive a bus. If Trump were to conscript school bus drivers to drive the school buses full of immigrants from, say, Nebraska to Texas or Arizona, they would have to be paid…and housed…and fed…and so on, and so on, and so on.

Do you see what we’re looking at here? Rounding up and deporting 20 million undocumented immigrants, even using the Alien and Sedition Act of 1798, would entail a logistical capability that not even the U.S. military has. It would entail, under that unthinkable law itself, the issuance of formal “orders” that under the language of the law would involve the Department of State, and then arrests of those not complying with the “order,” and then trial and conviction of violating the “order,” and then imprisonment, and then deportation.

We don’t have enough immigration courts and judges to handle the thousands of applications for asylum in the system right now. The backlog is at least part of the reason we have so many immigrants in this country with undocumented status waiting for hearings, appeals, hell, just waiting for paperwork. Congress has been asked repeatedly to increase the budget for more immigration courts and judges, and it hasn’t happened.

The words pipe and dream come to mind if you step back even a half-foot and consider Trump’s rhetoric about deporting undocumented immigrants. It may be red meat for the MAGA masses, but it’s as untethered from reality as his talk about Hannibal Lecter.

Lucian K. Truscott IV, a graduate of West Point, has had a 50-year career as a journalist, novelist, and screenwriter. He has covered Watergate, the Stonewall riots, and wars in Lebanon, Iraq, and Afghanistan. He is also the author of five bestselling novels. You can subscribe to his daily columns at luciantruscott.substack.com and follow him on Twitter @LucianKTruscott and on Facebook at Lucian K. Truscott IV.

Trump's 'Closing Argument': Turn The Hate Knob Up To 11

Trump's 'Closing Argument': Turn The Hate Knob Up To 11

I’ve been trying to figure out what’s going on with Donald Trump’s recent use of profane language and the new level of personal attacks he’s hitting on the campaign trail. Listen to how he described Kamala Harris in Detroit last Friday: “She’s a shit vice president. The worst. You’re the worst vice president. Kamala, you’re fired. Get the hell out of here, you’re fired. Get out of here. Get the hell out of here, Kamala.”

The next day, in Latrobe, Pennsylvania, Trump led a call-and-response to his audience with, “Such a horrible four years. We had a horrible — think of the — everything they touch turns to…”

“Shit!” came the eager response from his rally-goers. Trump then urged them to get out and vote to send the message, “We can’t stand you, you’re a shit vice president.”

The New York Times reported that in his opening at the same Pennsylvania rally, Trump’s “monologue culminated in lewd remarks about the size of Mr. Palmer’s penis.” Trump’s “monologue” about his “friend Arnold Palmer” consisted of this: “This is a guy that was all man. This man was strong and tough. And I refuse to say it, but when he took showers with the other pros, they came out of there, they said, ‘Oh, my god, that’s unbelievable.’” The Times reported that Trump “chuckled” at the crowd’s reaction, later confiding, “I had to tell you the shower part of it because it’s true. What can I tell you? We want to be honest.”

The Times reported that Trump’s advisers “billed Saturday’s speech as the start of his efforts to make a closing argument to voters.” If it’s true that this is all part of his “closing argument,” then what Trump said in Detroit and Pennsylvania wasn’t the decompensation Mary Trump wrote that she saw in him the other day. It was purposeful. He meant every word.

What does that say not only about Trump, but about his voters? What is he trying to do?

Without necessarily knowing what he’s doing, I think he’s breaking down childhood permission structures and inviting his audience to join in. Think about learning so-called dirty words for the first time as a child and your parents’ reaction when you came home and used them. A common reaction would be, Wash those words out of your mouth! We don’t talk that way in this house.

Because you’re not expecting it, the word, “shit,” coming out of the mouth of a nine-year-old can be at once shocking, endearing, even titillating. Now turn that scenario upside down and think of the same word uttered by no less an authority figure than a presidential candidate. The reaction by a crowd of adults can be nearly identical. Oh, my God, he went there! Isn’t that amazing? I was just thinking the same thing myself.

Trump is doing what he’s always done: breaking rules and norms. He’s like the bad boy in class that called the teacher an asshole and his parents got called into the principal’s office. He got in trouble, but it made him famous, because everybody agreed with him, even some of the teachers. The teacher is an asshole. He’s the one who had the guts to say it.

Trump has been bringing his MAGA base along with him as he has crossed one boundary after another, from calling Mexican immigrants “criminals and rapists” to saying “there are good people on both sides” of a demonstration by Nazi sympathizers and white supremacists in Charlottesville, to calling the attack on the Capitol on January 6 “a day of love” in a speech at a rally on Thursday, to comparing those arrested for crimes at the Capitol to “the Japanese during Second World War, frankly. They were held, too.”

All this stuff is far outside the bounds of political discourse in this country, and pundits have pointed out time and again that his MAGA base has come to expect it of Trump. In fact, they love him for it.

He has built a primal connection with a large part of our population that was clearly looking for one. To be part of what we might call America’s white underclass – those without college educations, who cannot afford to buy a home, who live paycheck-to-paycheck, who believe that “others” have been given what they haven’t, such as preference in college admissions or going to the “head of the line” when it comes to jobs – is to remain in a childlike state of need and jealousy of those seen to be “better” than they are.

And along comes Donald Trump, the guy from The Apprentice, and his followers think that not only does he believe in them, but he also speaks their language. He isn’t afraid to describe a woman as “hot,” he’s not afraid to make fun of disabled people, he’s not afraid of being called out for saying that Blacks are given advantages denied to whites.

This is the way Trump got away with the stuff he said on the Access Hollywood tapes. He said it was “just locker room talk,” and for many people, especially those who voted for him a couple of weeks later, that’s exactly what it was. What was his description of Arnold Palmer in the clubhouse showers? Locker room talk. What’s dropping the occasional N-word? Locker room talk. What’s a joke about the guy who “spazzed out” on the third tee? Locker room talk.

At his rally in Detroit, Trump riffed on an attack on Joe Biden, couched in language about his wife: “Jill, get your fat husband off the couch,” Trump yelled. “Get that fat pig off the couch. Tell him to go and vote for Trump, he’s going to save our country. Get that guy the hell off our— get him up, Jill, slap him around. Get him up. Get him up, Jill. We want him off the couch to get out and vote.”

That’s the rant of every employee who ever had a boss he disrespected. Trump knows exactly what he’s doing. He even throws in “we” in the final sentence of the rant, bringing his MAGA followers along with him. To Trump It’s not just him who disrespects Joe Biden and his wife, Jill. It’s everyone at his rallies, everyone in their neighborhoods back home, everyone in their families.

This stuff is way more dangerous than it seems. Adolf Hitler talked about what “we” know about the Jews, how “we” need them out of our country, how “we” know about their greed and their otherness, their non-Christianity, their Jewishness.

Trump is closing his argument with his base by reminding them how much they are like him, that “we” all feel the same way he does about immigrants and Blacks and women and the disabled and everyone who is not just like they are, which is white and Christian followers of Donald Trump.

We’ll see in two weeks how well the two closing arguments work: Kamala Harris’ empathy for, among others, those Trump and his MAGA base hate, versus the hatred itself.

Lucian K. Truscott IV, a graduate of West Point, has had a 50-year career as a journalist, novelist, and screenwriter. He has covered Watergate, the Stonewall riots, and wars in Lebanon, Iraq, and Afghanistan. He is also the author of five bestselling novels. You can subscribe to his daily columns at luciantruscott.substack.com and follow him on Twitter @LucianKTruscott and on Facebook at Lucian K. Truscott IV.

In Trump's January 6 Rhetoric, The Specter Of Civil War Looms

In Trump's January 6 Rhetoric, The Specter Of Civil War Looms

I’ll just bet you haven’t heard the term, “fatal funnel.” Can you imagine what it might be? I mean, try to form an image in your mind of a funnel, any kind of funnel, like the one you might have used to pour oil into your car’s engine, or even a waffle ice cream cone with the small end removed. Now try to figure out how you would make a thing called a “funnel” deadly.

I’ll bet you can’t. But I want you to know, there are a lot of people who can. Some of them bought militia manuals and bomb-making videos that a man by the name of Christopher Arthur published online through a company he called Tackleberry Solutions. One of the manuals was called, “The End of America or the Next Revolutionary War.” According to an ABC News story published today, Christopher Arthur believed that, “the U.S. was falling into chaos and there would be only one way to survive: kill or be killed.”

Arthur is an Army combat veteran of the war in Iraq and a member of the National Guard. He was found guilty of teaching people to make improvised explosive devices intended to kill police officers and for possessing bombs and bomb-making materials inside and around his home in Mount Olive, North Carolina. His wife and five children lived in the home where he stored the bombs. One bomb was on his porch under an overturned plastic tub where his children played. It was wired to a trigger that would set it off if police ever approached his house to arrest him. A judge gave Arthur 20 years in prison, the maximum allowed by law.

A fatal funnel is a tactic taught by Arthur to prospective militia members who visited his North Carolina farm for training sessions. The tactic is intended to trap attackers by funneling them into a smaller and smaller space until they can be shot and killed by a small untit or single shooter. Joshua Blessed stayed at Arthur’s farm and slept on a cot in his kitchen. During the day, Arthur and Blessed would go out into the surrounding woods to shoot automatic weapons and practice bomb making and military tactics.

Blessed was a truck driver. According to ABC News, weeks after training with Arthur in North Carolina, Blessed was stopped for speeding in his truck on a road between Rochester and Buffalo in upstate New York. An argument with the police officer ensued, and Blessed drove off with the officer still standing on his truck’s running board. During the chase that followed, Blessed fired at pursuing police cars until he finally turned his truck to block a narrow highway off-ramp with the truck’s trailer and cab in a V-shape. Blessed fired from the cab at officers until one of the officers managed to get around to the other side of the truck.

Surprised, Blessed drove off, followed by the police cars. Finally, they forced his truck onto a farm road where they had set up a police ambush and fired at the truck cab as he sped by. The truck crashed into a ditch, and officers found Blessed dead in the driver’s seat with a bullet through his head. Five police vehicles had been struck by bullets fired by Blessed. Forty police officers in all were involved in the chase.

Blessed had been trying to form a militia group called “The Army of God” to prepare for an “upcoming Civil War,” according to the FBI’s field office in Richmond, Virginia. ABC reported that officers found in Blessed’s truck after the chase “two how-to explosives and military tactics manuals for which he had paid $850 from Arthur’s Tackleberry Solutions. They would find $125,000 in cash, 14 live pipe bombs, an AK-47 with a scope, a .50-caliber rifle, a sniper rifle and tens of thousands of dollars in ammunition.”

The FBI finally arrested Christopher Arthur after an undercover officer witnessed and secretly recorded Arthur teaching others, including the undercover officer, to make improvised explosive devices. Arthur described to the undercover officer how he would kill the governor of a state: “Say it’s a whole walled-off gated house. The governor’s mansion. Alright, how do I attack him? Well, he’s going to have to leave to go to the Capitol at some point, right? I know if I can put a round right there in the base of the windshield where it meets the dashboard. I’ll hit him. So is the sniper hit better? Yes.” According to the undercover FBI man, Arthur’s wife and children were nearby in the yard working in a garden and talking about school when the assassination instruction took place.

Twenty years in prison. A heavily armed truck driver killed after a chase by 40 cops on a public highway. Hundreds convicted of criminal trespass and violence against police officers at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, people Donald Trump among whom included himself at a town hall yesterday on the Univision Network when he used the word, “we.”

“We didn’t have guns. The others had guns, but we didn’t have guns,” Trump said. “That was a day of love.”

Please allow me to tell you what the difference is between politics and a gun. With a slight depression of your finger on a trigger, a gun can kill, meaning a gun can end the life of another human being. Politics can affect you. Politics can change what you pay in taxes, or what speed you are allowed to drive on your local streets or an interstate highway, or whether your trash is picked up once or twice a week. Politics can be confusing and infuriating. Policy arguments and political contests can be won or lost, but the results are not forever.

When politics and guns merge, civil war is the result. Six hundred thousand Americans died between 1861 and 1865 because of a political argument over the issue of slavery. The difference between the South and the North was that the South was willing to kill and be killed in order to maintain the right to own other human beings as slaves. The political argument ended when the first shot was fired.

Wars are absolute. Winning and losing means life or death. But politics in this country is not a fatal funnel, narrowing it down to “us” and “them,” making it as absolute as warfare.

They used to call politics the battlefield of ideas. One of our two political parties has decided that its politics is existential, that it is a battlefield where being “right” conveys absolute power given by God. Winning in this kind of politics means the rule of law can be superseded by force, allowing the National Guard and active duty Army to be employed against those who were “wrong.” One of our two political candidates has recently threatened to do just this if he is elected. Such a right to retribution comes only from belief in self, not in laws that are agreed upon as greater than oneself.

Our other political party has more doubts than beliefs. Doubt allows for the possibility of loss in the way that science assures us of the inevitability of our own deaths. We know the sun will come up in the morning because we have experience in day and night that dates back to the opening of our eyes as infants. We have no such experience with certainty. It is a belief system, an illusion invented in hopes of personal gain.

How does “whatever” win out over “must be”? By realizing that right and wrong are temporal, part of the natural ebb and flow of living on this planet, as floods and fires and earthquakes are as much a part of the weather of existence as the birth of a child or the death of a loved one.

We are here. One day, we won’t be, and there will be others who come after us. Then politics will belong to them. That is the difference between belief, which seeks to fix a certain future, and doubt, which allows for the inevitability of change.

Lucian K. Truscott IV, a graduate of West Point, has had a 50-year career as a journalist, novelist, and screenwriter. He has covered Watergate, the Stonewall riots, and wars in Lebanon, Iraq, and Afghanistan. He is also the author of five bestselling novels. You can subscribe to his daily columns at luciantruscott.substack.com and follow him on Twitter @LucianKTruscott and on Facebook at Lucian K. Truscott IV.


Donald Trump

The Impossibility Of Comprehending Trump's Depravity

If you’re anything like me, hardly a day goes by that you are not struck dumb by who and what Kamala Harris faces in this presidential election contest. The other night, I found myself using a phrase that I have come to hate. I said, “I have trouble wrapping my head around this.” But I said it, and to my horror, I realized that I meant it. There are times that I simply cannot comprehend how it is that we find ourselves as a nation facing the politics we must witness every day.

It is hard to imagine that the candidate of one of our political parties made himself famous by claiming that if he shot someone in the middle of Fifth Avenue, he wouldn’t lose any voters. It is even harder to imagine that what he said way back in January of 2016 may be the truest thing he ever said.

The horrors of this man and what he has said and done over the last nine years are equally hard to comprehend. Where do you start? With the fact that he promised to get Roe v. Wade overturned and did it, denying women in half our states the right to control their own reproductive health and causing the deaths of multiple women who were unable to receive emergency care when they miscarried or suffered ectopic pregnancies or other life-threatening complications? With the fact that he tried to launch a coup that would have overtaken the seat of our government, its Congress, and reversed the outcome of the last election? With the enormous damage he has done to our government, including our military, with his aggressively sloppy appointments and governance? With what passes for his ideology, consisting mainly of contempt for our government and our democracy and our way of life?

How about the fact that he has, by word and deed, polluted our politics and our sense of national morality? How about his contempt for the disabled, for those who must endure chronic illness, for entire classes of people such as women, Blacks, Latinos, the poor, immigrants, and even citizens who are from a rival political party and did not vote for him?

What is going on that we must confront and discuss matters that are clearly un-American, and in fact deal with a man who acts as if he is an enemy of this country?

What he has done to the country which welcomed his grandparents as immigrants and gave his father and mother and him and his children a chance to not only make a living but to become enormously wealthy is not just wrong, or ignorant, or callous, or even criminal, although what he has done is all those things.

I have been covering this man for nine years, and I have spent more than a tenth of my lifetime cataloging his misdeeds and cruelty and crimes, so I don’t say this lightly. What he represents, what he stands for, and what he has done is evil.

'A Sleazy, Oily, Adept Liar': The Debating Style Of J.D. Vance

'A Sleazy, Oily, Adept Liar': The Debating Style Of J.D. Vance

If you didn’t watch tonight’s debate, this is all you need to know:

JD Vance’s solution to the mass killing of school children is “stronger windows.”

Not one child has ever been shot through a school window. Not one killer ever climbed through a window to get into a school. Not one report after a mass shooting at a school has even mentioned windows.

That is how far JD Vance went in the opposite direction of the thing that caused the death of every child killed in every single school shooting: guns.

Let us recount just a few more of JD Vance’s many lies during the debate:

Asked how he would protect people with pre-existing health conditions, Vance answered, “We already have a law that does that” without acknowledging that the law is Obamacare.

Vance said that Donald Trump “saved” the Affordable Care Act. Trump backed 70 attempts by Republicans to repeal the Affordable Care Act and said if elected he would “end it on day one.”

Vance said January 6 was not a threat to democracy. Censorship, somehow attributable to Kamala Harris, “is the threat to democracy we should be talking about.”

Vance claimed that the housing crisis is caused by “25 million illegal aliens” driving up the cost of housing.

The country that during the Biden-Harris administration produced the largest quantity of oil and natural gas in the world “needs more drilling,” according to Vance.

JD Vance claimed to have “never” supported a national ban on abortions. Vance told an interviewer in 2022 that he would “certainly like abortion to be illegal nationally.” Vance went on to say that the problem Republicans have on the abortion issue is, “We’ve got to get better at our message of supporting women.”

By refusing to answer a question asking him whether he believes climate change is a “hoax,” Vance confirmed that he believes it is.

Vance talked over the moderators to push his lie that Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Ohio are here illegally. Not only did he get the law wrong, but the law he cited was passed and signed by Donald Trump.

Asked by Tim Walz if he believed that Donald Trump lost the 2020 election, Vance answered, “Tim, I am focused on the future,” and said Kamala Harris had censored people “during COVID.”

Vance lied when he said that guns are “coming into this country from Mexican drug cartels.” It is just the opposite: drug cartels regularly smuggle American firearms into Mexico because they have such strict gun laws in that country the cartels can’t get them there.

My wife Tracy turned to me about halfway through the debate and sighed, “Vance is a such a sleazy, oily, adept liar.”

‘Nuff said.

Lucian K. Truscott IV, a graduate of West Point, has had a 50-year career as a journalist, novelist, and screenwriter. He has covered Watergate, the Stonewall riots, and wars in Lebanon, Iraq, and Afghanistan. He is also the author of five bestselling novels. You can subscribe to his daily columns at luciantruscott.substack.com and follow him on Twitter @LucianKTruscott and on Facebook at Lucian K. Truscott IV.

For Armchair Pundits, The Buzzword Of The Week Is...Wider War!

For Armchair Pundits, The Buzzword Of The Week Is...Wider War!

Isn’t it incredible how mainstream media mavens and off-the-cuff pundits alike can agree on a word or phrase to sum up their utter disengagement from and ignorance of what’s going on away from our shores? I mean, has cell phone service failed in Washington and New York today? Somebody could have picked up an old blower or Version XIIVVMM thing in their pocket and placed a call to…I don’t know…Yemen or Beirut or Kyiv and asked them what the sky looks like today. See any missile contrails? Heard any explosions lately?

My point being, there is already a wider war in the Middle East and elsewhere, and it’s a bloody one. That very much includes the very wide, very bloody, very warlike war being waged by Ukraine against the Russian aggressors who have already taken a slice of their country and want to take a lot more.

The Crisis Group, a non-profit established with the aim of “Preventing War and Shaping Peace” has a handy list they call “Ten Conflicts to Watch in 2024” that includes the usual suspects, Ukraine and Gaza. They also list what they too call the “Wider Middle East war,” Sudan, Ethiopia, The Sahel (mainly Niger), Haiti, Armenia-Azerbaijan, and just for good measure, U.S.-China.

The Geneva Academy, which maintains an extensive list of armed conflicts around the world that totals out at 110, believe it or not, counts “more than 45 armed conflicts in the Middle East and North Africa,” including the ones in the news as well as Cyprus, Egypt, Libya, Morocco, Syria, Iraq, Yemen, and Western Sahara.

In Europe, the Geneva Academy counts seven armed conflicts, including the obvious, Ukraine, as well as Moldova, Georgia, and Armenia-Azerbaijan.

In Asia, they have 21 armed conflicts going on in Afghanistan, India, Myanmar, Pakistan and The Philippines. Two “international armed conflicts” are happening between China and India, as well as between India and Pakistan.

Latin America lucks out with only two “armed conflicts,” according to Geneva Academy: armed violence involving criminal organizations and drug cartels in Mexico and Columbia, although I don’t know what they would call what’s happening daily on the streets of Caracas, Venezuela and elsewhere in that beleaguered country.

What has caught the attention of the headline writers and bookers for cable news shows is, of course, movement of tanks and troops by Israel tonight into Lebanon. They can get pictures of that, although the armed conflict between Israel and Hezbollah and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) and other radical Muslim groups has been bloody and deadly for decades.

I suppose “wider” has a role to play in buzzword-ville because what they’re really talking about is the war between Israel and Hezbollah and Gaza spreading further through the Middle East. Although, once again, when Iran recently sent several hundred missiles and armed drones into the skies over Israel, the so-called “wider war” is already here, wouldn’t you think?

Speaking of “wider,” it would seem that the United States, which has some 100 military installations of one kind or another around the world, should be on all the lists. The U.S., after all, is currently supplying troops and arms to multiple countries including Iraq, Israel, Ukraine, Western Europe, The Philippines, Japan, South Korea, the waters of South China Sea, and we don’t even know for sure what we’ve got going on in places like Africa, Thailand, Guam, and other garden spots around the Pacific and Indian Oceans.

So, wider war? As Martin Short's Ed Grimley used to say on Saturday Night Live, Excuuuuuse me!

We Don't Have To Execute The Innocent -- Or Kill Pregnant Women

We Don't Have To Execute The Innocent -- Or Kill Pregnant Women

The state of Missouri killed an apparently innocent man on Tuesday. His name was Marcellus Williams. He was put to death by lethal injection even though the prosecutors who handled his case and the family of the woman he was accused of killing thought him innocent and asked that he be spared the death penalty. That didn’t happen because the Republican governor of Missouri, Mike Parson, was in a hurry to kill him.

Also in a hurry was the Supreme Court, which refused 6 to 3 to stay his execution even though serious issues involving the racial makeup of the jury in his trial were at issue. Also at issue was the lack of evidence in the case against Williams. There was no physical evidence linking him to the killing; no fingerprints; no hairs; no footprints; and no DNA from Williams was found on the weapon used in the killing. Additionally, witnesses against him were promised leniency in their own criminal cases as well as reward money.

A total of five people were executed during the week, three of them Black. The other states where prisoners were executed were Texas, Oklahoma, Alabama, and South Carolina. In Missouri, Williams was the third death row inmate executed this year.

As we all know, the Supreme Court this year handed down a decision that would give the President of the United States immunity from prosecution for anything he does as part of his official duties. It was widely noted at the time of the decision that if Donald Trump is elected in November and is inaugurated president, he could use a military unit such as Seal Team Six or Delta Unit to kill someone by giving them an order to do it. Since the military unit is under his authority as Commander in Chief, the order to kill someone, including political opponents he has regularly threatened to jail, would be an official act for which he could not be prosecuted while in office or even after he leaves office.

This was the same Supreme Court, led by the same six Republican-appointed justices, that refused to hear appeals by death row inmates like Marcellus Williams.

Donald Trump has been going around the country holding rallies during which he accuses Vice President Kamala Harris of “sending” immigrant criminals into small towns to commit crimes such as drug dealing, seizure of homes, and other property crimes, rape and murder. Today, Trump told a rally in Erie, Pennsylvania, that Vice President Harris is “mentally impaired.”

“Lyin’ Kamala Harris…honestly, I believe she was born that way. There's something wrong with Kamala,” Trump said.

On Tuesday, Trump wrote on his social media platform, “If Kamala Harris wins this election, she will flood Pennsylvania cities and towns with illegal migrants from all over the world, and Pennsylvania will not be Pennsylvania any longer.” Trump charged that Haitian migrants who are in this country legally are “taking over” the Pennsylvania town of Charleroi, where many were hired by a plant that packs sandwiches and other lunch staples into small boxes, low-paying factory-floor repetitive jobs that local residents have not taken.

The town is in a Republican area of western Pennsylvania where even the borough manager of the town spoke out against the idea that Haitian were “stealing jobs” from local citizens. State Senator Camera Bartolotta, a Republican, posted on TwitterX. “They’re here legally,” Bartolotta said of the Haitian immigrants, calling them “good, hard-working people.”

You can’t turn on cable news, you can’t pick up a newspaper, you can’t check your own email inbox without being deluged with the lies and outrages of Donald Trump and JD Vance and North Carolina gubernatorial candidate Mark Robinson and other Republican candidates around the country. I was watching an NFL football game this afternoon when a Trump ad came on accusing Vice President Harris of promising “amnesty for the 10 million illegals she allowed in as border czar, making them eligible for Social Security.” It’s a lie, of course.

Trump’s SuperPacs, funded by right-wing billionaires, will blanket the country with similar and even worse lies between now and November 5.

Our politics didn’t used to be this way. Even spurious political attacks like the “Willie Horton” ad against Michael Dukakis had a factual basis. Horton was released on a Massachusetts prison weekend furlough program while Dukakis was governor, and during the time he was free, raped a woman and pistol-whipped her fiancé.

Trump and other Republicans have dropped the pretense that truth matters, or at least used to matter, in our political life. They realized that they can open their mouths and say anything at all, and because they utter the words, some people will believe them.

It feels more and more that we live in a lawless country. Guns and mass killings proliferate because the Supreme Court that decided the president is above the law also decided that the Second Amendment confers a “right” to own firearms that did not exist for more than 200 years in our country. When Donald Trump’s Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, they made it legal for states to outlaw abortions with legal language that has led to the deaths of dozens of women who sought help for pregnancies that were in extremis and were denied proper care.

We are executing pregnant women just as we execute innocent prisoners. Laws do not mean anything when they are written for the purpose of making murder legal. It is essential that we vote for better people to make our laws, a better and less cruel way of living, and a better country. We don’t have to live this way.

Lucian K. Truscott IV, a graduate of West Point, has had a 50-year career as a journalist, novelist, and screenwriter. He has covered Watergate, the Stonewall riots, and wars in Lebanon, Iraq, and Afghanistan. He is also the author of five bestselling novels. You can subscribe to his daily columns at luciantruscott.substack.com and follow him on Twitter @LucianKTruscott and on Facebook at Lucian K. Truscott IV.

He's Got An Issue: Flailing Trump Seizes On 'McDonald's-gate'

He's Got An Issue: Flailing Trump Seizes On 'McDonald's-gate'

Donald Trump is obsessively claiming that Kamala Harris never worked at McDonald’s. He is saying it over and over and over again at his rallies. “It was a lie,” Trump told a rally in Mint Hill, North Carolina. “It was a fake story. It was a fake story; the press now refuses to write it because it’s so, you know, this is a simple one. She said she worked at McDonald’s and she didn’t. It was a lie. She never worked at McDonald’s over the hot French fries.”

Trump thinks that this time, he’s got her. First, she’s not really Black, now Vice President Kamala Harris has “lied” about working part time at an outlet of the fast-food chain one summer when she attended Howard University.

Trump demands to know why this isn’t a bigger story. After one rally, he went onto his social media platform and charged, “NEVER WORKED AT McDONALD’S — A TOTAL LIE. LAMESTREAM MEDEA (sic) REFUSES TO REPORT THIS FACT.” That’s a direct quote.

Trump’s repeated charge is so absurd that in an interview on MSNBC on Wednesday, Stephanie Ruhle asked the Vice President the question of the hour: “At any point in your life have you served two all-beef patties, special sauce, lettuce, cheese, pickles, onions, on a sesame seed bun working at a McDonald’s?”

“I have,” Harris answered. “Part of the reason I even talk about having worked at McDonald’s is because there are people who work at McDonald’s in our country who are trying to raise a family and pay rent on that. And I think part of the difference between me and my opponent includes our perspective on the needs of the American people, and what our responsibility then is to meet those needs.”

According to Steve Benen at MaddowBlog, Trump has repeated his charge in Georgia, Pennsylvania, Nevada, and Washington, D.C. In California, at one of his "press conferences" where he doesn’t take questions from the press, Trump continued to attack Harris for her claim that she worked at McDonalds. In North Carolina, Trump complained that in her interview with Vice President Harris, Oprah Winfrey had not challenged her about whether she was telling the truth about working for McDonalds.

With 39 days left before the election in November, at a time when the Middle East is blowing up, Russia is drawing a brand new red line threatening to use nuclear weapons against Ukraine, and the state of Texas is going to the Supreme Court to make sure it can continue to deny women abortions in emergency rooms when their pregnancies are in life-threatening distress, Trump has found the issue he wants to stake his campaign on: Kamala Harris’ work history at McDonalds.

I know Trump’s MAGA base will follow him down any rabbit hole he wants to lead them into, but someone should take his temperature and help him to a place where he can lie down. Donald Trump needs help.

Lucian K. Truscott IV, a graduate of West Point, has had a 50-year career as a journalist, novelist, and screenwriter. He has covered Watergate, the Stonewall riots, and wars in Lebanon, Iraq, and Afghanistan. He is also the author of five bestselling novels. You can subscribe to his daily columns at luciantruscott.substack.com and follow him on Twitter @LucianKTruscott and on Facebook at Lucian K. Truscott IV.

Sex, Secrecy, And Those Exploding Hezbollah Pagers

Sex, Secrecy, And Those Exploding Hezbollah Pagers

Two things in warfare are worth more than bullets or guns or money: The skill to analyze problems and the ability to keep secrets.

Take analysis. Say the problem you have is that you want to get behind the enemy, so that you can attack him from the rear. You can’t go around the enemy position from the left, because there’s a river in your way, and crossing rivers is the most dangerous thing you can do in a war. But you can get around the enemy on the right if you go over a mountain. So, what is the best way over the mountain?

You have some heavy stuff to carry with you, so you can’t go up and over the steepest part of the mountain, where the enemy would be least likely to expect your movement, thus you lose the element of surprise. Part of the mountain is wooded, which would provide good cover and concealment, but getting through the trees would slow you down. The other part of the mountain is the least steep and most easily traversed, but that’s where the enemy would expect you to come from, so it would probably be the best defended section.

But because it’s less steep and rocky and isn’t covered with trees, it’s the fastest. If you use darkness or bad weather as cover, and you move fast, you stand a chance of surprising the enemy and getting behind him, where he doesn’t expect your attack.

But what if it’s impossible to attack the enemy on the ground? His defenses are too well established – think: Russian positions along the front lines in Ukraine. If he is too well dug in, attacking from the air or using artillery and rockets wouldn’t be effective. What if the enemy is so spread out, a narrow, targeted attack wouldn’t kill or wound enough of them to have a decisive effect? What if the enemy is not an identifiable uniformed army but is rather part of the population, diversified through towns and villages until orders are given to coalesce and take up positions for an attack against you?

That’s a pretty good description of Hezbollah in Lebanon. They’re not just a military but a political force, winning parliamentary seats in elections, holding cabinet positions in the government, running schools and hospitals and social programs, feeding children, even picking up the garbage in towns that Hezbollah controls. They have popular support; they run television stations and other news organizations.

Hezbollah also has a strong military component. Al Jazerra estimates that Hezbollah has as many as 60,000 fighters, including regular and reserve forces. They are armed with everything from rifles to mortars and artillery and anti-tank guided missiles, and it is believed Hezbollah has as many as 45,000 short and long range missiles, some of which can reach the port of Haifa and Tel Aviv. The government of Israel believes Hezbollah has 150,000 rockets, some of which can reach the southernmost Israeli city of Eilat. Hezbollah is backed by Syria and Iran. Ominously for Israel, yesterday the Egyptian foreign minister, Badr Abdelatty, called his counterpart in Lebanon and the country’s president to convey his “full support” for Lebanon and offered to provide any help the country needs.

This has been Israel’s problem throughout its military confrontation with Hezbollah on its northern border. How do you damage such a diverse and popular movement? Israel has bombed them from the air or hit them with guided missiles from the ground. In late August, Israel used more than 100 warplanes to attack thousands of rocket-launcher positions throughout southern Lebanon. The preemptive strike was to prevent a large missile and rocket attack that Israel believed Hezbollah was planning. Hezbollah responded by hitting Israeli military positions with dozens of drones and short-range missiles.

That’s where things stood in the standoff between Israel and Hezbollah until Tuesday when Israel sent a signal to thousands of pagers used by Hezbollah militants as communications devices, causing them to explode. Twelve people were killed and as many as 3,000 were injured, filling hospitals throughout the country with the wounded. Today there are reports out of Lebanon that walkie-talkies used by Hezbollah militants have exploded, killing nine and injuring 300. And now there are late reports of rooftop solar systems exploding in Lebanon. It is unknown how many were killed or injured by solar system explosions.

Israel has not taken responsibility for any of these events, but all of them are obviously the work of Israel’s Mossad, its intelligence agency that also carries out military operations and assassinations. The head of the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), Lt. Gen. Herzi Halevi, announced today that Israel has “many capabilities that we have not yet activated,” and said they were “preparing plans going forward.”

The question of the day is, how did Israel manage such a wide-ranging and innovative attack? The answer is: by keeping secrets.

Take the pager attack: Pagers are no longer in widespread use in most of the world, but in developing nations, there is still a market for them because they provide a way to communicate that is separate from cell phone networks and satellite communications such as Starlink and other internet-based systems. Pagers are old-fashioned: They use a radio signal that can be sent to as many as a million of the devices. Each pager is assigned a different identity, usually a conventional phone number. Pager signals are sent in the same way a radio station sends its signal carrying music or other programming that can be picked up using radios.

If you send a page, it is received by the central network and repeated from a radio tower to every pager on the network. But the page you send can only be received by the person carrying the pager with the number you put in. That is why groups like Hezbollah have used pagers. You can’t “tap into” thousands of individual pagers that receive radio signals unless you have the thousands of numbers associated with them. Thus, the messages sent over pager networks are secure.

Or so Hezbollah thought until yesterday. Pager networks can also send signals to multiple pagers. An example would be a hospital pager network. A signal could be sent to multiple people with pagers to report to the emergency room because of a patient with a heart attack. (Hospitals use low-power pager networks that can only send and receive within a limited area.)

But pager networks can send signals to larger numbers of pagers, which is what happened on Tuesday. A signal was sent out to everyone with what we will call a “Hezbollah pager,” and that signal detonated an explosive charge within the pager, injuring the carrier and people in the immediate vicinity with the resulting small explosion.

Now the question becomes, how did Israel manage to get 3,000 pagers into the hands of Hezbollah militants, and how did Israel get explosives into every single one of those pagers?

The answer is that Israel’s Mossad has had deep-penetration agents within Hezbollah (and Hamas and other militant groups) for decades. They were planted as so-called sleeper agents to be used for exactly this sort of attack. The sleeper agent would have entered Hezbollah years ago as a member and worked his way up through the organization until he got to a position where he could be involved when something comes up like, “Hey, we need new pagers.”

Other Mossad deep-cover agents were planted years or even decades ago in electronic companies for just this reason. They were activated when the order came up for several thousand pagers.

Even more agents were inserted into what are called “supply-chain” networks that would get right down to the level of manufacturing plants, trucking outfits, or even air-shipment companies.

Let’s look at what had to happen for this attack to have occurred. Hezbollah needed new pagers. A Mossad guy was there to learn about the need and report back to his chief in Israel. Then the other agents were called up. Someone within Hezbollah had to place the order. A Mossad agent had to know the number of pagers needed and what sort they were: numerical or text-and-numerical, that can send brief text messages.

The pagers were reportedly manufactured in Hungary in a factory that licenses the pager design from a company in Taiwan. Mossad had to have bought dozens and dozens of pagers in advance to plan for the possibility of using any one of the designs in its plans. So, in Israel, there was a building run by Mossad where these things were disassembled and examined for how an explosive could be inserted, along with a detonator, in such a way that the pager would still operate, and the detonator had to use a 1.5 volt charge to go off, because almost all pagers use 1.5 volt ordinary AA or AAA batteries.

When the order came in from Hezbollah for several thousand pagers, the supply-chain Mossad guys swung into action. The pagers had to be taken from the factory, apparently in Hungary, to a location where the explosive could be inserted, and then returned to the supply-chain to be shipped to Syria or Lebanon where they would be delivered to a central Hezbollah location and be distributed to the militants they were issued to. It is not known what sort of explosive was used, but it is probable that it was Semtex or another “plastic” type explosive that could be either rolled into a small button or tube shape or laid out in a thin slice.

Think of the secrets that had to be kept! The identities of all the deep-penetration Mossad agents within Hezbollah, of course. But also, the Mossad agents at the factory, in the supply-chain, and in the building where the work was done on the pagers.

That is a lot of people who had to keep a lot of secrets over a fairly extensive period of time in order for the Mossad pager conspiracy to work.

Additionally, there had to be someone inside the pager company that controlled the radio tower and system to send pages, or that system had to be hacked into without being detected, in order that the detonation signal could be sent out to some 3,000 pagers all at once. This may seem far-fetched, but it is possible that Israel owned a front company that owned the pager manufacturing plant in Hungary and the pager company in either Syria or Lebanon. It’s possible that Mossad was running the entire network right under the noses of Hezbollah the whole time.

You want to know how I know this? Because back in the mid-1970’s when I was working for The Village Voice and traveled to Israel and Lebanon to write about terrorism, I met a guy at a party in Israel who told me that he worked for an electronics firm. A couple of weeks later, my friend Jonathan Broder and I were walking down a street in Beirut when we saw that guy we had met in Israel walking straight towards us. When he recognized us and we recognized him, all three of us turned and walked in different directions.

We later learned he was a deep cover Mossad agent who lived a life in Beirut, yes, working for an electronics firm, as a Palestinian. He had been undercover in Lebanon with a Palestinian identity for years. When we met him at the party in Tel Aviv, he was on “vacation” in his home country, probably meeting with his Mossad bosses. In Beirut, he had told his electronics firm he was traveling on business, which he actually did to some third or fourth or even fifth countries, before covertly going to Israel, and then returning covertly to his “business trip” that took him back to Beirut. He even had a family in Beirut. That’s how deep undercover he was.

That was in 1975. Now imagine that same sort of operation going on for 50 years, through multiple variations of Palestinian radical militant movements such as the PLO and PFLP, through the establishment of Hezbollah in the 1980’s to fight the Israeli invasion of Lebanon, through the 1990’s into this century.

You end up with a Mossad operation that uses exploding pagers to hit an entire network of Hezbollah militants, up and down the chain of command.

Today it was revealed that Mossad had also penetrated Hezbollah’s walkie-talkies they use to communicate over short distances, probably from one rocket emplacement to another to coordinate timed-attacks on Israel, and those things started exploding all over southern Lebanon.

How was Mossad able to do all this? I don’t have any sources in Mossad, but if I were to guess, a lot of the deep-penetration of agents and the turning of Hezbollah militants into providers of information to Mossad was done with sex. Intelligence agencies famously use the weaknesses of the enemy against them, and where Muslim militants are weak is around sex.

The religious strictures on Muslim women make pre-marital sex dangerous if not impossible for young Muslims, so the men turn to non-Muslim sources for sex, which you can read as prostitutes who are Christian or some other religion, dangled as “honey-traps,” and bingo. You’ve got Hezbollah militant either talking to a Mossad “prostitute” or you’ve got them on a secret camera doing very un-Muslim things, and you use the un-Muslim videos to encourage them to cooperate with their friend who turned them on to the friendly young woman from Beirut, and…you get the picture.

There is sometimes a high price to pay for holding extreme religious beliefs, and I think it’s highly probable that Hezbollah is paying that price right now in Lebanon for having allowed adherence to those beliefs to have led them down a path strewn with rose-petals and lacy lingerie straight into the arms of Mossad.

Funny how that happens, isn’t it? In this country, when fundamentalist preachers and politicians climb into bed with women who are not their wives or men who aren’t their wives, they lose their careers. In Lebanon, when the women or men who are not their wives end up being from Mossad, fundamentalist Hezbollah militants lose their lives.

Lucian K. Truscott IV, a graduate of West Point, has had a 50-year career as a journalist, novelist, and screenwriter. He has covered Watergate, the Stonewall riots, and wars in Lebanon, Iraq, and Afghanistan. He is also the author of five bestselling novels. You can subscribe to his daily columns at luciantruscott.substack.com and follow him on Twitter @LucianKTruscott and on Facebook at Lucian K. Truscott IV.

Ripping The Covers Off The Republican Party's Neo-Nazi Undercurrent

Ripping The Covers Off The Republican Party's Neo-Nazi Undercurrent

I couldn’t open my newsfeed over the last couple of days without seeing a new story about some outrage involving the odious Laura Loomer. I’m sure you’ve seen her various racist tweets and the stories coming out of the Trump campaign about her presence on his plane when they flew to Philadelphia for the debate, the fact that she accompanied him to the Ground Zero memorial service for those lost on 9/11 – even when she has repeatedly called the attack on the World Trade Center and Pentagon “an inside job.”

The latest Loomer news came from The Guardian, which reported that she called herself a “white advocate” at a conference of the American Renaissance movement in 2022. The American Renaissance conference, according to the Southern Poverty Law Center, “is a venue where ‘racist intellectuals’ rub shoulders with Klansmen, neo-Nazis and other white supremacists,” and, it seems, Ms. Loomer. According to The Guardian, referring to Loomer’s two losing campaigns for Congress, she told the assembled white nationalists and evangelical racists, “I was one of the first candidates to campaign in favor of mass deportations in an immigration moratorium.”

Two weeks before the American Renaissance conference, Loomer went on a podcast run by Jared Taylor, a neo-Nazi Holocaust denier who was an organizer of the conference, and thanked him for his “white advocacy and being a white advocate and pioneering the intellectual discussion, right around race and demographics in this country.” Jared Taylor runs a magazine called American Renaissance that promotes white supremacy and “scientific racism” that believes in differences in intelligence among various racial and ethnic groups.

We already knew Laura Loomer is a racist nutcase and promoter of conspiracy theories and all the rest of it, which doesn’t make her all that different from many of Trump’s MAGA supporters. Now we know of her apparent “friendship” with Donald Trump and closeness he has encouraged by including her in his campaign travels. He has been shown in numerous photographs with his arm wrapped around Loomer’s waist, and it has been reported that Loomer told Trump “I love you” within earshot of people who shared the quote with reporters.

What really caught everyone’s attention was when Lindsey Graham and Marjorie Taylor Greene came out and denounced Loomer’s extremist views. Graham called Loomer “toxic” and tweeted: “I think what she said about Kamala Harris and the White House is abhorrent, but it’s deeper than that. I mean, you know, some of the things she’s said about Republicans and others is disturbing. I think that the president would serve himself well to make sure this doesn't become a bigger story.”

To which Loomer shot back in a tweet, “When is Lindsay coming out of the closet? We all know you’re Gay, Lindsey…. And that’s ok. It’s ok. It’s 2024. There’s nothing wrong with Gay people. I like men too. You and I have something in common we can bond over. Just be honest about it. Nobody is going to judge you for being open about who you are.”

Greene called Loomer “extremely racist” when Loomer posted on Twitter/X that if Kamala Harris wins, “the White House will smell like curry & White House speeches will be facilitated via a call center.” Greene went on to denounce Loomer for hurting Trump’s chances in the election, and no stranger to hate herself, called attention to Loomer’s “rhetoric and hateful tone.”

Senator Thom Tillis of North Carolina, a state that is currently listed as a “toss-up” between Harris and Trump, tweeted yesterday, “Laura Loomer is a crazy conspiracy theorist who regularly utters disgusting garbage intended to divide Republicans. A DNC plant couldn’t do a better job than she is doing to hurt President Trump’s chances of winning re-election. Enough.” Loomer fired back, calling Tillis a “RINO who attacked President Trump after January 6 and called for all of the January 6 political prisoners to remain in jail. Thom Thillis IS the DNC Plant he accuses me of being,” misspelling the name, “Tillis.”

Trump spoke to the press yesterday at his golf course in Rancho Verdes near L.A. and defended Loomer as “a strong person” who has “strong opinions. I can’t tell Laura what to do. She is a free spirit.”

So, here is what I think is going on with the brouhaha surrounding Laura Loomer. One by one, some Republicans are starting to tinker with the calculus of the last eight years that there is only one way to be a Republican and to get ahead in the Republican Party and that is through Donald Trump. It’s as if they’ve been on a little island with Trump and if they put their foot off the island, it sank into MAGA quicksand.

But now look at what’s happening: Both Cheneys have announced that they will vote for Kamala Harris; so has Adam Kinzinger, who spoke at the Democratic National Convention. And now there are Republican senators who have said they will not vote for Trump: Romney and Collins and Murkowski and Moran from Kansas, of all places; Cassidy from Louisiana (!); and Young from Indiana.

Speaking of Indiana, Trump’s former Vice President, Mike Pence, has come out against him along with dozens of former cabinet and White House officials, former Republican members of the House and Senate, and yesterday, former Bush Attorney General Alberto Gonzales announced he supports the Harris-Walz ticket.

There is a list of former Republican governors who oppose Donald Trump that is too long to go into here, and so is the list of former Republican state senators and representatives.

It’s not a tidal wave, but it is movement in the Republican Party away from Donald Trump, and that should not be ignored.

Now there are teeny cracks showing in the ground of Trump’s island. One story yesterday said there is a “MAGA civil war” looming about Loomer and her access to Trump. Jonathan Chait in New York magazine tried to parse what it is going on with Loomer and found it nigh onto impossible: “The agita around Loomer’s influence is difficult to understand in ideological or moral terms. News accounts attempting to summarize what makes Loomer’s beliefs unacceptable tend to fall short.” Chait cast around for who to blame and found Trump himself: “The Republican angst over Loomer’s influence is not an attempt to establish boundaries. It is, to the contrary, a reflection of Republicans’ inability to confront the derangement and racism expressed by their party’s leader.”

Well, yes, but it also reflects an inability of the Republican Party to confront the derangement and racism of the MAGA base, doesn’t it? That’s where the rubber meets the road, because if Trump loses in November, and he’s not around for another four years yapping about running for president again, who’s going to pick up the Banner of the Base?

That’s the question here. Republicans at every level are starting the difficult process of differentiating themselves from Trump and from each other, because as they contemplate the idea that he may no longer dominate the party, they’re going to have to get ahead in some way other than pledging fealty to Trump. A realignment of the Republican Party has begun in the most convenient way possible: by voting the most extreme among themselves off the island.

What’s interesting about Loomer is not her extremism but her closeness to Trump. Loomer has shared her extremism in the past with Marjorie Taylor Greene herself among many, many others in the party. As Chait pointed out, “Trump himself is both a racist and a conspiracy theorist. These facts are both too inculpatory for his Republican allies to concede yet too obvious for them to deny. And so their dismay is channeled into the figures surrounding Trump.”

The figure in their crosshairs for the moment is Laura Loomer, but just wait. There will be others. The realignment of the Republican Party that appears to be underway, even before they know for sure that Trump will be gone, has a long way to go. It’s going to be interesting to see, if Kamala Harris is inaugurated, who is still standing and who has fallen in the inevitable Republican bloodbath that will follow.

Lucian K. Truscott IV, a graduate of West Point, has had a 50-year career as a journalist, novelist, and screenwriter. He has covered Watergate, the Stonewall riots, and wars in Lebanon, Iraq, and Afghanistan. He is also the author of five bestselling novels. You can subscribe to his daily columns at luciantruscott.substack.com and follow him on Twitter @LucianKTruscott and on Facebook at Lucian K. Truscott IV.

Smiling Harris Decisively Beats Enraged Trump In ABC Debate

Smiling Harris Decisively Beats Enraged Trump In ABC Debate

Finding the words to describe what we saw last night on national television is going to take me a while. Where do you begin? With the insane gibberish about immigrants eating pets someplace in Ohio? With Trump begging his idol Viktor Orban to replace JD Vance as his running mate? With his not-ready-for-prime-time permanently angry teeth-baring scare-face? With his inability to string even five words together without careening off into what he now says is criminals from 168 countries coming into our country so those countries can reduce their crime rates?

Despite the format, despite the questions, despite the ostensible purpose of the exercise, there was no controlling the extraordinary Trump madness on display. Vice President Harris should get an Oscar or an Emmy or something for the way she put a quizzical little smile on her face and rested her chin on her wrist and just looked at him in astonishment as even more outrageous lies spilled from his mouth. The look on her face was better than fact-checking him.

Donald Trump, on the other hand, never once turned his head to look toward his opponent at the other lectern. He started off his first answer with a worn-out version of the speech he gives at every rally about the criminals coming across the border and all the rest of it. And then Kamala Harris stuck the needle all the way in. She invited people to go to one of his rallies so they could see all the people leaving early because they are “exhausted and bored” by Trump.

His hackles went up and they never went down. It was at this point that he threw out the right-wing internet talking point that Haitian immigrants are eating people’s dogs and cats in Springfield, Ohio. ABC moderator David Muir fact-checked Trump in real time, saying that Springfield’s city manager had said “there was no credible allegation” of such things happening, and that sent Trump further into crazed mumbling and accusations that crime rates had risen and babies were being murdered right after birth by a governor in West Virginia, then it was Virginia, and then he got cut off by one of the moderators with a fact check that so-called “after birth” baby killings are illegal in all 50 states.

That that is the sort of fact-check the ABC moderators were reduced to performing will go down in American political history.

One of the panelists on MSNBC, I think it was Chris Hayes, went so far as to say that Kamala Harris’ performance was the best he had ever seen in a presidential debate, and he may be right about that. Lawrence O’Donnell made the excellent point that when Trump was running down his list of lies about abortion, he lied to the American people about themselves by saying that everyone, Republicans and Democrats alike, wanted to get rid of Roe v. Wade. O’Donnell gave a statistic, something like 60 percent, of Americans who say they supported Roe, and that percentage I think went up to 70 percent after the Supreme Court overturned it. O’Donnell said Trump was looking into the camera and telling people they didn’t believe what they believe.

Which would be remarkable if it wasn’t just one more in a list of lies that began with the first parting of Trump’s lips and ended only when his last utterance had blessedly left our television screens. The Vice President called out several things Trump said as lies, using the word “lie,” and she turned to face him several times when she accused him of lying, a power-move that Trump has not faced before on a debate stage, or to my knowledge, ever, at least since he announced he was a candidate for president in 2015. No Republican who debated him in either 2015 or 2016 called out his obvious lies, not even once. No Republican in the House or the Senate ever called him a liar to his face. Certainly, none of his ever-changing array of cabinet secretaries ever called him a liar. And Kamala Harris has to be the first human being to tell Trump to his face, “you were fired by 81 million Americans.”

It was impossible to see if he was unsettled by being called a liar by the woman he is running against, because by the time Harris uttered the word and pointed out the obvious, he was already so crazed with anger he was screwing his face into a mask of rage and doing everything but spit audibly into his microphone.

By any rational measure of who won the debate, it was Kamala Harris. It is of course unknown at this point if she will get a “bump” in the polls that derives from Trump’s display of rank insanity on the public stage. If there is any decency left in the psyche of an America that has withered under the daily deluge of ten years of the madness that was on display tonight, this election may have just hit its turning point.

Buckle in. We will soon see how deep is the rot of the MAGA and how hard we will have to struggle to overcome it.

Lucian K. Truscott IV, a graduate of West Point, has had a 50-year career as a journalist, novelist, and screenwriter. He has covered Watergate, the Stonewall riots, and wars in Lebanon, Iraq, and Afghanistan. He is also the author of five bestselling novels. You can subscribe to his daily columns at luciantruscott.substack.com and follow him on Twitter @LucianKTruscott and on Facebook at Lucian K. Truscott IV.

Joy Returns To Politics -- With The Power Of The Smile Behind It

Joy Returns To Politics -- With The Power Of The Smile Behind It

We just finished watching the Harris-Walz rally in Philadelphia. Do you want to know what Tracy and I took away? The political electricity of two candidates with great big wide smiles on their faces filled that arena with the theme of the night: “Thank you for bringing back the joy,” Governor Tim Walz said to Vice President Kamala Harris right after she introduced him.

The crowd went wild. Joy about the brand-new Democratic ticket was on everyone’s faces as they listened to Harris and Walz. It’s been quite a while since I’ve seen that kind of enthusiasm and delight in our politics. It’s hardly necessary to point this out, but I’m going to remind you anyway: at the grim rallies of Donald Trump, where he spreads lies about “American carnage” and blames everyone but himself, he never cracks a smile, and you don’t see smiles on the faces of his rally crowds. Trump paints a dark picture lamenting this country’s future, and his crowds lament right along with him.

Not tonight in Philadelphia. Democrats are smiling again, laughing at the jibes Harris threw at Trump for wanting to take people’s freedoms away and Walz’s patented refrain that Trump and Vance are just plain “creepy and weird.”

Energy in politics can’t be bought, and it can’t be manufactured. It has to just be there. Tonight, in an arena filled to its 12,000 capacity in Philadelphia, Kamala Harris and Tim Walz reminded Democrats who they are. Empathy is energy. Humor is energy. Dedication to freedom and justice is energy. Being willing to fight for what you believe is energy.

All around Vice President Harris as she spoke, people waved signs that read, “When we fight, WE WIN.” And they joined both candidates when they led the crowd in chanting the Harris-Walz campaign slogan: “We aren’t going back!” Walz captured the energy of the campaign when he said there are 91 days until the election. “This will be easy,” he said to cheers. “We’ll sleep when we’re dead.”

They are on a seven-state, five day swing through the battleground states billed as the campaign’s introduction of Tim Walz as the Vice President’s running mate. He’s not going to need much of an introduction when rally crowds see the smile on Kamala Harris as she holds his hand aloft. They say Walz has the folksy charm of the Midwest. Yes, but more than that, they both have the power of the smile that is renewing Democratic politics and energizing voters in Philadelphia in a way I haven’t seen in years.

Lucian K. Truscott IV, a graduate of West Point, has had a 50-year career as a journalist, novelist, and screenwriter. He has covered Watergate, the Stonewall riots, and wars in Lebanon, Iraq, and Afghanistan. He is also the author of five bestselling novels. You can subscribe to his daily columns at luciantruscott.substack.com and follow him on Twitter @LucianKTruscott and on Facebook at Lucian K. Truscott IV.